Due to needing repairs on my bicycle I was up at approximately 3:45 AM and completed spoke replacement and truing work on the rear wheel at approximately 4:30 AM. I went to the gas station to repair my tire in addition to the spoke job* completed just prior. I discovered that the nozzle was broken from the inner tube and there was no way to replace the tube at 4:40 AM.
I had yet needed to finish drawing up my motions so I walked to get to the copy shop.
I also planned on walking to the courthouse about seven to eight miles away in addition to the mile or so to the copy shop. I* arrived at the copy shop about 5:10 AM and did not finish my work until about 8:15 AM. I planned on it taking me about two and a half to three hours to walk to the courthouse a distance of almost eight miles. I figured if I left the copy shop at around 6:00 AM I would make it to court on time.
Problems with availability of printer drivers and white out correction fluid that bleeds and the like were among the unexpected problems creating delay. The final straw was that I suddenly became aware that it was raining outside, it was 8:20 AM, and I had to be at court at 8:30 AM. I evaluated my cash and called the cab. I figured it would take an hour for* a cab to come but a miracle occurred and prayer was answered and the dispatcher's estimate of ten to twenty minutes was right. The driver arrived in just under twenty minutes.
I arrived at the county court complex at approximately 9:13 AM after bumping into traffic jam after traffic jam including the road leading up to the courthouse door. I arrived in the courtroom at approximately 9:45 AM after three times I had attempted to get through the search and metal detectors as you enter the courthouse. I had some miscellany in my pockets that they would not allow. Of all things, they would not allow a pad lock. I had to get to the end of the line after waiting once through the lines. They would not let me pitch the lock and the like in the trash bucket at the end of the table.
I then got back in line and got a third of the way through when I recalled another lock that the deputies did not detect that was buried in my bag. I again stepped out of line and disposed of it back at my bike.
Finally, I got back in line and went through on the third try. So it took me just over a half hour just to get into the courthouse much less the courtroom.
I got to the right courtroom, 4010, this time and the Naperville attorney was not there. Mind you, this was an hour and fifteen minutes after I was supposed to be there.
Of course, I was apprehensive of another Bench Warrant for my arrest after the despicable conduct of Mr. Francis Cuneo and his subordinate not blocking the arrest similarly instigated a week prior. I will relate the particulars of those events soon!
Fortunately Judge Burke had a similar experience of delay getting into the courthouse and that apparently opened the door for leniency and not issuing another Bench Warrant.
Finally when Naperville's attorney arrived, approximately an hour to an hour and a half later the court called my case.
The motion also asked for the order of Judge Burke to be stricken and an assignment to a proper judge who had no conflict of interest. It was Judge Burke who refused to lower my bail on or about November 5 or 6, 1998 when I was kept in jail on a non-jailable offense for almost twenty-seven days.
There was more to the motion but for lack of the motion being handy at the moment this is the gist of the argument. I, in short, let the Judge know what "time" it was due to his prior errant determination in 1998 and that his* exparte ruling on my motion to change venue from Dupage County was similarly errant. It was Deja Vu 1998 all over again. The order that I got from Naperville on Tuesday, 10-22-02 stated that my motion for change of venue was denied because I did not appear and note my so called non-appearance was due to similar interferences as I had experienced in getting to the present hearing excepting I got to the correct courtroom* this last time.
Deja Vu 1998 was the word for this last Tuesday, 10-29-02 also. The judge let me present a verbal representation of my motion and then Naperville responded. She took a cheap shot suggesting that I feel everyone is out to get me. I responded by requesting rebuttal and surprisingly the judge let me respond.
I specifically addressed the "everyone out to get me" type allegation and then hit the others which at this moment I will not discuss for lack of time.
Deja Vu, the Judge decided against my motions and my presentation of Judge Dwyer’s purpose for Judge Burke having anything to do with the hearings. That purpose was only to reassign the hearings to another judge, as I understood it. Nonetheless, he heard the motion exparte on October 22, 2002 and then heard my motion October 29, 2002. He suggested that I participated. I said I had to have him hear my motion since he ruled exparte on October 22, 2002. I had no choice but nonetheless I was there on special and limited appearance and that was for the purposes of reversing the ruling of October 22, 2002 when I was arrested for "non-appearance".
He apparently agreed that Judge Dwyer should have a look at the circumstances and sent the case back to him in Room 4002. Judge Dwyer, in my opinion and I believe the transcripts will show that Judge Burke was only a wayside to the hearings judge to be assigned for my case, went back on his directive and said that there was no guaranteed or commitment that Judge Burke was to step aside and reassign the case.
Interestingly Judge Dwyer was verbally informed on or about September 17, 2002 that there was a conflict of interest with Judge Burke. Interestingly he redirected the case because he was also in conflict of interest of the motion of issue. He gave it to Judge Burke anyway and the rest you know.
So Judge Dwyer sent the case back to Judge Burke. I was told nothing of whether that was to be immediately after his review or if that would be rescheduled later. I received no copy of order. Similarly I received no copy of order that Naperville drew up in Judge Burke's courtroom just prior EVEN AFTER I SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED ONE!
As I walked out of Judge Burke's courtroom addressing the fallout with the woman counsel from Naperville she was somewhat hostile and I let her know that my intent was to sit on this case and its issues "until hell freezes over"! Notably as happened with even less vehement conversation when talking to Charon Vantellingen back in 1998-99 out in the hall on the way to the assignment judge's clerks offices I was interfered with by a sheriff's deputy. In both cases they instigated accusations and innuendo suggesting that either I was improper in my conversation or as in this case I was threatening the attorney. I made no threat and I specifically emphasized that with the officer, which led me to accuse him of interference. He persisted and I, while he followed me into the courtroom while in the foyer, challenged him as I did Mr. Francis Cuneo: " In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit and through Christ's Blood",.... you know, the phrase and challenge in Love of which Mr. Francis Cuneo and his associate said they felt offended.
I then suggested the officer read Matthew 18:1-17. It was clear he was trying to make any lawful conversation between officers of the court look like I was improper and he was trying to prevent me from evoking my intent of determination not to lay down on this case. As an officer of the court, I have the right to communicate and negotiate with counsel. Sheriff's deputies try to make one think that this is boot camp and the prosecutor is the DI, (Drill Instructor). Not so! There was no threat, no weapons drawn and no improper language. She was dealt with firmly and poignantly PERIOD!!! Certainly, they have been dealt with far less harshly than that of which they have dealt with me! I have certainly set the good example!!! They are clearly trying to sucker me into another altercation of which they can make something or complicate matters more!
That scenario is what I call the Naperville Dupe Age Shuffle Hustle.....almost sounds like a dance. Keep in mind, however, that some people believe me to be a good dancer so they had better look out!!!
This time he just "blew me off". I looked at the deputy, he looked at me, and I just left!
I then went back to Judge Burke's courtroom only to find it locked. The deputy was uncertain as to what the scenario for my next appearance before* that judge was too. I attempted to get a court order from a secondary source but the workers had left for the day. I found out from another clerk that the next hearing was scheduled for November 5, 2002. I hope that is not Deja Vu November 5, 1998 when I was arrested and put in jail for almost 27 days.
So that is it in short. I will elaborate in more detail as time permits especially with reference to the arguments on the motion presented instanter last Tuesday 10-29-2002.
It appears, folks, that I will be going to Appellate Court on this one in the next week or so, so I will be very busy in preparation as this type of appeal is compressed into a couple of days time not the thirty days that regular appeals are done.
It looks like less Masses and Prayer time for me MVVSF&L and more research and typing thanks to Mr. Francis Cuneo and the "Boys"!
Sorry I have not been able to get in for Mass and Prayer Chapel this week but too much too do and too much Murphy's Law!
I believe that you missed a few days last week as well as last Sunday as I did not see you! Obviously, I have no input on how you fared in attendance this week. I do understand that sometimes it is better to be alone than at church sometimes as it helps one to clear their head and get a better focus.
I hope that the priest has been able to talk with you about nipping the Lisle case in the bud!
If the priest has not yet talked to you please make yourself available to him about it.
You can make much less work for yourself and me if you think this through very carefully. By all means, don't let the police or states attorney intimidate you if you choose to withdraw from the allegations of your case. I personally believe that Officer Pavoris #479 has deliberately "stirred the pot" to make you and me antagonistic toward each other. She has no legitimate grounds for pursuing the original claim much less at the late date I was arrested with no other aggravating incidents. I do not believe for one moment that she was honest with you either! I will be addressing her legally in Federal Court on this one! Remember, I was jailed for almost eight days in this case already, a case of which I have not even been convicted!!! Par for the course in Dupe Age County!!!
I believe that you did NOT intend to reinitiate your claim. I believe your presence in the Prayer Chapel and the indications I picked up from you on Saturday, September 21, 2002 were indicative that you were pleased that I came in to pray also. I feel the police did not want that positive indicator between us to flourish and so they stirred the pot and had me arrested on Sunday, September 22, 2002 at 11:00 PM at the Naperville train station. I was simply caught cold!
Please pray hard about this and do not let STUD influence you, as I believe he is the major earthly reason for all this confusion and hurt between you and me. Pray, Pray, Pray, Think, Think, Think MVVSF&L!!!
I believe the Lord wanted us, (you, your sister and me), to be friends not enemies. I believe we were to meet for that reason. Certainly, He does not want what has happened so far.
The police have helped the offender who is none other than STUD. Do not let them win! Make my heavy burden fifty percent lighter to bear MVVSF&L! Nip this fraud in the bud NOW!!!
As it was on December 21, 2001 and, I believe, on September 21, 2002 in prayer chapel we can still pick it up from there because I know that hateful and envious powers that be are running interference! I am keeping a positive attitude and positioning toward you as LOVE enables. The hateful and envious are powerful but HE is more powerful!
Pray and help me so that I do not get my "eyes" off that "mark of the high calling in Christ Jesus".
For the record folks.... I, at this time, cannot support a Dupage County States Attorney for Attorney General of the State of Illinois who has allowed his subordinates to act in what I construe as an unlawful, dishonest, unconstitutional and un-American way.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows his subordinates to lie *much less lie to Defendants for the purpose of the ends justifying the means.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows his subordinates to make false accusations about Defendants* especially while in Trial that are clearly beyond the scope of the issues being tested.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows his subordinates to deliberately mislead the jury.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows his subordinates to suppress evidence that clearly would show the truth and exonerate a Defendant!
*I cannot support a States Attorney who permits his subordinates to lower penalties for the purpose of eliminating a Defendant's rights and access to Public Defender representation especially without conferring with the Defendant first and giving him the option to decide for himself what would be best.
I cannot support a States Attorney who fails to see that inmates in "his" jail have proper and realistic access to the jail law library and at that a law library that should have the same efficient information access equipment that the main county library does have.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows his subordinates to destroy a man's life based on frivolous, malicious and unfounded gossip, trickery and chicanery!
I cannot support a States Attorney who permits psychological and psychiatric abuse of Defendants and inmates especially for political motives.
I cannot support a States Attorney who prosecutes politically engendered malicious claims designed to disrupt and destroy people and souls!
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows vigilante "justice" to destroy my business of twenty years not to mention my personal life as is noted in these updates especially with and similarly as MVVSF&L. Nor can I support a States Attorney who allows the Lisle Police Department and especially Chief Michael Damico to allow STUD to pervert a personal, spiritual and business relationship and persons that was and were very good and wholesome.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows sensitive and fragile lives to become mangled mentally, emotionally, spiritually and even physically.
I cannot support a States Attorney who has allowed my whole estate to be destroyed or disseminated especially when sensitive documents were involved.
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows clear-cut INVASION of privacy in such a sensitive scenario that is impacting hundreds of people!
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows both Federal and State's evidence painstakingly obtained and preserved over almost thirty years to fall into the enemy's hands or be destroyed.
I cannot support a States Attorney who has his subordinates direct Defendants Pro Se, the defense "attorney" on the case, how they are to conduct their questioning and conversations with the Judge of the Court who by doing so intimidates subverts rightful and necessary defense tactics and communications as an EQUAL OFFICER in the court before the Bench. To do so suggests exparte arrangements with the court which are clearly unlawful and pervert our system and spirit of American Justice!
I cannot support a States Attorney who allows, permits and even may be encouraging his subordinate officers to deliberately degrade and entrap persons who clearly are not guilty of the allegations
that are being lodged at them.
I cannot support a States Attorney whose main goal is to achieve convictions rather than determine the truth of the issues involved.
These have been my personal experiences and observations since living in Naperville, Dupage County, Illinois the last almost thirteen years!
I CANNOT SUPPORT DUPAGE COUNTY STATES ATTORNEY JOE BIRKETT FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS!
|
PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR
JOE BIRKETT
FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
ON NOVEMBER 5TH 2002!!!
|
-------------------
Please be sure to re-read the above entries as I have updated them and modified them since their original postings today!
-------------------
Please be sure to re-read the above entries as I have updated them with some minor modifications and one addition since their original postings yesterday! Note especially the green asterisks. Typos and other mechanical and technical errors observed and noted have also been corrected for easier reading and comprehension!
-------------------
I, from my gut am reluctant to support politicians and attorneys that appear to be a part of a "club" that serves special interests instead of the equal protection of the law for everyone especially in the TRUE SPIRIT of the law.
I cannot get the Jeanine Nicarico, Rolando Cruz and the Dupage Seven cases out of my mind. (Be sure to check the "cashed" pages at the ends of each listing for the articles not appearing). Even more so I cannot get those cases out of my mind in consideration of my personal experiences with the Dupage County State's Attorneys and certain law enforcers and the courts over the last thirteen years that I have resided in Naperville.
I cannot get out of my mind that the Nicarico case lingered so long pursuing Rolando Cruz and the like when Brian Dugan was sitting there as prima facie evidence. I cannot get out of my mind that Rolando Cruz, (even though he admittedly had a bad habit of lying but yet had some bad law enforcement examples to follow), sat on Death Row for TWELVE YEARS for something HE DID NOT DO! I cannot get out of my mind the lingering of the last four years or so the rating as a conviction of myself on a so called "criminal trespass". I cannot get it out of my mind when there is replete evidence in a tape recording that was admitted into evidence and faithful transcripts of that recording that were available for the jury's consumption and testimony preserved on court transcripts that show my innocence and also show clear cut lying by a so called "victim" Penny Dorta and Villa Park Police Officer R. Budig.
Yet I suffer the repercussions of the last five years with a record that I do not deserve, the loss of my position in the community, the loss of my twenty year business, (for all practical purposes), that, as former and late U.S. Representative George O'Brien of Joliet, Illinois would say with reference to his efforts on the job: "I worked my butt or buns off for", the loss of privacy and the INVASION of PRIVACY,( and not just my privacy), of my estate, the social, psychological and psychiatric abuse and the presumptuousness of cult zealots. I cannot get out of my being law enforcers that are not upholding the law with EQUAL PROTECTION who go after the true offenders only after the damage is done to the people who are the TRUE victims like myself and also like the Lisle incidents with MVVSF&L!
I cannot get out of my mind and being that not one Defendant in the Dupage Seven case was found guilty of some sort of improper conduct especially with all that went wrong in the Nicarico and Cruz cases!
This is why I have to draw your attention to Jim Ryan and Joe Birkett who have stood for good law enforcement yet it appears to me that good law enforcement has not been the outcome of their acts especially in the cases I have noted above!
Can we afford to have Jim Ryan as Governor of the State of Illinois when he was in control of the cases above noted directly or indirectly? Can we afford to have Joe Birkett as Attorney General of the State of Illinois when he was in control of the cases above noted directly or indirectly?
Perhaps it is time for a change in party leadership so to clean house and make sure that our basic constitutional guarantees are affected. As we all know, any party that is in power long contiguous periods tends to breed corruption. Governor George Ryan's debacle is symptomatic of this problem. Whether he is truly involved in the allegations lodged against him or not the tenure of the Republican party in control of powerful leadership positions in this state may have sucked Governor George Ryan down into the abyss that he has found himself.
Is it not time to change the party control in this state irrespective of which party it is for the purposes of cleaning house and purifying the political and constitutional processes?!
This is one election we really have to ponder and pray about before we vote because there are those of us out here that are hurting and being deprived basic liberties that we SAY we support and all too many take for granted in the Constitution of the United States of America, liberties that more and more of us are losing quietly and in a low profile way for NO JUST REASON. Subtlety our freedoms are disintegrating and we are being conditioned to go along with something less, we are being conditioned subtly to believe the LIE whether intentionally intended by the leadership or not! Look at what has happened to me over the last at least forty years and especially the last thirteen years here in Dupage County.
Tomorrow is Election Day. Tomorrow you must VOTE not just "checkmark" "boxes" for your "friends"and the status quo but for the quality of the lives and freedom of all of us!
Respectfully,
Scott M. Huber
Publisher and Editor
The Porcupine Quills
-------------------
*** PLEASE NOTE: DUE TO PRINTER FORMATTING DIFFERENCES "CLICK" HERE FOR A VERSION TO HIGHLIGHT AND PRINT!
-------------------
I believe the people have spoken in the State of Illinois.
A turn over of the political powers that be to another party, for the most part, is now in effect.
The trade off of power is certainly a lesson of hind site to the Republican Party in this state to make sure that they always keep their door step clean and set the proper example by making sure that their membership is consistently, as the Lord of Love enables, practicing what they promise!
Hopefully those who still hold office on the tail end of their terms will take advantage of the opportunity to set things straight with those they have not been properly careful in administering their oath of office!
Thursday, November 14, 2002 I will again be in court. I will be before Judge Lucas in room 4001. Again I will be asking the court for a change of venue only this time in the Lisle case involving MVVSF&L.
Today my priest of contact and communication with MVVSF&L was able to execute that contact with her. Sadly to say she refused to talk with him about the case in any way, shape of form.
Is this specific instruction from the State's Attorney and / or the Lisle Police. If it is it is certainly an interference with the Church's right to minister to its parishioners!
It is clearly an attempt by the state to prevent the priest from ministering in the spirit of love to give guidance from a non-legalistic point of view. This kind of conduct on the part of the state suggests interference in religion and the practice thereof. Certainly a violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.
I would very sensitively suggest MVVSF&L to reconsider her positioning. It is clear that there are witnesses that don't agree with her allegations about my conduct. It is clear that there are priests that don't agree with her allegations about my conduct. It is clear that the police are instigating animosity toward me and interfering with my personal relationships filial and agape. It is clear they justly have no right to interfere, as there has been nothing I have done that violates the law. It is clear that the police have instigated a police action that interferes with the establishment of religion especially within the very walls of the church. It is clear that the police are clearly causing problems where if they had left things alone there would be no problem. It is clear that the police have and are aiding and abetting a male chauvinist who obviously does not respect the Bible, the Church nor the ministry of the Holy Spirit.
This is not the first time police have aided and abetted male competitors in my life who are clearly on the wrong side of the law and LOVE. Yes the same LOVE that we see mentioned on our U.S Postal Service postage stamps.
When will it end?
As I told the priest: I refuse to accept that MVVSF&L was the source and causation of the allegations alleged. I will pursue this case with the position that the State and the Lisle Police are the hostile perpetrators. I will deal gently and kindly with MVVSF&L but the truth will be ferreted out! If she won't talk under friendly, loving, caring, concerned and spiritual auspices then the court forum it will be!!!!
It may foment expenses that you did not want MVVSF&L. It is certainly going to foment my charges against the STUD as prior stated and especially with the State's Attorney!!!
More on this later!
-------------------
It looks like hackers have been at it again. The article you see above this one dated for yesterday, Monday, 11-11-2002 was erased and believe it or not they made a copy of the whole file but deleted my article about the governor's race in the copy.
Strange people those hackers!!!!
-------------------
Here is the latest on the Lisle case.....
Of course Murphy's Law prevailed in getting to court on time and I was late however, I think Judge Lucas is aware of my very very unusual circumstances now and no Bench Warrant issued and I was not arrested.
I presented my motion for change of venue with a special and limited appearance so that the motion has to be considered and trial is barred. It is also set up with an alternative that requests injunctive relief if the motion is denied which gives me the option to appeal if they try to force me to trial.
The motion is being taken under consideration and a continuance issued for next Thursday at 9:30 AM as I have it now. I will double-check that date.
For lack of time as I have to get to choir practice I will relate more details later.
This effectively buys MVVSF&L more time to reconsider her facts and pull the plug on this case and save she and I much much time, money and inconvenience with our jobs and life in general.
Please think hard MVVSF&L and pray hard! Thanks!
With Love In LOVE,
Scott
-------------------
Here are the details from yesterday's scenario.
I got up around 3:30 AM and "hit" the road approximately 3:45 AM. I dropped off my bike at the train station and leaned down my baggage and got my court papers together as I was walking to the copy shop and then to the county courthouse complex in Wheaton.
I arrived at the train station around 4:00 AM. I left the train station around 4:30 AM and headed for the copy shop. I arrived at the copy shop at about 5:00 AM.
I set up my notebook computer so I could extract my document from it to print but I could not get my floppy drive to read the disk. In fact it would not read any disk. I discovered that the lower head in the floppy drive had separated from its mooring. So the first Murphy's Law took effect.
In trying to re-glue the head into place I attempted to use a brand new tube of super glue. I broke it open and attempted to apply the glue but to no avail. I shook the tube and I banged it down on a surface trying to get the glue out but no success. I then had to scrounge around to find anything that simulated a pin so to clear the passageway in the tip of the tube. Several times I used a couple of different metal spring tips found on the floppy drive constantly looking for one that long enough to break through the apparent barrier but none of the options worked. The glue just did not flow. Finally I took a tool out and broke open the tube doing "radical surgery" to find out why the glue did not flow hoping to find some I could use. To my dismay the glue inside the tube had solidified. It was like a heavy rubbery gum. I cut through the glue deposit to see if there might be any little nook that had some usable glue. No such opportunity! Here I was with new glue that was bad. So the second Murphy's Law took effect.
I then asked the employee on duty if they had any superglue. He said that he did not have any but there might be some on their sales rack.
So the third Murphy's Law took effect.
I really could not afford to buy more superglue. So the fourth Murphy's Law took effect.
I looked anyway and there was no "superglue" to be found. So the fifth Murphy's Law took effect.
As I went back to the counter to tell the employee there was no glue he found a "crazy" glue tube. I took it back to my cubicle and attempted to use it but for some reason the tube was clogged or the glue was almost out as I could not get a decent flow out of it without great consternation. So the sixth Murphy's Law took effect.
I finally time consumingly got enough glue out to at least make a good try out of gluing the floppy head. It set after carefully re-gluing it to its position carefully realigning it to its original positioning. So the sixth Murphy's Law took effect.
I reassembled the floppy drive and inserted the floppy and the drive still would not read the disk or write the disk. It took time consuming waiting before it would tell me that the disk was not there or not formatted or the like. It just did not want to work. So the seventh Murphy's Law took effect.
Just attempting to repair the floppy drive took about forty-five minutes to work through. So the eighth Murphy's Law took effect.
I considered that I could download the document through the copy shop printer system but prior had been told that they did not have the drivers available anymore. The last time I was at the shop the employee finally found out that they could load the document via a floppy inserted into their computer. This time I could not due to the fact that my floppy drive was out. So the ninth Murphy's Law took effect.
This time I was told by an employee that the drivers they used to download files from the notebook computers of the customers have been known to wipe out the whole hard drive. That discouraged me from using the printer cable to download the file from my hard drive to their printers. So the tenth Murphy's Law took effect.
The eleventh Murphy's Law occurred when I realized that I would not be able to use the document I spent some time producing the day before. I was going to have to use the original older version that was hand printed. It was not up to date but would have to suffice as the clock was running and I still had to walk to the courthouse.
The twelfth Murphy's Law occurred when I went to fill my copy card with money. The money loader machine was out of order!
The thirteenth Murphy's Law occurred when I approached the employee to see what could be done about the money card loader and he said that he could load it at the register. When he attempted to load the money into my card the circuitry shorted out. Fortunately he had a master that he let me use for unlimited copies with my original investment that was lost.
By the time I had finally finished the copying and modifications and got ready to leave it was 7:45 AM and I had to be at court at 8:30 AM. So the fourteenth Murphy's Law took effect.
Walking with my computer, lunch and dinner cache, change of clothes and notebook full of my court papers put enough weight on my hands that they got numb and I had to stop numerous times taking more time to shake them out to allow the circulation to return and resultantly bring them up to temperature. So the fifteenth Murphy's Law took effect.
I was hoping to intercept the last PACE 747 bus to the Wheaton train station from Naperville Road and Roosevelt Road at approximately 9:00 AM but missed it by about ten minutes so I had continue walking to the train station. So the sixteenth Murphy's Law took effect.
It took me until 10:00 before I got to the courthouse with the aid of the shuttle bus from the Wheaton bus station that started leaving just as I was running up to it to catch it. So the seventeenth Murphy's Law took effect.
I got off the shuttle at the first entrance from Manchester Road east so to save some time as the bus took the long way in and with construction and traffic it could take a few minutes and I felt I could walk faster but as I arrived the bus had already reached the courthouse and was leaving already as I was just arriving. So the eighteenth Murphy's Law took effect.
As I went through my pockets to make sure I had nothing in them that would prevent my entry through the security checkers I discovered that I had some tools in my pockets that I had to get rid of prior to entry causing more delay. So the nineteenth Murphy's Law took effect.
When I went through the security check the officer had to run some of my bags through several times taking more time. So the twentieth Murphy's Law took effect.
When I got into the courthouse I did not have enough time to fully change my clothes necessary after sweating up walking and I had to take some short cuts that worked but nonetheless this was the twenty-first Murphy's Law that took effect.
Arriving late at 10:19 AM (twenty minutes earlier than I did in the Naperville case a week prior on Tuesday...at least an improvement walking), to the courtroom put me under great concern as to whether I would be arrested. Just another stress that I did not need and thus the twenty-second Murphy's Law took effect.
So there you have it. That is what I went through just to get to court Thursday, November 14, 2002. I explained after successfully getting the judge to receive my motions and set them for continuance for a week from yesterday that I started out at 3:30 AM and it was a Murphy's Law circumstance in getting to the courtroom.
Thankfully, by the grace of God and your prayers the Judge exercised good discretion and did not issue a Bench Warrant for my arrest and thus he knocked out the ultimate negative effect that the Murphy's Law Syndrome was apparently designed to instigate.
It is amazing that people take me for ten years younger with all the Murphy's Law I have had to go through the last at least thirteen years!
Now for the epilog:
The Murphy's Law did not stop! After leaving the courtroom without new "jewelry" about my wrists I went down to the Circuit Clerks office to get my motion I had presented to the court time stamped. I took a number and waited and waited and waited. Finally after apparently about thirty to forty minutes of waiting a clerk finally assisted me. I took care of a number of items like thoroughly evaluating and noting the contents of that case's court file as well as notarizing my affidavits and finally attempting to get the motion time stamped. So the twenty-third Murphy's Law took effect.
The clerk refused to time stamp my motion since I did not have a copy to file with them also. I related I filed it with the judge when presented earlier in the morning. She said that I would have to go to the clerk in that courtroom and have her time stamp the document. I left the clerk's office and proceeded to the courtroom. So the twenty-fourth Murphy's Law took effect.
When I arrived I notified the deputy that I had come to have the clerk time stamp my motion. He said fine and in fact he offered to find the clerk and have her time stamp the motion. I thanked him having just about fallen off my seat with the unexpected congeniality.
However, when the clerk did come out after her lunch break she called me by my first name of which I do believe under such circumstances is not proper professional etiquette for the court clerk. (This is the same clerk that has mispronounced my name and been terse and rather hostile to me over the years when I have been in the courtrooms she has served). So the twenty-fifth Murphy's Law took effect.
The courtroom clerk then told me that she does not time stamp the documents. I related to her that I just came up from the Circuit Clerk's office and that they specifically told me that the courtroom clerk would time stamp the motion for me. So the twenty-sixth Murphy's Law took effect.
The clerk then told me that I would have to go down to the end of the hall and the party at the cashier's "cage" would time stamp my motion. So the twenty-seventh Murphy's Law took effect.
When I got to the cashier's "cage" no one was there. I went into the clerks in the office behind the "cage" and they said that I would have to wait for the cashier to return. I had to sit and wait another ten to fifteen minutes before the cashier arrived. So the twenty-eighth Murphy's Law took effect.
When I approached the cashier she refused to time stamp my document saying that she does not do that there and that I would have to go downstairs to the Circuit Clerk's office to have them time stamp it there! So the twenty-ninth Murphy's Law took effect.
I told the cashier that the clerk in the courtroom specifically said I could get the document time stamped with her and she still refused. So the thirtieth Murphy's Law took effect.
The court clerk that directed me to the "cage" suddenly showed up at the "cage" and I addressed her and asked her to vouch for my having presented the motion in court that morning and asked her if she would see to it that my document was time stamped, which she prior indicated was where she goes to have the documents she enters into the files time stamped, and she refused. So the thirty-first Murphy's Law took effect.
I then asked the cashier to call her supervisor so I could take the request to her for her disposal and instead she called the sheriff's deputies. So the thirty-second Murphy's Law took effect.
Three deputies, the supervisor and two subordinates, showed up to investigate the alleged "disturbance" and dispose of the "problem". So the thirty-third Murphy's Law took effect.
I kept my cool and explained the scenario noted above and noted that it was taking me no less than forty five minutes just to get a time stamp on a motion filed in the court that morning and that now I was being sent back to the Circuit Clerk's office from where I started. I indicated that it was the proverbial run around. So the thirty-fourth Murphy's Law took effect.
The Sheriff supervisor directed the two subordinates to escort me to the Circuit Clerk's office to get the motion time stamped. The escort suggested I might be a problem that needed an escort. So the thirty-fifth Murphy's Law took effect.
I informed the deputies that I did not need an escort. They said that they were directed by their supervisor to see that I get where I am going and I said that it is provocative of something else and they said you are not in cuff's and I said no but it still looks provocative. They fell back away behind me and came into the Circuit Clerk's office a few moments after I arrived and then got immediate assistance from the supervisor of the Criminal Traffic Professional division. He stated that he would have to go up to the courtroom to secure a time stamp. So I waited another approximately half hour. So the thirty-sixth Murphy's Law took effect.
While I waited one of the Sheriff's deputies that accompanied me down to the Circuit Clerk's office suddenly appeared and hung around. He was making chit chat with one of the private attorney's law clerks. She seemed concerned that he was present while she was taking care of business and he said that he was just taking some time to converse with her since he does not see her so much or something like that and I interjected in a humorous way, come on deputy, addressing him with his last name, you and I both know why he is here. I said that he is hanging around to keep an eye on me! He said do I know you? I said yes. He said I don't know you. I said you sure do. I am the party who you just accompanied down the elevator from the cashier's "cage". He said you know my name what is yours? I gave him my name. He said ok Huber and proceeded to evade admitting that he was assigned to watch me. So the thirty-seventh Murphy's Law took effect.
Finally the supervisor clerk came back with my motion but it still did not have a time stamp on it. The clerk refused to put an original time stamp on my document even after apparently comparing my document with the one submitted to the courtroom clerk. So the thirty-eighth Murphy's Law took effect.
Instead the supervisor circuit clerk produced two pages of document. One was a copy of the front page of the document I submitted to the judge in the courtroom earlier that had been time stamped. The other page was a copy of the affidavit I had submitted similarly and it also had been time stamped. He indicated that they normally charge, I believe he said, between four and six dollars but he will waive the charge. So we nevertheless have a thirty-ninth Murphy's Law that took effect.
Finally I left after checking on other cases in the computer.
Of special humor to me was the yarn that the deputy at the Circuit Court Clerks counter related to the attorney's law clerk mentioned prior. She was relating that she did not like snow. That reference to snow primed the pump on the deputy to tell her about his having a driveway that often had to have the snow removed. He said you know that men are not supposed to do that kind of work, shoveling out the drive and walks.
I listened intently.
He said he has his wife do it. He said that men are more prone to heart attacks than women so he lets his wife do the shoveling.
I thought yeah tell me another one. What ever happened to a snow blower or a pick up truck with a plow on the front of it.
I did not say a word. He was really leading the law clerk on on this one!
So I left the Circuit Clerk's office with at least some representation that I had filed my motion. It took about an hour and fifteen to thirty minutes to achieve.
I went to the lunch room had lunch at about two thirty or three o'clock and then went up to the law library to research case law and the like for both the Naperville and Lisle cases.
On the way out it was raining and I was intending to walk back to Naperville. So the fortieth
Murphy's Law took effect.
Because of the rain I had to take public transportation, which meant using the bus and train to get back to Naperville last night. That took the last few bucks out of my pocket leaving me with about a buck and a half. So the forty-first Murphy's Law took effect.
So folks again I approach you for your kind gifts as this litigation is draining my finances seriously and it is nice to have transportation money for transit and bike repairs and hot food and drink when it gets too cold to eat pantry food outside.
And that brings me to perhaps the last Murphy's Law for this report. My bicycle is in need of extensive rear wheel repair. The bike shop employee that has helped me out with parts in the past with some breaks on the price is trying to locate some heavy-duty spokes for me to install in my rear wheel. I need to locate some of the parts that fell off my derailleur on the way up to court last week and then reassemble it too.
Heavy-duty spokes cost at least 50 cents each and there has to be at least twenty-four spokes to be replaced. A new tire is also needed, as it is now bald. So a few bucks this way as soon as someone can spare it will be appreciated. As it stands right now I will have to walk five miles or so to church this weekend and I am not attending Mass in the mornings as it is an hour to hour and a half each way and I have to focus on my litigation in Naperville and Lisle.
I think you all can see that I have my hands full with my litigation and negotiations. Your continued help will be much appreciated in my efforts to regain my property and business restoral in this community. Thank you!
As I related prior to MVVSF&L I am very good with my money. I am frugal and I stretch it further than most people do so you can be assured it is not being unwisely used. I believe most of you have prior contributed already know of my frugality. Your prayers are and have also been very much appreciated.
Thanks Again!
-------------------
Hackers have been at it again not just on or just before November 12 when I file my latest hacker report they have been snipping and changing this page and the printer version pages frequently. The very article I posted on November 12 about hacking noted above was erased from this page. I reinserted it on Wednesday evening just before 9 PM.
In the printer version of this page they erased the header for November 14 and thus merged the November 14 article into the November 12 article.
You will also notice that the framing of this viewing page and the printer page have been changing. In both cases code was changed making the frames expand beyond the screen view thus defeating the design and the purpose of having a printer version page. I have corrected it this evening.
Strange people those hackers!!!!
It looks like someone is trying to give me busy work and wear me down mentally so I cannot attend to my court business and ministering to MVVSF&L again...not to mention distort my reports and hamper my personal functioning.
-------------------
Please keep in mind the content of the charges on the complaint. I think in hind site you know that they are not representative of what really happened at the church on July 5, 2002 when you went to the police to file your report.
I don't know if you actually filed a complaint and wanted to press charges on July 5, 2002 or if the police took an information report and then spiced it up and had you sign it at a later date without really reading the content. That does happen these days you know!
I realize that you were apparently of an emotional level and strain at the time due to other events in your life and physiological make up and that those factors came into play causing you to act before you were actually thinking about what you were doing.
Please review the allegations in the complaint. Please be not afraid to tell the States Attorney that you were over reacting and did not take the time to really evaluate what the police officer put down for your allegations.
You know my position. You know the priests don't agree with the police report allegations.
You will note I did not speak to you until you spoke to me and my comment was in essence “leave me alone”.
I directed my initiated conversation only to your girl friend and approached her from her side. She did not object and in fact took note of what I said. I stick to that because it is the truth.
You are a good spirited person as my first impressions of you stick from December 21, 2001. Please let that good spirited person flow again and on this issue MVVSF&L!!!
If this case turns around you could be the one getting fined or even jail time MVVSF&L. I don’t want that to happen. Think, think, think and pray, pray and pray very hard MVVSF&L!!!
With Very Special Love In LOVE!
Scott
-------------------
I have no idea if you would participate in such things however, the priest we mutually talk to had a homily at the 11:30 AM Mass this morning dealing with those who consult with psychics, tarot card readers and the like.
He pointed out that Christ wants us to pursue the present, as it is not for us to know the future. That means we should talk to the people we SHOULD be talking to now at present LIKE PEOPLE WHO CARE ABOUT YOUR WELL BEING,* (Hint! Hint!!!), AND NOT SOME STRANGERS YOU HAVE TO PAY!!!!
Saint Paul says we see as through a glass darkly. That means none of us know it all! He says that we won't know it all until we are resurrected with him.
To pursue* psychics, tarot card readers and the like type avenues makes you a very vulnerable person, as often these agents are frauds. Don't forget that the government* like the CIA and God forbid, the Justice Department, (Remember Attorney General Robert Kennedy, Cuba and the Mob in the 1960s?), the Lisle Police Department?, crime organizations, certain police officers and the like are not beneath using such avenues to manipulate vulnerable and naive persons who seek such avenues. Don't be misled, they can use such avenues as well so to manipulate people against people so to make friends enemies and the like. They work on the principle President Lincoln made note of during the Civil War...."a house divided cannot stand". The nation was divided on issues like slavery. Today they divide not only nations but families and friends on things as simple as ego! Divide and conquer is their modus operandi if you don't join their club!
They can cause trusting people to fall into the mouth of the Lion! You know, the one that roams about seeking whom he may devour.
He devours friendships* and people for devious intents.
Food for thought!
Your Friend In LOVE,
Scott
-------------------
Please take note of the "*" additions and modifications to the article from Sunday evening above.
Missed you this weekend and today but until the litigation load and bike repair need drops and thus puts less drain on my pocket book and the donations increase it looks like I will be missing more Masses. The two Sunday Masses with choir I will make exceptions for even if I have to leave at 4:30 AM and walk the five or so miles! Of course if a certain person would give me a ride that would also be a possibility that would also give us a chance to talk as friends like we used to! Remember HOW GOOD IT WAS especially January 5, 2002 when JUST you and I rode to your home for the first time from the store????
I continue to pray with you and for you and your sister and the Lisle litigation. Please re-evaluate your facts. It is not sin to admit oversight, confusion or being misled.
With Love In LOVE.
Your Friend
Scott
-------------------
If you thought I was joking when I said I have other namesakes out there think again! Here are the results of a search I did the other night:
"Click" here and you will see that Scott M. Huber is not alone! Note the listings just in the Chicago area much less the USA! Who knows what a world search would bring up!
Then check these out:
Illinois references to Scott Huber !!!
National references to Scott Huber!!!
By the way, MVVSF&L I did a similar search on you and you are one of a kind!
See folks I told you she was a "one in a million" actually she is one in over 250 million!!!!
Plug your or your sister's name in there and find out for yourself MVVSF&L!
You see what some are saying about me is also being said about a number of other Scott M. Hubers!!! What some are saying about this Scott M. Huber may have been actually derived from information about another Scott M. Huber. It pays to be very careful when you say something about Scott M. Huber. Make sure you have the right one!!!
Keep in mind that several Scott M. Hubers live right in the area!!!
What a wonderful class action lawsuit malicious gossip, deceit and defamation about Scott M. Huber could foment!!! Class action lawsuits go on and on and on and take "forever" and cost "big bucks" to conclude and resultantly are a constant drain and irritant to one's pocket book and budget for long periods of time!!! Class Action Lawsuits are when, in this case, all the Scott M. Hubers would get together and sue the offenders. It would be like if we all got together and sued say,....now let me think,......why yes, STUD of course!!!
Those of you that insist on black balling and lying about Scott M. Huber take note!
Is it possible and did it ever occur to you that what you heard about Scott M. Huber does not apply to me???
STUD, who "shoots" first and then asks questions later,....that means YOU and your agents and the others like certain law enforcement officers and politicos who really think they know it all about Scott M. Huber!
-------------------
Tomorrow is Court Day again! Tomorrow I have to report back to Room 4001, Judge Lucas' Court Room. Tomorrow my Motion For Change Of Venue Or In The Alternative Injunctive Relief should be, if properly handled, sent to a non-involved Judge for evaluation on its merits.
A non-involved Judge would be one that has had nothing to do with my evictions or alleged criminal matters in this courthouse.
I will be watching and waiting patiently as usual to see what the Courts do this time around.
More than likely after our hearing I will be spending the rest of the day researching both the Lisle and Naperville cases for further response and action.
As usual your prayers, those of you who believe in prayer, will be appreciated!
Unfortunately My Very Very Special Friend and Love has still chosen to silence me and there has been no indication that she will pull the plug on this case as of this hour.
I find her lack of response amazing in that this whole thing can backfire and she could be the one paying the fines and going to jail as I mentioned in a prior update. How she can go up against her own priests beats me!
The only thing I can see is that the State's Attorney is up to no good like in the Dorta case and they intend to railroad me irrespective of what the facts are. Are they out for a conviction no matter what? That remains to be seen but one thing is for sure, the character and reputation of the State's Attorney and his office is on the line as it is in the Dorta case.
I find it hard to believe that they have not investigated this case and not talked to the priests, especially one priest that was there and personally involved in the scenario July 5, 2002.
Of special interest is how the Lisle Police, the States Attorney and the Judge who ordered my arrest can justify it when there had been no further contact with MVVSF&L in the context of that of which I was forbidden for a period of almost two and a half months after the original report and just out of the "blue" I am arrested!!! It does not make sense folks!
One thing for sure, conviction or not there will be a long drawn out fight and investigation going on for years to come on this one for sure! Politicos cannot be allowed to make up stories and innuendo and arrest people that they may not like. They cannot be allowed to lie as privileged persons above the law. They cannot be allowed to decide who can be friends with whom and tell people not to talk to other people without the proper grounds. They cannot deny investigators their lawful constitutional right to investigate. They cannot be allowed to just label a person with an inflammatory label like "stalker" and be able to get away with it without retribution.
As I told the Deputy Chief of Police of Lisle Kosocas, (sp), and similarly told Chief Prosecutor of the City of Naperville Francis Cuneo, "Justice grinds exceedingly slow but exceedingly fine" and it will come full circle no matter how many times he or his department and chief put me in jail. They will be held responsible for their acts to the “enth”! I really don’t know how these people can sleep well at night much less sleep at all unless of course their consciences are seared as though with a hot iron of which the Bible talks.
So the Lisle Police, any other law enforcement organizations or persons, politicos and STUD, STUD who in my evaluation and estimation is a sex predator wolf among the sheep who feeds on vulnerable trusting Christian foreign girls, a predator who the Lisle Police has ironically protected can plan on a long haul on this one. I don't plan on laying down on this one any time in the future!!! SELAH!!!!
-------------------
Here is the latest from the Dupage County Courthouse Complex. I got to court within 25 minutes of court call time, a great improvement.
Murphy's Law is still taking its toll however. My bike wheel cracked while just rolling it along without riding it. It looks like I need a new wheel at this point. I need to find a heavy-duty spoked wheel. I walked to the courthouse and copy shop as usual.
Judge Lucas reviewed the motion in spite of a conflict of interest. He also denied my special and limited appearance. I don't think he can do that but he says he did. It was not an issue of permission of the court but rather a fact of life that I filed my appearance for the sole purpose of having the change of venue effected via my motion.
The States Attorney came in later in the hearings and announced a plea agreement that has been given them. I don't know if that is from MVVSF&L or if they are going to offer me a plea bargain.
The took my corrected mailing address as the Clerk of the Circuit Court apparently still has not gotten that correct. That could cause me another arrest so they really have to get with it over there.
The State’s Attorney is mailing me some information. I will analyze it when it comes in and let you know what is on the agenda.
Jury Trial is scheduled for January 9, 2003 at 9:30 as I have it. I notified the Judge that he is forcing me to appeal.
I researched my cases this afternoon and got some static from the Circuit Clerks. I will explain in my next update.
Choir practice tonight and I have to walk so I have to cut it short again.
Thanks for your support folks!
-------------------
Folks tomorrow is court again in the Naperville case. It is a status hearing that was originally supposed to be a surrender date for a warrant that was issued by Judge Burke as I have it. Since I have already appeared before that judge about two weeks ago the matter is moot and should not create a problem.
If I should not be so successful you will then find me in the county jail. Again that should not be the case.
More on this later. Your continued prayers are appreciated.
-------------------
Good news! I did not get locked up. The bad news: I did not have to go to court yesterday.
The court did not remove the required date from the record and so I was taking no chances.
I made use of my day up at the courthouse by reviewing cases at the Circuit Clerk's office and held a couple of conferences with the States Attorneys handling the Lisle case.
They at first said that they had mailed a deposition and other information to me but their supervisor found out that apparently I was misled and the letter and paperwork has yet to be produced. I was originally led to believe the letter was in the postal service system and just did not get to me yet.
I found out about this discrepancy when I asked for a copy of the documents to prevent me not timely getting the material so to properly prepare to respond and respond timely.
I indicated to the State's Attorneys that the case is frivolous and malicious and should be dismissed. Time will tell but they shall know the TRUTH and the TRUTH shall make them free!
I just hope I don't have to go through all the "hoops" and waste my time and money with another Dorta styled scenario of TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AMERICAN WAY.....DUPE AGE COUNTY STYLE!!!!
It is clear that the State's MO is the same or similar to tact and tactics used in the Dorta suit so it appears to me that this is just another HIT designed to put me down in the mud maliciously and deceitfully.
The full truth is going to be ferreted out if I do have to go through the "hoops". This is going to be investigated even after this litigation is finished as "JUSTICE GRINDS EXCEEDINGLY SLOW BUT EXCEEDINGLY FINE"!!!!
MVVSF&L why not nip this in the bud before things come out publicly that you would really rather not have exposed!
Please think and pray hard because ultimately it is your reputation that will suffer. I am firm in defending the truth. I have committed no wrong and I will defend that reality!
-------------------
HAPPY THANKSGIVING FRIENDS AND LOYAL CUSTOMERS!!!
-------------------
Missed you at Thanksgiving Mass! Missed you yesterday morning and this morning at Mass. Maybe we will both be at Mass Sunday?
Hope your Thanksgiving was positive.
Another positive experience would be for you to talk to me again so that we can achieve a realistic understanding of each other.
Obviously someone poisoned your mind toward me as your sister and we were doing just fine for the most part until STUD started showing up and clearly running interference.
What really TO's me is that the police aided and abetted him in his dishonesty toward you, your sister and me.
I really find it hard to believe that you were into the conduct that you were with STUD prior to our meeting on December 21, 2001.
December 21, 2002 is coming fast upon us. Will you let it slide by without any acknowledgement?
I hope and pray not.
I hope and pray that you will not let this case proceed to trial but rather face off with the State's Attorney and end this criminal conduct that is evolving.
I really don't believe you wanted me arrested on September 22, 2002. I believe Officer Pavoris #479 wanted to "stir the pot"!
Please talk with me and lets end the Lisle Police and STUD reign of terror and deceit. It is clear that they wanted STUD to take advantage of you and destroy my friendship with you and your sister.
God has ways of things coming back at people so undo this incredible wrong before it comes back and bites you when you least expect it. Please save yourself unneeded turmoil. Please don't let STUD have his way with you. He tricked you. I told you he was lying to you in my tape messages back in January. I warned you and tried to save you this embarrassment but to no avail.
I still believe STUD seduced you and then after he disarmed you with drugs you took unknowingly he took advantage of you and then conditioned you into believing he did no wrong with you. He broke down your moral barriers and used you until you could give no more. Thank God that you broke it off with him.... at least it appears that way in church and according to the priest.
That ring he tried to put on you this last Summer in my opinion was nothing more than cubic zirconium.... a fake diamond. Isn't that typical of his Method of Operation?
I believe the Lord sent me out into the parking lot just in time to intercept that little fraud. I let you know how I felt toward you nonverbally. Don't let that go.
Get on the level with me and lets communicate and let a lot of hurt be undone.
Don't let outsiders who think they know all about me tell you what you should and should not be doing with me. They are presumptuous and preposterous and deserve to be punished in God's own special and unique way.
Lets talk. Lets be friends again. Let us pick up from where we left off in God's timing and be friends.
I don't like this court stuff nor putting you on the stand and forcing you to talk and admit to things that you would rather not talk about. Please kill this case. Make my burden lighter.
Hope to see you this weekend in the same kind and positive spirit I believe you felt toward me on Saturday, September 21, 2002 when we were both in the prayer chapel. I distinctly believe you had positive vibes toward me and my presence there that morning.
I believe the arrest the next night, Sunday, September 22, 2002 was not your doing but rather Officer Pavoris #479 who prior told me she was going to push the arrest through.
Again, I believe you wanted July 5, 2002 and the complaint to fade away when Lisle Police with out grounds had me arrested and put me in the county jail for almost eight days for something that I did not do. Is this what you want for me, your friend? I think not!
Please get in touch with me soon. January 9, 2003 at 9:30 AM is the Jury Trial date as it stands right now. Lets not let it come about. Lets be good to each other! Lets celebrate the coming Holiday Season with togetherness, joy and friendship especially in Christ!
With Very Special Love in LOVE,
Your Friend,
Scott
-------------------
Send your cards and letters to my voice mail phone or e-mail links below!!!
Thanks!
-------------------
-------------------
These are Advance Sheets Folks! Note revisions appear after the asterisks "*" throughout the document. Please be sure to periodically review these update pages throughout The Porcupine Quills for Revisions and Additions!!!
-------------------
*** PLEASE NOTE: DUE TO PRINTER FORMATTING DIFFERENCES "CLICK" HERE FOR A VERSION TO HIGHLIGHT AND PRINT!
-------------------
