Mr. David Bast never answered my letters that he requested. It occurred to me afterward that he never intended to respond to the letters due to the fact that he never thought I would sit down and produce the letters giving him that courtesy and respect.
* Or, that he just wanted to pile on me more responsibilies that would further frustrate and debilitate my efforts to get caught up especially financially! This negativism was par for the course with respect to Mr. Bast's overall attitude toward me for the most part of the approximately four and a half years that I resided at this residence.
Mr. Roy Bynum, the then Executive Director, followed the same course and did not question Mr. Bast's judgement and relied totally on Mr. Jim Holman's legal positioning.
I sent letters to Mr. J. Allen Fry who was Chairman of the Board of Directors at that time and had a phone call with him and was promised that the letters would be presented to the full board for further consideration and reconsideration and that was never carried out. Just a few members of the Board of Directors were in on this action and that was dominated by Jim Holman. Yes, the same Jim Holman who, in February of 1999, saw to it that I was evicted out of the Vantelligen residence of which I resided at after he saw to it that I was evicted from the Naperville YMCA in May of 1994!
* It is also very interesting to note that when I was evicted from my room at the Naperville YMCA the Dupage County Sheriff completely disassembled my room almost identically as did the Dupage County Sheriff did at the Vantelligen residence with the exception of the officers sitting in their cars playing solitaire on their police computers!
This complete disassembly of my room was in essence the going through my boxes, files and the like which would comprise a search without a warrant as was done at the Vantelligen residence! This was not just a mere moving of containers and file drawers and cabinets! This was the beginning of formal official visit misconduct effecting an invasion of my and third party privacy! These people were trying to get anything on me that they could! They did not find anything though because there was nothing there of which they could have legally been interested.
I had made my case clear to Mr. Bast and Mr. Bynum as well as Mr. J. Allen Fry and it fell on deaf ears! Mr. Holman claimed, after he forced the issue to a court hearing, that he did not know of my offers!
* It is clear that these men had an agenda. It is clear that if I challenged any wrong doing by YMCA employees that I was considered out of line and that same qualified me for expulsion! No apologies were ever extended to me for the improper handling of my mails. An air that their employees could do no wrong prevailed,(or at least that is what they wanted me to believe)!
It is clear that if they admitted improper handling of my mails that they knew that they could be in trouble with the FBI and me. My tenure at the YMCA was put in jeopardy because I exerted my right to file my complaint with those involved, doing so properly, not because my rent, which was prior arranged and in good faith, was in arrears!
It is clear to me that at the Naperville YMCA it was alright for them to interfere with my business, a business of which its purpose was designed to pay my bills, and then claim that I was not paying my bills to them! They had and have a credibility problem.
This agenda is a method of operation that is similar to the agenda that was executed by the Dupage County States Attorney and the Court mentioned elsewhere in this site and as follows:
When I attempted to get an evidence receipt for the tape recordings I wanted the States Attorney to evaluate, before they proceeded to prosecution, so to determine if a Nolle Prosequi was in order I was denied and told that they do not Nolle Prosequi cases in Dupage County!
When I fired Public Defender Mr. Ron Fraley for his apparent dishonesty the State saw to it that my rights to a Public Defender were eliminated. They reduced my penalty to non-jailable yet went along with the Judge when she jailed me for approximately 27 days for being late to court due to prior noticed financial and emergency circumstances making me tardy. And in spite of around 20 or 25 good faith appearances in my case, at that point, the Judge claimed that she feared I would not show up for trial!
When the States Attorney made a copy of the evidence tape recording which resulted in a substandard quality tape for use by the jury which was clearly unintelligible compared to the specially enhanced original tape I provided instead of the court allowing an enhanced copy I had available!
When the States Attorney suppressed the tape recorded evidence that the jury requested to hear at their behest in the jury room, they limited it to two hearings in the courtroom thus preventing their proper and close scrutiny of an approximate 4 minute tape that took me a minimum of six hours to hear, understand and transcribe properly!
And similarly when I was focused on and harassed in the Dupage County Jail by other "inmates". I was removed from the pod I was in and put in a new pod where there were a new set of harassments existed which included an immediate interview with a psychiatrist who wanted to put me on psychotropic drugs because I "seemed agitated" rather than just removing the "inmate" that was causing the problem and letting me continue non-agitated in the original pod without the harassment!
Is there a connection here?
These folks did not want to know the facts and did not want to deal with the facts properly! Simply put they wanted to treat the symptom and not the cause and the cause was them!
* These folks did not want others to know about their actions or inactions nor those who participated. To solidify their black out of information someone instigated and brought a motion before the Dupage County Circuit Court requesting a paperwork reduction rule to be applied to the YMCA eviction court file. (If you get a chance take a look at the court file and see how "voluminous" it is even when you insert the letters!)
The motion was moved on ex parte due to the fact that I never knew about the motion until months after it was effected! What in fact happened is that the letters you are reading here were removed under the guise of excess paperwork in the court file so to protect themselves from being scrutinized!
In response I have ordered that the motion is now overruled! I have provided that they appear here so that almost anyone who wishes to view them can!
THIS PAGE LAST UPDATED 11-09-2000