|
Soft Tissue Discovered In Dinosaur Bone ! I wonder when the mainstream media will actually report the event, and its implications, of the 2005 discovery of a Tyrannosaurus rex thigh bone with reasonably well-preserved soft tissue that included blood vessels and cells? (see : Schweitzer, M. H., et al.,Science, vol. 307, no. 5717, pp. 1952-1955, 25 March 2005. [ a secular science journal that hates creationists!!] ) To me it seems to be rather damaging evidence against the idea that dinosaurs died out millions of years ago. Common sense tells me that soft tissue of any creature will have decayed even after a few thousand years. However, all our evolution friends REFUSE to believe that this can even possibly be evidence of a dinosaur that died at most a few thousand years ago, if not a couple of hundred years ago. (There are some legends dating to less than a thousand years ago of people encountering "dragons" and other dinosaur-like creatures.) Once again, the flawed dating techniques MUST be correct in their opinion (there are numerous examples of wrong dates (of the order of millions of years - see the AIG site) achieved from articles dating to within the last one hundred years), so no secular scientist will dare to raise the implication (at least not very loudly) of very recent dinosaurs. How much evidence must there be before the scientific community wakes up and realise that earth's chronology extends back thousands, not millions or billions, of years? UPDATE: It seems the person who made the discovery, Dr Mary Schweitzer, even though she is an evolutionist, is struggling to get her results published in other scientific journals. (Now she knows how most creation scientists struggle to get LEGITIMATE scientific results published in secular journals!) . As she herself has found:
(emphasis mine) So, NO MATTER WHAT THE EVIDENCE SHOWS, IF IT CONTRADICTS THEIR WORLD VIEW, THEY WILL REJECT IT - BECAUSE IT JUST CANNOT BE TRUE. Notes :
|
