(14) Taxpayer. The term "taxpayer" means any [person] subject to any internal revenue tax. [emphasis added]

To understand the liability of the people to the federal income tax, you need to understand how three words are used in the IRC:

"INDIVIDUAL", "PERSON", AND "TAXPAYER"

These three words are used through out the IRC. The confusion starts when one of the three words is used to include a corporation as an "person" or "taxpayer". Just because the IRC uses these terms to include a corporation, does not mean the same term when used in the IRC under Subchapter "A", Part 1, sec. 1, to attach the people, makes the people the same kind of entity as a corporation. The word "person" is used to cover up the identity of what type of "taxpayer or "individual" the IRC is really referring to. Remember, under Subchapter "A", Part 1, sec. 1 of the IRC the word "individual" also means "person" via 26 USC 7701.

How many definitions of "person" are there? Basically, there are two:

3. But when the word "person" is spoken of in legislative acts, natural persons will be intended, [unless] something appear in the [context] to show that it applies to artificial persons. 2 Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 8^th Ed., (1859), p. 333, title "person". [emphasis added]

"This word ‘person’ and its scope and bearing in the law, involving, as it does, legal fictions and also apparently natural beings, it is difficult to understand; but it is absolutely necessary to grasp, at whatever cost, a true and proper understanding of the word in all the phases of its proper use...The words persona and personae did not have the meaning in the Roman which attaches to homo, the individual, or a man in the English; it had peculiar reference to artificial beings, and the condition or status of individuals ...A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested...not an individual or physical person, but the status, condition or character borne by physical condition.

CANNOT BE SYNONYMOUS, FOR THERE CANNOT BE AN ARTIFICIAL MAN, THOUGH THERE ARE ARTIFICIAL PERSONS. Thus the conclusion is easily reached that the law itself often creates an entity or a being which is called a person; the law cannot create an artificial man, but it can and frequently does invest him with artificial attributes; This is his personality...that is to say, the man-person; and abstract persons, which are fictitious and which have no existence except in law; that is to say, those which are purely legal conceptions or creations." American Law and Procedures, (1910) Vol.13, pp. 137-162. [Emphasis mine]

Clearly, we are dealing with two definitions of persons, "Natural Persons" and "Artificial Persons". The problem is, when the word "person" is used in the IRC, does it apply to "Natural Persons" or "Artificial Persons"? We know when the IRC uses the word "Person" referring to corporations, trusts, estates, a partnership, "Artificial Person" is the only status that can be inferred. Like wise, if you are not involved in alcohol, tobacco. or firearms, you don’t need to define what a "person" is under those sections of the IRC. Make no mistake, that if you are within the above entities termed as artificial persons, these entities are subject to the Excise Tax, as the United States Supreme Court has ruled these entities are the subject of the "Excise Tax" via the 16^th Amendment. (see Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, (1916), 240 U.S. 1. 36, S.Ct. 236, 60 L.Ed. 493.) Without going into all the arguments of the right or wrong of this ruling, artificial persons or those person(s) engaged in Alcohol, Tobacco. and Firearms are subject to the Federal Excise Taxes.

If you read the IRC, you can readily see what context the word "person" is being used.

CONTEXT. The general series or composition of a "law", contract, covenant, or agreement.

What is the context of the words in the definition of person in the Social Security Act. "trust or estate, a partnership, or corporation". All of these terms are describing an Artificial person, therefore the word "individual" also is an Artificial person following the context of the sentence.

In the Federalist Papers we find this:

"...we must extend the authority of the Union to the persons of the citizens". The Federalist Papers, No. 15, p. 109, Clinton Rossiter Ed.

"...It must carry its agency to the persons of the

citizens..." The Federalist Papers, No. 15, p. 116, Clinton

Rossiter Ed.

As I read the above, I notice the word "person[s]" is used in the plural sense, but I also notice the United States Legislature (Congress) can not legislate directly on a Citizen. Congress is restricted to legislate only on "persons". This legislation can be on "Artificial Persons" or "Natural Persons". There are many sections in the 50 Titles of the United States Codes that use the term "person(s)". It is only understandable by understanding the "Context" of the legislation to determined if the word "person(s)" is an "Artificial Person(s)" or "Natural Person(s)."

One thing I have observed is, that all of the Income Tax Laws are found in what is called Non-positive Law, such as 26 USC. I have also observed that non-positive laws seem to deal only with "Artificial Entities". The non-positive laws are also called "color of law". Does this mean that non-positive law is only law a Citizen can be termed as an "Individual" within the status of "person(s)." One other point I have observed, is the non-positive titles do not recognize Common-Law Jurisdiction. The Common Law recognizes only Citizens having unalienable rights. The IRC does not recognize any Natural Rights (Unalienable), only statutory rights. If this is true, and I believe it is, then, when the IRC refers to married individuals, it can only be referring to those married by statute, such as a marriage license. Those married by "Natural Right" marriage PROTECTED BY COMMON-LAW VENUE and JURISDICTION, are not within the term of married individuals in Subchapter "A", Part 1, sec.1(a) of 26 USC.

The IRS and the U.S. Attorney’s say the Social Security Number is just to identify you, like your name. Bull!!! It is used to identify you as an "Individual" according to the liability statute in 26 USC, Subchapter A, Part 1, sec. 1(a)(b)or(c).

18 USC 1001 in part:

"covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing to be false, fictitious fraudulent."

The Ninth Circuit has addressed the issue here raised in Steiner v. United States, 229 F.2d 745, (9^th Cir., 1956). The Defendants in Steiner contended that certain counts of the indictment failed to state an offense against the United States. The Defendants were charged in several counts under 18 USC 545, with knowing and fraudulent importation and transportation of certain birds, "contrary to law". Like 26 USC 7203, 18 USC 545 provides criminal penalties for violation of other provisions of law. 18 USC 545 simply provided penalties for the importation of "any merchandise contrary to law". The court held that:

"Each of counts 8, 9, 10 and 11 attempted to charge a violation of 18 U.S.C. 545 and did not charge or attempt to charge any other offense. However, each of counts 8, 9, 10 and 11 failed to state what law (other than 18 U.S.C. 545) the importation mentioned therein was contrary to, or in what respect such importation was contrary to such law. Thus each of counts 8, 9, 10 and 11 failed to charge a violation of 18 U.S.C. 545 and failed to charge an offense against the United States." Steiner v. United States, 229 F.2d 745, 748, (9^th Cir., 1956).

Shouldn’t it be equally true, the IRS and the U.S. Attorney should show the liability statues and sections in an indictment. Take a look at the Venue statement in an indictment. I will place [ ] where the venue is stated.

The Grand Jury charges that:

During the calendar year 1991, in the [Eastern District of Virginia], defendant R____ C. M_____, who was a resident of [Richmond, Virginia], who worked as a construction contractor in the [vicinity of Richmond, Virginia] during 1991, had and received gross income of 39,753.63 that by reason of such gross income he was required by law, following the close of the calendar year 1991, and on or before April 15, 1992 to make an income tax return to the District Director of the Internal Revenue Service...in violation of Title 26 United States Code, Section 7203. [emphasis added]

Here’s how the Venue statement should be stated:

The Grand Jury charges that:

COUNT ONE

During the calendar year 1991, in the [Eastern District of Virginia in Federal Regional Area Three], defendant R____ C. M_____, who was a resident of [Richmond Division in National Area 99999 (ZIP Code makes you a resident of the United States) in Federal Regional Area Three known as, VA.], who worked as a construction contractor in the [vicinity of Richmond, Virginia] during 1991, had and received gross income of 39,753.63 that by reason of such gross income he is the "individual liable under 26 USC, Subchapter "A", Part 1(a)(b)or(c), following the close of the calendar year 1991, and on or before April 15, 1992 to make an income tax return to the District Director of the Internal Revenue Service... in the District of Va. in Regional Area Three, in violation of Title 26 United States Code, Section 7203. (willful failure to file)

vicinity -- "...a region about..." Black’s Law Dictionary 6^th Ed., p. 1567, title: "Vicinity".

As I have said, the ZIP Code makes you a resident of the United States in a National Area. (Military venue)

The issues that need to be addressed, so far, is the United States District Courts venue and jurisdiction:

Examine the process of an income tax charge. First a United States Magistrate receives an indictment or information from the United States Attorney’s Office. The United States Magistrate orders a summons to issue for the individual charged, and an arrest warrant. There is no doubt the United States Magistrate is an Article I Tribunal. That the process is within the limited judicial power cannot be disputed!!! The United States Magistrate brings the "person" into his Article I Jurisdiction to arraign the person before him. The United States Magistrate demands the person before him answer certain questions.

If you don’t do all the United States Magistrate demands, you are sent to jail until you either agree to comply or file a Writ of Habeas Corpus or Writ of Prohibition. If you have sometime before you are to report to the United States Magistrate’s Article I Tribunal when served with a summons, you can file a Writ of Prohibition. If you don’t have any time and are arrested, you can file a Writ of Habeas Corpus. These Writs can only be filed by natural born Citizens and must be at some point filed to the United States Supreme Court, as this Court is the only Court that possess the "Judicial Power of the United States". The District Courts and Circuit Courts of Appeal do not possess the "Judicial Power of the United States". But, you may have to file these Writs to the inferior courts and have them reject the Writs to prove the United States Supreme Court is the only Court that possess the full Judicial Power pursuant to Article III of the Constitution for the United States of America.

What I am showing in this article is the FOURTH BRANCH of GOVERNMENT. Justice Scalia of the Supreme Court remarked:

"That the Founding Fathers came up with three coequal branches of Government; that somewhere in the late eighteen hundreds, along came the Congress and set up an independent regulatory agency; that Congress gave to the head of that agency executive powers; and that Congress has repeated that in subsequent years, from 1890 through today; and if, in fact, the head of an independent regulatory agency is not serving at the pleasure of the President, that is, able to be fired by the President, relieved without cause by the President, then, what the Congress has attempted to do is unconstitutional, i.e., [they have essentially established a quasi-executive branch of the government, which is a fourth branch of government sitting out here]." Hearings Before The Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Ninety-ninth Congress Second Session on the Nomination of Judge Antonin Scalia, to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, August 5 & 6, 1986, Serial No. J-99-119, Page 50. [emphasis added]

Simply it works like this. Under the Due Process clause of the 14^th Amendment, Congress has created a limited judicial power not authorized under Article III of the Constitution for the United States of America!!! To regulate this Fourth Branch of Government, Congress has enacted 50 Titles termed United States Codes (USC). 42 USC is a code recognized by the federal courts to be enforced under the limited judicial power as stated in Palmore v. United States, (1973), 411 U.S. 389.

As the 14^th Amendment was not enacted to grant the status of citizenry to the existing white State Citizens, (Van Valkenburg v. Brown, (1872), 43 Cal 431, 47), and the 14^th Amendment did not grant full fledge citizenry to those within the 14^th Amendment (Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 98-99, 29 S.Ct. 14, 53 L.Ed. 97). How did the White Natural Born Citizens come under the status of the 14^th Amendment and the limited judicial power created under the 14^th Amendment?

The following paragraph, written by C.J. Scheppers, may help you to understand "HOW" we did it to ourselves.

Any time the government asks you to register or apply for some privilege which would otherwise be your right (and responsibility) you will find an excuse to take you out of the common law of the original Citizens of the united States. When someone registers or applies under some Statute for some privilege, whether it be driver license, marriage license, insurance, sales tax (business privilege) license or the Great One called Social Security, he clouds his God-given rights by asking for the privilege and further regulation set up by the statutes. The legislatures not only write the statute which appears to compel you to obtain the license but also write the statutes which dictate what evidence is sufficient to convict you, how you will be tried (among which, jury or no jury, or what the jury can or can not decide) and what kind of sentence you will serve. The true question is not about evidence, conditions of trial, jury or no jury, nor penalty but whether or not you need to be licensed in the first place. Once the license is obtained, a serious doubt as to the intentions of the person obtaining the license is raised. The person is sending mixed signals to his oppressors as to whether he wants to enjoy the rights and responsibilities given to him by Almighty God or if he wants to cower in the false protections extended by man. I think it was John Locke who said that the legislature is unfit to rule mankind because the legislature can not protect man from the judgement of Almighty God. Through licensing, the legislature is trying to excuse their guilt and place it on you.

Mr. Scheppers is right on point!!! Once you accept the de facto governments system and ask for permission to exercise an Unalienable Right, you have become a "Person" under the statutory jurisdiction of the due process of the 14^th Amendment.

Understanding how you became a "Person" (Alter-ego)-(fiction of law), you can understand how the United States Magistrate can summons you (flesh and blood) into his Article I Jurisdiction to defend how you have managed or mismanaged your Alter-ego entity to comply with the laws passed by Congress regulating your Alter-ego under the 50 Titles (USC). Most Citizens think they are charged as flesh and blood entities, but what gets them charged is their mismanagement of their Alter-ego.

For example, in an inferior Federal Court of limited judicial power, the court only recognizes you as a Pro Se (defending your Alter-ego). The inferior federal court has no power through the court to recognize you as Pro Per (defending flesh and blood).

Remember, a judge can only exercise the power the court possess. Once the United States Magistrate has partially or completely set the requirements of arraignment, he transfers your case to the United States District Court for trial. Of course trial in the United States District Court under the limited judicial power. Then you can appeal your conviction to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals, also exercising the jurisdiction of the limited judicial power established in the United States Magistrate and United States District Courts.

"...it was said that under the authority of article 3 Congress had created the District Courts, the [Circuit Courts], and the Court of Claims, and vested each of them with a [defined portion of the judicial power] found in the Constitution..." Williams v. United States, (1933), 53 S. Ct. Oct. term, 289 U.S.

553, p. 755. [emphasis added]

Just recently, United States Magistrates have been granted the title of Magistrate/Judge. United States Magistrates can now, if you sign a consent form, conduct your criminal trial. Of course the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Article I Tribunal is under the limited judicial power of the due process clause of the 14^th Amendment.

Read again:

[4] "That judicial power [apart] from that article may be conferred by Congress upon legislative courts, as well as upon constitutional courts,..." Williams v. United States, (1933), 53 S. Ct. Oct. term, 289 U.S. 553, p. 754. [emphasis added]

United States Magistrates are Article I Tribunals, the vesting of this limited judicial power is not authorized under Article III of the Constitution for the united States of America. It’s all been a con job!!! Where did it all go wrong??? In the zeal of those White Citizens who wished to make all free in this Nation, opened the door of destruction upon themselves and us!!! Our Creator set certain laws for us to obey!!!

shall proceed from the midst of them; and I will cause him to

draw near, and he shall approach unto me; for who is this that

engaged his heart to approach unto me? saith the LORD." Jeremiah

30:21

Clearly, we were to govern this Nation as one people (race).

America’s founding Father’s understood this law of our Creator:

"With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to [one] united people - a people descended from the [same ancestors], speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established their general liberty and independence." The Federalist Papers, No. 2, Jay, p.38, Rossiter Ed. [emphasis added]

"We are bound to interpret the Constitution in the light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted." Mattox v. U.S., 156 US 237, 243.

Our only salvation to ensure to our Posterity they live as free Citizens, is to recognize our mistakes and correct them. To pray to our Creator to forgive us for our err’s and turn His Face back towards His People and give us the strength to overcome our enemies.

"If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave." Samuel Adams, 1772.

This ends Part 2 of Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.

Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely: Part 3

by Robert W. Wangrud September 1998

POWER IS THE ONLY PRODUCT OF GOVERNMENT!!!

Governments will push and push to get all the power they can. Even the United States Government will grasp all the power the people will let them have. The several States are no exception to the lust of power. They too, will grab all the power they can.

As I have shown in Parts One and Two, the Federal power lead the way to over turn the power of the Free White State Citizens. The several State legislatures were and are willing partners in grabbing power away from the State Citizens. The White Citizens who founded America were well advised in the power of governments. They said you treat good government like it was your worse enemy. The White People at that time knew government was force and force needs to be controlled at all times. The People in their Constitution set the power to control the government by the power of the jury box, State and Federal. But today, the jury box does not control the government and there are reasons why juries don’t control the government.

The fact is the people known as "We the People" are Sovereign

over the government, only when the People are formed into an

established convention to form a government, by establishing a Constitution. Many authors fail to show this Body Politic was composed of only the White race [Israelites] in this country. It is this Body Politic that is Sovereign over the government. It is this Body Politic that binds the government to the limitations of the Compact (Constitution) agreed to by the established and existing Body Politic.

branches of government shall concur in opinion, each by the

voices of two thirds of their whole number, that a convention

is necessary for altering the Constitution, or correcting

breaches of it, a convention shall be called for the

purpose.’"

and it is from them that the constitutional charter, under

which the several branches of government hold their power"

Federalist Papers, No. 49, Madison, p. 313, Clinton Rossiter

Ed.

good old rule, that on questions of fact it is the province

of the jury, on questions of law, it is the province of the

court to decide. But it must be observed that by the same law

which recognizes this reasonable distribution of jurisdiction,

you have nevertheless a right to take upon yourself’s to

judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact

in controversy. On this, and on every other occasion, however, we have no doubt you will pay that respect which is due to the opinion of the court; for, as on the one hand it is presumed that juries are the best judges of facts, it is, on the other hand, presumable that the court are the best judges of law. But still both objects are lawfully within your power of decision." The State of Georgia v. Brailsford et al., (1794), 2 Dall. (2 U.S.) 402, 1 L. Ed. 433. [emphasis added]

The People made the mistake of allowing the governments to control the education of their children. All the government had to do is omit certain issues and wait a couple of generations and the Posterity would not understand their true power in the jury box. Only, when the people no longer understand God’s Law and the relation of God’s law in their Constitutions, is when the governments are able to steal power away from the people.

The beginning of this theft of power by the government began with the 13^th, 14^th and 15^th Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Founding Fathers of America understood this land was to be governed by their own race according to our Creator’s law and none other.

shall proceed from the midst of them; and I will cause him to

draw near, and he shall approach unto me; for who is this that

engaged his heart to approach unto me? saith the LORD." Jeremiah

30:21

The several States were the power to maintain the civil and criminal jurisdictions under the Common-Law which was based on the laws of their God. America could not be destroyed until the people [Israelites] lost sight of this doctrine. The Anti-christ is always waiting to deceive the people and move Satan’s children into the government to further alter and destroy the work of the Founding Fathers and the Creator’s Law when America was established.

Psalms 83: 3,4

[being] a Nation; That the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance."

How many White people in America today still have the knowledge and understanding that America began as a Nation of one race?

When America was established, a majority of the State Constitutions forbid any but Free White Men to hold office within the State government, thereby withholding elected office from non-white persons in the States and the National Government.

Article 1, Section 31 (1859):

"White foreigners who are or may hereafter become resi-

dents of this state shall enjoy the same rights in respect to

possession, enjoyment, and descent of property as native-born

citizens. And the legislative assembly shall have power to

restrain and regulate the immigration to this state of persons not qualified to become citizens of the United States." Article 1, Section 31, Original Constitution for the State of Oregon, approved by conventions 1857, admitted 1859.

Article 1, Section 35, Oregon Constitution (1857-1859):

"No free negro or mulatto, not residing in this state at

the time of adoption of this constitution, shall come, reside,

or be within this state, or hold any real estate, or make

any contracts, or maintain any suit therein; and the legislative

assembly shall provide by penal laws for the removal by public

officers of all such negroes and mulattos, and for their effec

tual exclusion from the state and for punishment of persons who

shall bring them into the state, or employ or harbor them."

Article 1, Section 35, Original Constitution for the State of

Oregon, approved by conventions 1857, admitted 1859.

Article 2, Section 2 (1859):

"In all elections not otherwise provided for by this constitution, every white male citizen of the United States, of the age of twenty-one years and upwards, who shall have resided in the state during the six months immediately preceding such election, and every white male of foreign birth of the age of twenty-one years and upwards, who shall have resided in this state during the six months immediately preceding such election, and shall have declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States one year preceding such election, conformably to the laws of the United States on the subject of naturalization, shall be entitled to vote at all elections authorized by law." Article 2, Section 2, Original Constitution for the State of Oregon, approved by conventions 1857, admitted 1859.

Most of the State Constitutions had the same articles, that only those of the White race could hold the reins of power in the State and Federal Governments.

What went wrong? America let too many white aliens into the Nation without proper schooling them in the principals of the Form of government under the State and United States Constitution. The only process of becoming a Citizen in America was for a State to accept the petitioner to State Citizenry. As long as the one race doctrine was the established law, the people had a common interest to protect themselves and their children.

The courts of the States recognized only white Citizens of the State as Flesh and Blood before the courts [Natural Persons]. The State Courts were Constitutional Courts and possessed Common-Law Jurisdiction. All was well with the people known as "We the People".

It was not the 13^th or 14^th Amendments to the United States Constitution that upset the power of "We the People". It was the 15^th Amendment that allowed the children of Satan and other non-whites to enter into the State and Federal elected offices!!! Read the Constitutions, State and Federal, to be elected into a State or Federal elected office, you must be an elector in a State. Understanding the limited citizenship of the 14^th Amendment uncovers the 14^th Amendment is a limited citizenship by intent of its framers or there would not have been a need for the 15^th Amendment.

When a White alien was accepted to the Citizenry of a State, he had the right to be an elector in that State. [see Oregon Const] Once he was a Citizen of the State, he was also known as a citizen of the United States. I say known as a citizen of the United States, as there was no physical citizen of the United States. The physical citizenry was State Citizenry. The 14^th Amendment is just the reverse of this doctrine:

to the adoption of this amendment, strictly speaking, there

were no citizens of the United States, but only of some one of

them. Congress had the power "to establish an uniform rule of

naturalization," but not the power to make a naturalized alien a

citizen of any state. But the states generally provided that

such persons might, on sufficient residence therein, become

citizens thereof, and then the courts held, ab convenienti,

rather than otherwise, that they became ipso facto citizens

of the United States. But the amendment declares the law

positively on the subject, and reverses this order of proce-

dure, by making citizenship of a state consequent on citizenship

of the United States; for, having declared what persons are

citizens of the United States it does not stop there, and

leave it in the power of a state to exclude any such person

who may reside therein from its citizenship, but adds, "and

such persons shall also be citizens of the state wherein they

reside." 9 Fed. Stat. Anno. p. 387. [emphasis added]

The 14^th Amendment citizenship did not abolish the original Citizenry of the States. The 14^th Amendment original purpose was to grant a limited citizenship to non-whites, but not to allow non-whites to be qualified electors to hold elected office in the States of Federal Governments.

However, the 14^th Amendment did not destroy or overthrow the common-law citizenship of "free white." Van Valkenburg v. Brown, 43 Cal 43, 47, (1872).

It merely purports to create a second statutory and limited citizenship, in the nature of a franchise, and subject to regulation and taxation by Congress. This never was and is not so as regards the free white sovereignty and their natural common-law status.

But when the 15^th Amendment was passed, it allowed all non-whites to become electors and hold elected office in both the several States and Federal elected office.

The 19^th Amendment allowed women to be electors and also hold elected office. Placing women over man.

and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth chil-

dren; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall

rule over thee." Genesis 3:16.

These Amendments are all in violation of the Creator’s laws. America has gone down hill ever sense these violations were passed. Allowing strangers to be elected into America’s Government has lead us to the brink of destruction. To destroy the Christian principals of the Original Constitutions [State-Federal], the Anti-christ children could now gain access to powerful elected offices in America.

The United States Supreme Court is one of the most powerful offices in our government. Although it is not an elected office, the Justice’s are confirmed by the United States Senate and recommended by the President of the United States. Should the Anti-christ children get into these offices [Congress], they could pack the United States Supreme Court with their creatures and alter the Organic law of the several States and United States Constitutions.

Under the authority of the 14^th Amendment, the power of Naturalization was taken from the several States jurisdiction and lodged in the Federal jurisdiction. The people who lived at the time of the 14^th Amendment did not realize the 14^th Amendment among other things was a New Naturalization Law. The 14^th Amendment took from the jurisdiction of several States the determination of who could be a Citizen in America.

This was the opining the children of Satan needed to undo all that America stood for. There have been 6 or 7 of Satan’s children to obtain the office of Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Of course there are many others of Satan’s children in elected offices in the several States and United States Governments.

We need to get a clearer understanding of the 14^th Amendment and the power it has over the Sovereign States.

A review of Justice Cardozo of the United States Supreme Court is a good start to a clear understanding of the original intent of the 14^th Amendment.

CARDOZO LAW REVIEW, SPRING 1979, BENJAMIN NATHAN CARDOZO, COMMEMORATIVE ISSUE, TITLED: "ORDERED LIBERTY", by John T. Noonan Jr, professor of LAW, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.

"...Cardozo read the decisions he cited expansively, making it clear that in his view the [corresponding provision of the Bill of Rights were no part of fourteenth amendment due process].’ [emphasis added]

Here the law review cites Twining v. New Jersey:

the Seventh Amendment (Walker v. Sauvinet, 92 US 90), and the

right to bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment

(Presser v. Illinois, 116 US 252), have been distinctly held

not to be privileges and immunities of citizens of the United

States guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment against

abridgement by the States, and in effect the same decision

was made in respect of the guarantee against prosecution,

except by indictment by grand jury, contained in the Fifth

Amendment (Hurtado v. California, 110 US 516), and in respect of

the right to be confronted with witnesses, contained in the

Sixth Amendment. West v. Louisiana, 194 US 258. In Maxwell v.

Dow, supra, where the plaintiff in error had been convicted in

a state court of a felony upon information and by a jury of

eight persons, it was held that the indictment, made indispens-

able by the Fifth Amendment, and the trial by jury gua-

ranteed by the Sixth Amendment, were not privileges and immuni-

ties of citizens of the United States, as those words were used in the Fourteenth Amendment... the decision rested upon the ground that this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not forbid the States to abridge the personal rights enumerated in the first eight Amendments, because these rights were not within the meaning of the clause ‘privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States.’ ...We conclude, therefore, that the exemption from compulsory self-incrimination is not a privilege or immunity of National citizenship guaranteed by this clause of the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgement by the States...

"...it is possible that some of the personal rights safe-

guarded by the first eight Amendments against National action

may also be safeguarded against State action, because a denial of

them would be a denial of due process of law... If this is so,

it is not because those rights are enumerated in the first

eight Amendments, but because they are of such a nature that

they are included in the [conception of due process of law]."

Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 98-99, 29 S.Ct. 14, 53

L.Ed. 97. [emphasis added]

Notice the words "conception of due process of law". What the Anti-christ children wanted out of the 14^th Amendment was to be able to create a new limited judicial power that did not have to recognize common-law principals. The several States Constitutions allowing common-law jurisdiction in the State Courts would be of no effect under the limited judicial power created and supported by the United States Supreme Court under the due process clause of the 14^th Amendment.

As a matter of fact, most of the several States only had Constitutional Courts established, and only State Citizens [free White] could access these Courts under the States Constitutions. The Anti-christ children in Congress and the State legislatures including the State and Federal Court system set to alter the civil and criminal jurisdiction of the Sovereign States. One of the first attacks on the Sovereign States came in the case of Neal v. Delaware;

the effect, in law, to [remove] from the State Constitution, or

[render inoperative], that provision which restricts the right

of suffrage to the white race. Thenceforward, the statute which prescribed the qualifications of jurors was, itself, enlarged in its operation, so as to embrace all who by the State Constitution, as modified by the supreme law of the land, were qualified to vote at a general election...." Neal v. Delaware, (1880), supra, 103 U.S. at 387. [emphasis added]

The United States Supreme Court in this decision is saying the power of the 13^th, 14^th, and 15^th Amendments to the United States Constitution are more powerful than the Organic Law. But, didn’t Cardozo say the due process of the 14^th was not within the jurisdiction [no part] of the Bill of Rights? The Neal decision could never have been decided in this light if Satan’s children were not entrenched in both the State and Federal Governments and amongst the people themselves.

After the Neal decision, the federal power went to work on dismantling more of the Sovereignty of the several States.

The first attack by Satan’s children was to get the several States to establish the New Limited Federal Judicial Power in the several States Court systems. Congress and the United States Supreme Court began to threaten the legislators and judges of the several States with criminal charges if they did not amend the State Constitutions to include the new federal limited judicial power into the State court system.

The State legislators should have informed the Citizens of the State to accept this power would be the destruction of the Sovereignty of the State and called the Citizens to Arms to defend the theft of Sovereignty of the State. But, this was not done as the Anti-christ children were fully entrenched in the State governments by this time.

Oregon legislators and all of the legislators of the several States went to work to amend the State Constitutions to please the federal government. The federal force [power] to demand the States accept the New Limited Federal Judicial Power created by the due process clause of 14^th Amendment was the authority of the new power clause in section 5 of the 14^th Amendment:

"The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article". 14^th Amendment, sec. 5.

Remember, the due process of the 14^th Amendment is not part of the Bill of Rights, so the power clause of the 14^th amendment could not claim Article 1, sec. 8, cl. 18 as this article is part of the Organic law.

The Citizens of the several States were lied to by the Anti-christ children in power and approved the amending of their Judicial Articles in their State Constitutions. The main change was to allow the State Legislatures to create courts by statute, [by law]. These State courts are courts that are vested with the federal limited judicial power created by Congress under the due process of the 14^th Amendment.

Supreme (sic) Court, Circuits (sic) Courts, and County Courts,

which shall be Courts of Record, having general jurisdiction,

to be defined, limited, and regulated by law, in accordance

with this Constitution. -Justices of the Peace may also be

invested with limited Judicial powers, and Municipal Courts

may be created to administer the regulations of incorporated

towns and cities.-

AS YOU CAN SEE ABOVE, THERE WAS NO AUTHORITY FOR THE STATE LEGISLATURES TO CREATE COURTS BY LAW. All COURTS WERE CREATED BY THE CONSTITUTION.

Section 1. Courts; election of judges; terms of office; compensation.

The judicial power of the state shall be vested in one supreme court and in such other courts as may from time to time be [created by law]. The judges of the supreme and other courts shall be elected by the legal voters of the state or of their respective districts for a term of six years, and shall receive such compensation as may be provided by law, which compensation shall not be diminished during the term for which they are elected. (Created through initiative petition filed July 7, 1910. Adopted by the people November, 8, 1910) [emphasis added]

The above amendment is deceiving. While it indicates the courts create by law can be vested with the full Judicial Power, the statutes creating these courts only use the words "judicial power" for the courts created "by law". To have the full Judicial Power, the words "Judicial power of the State" must be inserted in the statute.

Notice, also the Oregon State Supreme Court is the only court vested by the amended judicial article (7) to possess the Judicial power of the State. The forced insertion of the due process of the 14^th Amendment on the court systems of the States is divesting the inferior courts to the Supreme Court in Article 7 [Original] of the full Judicial Power in Oregon and the same condition exist in all of the several States:

"...Under section 1 of ART VII, prior to the amendment of 1910, the judicial power of the state was vested in a supreme court, circuit courts, and county courts, but under the 1910 amendment, circuit courts and county courts were not mentioned. Hence, under section 1 of ART VII, as amended in 1910, the Supreme Court is the only court created by the constitution itself; all other courts are to be created by legislative act..." STATE Ex Rel, Madden v. Crawford, 207 Or., pp. 82-83.

Here what is said in North Carolina:

the trial of impeachments, and except for such judicial power

as may from time to time be vested by the General assembly in

administrative agencies, the judicial power of the State is

vested exclusively in the General Court of justice, Provided,

that all existing courts of the State inferior to the

superior courts, including justice of the peace courts and

mayor’s courts, shall continue to exist and to exercise the

judicial powers vested in them by law until specifically

abolished by law, or until the establishment within the

county of their situs of a district court, or until Janu-

ary 1, 1971, whichever event shall first occur. Judgments

of inferior courts which cease to exist under the provisions

of this section continue in force and effect as though the

issuing court continued to exist, and the General Court of

Justice is hereby vested with jurisdiction to enforce such

judgments. (1965, c. 310,s. 1.)"

cial system for purposes of jurisdiction, operation and

administration, and consist of an appellate division, a

superior court division, and a district court division. (1965,

c. 310, s. 1.)"

If you look, you will find in every State the federal limited judicial power has been installed "by law" and the Constitutional Courts of full Judicial Power are being divested of the full Judicial Power or abolished.

The Anti-christ children like this condition just fine and those that are not of this breed are constrained as a judge can only exercise the jurisdiction vested in the court he sets in. We are told we will be in fear of the Anti-christ children. Well, aren’t we. Every time the people go to the court system, are they not afraid of the law? Do not the people curse under their breath the unjust decisions of the courts? Wake up, you curse the decisions of the courts because they are based on Anti-christ principals.

Here read it again:

"Thou shall in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose, [one from among thy brethren[ shall thou set king over thee, thou mayest [not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother]." Deuteronomy 17:15 [emphasis added]

"And [their nobles shall be of themselves], and [their governor shall proceed from the midst of them]; and I will cause him to draw near, and he shall approach unto me; for who is this that engaged his heart to approach unto me? saith the LORD." Jeremiah 30:21 [emphasis added]

It is time to confront the State legislatures and cast out the

Anti-christ Children and all of those of our race that joined

them, as they are twice the devil the children of Satan are. Once

the common-law [Christian principals of law] has been suspended,

the Children of Satan install the same system they have always

used to enforce their Anti-christ principals of law. That system

is known as the "LAW MARTIAL"

WHEN THE TERM "LAW MARTIAL" IS USED, IT ENCOMPASSES ALL FORMS OF MILITARY VENUE AND JURISDICTION.

Did Oregon make a mistake in Article 1, sec. 27 of the State Constitution? It only says the word "Military". I like Massachusetts article on this issue:

Constitution of Massachusetts, (1780), XXVIII. No person can in any case be subject to [Law-martial], or to any penalties or pains, by virtue of that law, except those employed in the army or navy, and except the militia in actual service, but by authority of the legislature. [emphasis added]

Behold Newsletter has exposed the fact that the "Persons" created by the 14^th Amendment were governed at first by full Martial Law. [see reconstruction acts] Then the Law Martial was extended under Martial Rule and is enforce on them today.

When you see the National and State flags with yellow fringe, you know the court displaying these flags are exercising the Law Martial in one of its three forms.

Congress needed a venue to enforce this new judicial power. As this new judicial power could not be within the civil or criminal jurisdiction under the principals of the common law. To give this new judicial power some Constitutional authority, they placed it within Martial Rule, one of the three jurisdictions of the "Law Martial".

In Oregon, this is the State flag you see in the courts of Oregon:

TITLE XXX SECTION 3828. Regimental or State Flag, What to be and Size.

"The regimental or state flag shall be of blue silk, with the arms of service of the state embroidered or painted in the center, with the number and arm of service of the regiment in a scroll underneath. The size of the flag shall be five feet six inches fly, and four inches on the pike. The [fringe shall be yellow], four inches deep, and the cord and tassels blue and white silk intermixed. The length of the pike shall be ten feet, including the spear. [L. 1901, p. 211, sec. 91; B. & C. sec. 3255.] [emphasis added]

Once the States were entrenched with these new courts vested with limited judicial power, the legislatures began passing multiple statutes to govern the 14^th Amendment persons who had access to these State courts. These courts of limited judicial power were vested with civil and criminal jurisdiction, but not the civil or criminal jurisdiction under the old system of Constitutional Courts of full Judicial Power.

The State legislatures disregarded the common-law maximum of what constitutes a crime. [hardship-damage-victim] This new criminal jurisdiction was based on "what if law", and "public safety".

They could make anything they wanted a crime. If you didn’t get a driver’s license it is a crime. If you didn’t register or insure your car [property] it can be confiscated, the list is endless as to the crimes under the new criminal jurisdiction authorized by the newly created limited judicial power forced on the States via the due process of the 14^th Amendment.

But, Oregon’s Constitution says the military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power! [Art. 1. sec.27] The State legislatures must feel as long as they’re regulating the military power that these statutes are passed under, they are not violating Article 1, sec. 27 of the Oregon Constitution.

The State legislators are the civil authority and they are regulating the military power??? The people would disagree with this warped thinking as soon as the people understand it. To clearly establish the separation between free White State Citizens and Federal citizens, all the case law says these two can not be mixed. When this is the only issue reported, it makes the reporter look like a Racist, either white or black. But, when you understand that Congress and the Courts are governing both white State Citizens and Federal citizens under a third status [Artificial Entity] the issue takes on another issue which is not Racism.

These State inferior courts are fully under the power of the State legislatures. These limited inferior courts violate every State Constitution separation of Powers Articles in their State Constitutions, unless the State separation of powers article has been amended such as Oregon has:

1) The [powers of the government shall be divided in to

three separate departments],-the legislative, the executive,

including the administrative, and the judicial; and [no person

charged with official duties under one of these departments

shall exercise any of the functions of another], except as

in this constitution expressly provided. [emphasis added]

The Original Article III of Oregon’s separation of Powers Article is simple and to the point. Any amending would only serve to destroy the original intent of the separation of powers. As a change of Venue came in with the 14^th Amendments due process, Article III of Oregon’s Constitution had to be amended to bring it within this new Venue. Let me show you the words in the amended Article III that bring this article into compliance with the change of Venue.

2) Budgetary control over executive and administrative officers and agencies. [The Legislative Assembly shall have power to establish an agency to exercise budgetary control over all executive and administrative state officers, departments, boards, commissions and agencies of the State Government].

appropriations and to authorize expenditures beyond budgetary

limits. (1) The Legislative Assembly is authorized to establish

[by law] a joint committee composed of members of both houses

of the Legislative Assembly, the membership to be fixed [by

law], which committee may exercise, during the interim between sessions of the Legislative Assembly, such of the following powers as may be conferred upon it [by law]:

agency, out of any [emergency] fund that may be appropriated to

the committee for that purpose, additional funds beyond the

amount appropriated to the agency by the Legislative Assembly, or funds to carry on an activity [required by law] for which an appropriation was made.

(b) Where an [emergency] exists, to authorize any state agency to expend, from funds dedicated or purposes of the budget of the agency as approved [in accordance with law].

such a time as to preclude the possibility of submitting a

budget to the Legislative Assembly for approval, to approve,

or revise and approve, a budget of the money appropriated for such new activity.

(d) Where an [emergency] exists, to revise or amend the

budgets of state agencies to the extent of authorizing trans-

fers between expenditure classifications within the budget of an agency.

(2) The Legislative Assembly shall prescribe [by law] what shall constitute an [emergency] for the purposes of this section.

ed or appointed officer, board, commission, department,

institution, branch or other agency of the state government.

(4) The term of members of the joint committee estab-

lished pursuant to this section shall run from the adjournment

of one regular session to the organization of the next regular

session. No member of a committee shall cease to be such member solely by reason of the expiration of his term of office as a member of the Legislative Assembly. [emphasis added]

Notice the word "Emergency"!!!!! The word emergency is the code word for legislation under the States Military jurisdiction. All the State legislatures have to declare is there is an emergency and they can violate the separation of powers and pass statutes [laws] under the Military powers of the State.

I have checked Oregon statutes and found just about all of the statutes sense 1921 are declared an emergency.

ADOPTED BY THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE THIRTY-FIRST LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY beginning December 19 and ending December 24, 1921", Compiled by Sam A. Kozer, Secretary of State and here-after referred to as Oregon General Laws, Special Session, 1921.

In this single special session of the Oregon legislature, numer-

ous acts were passed with immediate effectiveness with the

declaration of an "Emergency." Almost every enactment of the

foregoing special session is concluded with the words "... an

emergency is hereby declared to exist..." Chapters 8, 9, 10,

and 20 of the Oregon General Laws, Special Session, 1921,

which relate to highways, motorized conveyances, and the

agencies concerned therewith, all contain clauses declaring "an emergency" consistent with the federal scheme to implement powers of martial law origin.

Sixty-Eighth Legislative Assembly at its Regular Session begin-

ning January 9 and ending June 10, and at its Special Session

beginning July 28 and ending August 4 1995, Volume 2 of two

Volumes

"SECTION 150. Sections 1 to 128 of this Act and any amendments to and repeals of Oregon Revised Statutes contain therein become operative January 15, 1998."

"SECTION 151. This Act being necessary for immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, an [emergency] is declared to exist, and this Act takes effect on its passage.

The District Court of Oregon is the court created "by law" the Court vested with the federal limited judicial power. But this emergency statute says the legislature is abolishing this court? Have we won?!?!? Has the legislature come to their Constitutional senses? No, the legislature is merely abolishing the District Court as the Circuit Court is no longer a Constitutional Court and the legislature sees no reason to have two courts vested with the same venue and jurisdiction:

"agencies concerned therewith, all contain clauses declaring

["an emergency"] consistent with the federal scheme to imple-

ment powers of martial law origin.

All the State legislatures have been doing is "by law", bringing the States into compliance with the due process of the 14^th Amendment and committing Corruption of Blood against the White Citizens of their State. Of course Satan’s children and other non-whites excluded. [Corruption of Blood means Treason against your Nation] [Race]

"NATION -- 1. A body of people inhabiting the same coun-

try, or united under the same sovereign or government;---.

Nation, as its etymology imports, originally denoted a family or

race of men,---." An American Dictionary of the English

Language, Title: Nation, Noah Webster, (1828), reprinted by

Foundation for American Christian Education (1967).

To prove that the several States are being governed under a Military jurisdiction is easy. Look to the structure of the State and you can see the Military venue. But, then you have to know what the structure of a State or Country under a military venue looks like.

As far as I can see, the structure of a Country or State under a Military Power are all structured the same.

Provisional states divide themselves into state regional areas, just like the national government does. The lawyers in the State are first to see this structure and act to comply with the new Military venue:

"(1) The Oregon State Bar shall be governed by a board of governors consisting of 15 members. Twelve of the members shall be active members of the Oregon State Bar, who on appointment, on nomination, on election and during the full term for which the member was appointed or elected, maintain the principle office of law practice in the [region] of this state in which the active members of the Oregon State Bar eligible to vote in the election at which the member was elected maintain their principal offices. Three of the members shall be appointed by the board of governors from among the public. They shall be residents of this state and shall not be active or inactive members of the Oregon State Bar.

"(2) For the purpose of eligibility for nomination and to vote in the election of a member of the board of governors who is an elective member, and for appointment to the board of governors, the State of Oregon is divided into six [regions], constituted as follows:

(a) [Region] One - Baker, Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam,

Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jefferson, Klamath, Lake, Malheur,

Morrow, Sherman, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco and Wheeler

Counties.

Josephine Counties.

(d) [Region] Four - Benton, Clatsop, Columbia, Lincoln, Polk, Tillamook, Washington and Yamhill Counties.

ties." O.R.S. 9.025 (1)(2), Vol. 1-76.

"Members shall vote in and be eligible, for nomination and election to the board of governors from the [region] in which they maintain their principal offices." O.R.S. 9.030, Vol. 1-76. [emphasis added]

Provisional states develop regional areas to take over various duties of the County and City governments:

"334.010 Education service districts. There is created in each [region] a district to be known as the education service district to consist of the counties and the area of the common school districts as listed in ORS 334.020, with a governing body thereof to be known as the education service district board." <Amended by 1961 c.153 s1; subsections (3) and (4) enacted as 1961 c.153 s2; 1963 c.544 s29; 1965 c.100 s170; 1977 c.481 s 1;

1993 c.784 s2>

334.020 Composition of education service districts. (1) On and after the effective date of the order entered under section 25, chapter 784, Oregon Laws 1993, except as the boundaries of an education service district may be changed by merger under ORS 334.710 to 334.770 or other provision of law, the education service districts are as follows:

(a) [Region] 1. Clatsop, Columbia, Tillamook and Washington Counties.

(b) [Region] 2. Multnomah County.

© [Region] 3. Marion and Polk Counties.

(d) [Region] 4. Lincoln, Linn and Benton Counties.

(e) [Region] 5. Lane County.

(f) [Region] 6. Douglas County.

(g) [Region] 7. Coos and Curry Counties and the area lying within the Reedsport School District.

(h) [Region] 8. Jackson, Josephine and Klamath Counties.

(i) [Region] 9. Hood River and Wasco Counties.

(j) [Region] 10. Crook and Deschutes Counties.

(k) [Region] 11. Lake County.

(l) [Region] 12. Umatilla and Morrow Counties.

(m) [Region] 13. Union and Baker Counties.

(n) [Region] 14. Malheur County and the area comprising the Huntington School District.

(o) [Region] 15. Clackamas County.

(p) [Region] 16. Yamhill County.

(q) [Region] 17. Harney County.

® [Region] 18. Wallowa County.

(s) [Region] 19. Sherman, Gilliam and Wheeler Counties.

(t) [Region] 20. Grant County.

(u) [Region] 21. Jefferson County and the area comprising the Warm Springs Reservation.

(2) Where a boundary change or formation of a component school district results in a joint school district, the joint school district shall be included in the education service district in which the joint district’s administrative office is located." (Amended by 1957 c.678 s2; 1963 c.544 s30; 1965 c.100 s171; 1975 c.770 s39; 1993 c.784 s3; 1995 c.611 s6). [emphasis added]

Once the entire State is divided into military venues [Regional Areas], the State, County and City police are converted "by law" [statutes] into the Military Police of the provisional state.

One example of restructuring by the State Legislators was the conversion of the Sheriff department and City Police departments into a central State police force controlled by them, the State Legislators. The State legislators first formed (by statute) a State police force. If you examine the State police, you will find that they have lieutenants, captains, sergeants, and even quartermasters (all military designations). They even regulate themselves by military time.

Or, in other words, the State police agencies are a paramilitary organization. But, the State police are not the State militia, nor are the State police authorized by the Oregon State Constitution.

If all this is true, the question is, how are the State police authorized? The State police were given a State regional area within the State, to enforce the legislation of the State legislators which, allowed the State police to violate the common-law jurisdictions of the counties and cities.

The State legislators became as busy as Congress, passing statu-

tory law after statutory law governing the Citizens resid-

ing in their State. Of course, all of the law enacted by the

State legislators must follow the guidelines set by Congress as

laws within the venue of federal martial rule. But, of

course, it is not the State martial law, but the federal mar-

tial rule the State legislators conform to.

The State authorities never informed the White Citizens of this new venue. The confusion of the White people as to what has happen is understandable. When the authorities of the States joined the conspiracy to overthrow their own common-law republics, the public are the last to figure it out.

Once, the conspirators gained the ability to create a State

police force, they conspired to alter the Sheriff’s Depart-

ments and City Police departments and included them in their

scheme to form one centralized State police force regulating

federal martial rule.

municipal policeman, member of the Oregon State Police or inves-

tigator of the Criminal Justice Division of the Department of

Justice and such other persons as may be designated by law."

O.R.S. Section 161.015(5), General Definitions, Crimes and

Punishment, 1985.

"’Police officer’ includes a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff or deputy sheriff and a city policeman." O.R.S. Section 153.500(7), Traffic Infractions, Definitions, 1985.

"’Peace officer’ includes a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff or deputy sheriff and a city policeman." O.R.S. Section 488.005(5), Boating offense definitions, 1985.

These State statutes combine the Sheriff and City police and make them the same as State police under the term "Peace officer." When a County Sheriff or City Police write you a citation for violation of a State statute (law), what is really happening is, the Sheriff or City policeman is acting as a "peace officer," and he is enforcing, in reality, laws enacted by the State under the military venue of federal martial rule.

What this means is your local State police, (Sheriff and City police) now are quasi-federal officers administering federal martial rule. Also notice, that the Sheriff, his Deputies, and some City Police, now wear on their uniforms a patch made up of the United States Flag bordered with yellow fringe. This signifies they are quasi-federal officers.

If you don’t think this is true in your State, I offer you an example from Idaho. Idaho’s statute (law) 67-2902.

persons deputized by him as state policemen are peace officers

authorized to exercise within any county the same powers as

the sheriff thereof." I.C. Section 67-2902, Director and

deputies - Powers of police officers.

In the provisional state of Washington:

R.C.W.9A.04.110(15) "Peace officer" means a duly appointed city, county, or state law enforcement officer.

ized by law] to execute criminal process or to make arrests

for [violation of the statutes generally or of any particular

statute or statutes relative to the highways of this state].

(emphasis added)

Once the Republican form of government is overshadowed by the structure of a Military Venue [state regional areas], a peace officer can exercise military authority any where there is a Region. This is why a Sheriff or City Policeman can exercise authority out side of his elected County or City (venues) limits today.

Recently, a reader of Behold Newsletter had seen the April 1998 seminar video I made on the Military structure and went to his County Sheriff and asked if it was true he and his deputies were peace officers. The Sheriff told him his deputies were only County Deputies until they completed a one year training course to become peace officers. The Sheriff also said if the new deputies did not pass the course they were fired.

The police are always referring to us as Civilians! If we are Civilians, what are the police???

One problem the fed’s and the State legislatures had was the Birthright Citizens could not be governed under the 14^th Amendment. Here, the children of Satan devised a scheme to include them also. The laws of the new criminal jurisdiction are written to apply to artificial entities i.e. "Persons/Individuals".

The Social Security Act accomplish the acceptance of the Citizens on the Federal level to accept the entity of an artificial person/individual and this artificial entity is also accepted by the statutes of the States to enforce their new criminal jurisdiction.