Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Interlibrary Loan Service User Survey

Return this form to Colette Elick at The Talbot Research Library by Monday, October 26

The following survey will allow us to improve our services to you. It should take less than 10 minutes to complete. Your assistance is appreciated. PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:

Total forms given out=458; total forms returned=54; (12% responded)

  1. Which of the following describes you?
    1. Postdoc 15%
    2. Fellow 1%
    3. Nurse 11%
    4. Research Associate 3%
    5. Physician 13%
    6. PI 28%
    7. Other: 35% (Asst. Member, visiting scientist, nurse practitioner, exec. asst. etc)
  1. How many times during the last calendar year have you used the Interlibrary Loan services?

0 11%

    1. 1 time 13%
    2. 2-5 times 43%
    3. 6-10 times 19%
    4. 11-15 times 13%
    5. more than 15 times 7%
  1. How many interlibrary loan requests do you submit at one time?

0 7%

    1. 1-5 91%
    2. 6-10
    3. 11-15 1%
    4. 16-20
    5. 21+
  1. How do you usually submit your request?

NA—2%

    1. Electronic form at the library’s website 26%
    2. Paper form available in the library 54%
    3. Both forms 19%
  1. Which interlibrary loan service have you used (circle all that apply)?

NA 2%

    1. Requested books 31%
    2. Requested articles 85%
    3. RUSH (fax) article 39%
    4. Other: 1% ___________________________________
  1. How was the turnaround time for delivery of material?

NA 2%

    1. Good 83%
    2. Fair 15%
    3. Poor
  1. Did you feel the costs incurred were

NA 1%

    1. Very Expensive 7%
    2. Somewhat Excessive 35%
    3. Reasonable 48%

EXPECTATIONS

 

The following section deals with your EXPECTATIONS of Interlibrary Loan service. Please indicate the degree to which the following service elements are important to you.

 

  1. When I enter the Interlibrary Loan office I am greeted promptly and given immediate, courteous attention.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   78% felt it important

     

  3. The policies and procedures for the use of interlibrary loan have been communicated clearly to me.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   78% felt it important

  5. I should be able to request a large number of items at one time through interlibrary loan.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   46% felt it important

     

  7. I understand that because of the Copyright laws I may not be able to order certain items by interlibrary loan.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   59% felt it important

  9. I am notified promptly of any problems, delays or unusual charges for interlibrary loan services.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   83% felt this important

  11. My interlibrary loan requests are filled accurately.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   94% felt this important

  13. The items I request through interlibrary loan arrive quickly.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   94% felt this important

  15. The loan period for items borrowed through interlibrary loan is adequate for my needs.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7   80% felt so.

  17. The library should offer electronic delivery of article-length documents to my workstation.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7   72% felt this important

10. The quality of the faxed article is satisfactory.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7   80% felt so.

11. My overall experience with the Interlibrary Loan service has been satisfactory.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7   94% felt so.

 

 

Thank you for taking the time to complete this survey!

We welcome your additional comments and suggestions regarding Interlibrary Loan service.

  • Most of these comments were directed toward the quality of the faxed material (9%) figures, and graph-type items hard to read. (5%) commented on how electronic delivery to the desktop would be "great."
  • 1% of respondents complained about the turnaround time and high cost for the article to arrive, although another 1% felt "we were at the mercy" of the lending library .
  • 9% commented that they were pleased with the "fast" service.

Part II. Turnaround-time and fill rate of Rush requests

Chose 5 University Libraries. Tracked from March 16- May 15 1998. Sent faxed RUSH requests randomly.

Results:

Factors that may have influenced these findings: