Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Another view
Another view
« 1 2 3 »
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Isaiah 53:5 from Shane-Edward-Lee, at Shane-Lee-ministries. Plus I don't know if this has been happening or not, but my ex-wife recently thought that I exposed my penis on one of the photos, which can only be the second one down in the left colum, well for you carnal minded individuals, my hand was shaking when I took the picture, if you look at the middle finger, fore finger, and thumb, you will see that they are blurry, so that means that you aren't seeing my penis between the pinky and ring finger, but a blur of them, as I am shaking the camera, and my hands.
 
 

Comments (4) | Add a Comment

Though this picture may look like I am not using the towel, which is red if you look in the bottom left hand corner, you will see a touch of red which is the towel, in case anyone was thinking I was naked here, or showing my penis.
Shane-e-lee | shane1ed1lee1@yahoo.com | December 24, 2005

Also again this picture is blurry, because I was shaking a little when taking it, which if you notice my arm is stretched, and my pinky, and ring finger could also have been shaking a little, so that is the blur your see.
shane-e-lee | shane1ed1lee1@yahoo.com | December 27, 2005

The blur in between the pinky and ring finger could also be God itself covering me so that no one would think that I was showing my penis on purpose, in Eden the spirit covered us, so that we were naked and not ashamed until we sinned with Satan, though you can look at the other pictures, and see that these two fingers are out of focus, in this one picture it is different, and I didn't want anyone to think that I was showing my penis, so asked God to help me, because I knew that I would leave the red towel out of the shot when I took the picture.
shane-e-lee | Shane1Lee1savga@aol.com | January 09, 2006

This picture was also taken by the Kodak easysure camera CX7300, which it could simply be that the camera couldn't focus on the two fingers for some reason, though the lens is the Kodak 37mm (equivalent) Lens, so whatever it is, I took the picture honestly, and didn't doctor it at all.
shane-e-lee | Shane1Lee1savga@aol.com | January 09, 2006