Conditional Feedback Information Theory:
A Deconstruction
(CFIT)
One who conforms to a collective construct of reality and not
questions it
is simply satisfied with invisible spirits
and their perceptions are boarded
inside the ethos of their time.
 |
By Jason S. Page
First written document on CFIT: April 2002 (developing).
All material on this page is Copyright by
Jason Page 1998 through 2003.
|
Double, Richard. the Non-Reality of Free Will. Oxford.: 1991. Elizabeth and Robert Bjork ed. Memory: Handbook of Perception and Cognition. U of CA.: 1996. Laird, Johnson. The Computer and the Mind. Harvard U.P.: 1988. Schopenhauer, Arthur. Essay on the Freedom of the Will. Bobbs-Merrill Trans.: 1978. See Sec: Predecessors. Points to Spinoza pg 77. qtd. "...will...needs cause...determind to action..."Wallach, Hans. On Perception. Quadrangle NY.: 1976. White, John ed. Frontiers of Consciousness. Julian Press.:
1974.
|
| If you would like to suggest a book for my research, please drop
me an email.
Thank you. |
from the University of Arizona |
|
Visit the Chalk Board where ideas are being formulated ! |
|
|
| I. Introduction
Reality? That question has since the dawn of insight reappeared in many eras in written history1. The approach of answering has been in most instances from the collective conscious of the observer2. However the key role that plays into reality is our perception of it. Therefor, to analyze realty we must analyze how we perceive reality. Perception makes an impression in our ability to react. All objects, cognitive or not, posses this quality we call perception. From the theory presented henceforth, a mathematical construct can be made to analyze and predict the unknown variables in any dynamic and intelligent dynamic system free from the recurrent feedback of the Heisenberg principle or other parallel conundrum. Psychology or Physics?
It depends how the models and concepts are used whether it pertains to one field of science or another. There is no intention in writing this to limit the scope of this theory. This theory should belong to no specific category of pursuit other than the mother of all human collective knowledge, Philosophy. CFIT is as much the study of the mind as it is the study of things before the perception of the mind. Both the nature of the operations of mental processing and the nature of object processing are treated equally without a pun.1 From Aristotle to Darwin and Descartes. 2 Descartes is noted for questioning "How do we know we know?" His followers have since approached philosophy with constant doubt of our perception of reality. |
|
Preface |
|||
|
Axioms |
|||
|
Possibilities |
|||
|
Constructions |
|||
|
Experiments:
|
|||
|
Conclusions |
|||
|
Afterthoughts |
|||
|
Properties of Perception in accordence with CFIT |
|||
|
Learning Systems for cognition and perception |
|||
|
|
|||
| Defunct Archive | |||
| CFIT can cause some Irreversibility. This is not by any term of the word a bad thing. It simply means you will learn something that may have a permanent affect on how you perceive your world. This change in perception can be stomached easily. Do not think on the same plane of the concepts; think on a plane different than what the concepts will confine or allow. These concepts should have nothing more than a minuscule effect on your normal behavior, lifestyle, and attitude toward life. Unless you exhibit an Ignorant or a Vacuum function for this following intake, the information theory that follows will have some effect that is inevitable. That effect will feedback into the system of your perception. The effect that information theory has on you should be Conditional or Equal. If nothing that you just read turns out true when you finish reading, then I improperly conveyed the information which follows. With that said, it is important to understand what you, the observer, has to do with information theory. | More about the information
functions Ignorant, Vacuum,
Conditional, etc., are
defined in Chapter III: Axioms.
It has been touted discredit to information
theory when the theory creator is considered in the equation. How can a
creator of information theory have a valid theory when all it can know
is the result of what goes on in the mind in response to what it receives
as its external environment?
Well, it is at least given that the theory is only valid as long as it works in the confinements of our perception. |
The question has a similar parallel. Can a ruler measure something smaller than its unit? Of course not with precision. The ruler could only say, 'it is less than what I measure' with confidants. Likewise it is to say 'I cannot predict the position of a quark and its momentum at a single instant' or that 'I cannot always expect a gain on a day trade.' Unlike the weather, which is less in affect by our daily activities, the observation of objects effected by our detection and the change in a stock effected by our buying and selling are in correlation to the pattern of our detection or action on our perception. This correlation that paddles all aspects of life is an integral process for perpetual existence and non randomness, that being feedback. |
|
With an abundance of data, may it be a collection of quarks or a sheet list of day to day stock changes, under similar circumstances with respect to the data, the ruler can measure a known quantity of that thing smaller than it's unit and of somewhat equal measure can the ruler measure the sum of the heights and return a value then to be divided by the quantity. But this method is only persistent for a short time since the mechanism involved in the feedback is constantly changing and sometimes evolving to something new or the mechanism is becoming extinct. ... |
Clarity 2002 |
| Information are processes. Processes are controlled by processors.
Processors are a casual assimilation of processes. Thereby processes that
are controlled by themselves results in feedback. The feedback is the processor
and the information is the process.
The following is a categorization of the processor's behavior or
the different types of feedback that can occur in an information study.
|
The Feed 1999 |
Law 2001 |
Metal and Flesh 2001 |
| Reoccurring questions surround realms of conscious and unconscious
activity especially when differences between life and matter are to be
examined. The question that would bare all answers is what is this activity?
Conscious and unconscious states are composed of many processors. Do these processors have dependencies? To ask we might want to ask what processors are required to sustain the conscious and unconscious states. What is accepted conjecture about the process of the processors is that no central clock commands these processes. Rather it appears that these processors operate on the condition they receive input from another process. VI.1 This appearance is present in the examination of information flow in the universal: Simply our algoryth is causal and not formulate. This is argued, however, that our perceptive tools being an artifact of this algoryth, we cannot examine what might be a central clock without having immeasurable effects to our sample. Therefor, we cannot prove that our algoryth is formulative nor can we disprove that our algorith is causal. However, for the sake of our perceptive tools, our algorith is causal for most endeavors. |
|
VI.1 Laird, Johnson. The Computer and the Mind. Harvard Press.: 1988. pg. 354-355. |
|
In infinity full is no better than empty. Nothingness is both empty and full. As well might ye say anything else of nothingness, as for instance, white is it, or black, or again, it is not, or it is. A thing that is infinite and eternal hath no qualities, since it hath all qualities... - Carl Jung, THE SEVEN SERMONS TO THE DEAD 1916. |
These articles of writting do not relate specifically to CFIT. Therefor I have created a sort of junk yard for these tangent pieces of writting.
|
Introspect: A Means of Life Someone seems to have a large latitude of music appreciation; one who listens from heavy metal to classical and the more traditional forms of orchestra. I find the louder forms of music distracting, but have found the medium of that large latitude of yours most satisfying. My latitude for music is multidimensional. I listen to classical and take from it an interest in what the more modern Western music takes from it: the motifs, the passages, the montage, articulation, rhythmic changes, and the coda are fundamental dimensions that I consider when listening to or performing music. My greatest appreciation comes from music that has a never ending formulation, where each passage can be an intregal of the whole, but the whole could never be defined by the sum of the passages presented.
|
Such composers of this nature include Edgar Varese and John Cage
in the classical spectrum and some of King Crimson, Brian Eno, and orchestrated
Frank Zappa in the 'rock n' roll' spectrum. But I wouldn't describe the
music as rock n' roll. I do not know there is a category. Robert Fripp
created his own category called landscapes which both Brian Eno and Peter
Gaberial have shared common interest. Currently Eno does the composition
and performing for U2. Robert Fripp is still with the band King Crimson
from its conception in 1969. Members of the Police and Genesis have shared
roles in King Crimson. In fact, as of this writing, Bill Bruford is still
an active drummer with King Crimson.
Edgar Varese has been quoted that he is not a composer of a completed
piece. The listener completes the piece.
|
I consider the same respects to all other aspects of life. From enjoying food to cooking; learning and teaching; being dependent to being independent; observing art and making art; watching films and making films; that all aspects of life, in order to have appreciation for the object or subject, one must play a role in that object or subject. The means of life should offer complete contentment and offer fulfillment later on. |
The Music of Jason Page
Collection copyright 1999~2004.
| A |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Section ALandscapes |
Tickle Bell Pepper Splat!
Nickle on a Dime Peace for forgiveness Never set eyes the other way |
Descriptions | ||||||||
Section BVariants |
Inside a Box
Changes for me |
Descriptions |
 |
 |
 |
 |
