September 23, 2001
I know no one will see the journal today, since it's closed for the blackout in support of America. But I have something on my mind, and I need to release it.
America is about to go to war. War is one of the things that America does best, and Americans seem to be so much more American, for lack of a more descriptive term, when they feel threatened. They aren't a bad lot, really, they just have this sort of attitude that, although they don't like each other all that much, no one else had better mess with them.
Another thing about Americans is that they tend to drag the rest of the world into whatever passion has grasped them for the month. Whether it's their music, their video games or, in this case, their causes, the vast majority of the world seems to get swept up into the fervor. It doesn't even have to be an American idea. If you can remember that far back, recall the famine relief programmes of the '80s. It started with a singer from a small but well-loved UK group. Once the idea hit the shores of America, though, they embraced it with passion.
All of that has brought me to this. The world is about to be swept up again, into a war this time. It is a war that, quite frankly, I don't know if the world will win. There is talk that this "war on terrorism" could be another quagmire for America, much like their involvement in Viet Nam. For the sake of us all, it would be nice if it were so simple. Unfortunately, the enemy involved here is much more complicated. Ask the people of Israel. Ask the people of Ulster/Northern Ireland. Ask the people of Columbia and Peru.
Notice that this war has not been declared against one organisation, but against terrorism. Once this particular group has been rooted out (a goal that may take years, as well as many lives), there will still be terrorists in the world, and therefore a reason to continue. For now, however, let's just concentrate on this one aspect.
This war will be fought against an enemy without a border. It can disappear into the ground like water, only to emerge behind you. There can be no occupation of it's capitol. There can be no control of it's financial apparatus. There can be no peace treaty signed. How does one fight an enemy who believes that the only way to ensure his immortal soul can be rescued from damnation is to kill as many of his enemy as possible?
At the risk of sounding contrary, I say none of this to support arguments against this military action. Just because a thing seems impossible is not sufficient reason to surrender. Man, as a species, is the only creature capable of inhumanity. Terrorism is the progeny of centuries of cruelty, ultimately expressing itself through self-destruction. If we are to survive the next century of progress, we must end terrorism, because technological advancement, extrapolated mathematically, will ultimately result in a single person having access to enough power to destroy all life on Earth. Should such a thing become possible, statistics assure us that eventually someone will take advantage of such power. Can there be any cost so great that it would be worth the eventuality of extenction?
And so, I have now written myself into a circle. I have endorsed a course of action that I have stated in the early portions of this entry cannot succeed. How can I resolve such an obvious paradox? I can't. Like Sysiphus behind his boulder, we must attempt what we know will not be successful, because surrender is a concept even more abhorrent than failure.