The Contact Lingo Problem

See also: [
Back to the SF-FILM page] [SF index] [SF General] [LITERATURE INDEX] [The ALT LIST!] (ah, those literary weirdos!) [terms] (index of indexes)

SF Film

THE FILMS On this page: {Stuff} {B/G} {2001} {Back to the TOP of this Page}

Stuff

Some years ago (probably around 1975 or so; using HP-2000 Basic), i created a computer game "lingo" which would give you a sample of an alien text and you would try (based on clues as to where the text was found, and the circumstances underwhich it was found. You would then try keywords to try to deciphere more of the message. If your keywords were "close" then more of the text would be revealed, if futher away (colder), then the message would revert to fljsfjoweuweojwofjwoju3u20248j24oojo4jl4*)*(*))*)(*\ sorts of things. It worked well, and was pretty much just a "guessing" game to make people think (see map). Anyway,.... here we all are some 30+ years later... {
Back to the TOP of this Page}

b/g

Ref: Karl Wessel put it in "Alien Encounters: SF and the Mysteriusm in 2001, Solaris, and Contact", (Pp.202-205, in "The Science Fiction Film Reader, ed. by Gregg Rickman, LCCN PN'1995.9'.S26'R53'2004, ISBN 0.87910.944.7 (Limelight, New York, 2004). BEGIN BLOCK QUOTE NOTE: Freely re-formated into mini-paragrphs, etc. Jean-Francois Champollion's decipherment of Egyptian hieroglphics and Michael Ventris' of Linear-B, the language of ancient Minoan Crete, are rightly counted among the most remarkable and difficult accomplishments of the human mind, yet these men were dealing with the languages of memebers of their own species with whom they shared an evolutionary heritabe billions of years long. In a book he co-authored with the Russian astronomer I.S. Shklovski in 1966, Carl Sagan once proposed to bridge the evolutionary gulf between beings born of different worlds by using the supposed universal language or lingua franca of maths. He said: We wish to emphasise that a linguistic system based upon these fundamentals would be far easier to decipher than many of the written languages of ancient civilisations that have been deciphered by arachaeologists. [LOCAL NOTE 30, Shklovski & Sagan, "Intellegent Life in the Universe", 1966, P.430] This is quite false. What's worse, it's naievly anthro-po-centric. The error of this kind of ill-informed enthusaiasm (!) was perhaps put most succinctly by the philosopher David Lamb: The major problem with Lincos and other basic languages (designed to communicate with ET's) is that no message, no matter how simple, can carry its own interpretation: Symbols in themselves are meaningless and are not self-explanatory, require-ing an interpretive framework and a shared background of tacit knowledge. [Note 2] [LOCAL NOTE 32, David Lamb, "The Search for ETI: A Philosophical Inquiry (New York: Routledge, 2001), P. 33. [Note 1] A series of deep results in mathematical logic and the philosopher of language indicate the labyrinthine nature of the problem that Sagan and Shklovski treated so cavalierly in their book. The first, which Ludwig Wittgenstein had already disuccsed END BLOCK QUOTE {Back to the TOP of this page} NOTES (this section only) [1] In a remarkable SF story ??author?? scientists land on Mars, and find it long since deserted by an advanced race. All they need to do is to find a *single* clue to their languge to decode it. The point of the story is that they are all *linguists* and not until a young member of the team finds a periodic chart and realises its significance does the *key* become apparent. Of course this two is rather anthro-po-centric. What if they (the "martians" use a rather intuitive approach to knowledge -- they might "use" chemistry without knowing anything of the under-laying principles; ie, the atomic theory which gives us the "layout" of the periodic table. {Back to the TEXT} [2] For example, a carefully written bit of message might be "deemed" a tasty treat or simply art-work by an alien. In fact in one of Sheckly's Stories ??title?? the *gestures* of humans put the aliens into a kind of trance. And along that way, our gestures might be seen as a form of dance. (Similar to (i think) Clarke's story where-in an essential part of the Dolphin's language is *dance*; also refer to the h2g2 of course). Thus, the possibility of "missing" the signifcance of various gestures or text, etc. is high. Also, refer to Desmond Morris' "Manwatching" (anthro of gestures, etc). {Back to the TEXT} Next: zzz. {Back to the TOP of this page}

zzz