My Favorite Things About Angelfire
My Favorite Web sites
Angelfire Home Pages
Free Web Building Help
Angelfire HTML Library
htmlGEAR - free polls, guestbooks, and more!
I am interested in fitting different views together. The simple model "paradise wins because a healthy whole works better than a broken one" fits together at least the people or groups with the following views:
* a view completely according to feelings: a paradise
* common sense view: "healthy and "broken" are common sense concepts
* the view of scientifical objective thinking: they are also scientifically correct concepts
* a mechanical view: building blocks can be either healthy or broken
* a techinical view: the same as above
* moral view: moral means safeguarding and cultivating the health of a society and its members and of the world at large etc.
* the views of those who bring up children: they are typically for healthy ways of living and good moral
* the views of the environmentalists: they campaign for the health of the biosphere
* the view of the traditional Finnish culture and propably that of many other cultures: it is good to cultivate good health and stupid to break needlessly
* the views of most religions: a healthy natural paradise and good moral are things to aim at
* the view of the strongest one wins competition, in other words totally value-free optimising of wholes: healthy is strong and capable
* the view of a selfish person: the holistic view needed for getting at least the main points right brings into attention the benefit of benefitting the whole
* work efficiency pont of view for people in all kind of living conditions (nature, town, spacecraft, virtual world etc.) with all kinds of rulers: the nature of humans stays unchanged, scientifical truths like this are very sure
* view completely according to naturality: healthily means according to the natuiral ways of functioning
* an intelligence oriented view: natural healthy life gives best intelligence (read my texts)
* the view of an intelligent person capable of handling large interconnected wholes: "healhy" is a good concept to work with
* the view of the average person: also for the average person to understand
* the view of a very stupid person: and for the stupid ones, because it is so practical
* the view of what is commonly thought of as animal level intelligence/stupidity: animals aim at staying in good health
* the computer logic: healthy = well functioning = times 1, broken = non-functioning = times 0.
* a sexuality oriented view: what could be more attractive than health and happiness
* the points of view of aiming at manliness or womanliness: a healthy one is as strong, intelligent and feeling person as one can be, with lots of style too
* the view that we are in fact spirits and no material world exists: the wholes stay uncg´hanged even if their building material is different, so the truth about broken versus unfractured, healthy whole stays valid.
This means that we can support (on these grounds here!) a paradise from any of these many viewpoints.
In other words: all these viewpoints support a paradise. So all the people (with these divergent viewpoints) could ally for the paradise.
Healthy is happy.
And a healthy one works better than a broken one.
Applying this to the whole world, one gets the result that a healthy natural world is a paradise and that
in a strongest one wins competition the healthy natural world is the winning option over any other kind of world.
In other words, it is a paradise which wins.
Hannele Tervola, Finland, European Union