POLITICAL
scientists and sociologists, and perhaps criminologists as
well, may have their work cut out for a critical
assessment of the despicable
behaviour on the day this nation bid final
farewell to the late leader of the PNC/R and former (illegal)
Executive President, Mr. Hugh Desmond Hoyte, on December
30.
The
shocking 'hero's funeral’ given to the criminal `Blackie’
with the national flag draped on his coffin, would pale
into insignificance, outrageous as it was, when compared
with the shameful, disgusting, vulgar gesticulations and
horrible rowdyism at the State funeral of Mr. Hoyte that
December day.
It
would have been a most embarrassing day for the PNC/R,
whatever its previous politics that may have contributed
to such uncivilised behaviour. It was certainly most
hurtful to the grieving widow, Mrs. Joyce Hoyte, who could
never have imagined such rude, irreligious, callous
behaviour the day she simply wanted her husband to be
given a decent burial.
Those
who have since, unbelievably, sought to rationalise or
even apologise for what transpired at the Parliament
Building as well at the Place of the Seven Ponds have
succeeded only in adding insult to injury and further
demeaned themselves. There could be no justification
whatsoever, by anyone with even a modicum of decency, for
that day of national shame.
That
the manifested vulgarities were pre-planned, well
organised, with no concern for even the widow and other
members of the Hoyte family, must be in no doubt.
That
the PNC/R itself would have been stunned by the
developments must be accepted. What is now necessary, a
required post mortem, is for the PNC/R to undertake an
honest and thorough investigation to determine who were
the architects, the primary organisers of what happened
that day the party buried its second leader in 17 years.
Some
of the culprits could easily be identified. The police may
be of some help. But it is a matter for the PNC/R.
Hopefully, when it completes its investigation it will
have the strength, the decency, in fairness to itself and
its late leader, and also as a moral obligation to all
Guyanese, to take appropriate actions against the evil
doers who disgraced themselves, their party and Guyana.
This
process should not have to wait for the special delegates
congress being planned for February 1 to fill the
leadership vacuum created by the death of Desmond Hoyte.
It
could well be viewed as a most ugly manifestation of the
"dangerous adventurism" alluded to last week by
the PNC/R's interim leader, Mr. Robert Corbin when talking
about the "resolve" and "steadfast
commitment" of a post-Hoyte party.
Some
within the ranks of the PNC/R may not now wish to be
reminded about it, but those members of the public whose
memories are not short, would recall a link with what
happened outside Parliament on the day of Hoyte's funeral
and the dirty, scandalous e-mail sent out at 2.30 a.m. on
the morning of October 20, 2002, by a well known activist
member of that party. It had to do with a phallic symbol
as a "new Guyana emblem"
The
depravity of that e-mail messenger was more than matched
at the Parliament Building and Place of the Seven Ponds on
the day of Desmond Hoyte's funeral.
for