Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

CHIPPED STONE TOOLS

Chipped stone tools have been recovered in all areas investigated in the 1999 field season (Tables 3 and 4). This section will consist mainly of morphological descriptions with limited contextual and chronological information by areas of excavation.

'Harold' structure N10-27

Excavations conducted on structure N10-27 concentrated on midden accumulation. Midden debris found over the lower central stair consists of material that has been redeposited with minor disturbances, but still datable remains, with possible reconstructable vessels and fairly well preserved faunal material. Lot assignments from the midden over the lower stairs include LA1108, LA1115, and LA1119. The second midden investigated at the southwest corner of the structure contains moderately disturbed material not completely reliable for dating due to mixing. Only one lot was assigned for this midden, LA1114. Other lots for this area include LA1113 and LA1120.

Both expedient and formal tools are found in the assemblage from the N10-27 area. A total of 47 expedient flake tools (Table 3) were recovered from the five lots. The majority of work was carried out on the southwest front midden (LA1114) and a total of 31 flake tools were identified from this area. The remaining 16 were from lots LA1108, LA1113, LA1115, and LA1119.

Table 3. Expedient flake tools from 'Harold' structure N10-27

LOT NUMBERS

LA1108

LA1113

LA1114

 

LA1115

LA1119

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSESSMENT

Midden

 

Core

 

Midden

 

Midden

 

Midden

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Flake Tools - flake type

CT

WT

CT

WT

CT

WT

CT

WT

CT

WT

Incomp-sec cort-uniface-ind flk

2

3

4

12

4

12

 

 

 

 

Incomp-no cort-uniface-ind flk

4

16

 

 

10

17

 

 

 

 

Incomp-no cort-biface-ind flk

 

 

 

 

5

25

 

 

 

 

Incomp-sec cort-biface-core trim

 

 

 

 

2

41

 

 

 

 

Incomp-no cort-uniface-ind flk-heat

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

1

1

1

Comp-sec cort-uniface-ind flk

2

21

2

14

2

8

 

 

 

 

Comp-no cort-uniface-ind flk

 

 

 

 

7

32

 

 

 

 

Comp-no cort-uniface-thin flk

 

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

 

 

TOTALS

8

40

6

26

31

136

1

1

1

1

The assemblage of flake tools analyzed exhibit both marginal retouching and use wear. One of two flake tool production strategies could be occurring; 1) primary, 
secondary, or thinning flakes remaining from tool production or retouching were fashioned into flake tools or; 2) flakes are removed from a core and modified according to immediate use (Hayden et al. 1996). If stone tools were not formally manufactured at Lamanai one would be inclined to believe the flake tools recovered were most likely produced from debitage resulting from the production of tools from blanks, retouching, and refashioning. The flake tools were not recovered in an activity area but midden contexts as Pendergast (Personal communication 1998) pointed out may have accumulated as the result of a massive clean up effort in another location.

Other formal tools include LA1108/5 (Figure 5 and Table 4) recovered from the midden material over the front lower stairs of N10-27. This is a complete specimen referred to by Hester and Shafer (1991:157) as a side-notched dart point dating to Early Postclassic (circa AD 900-1200). Similar points were recovered at Colha and Pendergast (as cited in Hester and Shafer 1991:156) has recovered similar specimens from Altun Ha and previous excavations at Lamanai. Contextual information of the midden overlying the front stairs of N10-27 (LA1108) provided us with 'Buk' ceramics with a date of Middle Postclassic (Graham 1987:81-90). Graham feels 'Buk' ceramics were produced in quantity by AD1140, which generally corresponds to the date provided for side-notched dart points recovered at Colha and the LA1108/15 specimen recovered at Lamanai in 1999. Excavations at Colha have identified a transitional period where there is a disappearance of dart points and laurel or lenticular bifaces become dominant, (see below).

Two other fairly complete chipped stone tools from N10-27 midden include LA1114/15 (Figure 5 and Table 4) a lenticular biface recovered in midden contexts dating from Early to Late Postclassic. Lenticular bifaces are a fairly common occurrence throughout Belize at sites with Postclassic activity including Santa Rita (Shafer and Hester 1988:115), Barton Ramie (Willey et al 1965:421) and Colha (Hester and Shafer 1991:158). Hester and Shafer discuss the chronological distinction between the Early Postclassic lithics that can be separated into "Early" and "Late" facets. The early facet assemblages include side notched dart points (Figure 5, and Hester and Shafer 1991:157) and antler billets (Hester and Shafer 1991:156) It is during the late facet that lenticular bifaces become dominant and side-notched dart points disappear and analysis conducted here tentatively verifies this for Lamanai as well. The second tool recovered was an oval biface (LA1114/8 Figure 5 and Table 4) similar to specimens recovered from El Pozito referred to as biface celts by Hester et al (1991:72) due to the identification of polishing and bashing. These oval bifaces generally date to the same time period as the other lithic material recovered in the midden located on the southwest front of N10-27, Early to Late Postclassic. Further investigation through excavation in primary areas and analysis of previously excavated materials will need to be conducted at Lamanai to see if the same trend may be present.

The last category of formal tools is Late Postclassic arrowpoints (Figure 5 and Table 4). These arrowpoints are found frequently throughout the Maya region. A similar type of point has been recovered at several sites throughout Belize but are found to have a more elongated shape (Shafer and Hester 1988:112-114, Hester et al 1991, Willey et al 1965). These are not to be confused with the short triangular small side-notched points found more frequently (Figure 5, LA1114/6 and 1114/17). During excavations conducted in 1999 four elongated side-notched arrowpoints were recovered, three predominately unifacially worked and one bifacially worked. Two have mid-section side-notches and two appear to be small arrowpoint preforms.

Figure #5

Formal tools from 'Harold', structure N10-27.

 a) Early Postclassic side-notched dart point (LA1108/5)

b) Postclassic lenticular biface (LA1114/15)

c) Late Postclassic arrowpoint (LA1114/17)

d) Late Postclassic arrowpoint (LA1114/16)

e) Oval biface (LA1114/8)

Illustrations by M. C. England.

Table 4. Formal chipped stone tools from OP99-1, 4, 6 & 8

OPERATION

LOT

ASSESSMENT

DESCRIPTION

MATERIAL

COUNT

WEIGHT

OP99-8, 'Giant Midden'

LA187/3

Midden

bi-pointed biface

chert

1

9

OP99-1, N10-27

LA1108/5

Midden

side notched dart point

chert

1

12

 

LA1114/3

Midden

biface point/knife tip

chert

1

5

 

LA1114/8

Midden

ovoid biface

chert

1

69

 

LA1114/15

Midden

bi-pointed biface

chert

1

8

 

LA1114/16

Midden

small side-notched arrowpoint

chert

1

1

 

LA1114/17

Midden

small side-notched arrowpoint

chert

1

1

 

LA1102/3

Collapse & PAA

biface frag

chert

1

49.3

OP99-4, N12-12 Area

LA1181/4

Midden

small side-notched arrowpoint

chert

1

1.7

 

LA1183/2

Core

small side-notched arrowpoint

chert

1

1.8

 

LA1187/1

PAA

biface point

chert

1

10.9

 

LA1187/2

PAA

ovoid biface

chert

1

191.2

 

LA1187/3

PAA

ovoid ? biface

chert

1

58

 

LA1188/1

Fill

biface point/knife

chert

1

2

OP99-6, N10-15 & 28

LA1311/1

Core

biface point ? Midsection

chert

1

65

 

LA1336/1

Cache

uniface blade point

chert

1

14

 

LA1337/1

Cache

uniface blade point

chert

1

15

 

LA1337/2

Cache

uniface blade point

chert

1

5

 

LA1337/3

Cache

Uniface bpaglade point tip

chert

1

3

 

 

 

 

TOTALS

19

520.9

These are all attributes described by Shafer and Hester (1988:112-114) that are characteristic of these Late Postclassic arrowpoints. These arrowpoints were recovered in lot areas, LA1110 and LA1181, both preliminarily identified as Late Postclassic middens. Shafer and Hester hypothesize that there may be a "typological separation of the elongated versus the short triangular side-notched form" (1988:114) and they suspect chronologically the short triangular points are more recent.

'Ottawa' - N10-15, N10-28, and Plaza [N10]3

Only a small collection of formal stone tools were recovered in the 'Ottawa' complex (Table 4, OP99-6) most likely due to excavations which were focused on the clearing of rooms and removal of core during the 1999 field season. A lanceolate biface (LA1311/1) very similar in form to specimens recovered at El Pozito (Hester et al 1991:73) and Barton Ramie (Willey et al 1965:416) was recovered during clearing of core of the east platform of N10-28. The Lamanai specimen as with the El Pozito lanceolate biface is lenticular in shape and wear in the form of edge dulling and beveling suggest their use as knifes.

Figure #6

Stemmed unifacial blade points from 'Ottawa'.

a) LA1337/1

b) LA1337/2

c) LA1336/1

Illustrations by M.C. England.

Three other formal tools from 'Ottawa' include stemmed blade points (Figure 5, LA1336/1, LA1337/1, and LA1337/2). All three specimens are unifacially worked on the blade, and LA1336/1 and LA1337/2 contain bifacial chipping on their stems. The smaller of the three, LA1337/2, tapers at the stem very much like the Late Classic stemmed blades recovered at El Pozito (Hester et al 1991:73). All three stemmed blades were found in what has been tentatively identified as caches. Two of the stemmed blades (LA1337/1 and LA1337/2) were found while cleaning core above a two step staircase leading to a bench in 'Room C' in structure N10-28. As suggested by Pendergast this may represent a dedicatory offering because of the blade association with a phase of building construction within a residential area as opposed to a more ceremonial offering to a god or a diety. The other specimen (LA1336/1) also located in structure N10-28 was recovered when one of the large 'plinth' stones was lifted from the lower platform just west of the central stair. Again the cache's location-not along the primary axis-and what can be seen as a lower value object leans more toward a residential building dedication. But its placement below the 'plinth' may not be in direct relation to an architectural feature leaving the cache's purpose unknown for now.
Stemmed unifacial blades have been located at other sites throughout the Maya lowland area including Cerros (Mitchum 1991:48), Colha (Roemer 1991:60), El Pozito (Hester et al 1991:73), Tikal (Moholy-Nagy 1991:193), Pulltrouser Swamp (Shafer 1983:231), Santa Rita (Shafer and Hester 1988:116), Barton Ramie (Willey et al 1965:413-417), and Altun Ha (Pendergast 1990:365). The majority of the stemmed unifacial blade points from the above sites date to Late Classic, a few do not have dates provided, and the Santa Rita pieces were recovered in Postclassic contexts. The stemmed blades from Colha (Roemer 1991:6) were found in lithic workshop-related contexts, as were the ones from Pulltrouser Swamp (Shafer 1983:231). The only one recovered in a cache offering was the specimen from Altun Ha (Pendergast 1990:365) in structure K-33 located in a plazuela group near the main ceremonial area. Cache K-33/3 was located just off the primary axis and contained ceremonial flints and four stemmed macroblades. Further work needs to be done to identify if a trend may be occurring in the Late and Terminal Classic Maya occupation with regard to stemmed blades placement in cache offerings at both Lamanai and possibly Altun Ha.

Back