If we were to look at the first sacrifice made by man we would find a man spilling the blood of an animal to present to this God of the ancient Hebrew texts an offering; an offering that symbolized even a greater sacrifice that this man named Jesus would endure here on earth to reconcile those who were lost back to God.

In that time a son of God (elect believer) presented something back to this God and it was supernaturally vindicated with a response. A response that gave an indication of an interaction that was occurring between someone with legitimate experiences (Abel) with this God and those who did not (Cain).

Since the passing of William and up until now there has been no official presentation by elect believers of a legitimate sacrifice that is supernaturally vindicated by the presence of God, that is I believe until now.

Currently there are some who believe that when the scriptures mention false prophets and false Christs that these false prophets or false Christs are prominent leaders inside and outside every major and minor Christian movements who claim to be a sort of “Messiah” if not thee “Messiah”.

Examples such as these false Christs and false prophets are interpretations of scripture that are highly inaccurate and misleading when it comes to the identifying false prophets and false Christs today.

False prophets are by far and large easier to detect and identify then the latter of these two subjects and so I shall focus on what false Christs and false prophecies are and the very nature of where the works of these false Christs and false prophecies originate from in this study as both are a factor inside and outside the message today.

The detection of which spiritual sources are at work here begins early in the beginning with Cain and Abel. While most seasoned message believers will know who the two sources behind Cain and Abel’s experiences are immediately, these two sources and their lines are more difficult to detect today but are as significant as much now as they were in that time.

Not surprisingly there is very little change in the process of how this God interacts and identifies his own if there is any real change at all and yet there appears to be mass confusion still when it comes to identifying and recognizing the “elect of God”.

One factor that stays consistent throughout the history of mankind and the history of the bible is the very nature of this God. This God remains the same by nature wherever he is featured and does not change from being a supernatural entity that can and will break every natural law known to man when he appears and interacts with man.

Furthermore this “God” is more than just a supernatural entity or spirit. There is a duality here that Ill have to explain in another study called the Godhead but he is not simply just the current paradigm most people have of him when think about a supernatural spirit or entity. There is more to this “God” than that.

Naturally or in this case supernaturally when he interacts with man there is a highly peculiar and highly irregular experiences that take place. These experiences do not just happen randomly nor do they end with the recipient not knowing or never what is going on and why.

Cain inevitably expressed the very nature of the spiritual source he was subject to and that was responsible for creating him. He really did not know who his true father was, hence his offering to Abel’s God.

The source that was responsible for creating Cain was the very source that believed he could “ascend” to places of election and who rose up against an archangel named “Michael”.

If we are to generalize Cain’s offering to this Lord he believed he could do the lord a service by using knowledge without revelation to present to God, or in other words whether consciously aware of this or not he decided he could “ascend” to the service of this lord without revelation or faith nor without being called by God to do so.

Inevitably Cain manifested the very nature of his creator and his father and Abel manifested the nature of his lord and creator.

Unfortunately for most people and this has not changed for thousands of years, you simply cannot aspire to know God or the mind of God or do God a service without being called or supernaturally identified first by this source that is God.

Knowledge without revelation will always fail to uncover spiritual truths about God, the Lord, angels of God, the elect, and any event that involves any of these entities and their operations.

If we look at the works behind Cain and Abel’s offering purely based on sacrifice, and make no mistake about both of their presentations, sacrifices is what both of them offered; we will see that the sacrifice that was offered by revelation then faith was the only one that was supernaturally vindicated and accepted by this God.

These components of the Christian experience have not changed since that time; not election; not revelation; not faith; and not works of faith; nor has the nature of this God changed to accommodate modern or past ideas of the teachings of Christ.

But in hindsight what does that mean for the elect believer today?

A false Christ today is a false sacrifice. It is essentially an individual who is aspiring to do God a service purely by knowledge that is not based on a revelation or a legitimate experience given to them by a supernatural God.

Prime example of a false Christ or false sacrifice is Pope John Paul the II. He no doubt suffered in the service he believed he is doing for Christ but supernaturally there is nothing in his experiences or life that has identified him as an “anointed one”.

This example is a simple and easy one but let us look a little more closer at those that are a little more difficult to detect.

What ministers in the message have not “suffered” to maintain their post? Can you name one who has not seen some great difficulty in keeping the teaching of the prophet? I know not one, but I can tell you that their sacrifices have not been nor will they ever be supernaturally vindicated unless they are the elect of God.

Any man who aspires to know God, or the mind of God, or who aspires to “do God a service” without the supernatural presence of God identifying them through supernatural experiences is simply expressing the nature of their father and their God, and I hate to break it to you but it isn’t the same God that was with William Branham.

You may not think it at first but the people in the message are in fact worshipping “the God of this evil age” by expressing not only his nature, but by attempting to ascend to be the “elect of God” without possessing or manifesting legitimate revelations and/or experiences from a supernatural God.

If I were so inclined I would issue a statement to the people in the message and it would go something like this: You cannot and will not take the place of the elect. There is no way in any dimension nor any place in this world where you will ever bypass election or the realities of election simply because you want to, this is quite impossible. In fact I am calling out the ministers in the message on this.

Although it may seem like a good thing to want to “serve God” or to “do God a service”, you are essentially expressing the nature of that spiritual source that is and has been taking the place of this Lord, the man named Jesus for centuries.

It is the nature of that son of the morning to take this lord’s place and receive worship and praise in his stead; this is the nature this deviant spiritual source first expressed in other dimensions and worlds, and this the nature you are expressing if you nothing supernatural is identifying you.

Not only did Lucifer aspire to take his place and receive worship in his stead, but he has created a kingdom here where hundreds of thousands of his own currently follow, believe and worship him and his image. This is scripturally accurate and If you look at the kingdoms that were offered to Jesus when he was tempted, whose control were they in?

What have you, if you are not supernaturally vindicated? Good works? Converts to Christ? But how could this be achieved solely by an idea of God or the idea of this lord if he has not identified you with the presence of his spirit, which he promised to his church? This is also scripturally accurate.

Do you really believe that because you are sitting in a message church, following a dress code, have the favor of the elders of a man made institution, and accepted the idea of Christ as your savior that you are one of the “elect who will judge the world”? I for one think not and someone like me is going to dispute your claims on this.

Your attempt to ascend spiritually to a status that have not been given to you and your kind are and will be identified by those who have received these appointments legitimately through revelation and faith; Or what in other words what we can call supernatural vindication and identification.

How will you know if your experiences are legitimate in nature or the knowledge you are operating by is based on a revelation? Simple, present it spiritually and privately to this God if he exists and if supernaturally there is a response then we will know who you are and what you are not.

In the end, either you are presenting a legitimate sacrifice that is supernaturally vindicated by the presence of God or you are not. There is no hiding this.

Any “revelations” you claim to have whether it be of scripture, prophetic events, or any principle and commandment Christ gave to his church will be determined by the nature of works you present to one another.

A supernatural response determines if the worship you are presenting to God is “in season” or not and what line and spiritual origins you hail from.

So then, of what kingdom and from what branch of knowledge are you?