I LEFT A NOTE UNDER THE DOOR MAT OF VARSITY CALENDARS THAT
MS. DORTA LATER FOUND AND READ. IT SAID IN ESSENCE: WE
HAVE A PROBLEM AND WE NEED TO TALK!
PHONE CALLS TRANSPIRED BOTH WAYS. I TAPE RECORDED SAME
WITH NOTICE TO MS. DORTA. SAME TRANSCRIPTS WILL APPEAR
IN THIS WEB PAGE IN THE FUTURE. SAME TAPES WILL ALSO
LIKELY BE HEARD ON THIS WEB PAGE IN THE FUTURE IN SOUND
APPLETS.
THE ESSENCE OF THE CONVERSATIONS WAS OF MY COMPLAINT AND
MS. DORTA'S TRYING TO SELL ME ON OTHER LESS EFFECTIVE
ADVERTISEMENTS IN AREAS THAT WERE NOT AS GOOD COVERAGE
AS THE ORIGINAL ORDER. MS. DORTA REACTED VERY DEFENSIVELY
AND INSTIGATIVELY SIMILARLY AS NOTED IN THE TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED
HERE THUS FAR. EVENTUALLY SHE AGREED TO LET ME COME UP
TO HER BUSINESS AND PICK UP A REFUND AS I WAS NOT SATISFIED
WITH HER WORK NOR PUNCTUALITY OF PRODUCTION. THE FALL OUT
IS NOTED IN THE TRANSCRIPT PRESENTLY.
I WAS TRIED AND CONVICTED WITH A JURY THAT OBVIOUSLY DID
NOT LISTEN TO THE TESTIMONY AND THE TAPES PRESENTED TO THEM.
AS STATED ELSEWHERE IN THESE WEB PAGES, MS. DORTA STATED
THAT THE DOOR OF THE BUSINESS WAS OPEN AND I JUST WALKED IN.
SHE FURTHER STATED THAT SHE WAS ON THE PHONE IN HER OFFICE AT
THE BACK WHEN I WALKED IN AND THAT SHE ORDERED ME TO LEAVE AND
THAT I REFUSED. SHE FURTHER STATED THAT SHE ASKED ME TO LEAVE
HER BUSINESS EIGHT, (8), TIMES. THE TAPE SHOWS FOUR TIMES. THE
POLICE REPORT SAYS FIVE TIMES. OFFICER BUDIG STATED THAT
WHEN HE CAME IN HE STOOD BEHIND ME AND WARNED ME TO LEAVE
VERBALLY AND SAID THAT I REFUSED. THE TAPE SHOWS HIM SIMPLY
GRABBING ME AND "YOU'RE OUT OF HERE"! HE SAID I WAS STANDING
BUT IN FACT I WAS SITTING. HE INDICATED I WAS SITTING IN THE STORE
AS RECORDED ON THE TAPE OF ISSUE AND SAME WAS DISCUSSED WHILE IN
THE SQUAD CAR. HE DELIBERATELY
MISREPRESENTED THE FACTS TO COVER UP A FALSE ARREST AND
COLLUSION CONSPIRED TO BY, IN MY OPINION, MORE THAN JUST
A BUSINESSWOMAN AND A POLICE OFFICER BUT BY POLITICOS AND
EVEN JUDGES. SAME WAS DONE TO DESTROY MY PERSONA IN THE COMMUNITY AS
WELL AS MY HERITAGE AS REPRESENTED IN MY PERSONAL PROPERTY THAT MAY
HAVE BEEN DESTROYED BUT FOR SURE OF WHICH MY PRIVACY HAS BEEN INVADED AS
WELL AS JUST PLAIN KICKING ME OUT OF THE BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY
SO TO ERADICATE ANY PUBLIC SENSE OF STABILITY AND RELIABILITY IN MYSELF!
AS JUDGE MOY SAID: HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT P.A.D.S.! (THE HOMELESS SHELTER
PROGRAM IN DUPAGE COUNTY).
PROFESSIONALISM ON THE PART OF MS. DORTA WAS NONEXISTENT NOT TO
MENTION THE FACT THAT SHE IS SOME YEARS MY JUNIOR! SHE MOCKED ME
AND WAS OVER CONFIDENT IN EXACTING HER LIES ABOUT MYSELF. SHE HAS
TO THIS DATE, (11-5-99), NOT PAID ME A CENT IN REFUND OR OFFERED TO
DO SO. SHE HAS EFFECTED MY UTTER DEMISE FINANCIALLY, SOCIALLY, HEALTH WISE,
AND BUSINESS WISE WITH A MALICIOUS ALLEGATION! SHE MAY ALSO BE INVOLVED IN
THE UNRAVELING OF MY STORAGE PROPERTY SECURITY AND POSSESSION. SHE
CERTAINLY HAS BEEN INVOLVED INDIRECTLY AS PRIOR NOTED!
PLEASE NOTE THE REPETITIVE COMMENTS OR FRAGMENTS OF COMMENTS THAT ARE
PRESENT THROUGHOUT THE TRANSCRIPT ARE DUE TO THE HIGH PRESSURE MS.
DORTA KEPT ON ME WHILE I WAS IN HER BUSINESS. IT WAS DIFFICULT FOR
ME TO GET A WORD IN "EDGEWISE". THUS YOU WILL NOTE THE HALTING AND
REPETITIVE WORDS FREQUENTLY. YOU WILL NOTE A SIMILAR CHARACTERISTIC
IN THE PHONE CALLS, YET TO BE PROVIDED, THAT TRANSPIRED PRIOR TO THE
TRANSCRIPT PROVIDED THUS FAR. (11-6-99).
IT WAS VERY CLEAR TO ME THAT MS. DORTA WAS TRYING VERY DESPERATELY TO
MAKE A SCENE IN FRONT OF HER OFFICE WORKERS AS WELL AS
OFFICER BUDIG WHEN HE ARRIVED. (11-6-99).
AS NOTED IN THESE WEB PAGES AND IN THE COURT FILES NOTED LIKEWISE,
I WAS DELIBERATELY DECIMATED IN JUST ABOUT EVERY WAY A PERSON
COULD BE. THE STATES ATTORNEY HAD AN UNUSUAL BIAS TO BELIEVE
MS. DORTA AND BASICALLY REFUSED TO HEAR THE TAPES AND CONSIDER
A NOLLE PROSEQUI. IN FACT I WAS LIED TO BY ONE OF THE STATES ATTORNEYS
WHO SAID THAT THEY NEVER NOLLE PROSEQUI A CASE, YET I PERSONALLY SAT IN
ON A CASE PRIOR TO MY CASE IN WHICH THEY HAD AND SAME WAS A CRIMINAL
TRESPASS CASE AND NOTABLY THE JUDGE IN THAT CASE WAS THE
TRIAL JUDGE IN MY CASE AND FOR SOME STRANGE REASON SHE DID NOT
WANT ME TO BE IN THAT COURT ROOM FOR THE PRIOR CASE I HAD RANDOMLY
TOOK INTEREST. NOTABLY ALSO THE SAME STATES ATTORNEY WAS
INVOLVED IN SAME CASE! THERE HAS BEEN A NOTABLE DRIVE BY THE
STATES ATTORNEY IN DUPAGE COUNTY TO ACHIEVE A HIGH LEVEL
OF CONVICTIONS WITHOUT AN EQUALLY ZEALOUSNESS FOR DERIVING
THE TRUTH OR FALLACY OF THE ISSUES PRESENTED TO THE COURT.
AS I STATED IN COURT DOCUMENTS THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM
SEEMS TO BE MORE OF A PUPPET LIKE THE FORMER SOVIET UNION AND
ROMANIA HAD: ONE OF PERFUNCTORY JUSTICE: STRAIGHT TO
SIBERIA OR THE MENTAL INSTITUTION! I HAVE COMPARED NOTES
WITH OTHER FINANCIALLY DEVASTATED PEOPLE AND IT IS NOTED
THAT THERE IS A STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE TO AUTOMATICALLY
QUESTION THE MENTAL STABILITY OF ANYONE WHO SHOWS RESISTANCE
TO A GUILTY UNTIL INNOCENT MENTALITY OF THE SYSTEM: ESPECIALLY
IF YOU CANNOT GET AN ATTORNEY WHO IS TRUST WORTHY AND DOES
NOT LIE AND RESULTANTLY ONE HAS TO REPRESENT HIMSELF. A MORE DEFINITIVE BREAK
DOWN OF EVENTS IS FORTH COMING ON THESE ISSUES. STAY
TUNED!
STATE OF ILLINOIS.......)
........................................)...SS:
COUNTY OF DU PAGE..)
TAPE RECORDED IN A CONTIGUOUS AND NON EDITED FORMAT IN THE NORMAL
COURSE OF BUSINESS AT THE MEETING OF PENNY R. DORTA AND SCOTT M.
HUBER ON JUNE 23, 1997 ON OR ABOUT 15:19 THROUGH 15:24 ARE FAITHFULLY
REPRODUCED IN WRITING IN THE FOREGOING TRANSCRIPT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY AND EQUIPMENT ABILITY.
SCOTT M. HUBER
SITE SELECTIONS:
smail@dr.com
E-MAIL ME NOW! ...
NAPERVILLE, ILLINOIS 60540

LOOK UNDER THE "HOOD" AT OUR NEW SEARCH ENGINES
CLICK ON THE ICON!
YOUR OPINION HELPS ...E-MAIL ME AT:
* Regarding all the pages in this web site:
Friends,(thisEXCLUDES Ms.Penny Dorta, "The Man", other similar unfriendly parties including those noted in this web site and their relatives or agents), please feel free to make copies for your personal use! Your notification of copying would be appreciated and any donations to further my research, investigations and business recovery if possible! If use for educational purposes is desired a notification by the parties and/or institution is requested with a copy and synopsis of its application and date(s) intended for use! If used under the fair use doctrine by the media, personal notification of use is requested with a copy and synopsis of its application and date(s) intended for use! Any commercial and unfriendly use is subject to full copyright enforcement! Email: smail@dr.com