Vol I THE JOSHUA REPORT No. #21
 

"In the beginning GOD CREATED
the HEAVEN and the EARTH."
- Genesis 1:1

PART 1a of 5
INVESTIGATING the DEATH
of AMERICA: Was it MURDER?

[CHANGING OUR BELIEFS: Step #1
on the PATH to DESTRUCTION]

FASTEN YOUR SEATBELTS, FRIENDS: We are about to embark on the wildest
ride yet. Trust me, The CLINTON REGIME is planning some VERY bad things for us
[which we will be covering later]. So, in order to try to make some sense out of all this, we
are going to travel back in time to view some most unusual plans and incidents -
beginning with some DELIBERATELY-suppressed EVIDENCE that the Bible might just be
the real McCoy. Now, I don't claim to be a preacher-woman. I'm just a pretty darn good
bloodhound [Every answer I unearth sends me off on ten new trails!]. Perhaps studying
our past and certain plans - kept secret until recently - will provide us with clues as to
how we became a COMMUNIST POLICE STATE and lost our CONSTITUTIONALLY-
protected GOD-given RIGHTS. Y'all might want to get a copy of the Bible [while you still
CAN] and look up the passages as we go along [Aw, c'mon, now! If you haven't got one,
you can find one at your local library. If not, ask them WHY not: I know they carry the
KORAN - I've gotten it before. In any event, you should be able to get one from any
legitimate protestant church. I recommend the KING JAMES version, or second choice
the REVISED STANDARD version.]

O.K. Let's start with a given: when our country first began, we, as a people,
believed strongly in God ["IN GOD WE TRUST"], as well as certain fundamental principles
of the "GOOD BOOK:"

"Three months after leaving Egypt, the Israelites stood at the foot of MT.
SINAI...Suddenly, a black cloud surrounded the mountain, joined by thunder and
lightening and 'a blast of a trumpet so loud that all the people who were in the camp
trembled.' The Israelites watched in terror as GOD DESCENDED ON THE MOUNTAINTOP
concealed in fire and smoke 'like the smoke of a kiln, while the whole mountain shook
violently.' MOSES spent 40 days on the mountain, where the laws were 'WRITTEN WITH
THE FINGER OF GOD' on two stone tablets..."

I "Thou shalt have NO OTHER GODS before Me. Thou shalt not
make unto thee any graven image..."

II "Thou shalt not TAKE THE NAME of the Lord thy God in VAIN."

III "Remember the SABBATH DAY to keep it holy."

IV "HONOR THY FATHER AND THY MOTHER that thy days may be
long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee."

V "Thou shalt NOT KILL."

VI "Thou shalt NOT commit ADULTERY."

VII "Thou shalt NOT STEAL."

VIII "Thou shalt NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS against thy neighbor."

IX "Thou shalt NOT COVET thy neighbor's HOUSE."

X "Thou shalt NOT COVET they neighbor's WIFE...nor ANY THING
THAT IS THY NEIGHBOR'S."

JESUS added an ELEVENTH Commandment: "THOU SHALT LOVE THY
NEIGHBOR AS THYSELF." - Matthew 19:19

Good story. Reckon it's true? Or are all these teachings just so much hogwash?
Did the church leaders REALLY make all this up, "to keep the people in line?" WAS THAT
EVEN POSSIBLE? Back when I was just a pup, I attended one of these high-falutin' big-
city-style WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES establishments. It was all gussied up and the
people wore fancy clothes and drove even fancier cars. But in the midst of all this wealth,
I saw an unbelievable amount of hypocrisy practiced by these Sunday-mornin' Christians,
including racism - which confused me no end, since we were supposedly worshipping
JESUS - who I understood to be a color-blind JEW! Well, eventually, I became a Baptist
and was "BORN AGAIN." [Oh, yes: it really does happen - but, only if you ASK for it!]

"Now, between those times I went through the typical teen-age and young adult
rebellion years, when I was ashamed to admit I believed in God and His Son. If somebody
asked me, I would answer vaguely, "I'm an AGNOSTIC" - thinking that meant I neither
believed, nor disbelieved. But, if you have a thesaurus on your computer and look it up,
you will discover the last three definitions are "heathen," "infidel," and "atheistic." I had
forgotten what my grandfather [a "native American"] had taught me: "NO MAN CAN RIDE
TWO HORSES!" When it comes to GOD, you are either WITH Him or AGAINST Him.

Over the next decade, I suffered many hard times and on several occasions I
witnessed what I eventually came to realize were authentic miracles. On one such
occasion, it was freezing cold and I was traveling through the BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS
of Kentucky. At the top of the mountain, I ran out of gas [I had a half-tank when I began
my trip up the mountain]. Praying all the way, somehow I made it to a small town at the
bottom of the mountain. Thanking God, I coasted into a gas station and told the attendant
to "fill her up!" Well, he put the nozzle in and started the pump. INSTANTLY, GAS BEGAN
SPRAYING OVER THE SIDE AND ALL OVER ME AND THE ATTENDENT. Quickly shutting
the pump down, he examined the tank, speculating that maybe I had a "bubble" in the
tank. After testing it, he turned to me and declared, "Lady, whatever made you think you
needed gas? Your tank is completely FULL!" Was this a genuine MIRACLE? I couldn't
find any "logical" explanation, so I accepted it as such.

Despite this demonstration of divine intervention, I still wanted answers. In all the
time I attended that "politically-correct" church, I never once heard them tell us about any
discoveries of EVIDENCE that the Bible was true. They informed us that we were to
accept everything purely "on faith." My preacher even went so far as to tell us that it was
SACRILEGE to ask questions. ME? Not ask QUESTIONS? I figured he might as well have
sewed my mouth shut!

"Now, did GOD ever forbid us asking questions or looking for evidence? NO! He
told us we should worship Him with "all our hearts, all our MINDS, all our souls and all
our bodies!" JESUS told us in the end times more and more "hidden" secrets would be
disclosed. And they ARE! The problem is they are not being disclosed to us in THIS
country, because they are being CENSURED! Recently, when everything around me -
including our most basic beliefs - seemed to have turned topsy-turvy, I started thinking
about all this. Did WE change our beliefs as a people, of OUR OWN FREE WILL? Or was it
changed FOR US - as part of someone else's agenda? IS THAT AGENDA PRO-AMERICAN
- or ANTI-AMERICAN? Is there any REAL EVIDENCE supporting the Bible as GOD'S
WORD? If GOD is REAL and JESUS is truly HIS SON, then maybe the BIBLE really IS the
WORD OF GOD. Does it follow that there really is an ETERNITY and a HEAVEN and
HELL? And if that's true, WHERE DOES THAT LEAVE ME?? Have these idiots cost me MY
place in HEAVEN?! Have they condemned me to HELL? I admit that's an awful lot of
questions, but they are valid ones. Do y'all like science? Well, you're going to LOVE this
column! And Atheists are going to be hard put to explain the following "scientific" facts.
[Although I'm sure they will TRY!] F.F. BRUCE observes:

"Any part of the human body can only be properly explained in reference to the
whole body. And any part of the Bible can only be properly explained in reference to the
whole Bible. The Bible, at first sight, appears to be a collection of literature - mainly
Jewish.

"If we enquire into the circumstances under which the various Biblical documents
were written, we find that they were written at intervals over a space of nearly 1400
YEARS. The writers wrote in VARIOUS LANDS, from ITALY in the west to Mesopotamia
and possibly Persia [IRAQ] in the east. The writers themselves were a heterogenous
number of people, not only SEPARATED from each other by HUNDREDS OF YEARS and
HUNDREDS OF MILES, but belonging to the most diverse walks of life. In their ranks we
have KINGS, HERDSMEN, SOLDIERS, LEGISLATORS, FISHERMEN, STATESMEN,
COURTIERS, PRIESTS AND PROPHETS, a TENT-MAKING RABBI and a GENTILE
PHYSICIAN...

"The writings themselves belong to a great variety of literary types. They include
HISTORY, LAW (civil, criminal, ethical, ritual, sanitary), RELIGIOUS POETRY, DIDACTIC
TREATIESES, LYRIC POETRY, PARABLE and ALLEGORY, BIOGRAPHY, PERSONAL
CORRESPONDENCE, PERSONAL MEMOIRS and DIARIES, in addition to the distinctively
Biblical types of PROPHECY and APOCALYPTIC." The killer line, though, is the last one:

"For all that, the Bible is not simply an anthology; there is a UNITY which binds
the whole together. An anthology is compiled by an anthologist, but NO ANTHOLOGIST
COMPILED THE BIBLE!" [1]

So much for the theory that a group of men somehow got together [Where?
WHEN?] and "created" the Bible, so they could "keep the people in line." You know,
when you think about it, the ONES WHO ARE SELLING THIS LINE [the media, anti-
Christian advocates and organizations] sure have a lot of room to talk about
"brainwashing" to "keep the people in line," don't they? And THESE are the people we
trust to protect us from eternal HELLFIRE??! Another thing: how come it's only the
CHRISTIANS the government, the educational system, and the media seem to have a
problem with? Doesn't that seem just a bit suspicious? They seemingly have NO problem
with ISLAM, BUDDHAISM, JEWS, NATIVE AMERICAN teachings - WITCHCRAFT, or even
DEMONOLOGY. Shouldn't that "tolerance" and "multi-culturalism" include the
TRADITIONAL MAINSTREAM FAITH of Americans, as well? SOMETHING IS DEFINITELY
WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE.

Two FACTS we should bear in mind: The Bible has been read by more people and
published in more languages than any other book, and according to THE CAMBRIDGE
HISTORY OF THE BIBLE, "No other book has known anything approaching this constant
circulation." THIS INCLUDES THE TORAH, THE KORAN, SHAKESPEARE, HOMER, THE
EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD, etc., etc. Also, none of the other prophets, i.e., Buddah,
Muhammad, etc., have ever claimed to be the Son of God - only JESUS did. In addition to
the above, no one has ever been able to prove one LIE in the Bible.

But for our purposes, there is more than claims and faith to prove our case. There
is very REAL [we would call it "hard" in a court of law] evidence to prove THE BIBLE IS
HISTORICALLY-CORRECT. Let's begin with the discovery of the famous DEAD SEA
SCROLLS:

"In February or March of 1947, a Bedouin shepherd boy named Muhammad was
searching for a lost goat. He tossed a stone into a hole in a cliff on the west side of the
DEAD SEA, about eight miles south of JERICHO. To his surprise, he heard the sound of
shattering pottery. Investigating, he discovered an amazing sight. On the floor of the cave
were several large jars containing leather scrolls, wrapped in linen cloth. Because the jars
were carefully sealed, the scrolls had been preserved in EXCELLENT condition for nearly
1,900 YEARS (They were evidently placed there in A.D. 68)..." [2]

Few things look the way we imagine them, after listening to their description. The
DEAD SEA SCROLLS are no exception. I had always pictured them as being newspaper
or magazine-size. Guess again! The great ISAIAH SCROLL measures 24 FEET LONG! The
story of their travels is fascinating, but the important issue is WHAT IS IN THEM?

"The oldest complete Hebrew MSS [manuscripts] we possessed were from 900
A.D. on. How could we be sure of their accurate transmission since the time of Christ in
32 A.D.? Thanks to ARCHAEOLOGY and the DEAD SEA SCROLLS, we now know. One of
the scrolls found was a complete MS of the Hebrew text of Isaiah. It is dated by
paleographers around 125 B.C. This MS is more than 1,000 YEARS OLDER than any MS
we previously possessed.

"The impact of this discovery is in the EXACTNESS of the ISAIAH SCROLL (125
B.C.) with the MASSORETIC TEXT of ISAIAH (916 A.D.) 1,000 YEARS LATER...

"Of the 166 words in ISAIAH 53, there are only seventeen LETTERS [not WORDS,
mind you] in question. Ten of these letters are simply a matter of SPELLING, which does
not affect the sense. Four more letters are minor STYLISTIC changes, such as
conjunctions. The remaining three letters comprise the word 'light,' which is added in
verse 11, and does not affect the meaning greatly. Furthermore, this word is supported by
the LXX and IQ Is. Thus, in one chapter of 166 words, There is only ONE WORD (only
three letters) in question AFTER A THOUSAND YEARS OF TRANSMISSION - and this
word does not significantly CHANGE the meaning of the passage." [3]

Renowned Jewish archaeologist NELSON GLUECK wrote: "It may be stated
categorically that NO archaeological discovery has ever CONTROVERTED a Biblical
reference." [THAT'S quite a statement!] Another archeologist, WILLIAM F. ALBRIGHT,
states "...Discovery after discovery has established the ACCURACY of innumerable
details, and has brought increased recognition to the value of the Bible as a SOURCE OF
HISTORY...Until recently it was the fashion among Biblical historians to treat the
patriarchal sagas of GENESIS as though they were ARTIFICIAL CREATIONS of Israelite
scribes of the Divided Monarchy or tales told by IMAGINATIVE RHAPSODISTS around
Israelite campfires...[but] ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES since 1925 have changed all
that. Aside from a few die-hards among older scholars, there is scarcely a single Biblical
historian who has not been impressed by the rapid accumulation of data SUPPORTING
the substantial HISTORICITY of patriarchal tradition."

MILLAR BURROWS of YALE observes: "The excessive skepticism of many
LIBERAL theologians stems not from a careful evaluation of the available data, but from
an enormous PREDISPOSITION against the SUPERNATURAL [and yet they readily
embrace ALIENS, GHOSTS, "ASCENDED MASTERS," and EASTERN religions!]...On the
whole, however, archaeolgical work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the
RELIABILITY of the SCRIPTURAL RECORD. More than one archaeologist has found his
respect for the Bible increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine...THE
PICTURE FITS THE FRAME; THE MELODY AND THE ACCOMPANIMENT ARE
HARMONIOUS. The force of such evidence is cumulative. The more we find that items in
the picture of the past presented by the Bible...are compatible with what we know from
archaeology, the stronger is our impression of general AUTHENTICITY. Mere LEGEND or
FICTION would inevitably BETRAY ITSELF by anachronisms and incongruities." [4]

Over the years, hundreds of archaeologists have attested the AUTHENTICITY of
the Scriptures - BASED ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDS [HARD evidence]. Should we
ignore all of them? WHY? We certainly have no problem accepting ANYTHING the
UNITED NATIONS-sponsored EVOLUTIONIST SCIENTISTS claim. And for the most part,
they have NO "hard" evidence to back up their claims. Again and again, they admit they
are "THEORIES," and yet the general public accepts them as FACT and doesn't question
them or demand proof. Could this be the result of BRAINWASHING? Let's examine some
more specific archaeologic finds in recent times:

"An archaeological find that relates to Biblical criticism is the recently discoverd
EBLA TABLETS. The discovery was made in northern Syria by two professors from the
University of Rome, DR. PAOLO MATTHIAE, an archaeologist; and DR. GIOVANNI
PETINATO, an epigrapher. The excavation of the site, TELL MARDIKH, began in 1964; in
1968 they uncovered a statue of King Ibbit-Lim. The inscription made reference to
ISHTAR, the goddess who 'shines brightly in Ebla'...The proponents of the
'DOCUMENTARY HYPOTHESIS' [theory] have taught in the past that the period described
in the Mosaic narrative (1400 B.C., a thousand years AFTER the Ebla Kingdom) was a time
PRIOR to all knowledge of writing. But Ebla shows that a thousand years BEFORE
Moses, laws, customs and events were recorded in writing in the same area of the world
in which Moses and the patriarchs lived." [5]

This sounds like an old song: "DR. MICHAEL CHANDLER [specialist in
mythological theology, educated at STANFORD UNIVERSITY ("Founded in
1946...presided over by Charles A. Anderson, with emphasis on MIND CONTROL
RESEARCH and 'FUTURE SCIENCES' ") [6] asks, 'Why all the fuss over SODOM and
GOMORRAH? It's a mythological, moralistic story. THE CITIES NEVER EXISTED. This
story and similar stories were used by the high priests to instill fear and guilt among their
followers. The PRIESTS, having knowledge of science and astronomy, still used these
MYTHOLOGICAL stories to CONTROL people." [Now, remember, as is normal with the
LIBERAL MEDIA and INTELLIGENTIA, he presents NO proof - only his WORD as a
statement of "FACT!"] GAYS and HOMOSEXUALS might want to take note of the
following:

"...Something like 20,000 clay tablets were unearthed in northern SYRIA...Based
on the information in these tablets, we know that the city of EBLA was at its height of
power in 2300 B.C. with a population of probably 260,000 people. It was destroyed in
about 2250 B.C., but in the ruins, this treasure trove of tablets describing the activity of
daily life in the ancient world was discovered...DR. WILLIAM H. SHEA [a medical doctor,
medical school professor, and professor of Near Eastern studies at Andrews University]
reveals some startling new evidence that SODOM and GOMORRAH really DID exist. SHEA
comments:
'When the EBLA TABLET discovery was first announced in 1976, there was some
debate and discussion over whether the names of SODOM and GOMORRAH were
mentioned in these tablets...We have a more important tablet now to study. It's known as
the EBLAITE GEOGRAPHIC ATLAS. It contains a list of 290 place names...Of particular
interest is name number #210. ADMAH in the old Canaanite form. That's ADMAH from the
Biblical list of the cities of the plain from GENESIS 14. The next name, number #211, is
very interesting because it is written with signs that are unmistakably clear...SADAM, or
SODOM, the BIBLICAL SODOM...the debate is whether Sadam is really south of the
Jordan, or somewhere else, like in Syria...AQABAH is obviously the GULF OF AQABAH,
and that confirms that he had traveled through Sadam south of the Dead Sea. THAT'S
WHERE THE BIBLICAL SODOM WAS LOCATED.

"...why is this list of names from the EBLAITE GEOGRAPHIC ATLAS so
important? One reason is that it is a diary of cities visited by a well-traveled merchant
from the great city of EBLA of the Bronze Age JUST BEFORE THE TIME OF ABRAHAM.
Let's examine this more closely:

"What is it about SODOM and GOMORRAH that upsets the GOD OF ABRAHAM so
much? Here's what the Bible says about these cities: 'Now the men of SODOM were
wicked and were SINNING GREATLY AGAINST THE LORD.' - Genesis 13:13. It's this kind
of gratuitous comment that sets the critics on edge. One of them is AUSTIN MILES, a
former minister in the ASSEMBLIES OF GOD churches and currently an author and
speaker. His most recent work is entitled 'DON'T CALL ME BROTHER.' Here's what he has
to say about the cities of SODOM and GOMORRAH:

'SODOM and GOMORRAH is a myth created by the church, and that illustration is
used as a constant threat against the disobedient. Nor were SODOM and GOMORRAH
destroyed by FIRE AND BRIMSTONE. This was INVENTED by the same minds that
INVENTED HELLFIRE.' Interesting statement to come from a preacher-man. Especially an
Assemblies of God one. I guess my first question would be "Are YOU by any chance
gay?" and the second would be "Are you a member of the WORLD COUNCIL OF
CHURCHES [i.e., the UNITED NATIONS]. In any event, is there evidence to refute his
charges? Let's find out:

"According to HERSHEL SHENKS in the September/October 1980 issue of the
BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY REVIEW, 'Beneath the rubble [of Bab edh-Dhra] there is clear
evidence of a fiery conflagration.' Referring to Numeira, a city near Bab edh-Dhra and
possibly Gomorrah, Shenks writes, 'Even without excavation, the archaeologists [RAST
and SCHAUB] could see that the site had been burned. Spongy charcoal was all over the
ground and could be scooped up by hand.' Publisher-editor of "CATASTROPHISM IN
ANCIENT HISTORY," MARVIN LUCKERMAN, says, 'Sodom and Gomorrah certainly did
exist, and they were destroyed by a massive fire and brimstone explosion, AS
DESCRIBED IN THE BIBLE.' " But, there is even more evidence to support the destruction
of Sodom and Gomorrah:

"PROFESSOR RANDALL YOUNKER, director of the HORN ARCHAEOLOGICAL
MUSEUM, Amman, Jordan reports, 'Archaeologists have excavated at least three of the
five sites along the DEAD SEA, and they have discovered that all three of them were
apparently terminated abruptly before the end of the Early Bronze Age, at approximately
the same time...the abrupt and complete destruction has intrigued scholars because it is
not just a termination. There is actually an ASH LAYER ON TOP OF THE CITY RUINS, and
this suggests that the city was destroyed by fire.' " DR. BRYANT G. WOOD, Syro-
Palestinian archaeologist makes an even more compelling case for the Biblical version of
the destruction of these cities:

"At the end of the life of the city, they buried their dead in buildings right on the
surface. These are called CHARNEL HOUSES...a rectangular building made of mud-
brick...The scholars...found that these charnel houses were all burned...But when they
completed a very detailed study of a cross section cut through one of these charnel
houses, they found that the fire did not originate in the building itself, but rather on the
ROOF of the building...Fire RAINED DOWN FROM HEAVEN and destroyed these wicked
cities." [7]

Evidence has been found verifying the story of the BATTLE OF JERICHO - exactly
as it was described in the Bible: "During the excavations of JERICHO (1930-36) [JOHN]
GARSTANG found something so startling that a statement of what was found was
prepared and signed by himself and two other members of the team. In reference to these
findings, Garstang says, 'As to the main fact, then, there remains no doubt: the walls fell
OUTWARDS so completely that the attackers would be able to clamber up and over their
ruins into the city.' Why so unusual? Because the walls of cities do not fall outwards,
THEY FALL INWARDS. And yet in JOSHUA 6:20 we read '...The wall fell down flat, so that
the people went up into the city every man straight ahead, and they took the city.' The
walls were MADE to fall outward." [8]

Archaeologists have discovered evidence of NOAH'S ARK and The FLOOD:

"There have been numerous flood stories identified from ancient sources
scattered around the world. [9] The stories that were discovered on cuneiform tablets,
which comprise some of the earliest surviving writing, have obvious similarities.
Cuneiform writing was invented by the Sumerians and carried on by the Akkadians.
Babylonian and Assyrian are two dialects of the Akkadian, and both contain a flood
account. While there are differences between the original Sumerian and later Babylonian
and Assyrian flood accounts, many of the similarities are strikingly close to the GENESIS
flood account. [10] The Babylonian account is the most intact, with only seven of 205
lines missing. [11] It was also the first discovered, making it the most studied of the early
flood accounts.

"The EPIC OF GILGAMESH is contained on twelve large tablets, and since the
original discovery, it has been found on others, as well as having been translated into
other early languages. [12] The actual tablets date back to around 650 B.C. and are
obviously not originals since fragments of the flood story have been found on tablets
dated around 2,000 B.C. [13] Linguistic experts believe that the story was composed well
before 2,000 B.C., compiled from material that was much older than that date. [14] The
Sumerian cuneiform writing has been estimated to go as far back as 3,300 B.C. [15]

"Over the last two decades the search for NOAH'S ARK has received international
attention. Dozens of expeditions to the ARARAT region of eastern TURKEY, mostly by
American Christian groups, have led to numerous claims - but no proof. According to the
Bible, Noah's Ark was a large barge constructed of wood and sealed with bitumen. Its
overall dimensions were 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high with three interior
decks. A 'window' appeared to be constructed around the top (Genesis 6:14-16).
Incidentally, the overall size of the Ark makes it the largest seagoing vessel known before
the 20th century, and IT'S PROPORTIONS ARE AMAZINGLY SIMILAR TO THE LARGE
OCEAN LINERS OF TODAY.

"The Bible says Noah's boat came to rest on 'the mountains of ARARAT' (Genesis
8:4). 'Ararat' probably designated a region (the ancient kingdom of Urartu) and not a
specific mountain peak. After Noah and his family left the Ark on the mountain, the boat
virtually disappeared from the pages of the Bible. Later Biblical writers never suggested
they knew it could still be seen. MT. ARARAT IS IN TURKEY WHERE MANY 'ARK
SIGHTINGS' HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

"The mountain called Ararat today is more like a mountain range with twin peaks.
Interestingly, there have been numerous reports throughout history of a LARGE BOAT
ON A MOUNTAIN in this region. Earliest references (beginning in the 3rd century B.C.)
suggested it was common knowledge that the Ark could still be viewed on Mount Ararat.
Reports over the past century range from visits to the vessel, to recovery of wooden
timber, to aerial photographs [including during WWII, Korean War, Vietnam, and Desert
Storm, and by satellite]. It is generally believed that at least A LARGE PART OF THE ARK
IS INTACT, not on the highest peak, but somewhere above the 10,000 foot level.
Apparently encased in snow and ice for most of the year, only during certain warm
summers can the structure be witnessed or accessed. Some have spoken of climbing
onto the roof, others say they have walked inside." [16] If you ever get the chance, I
would strongly advise you to view 'QUEST FOR NOAH'S ARK.' It is a thrilling
documentary - you will never doubt the Bible again!

In addition, evidence has been found of the PLAGUES OF EGYPT; the CROSING
OF THE RED SEA; the BURNING BUSH; JESUS BIRTH, CRUCIFIXION and
RESURRECTION; innumerable cities and places: The base of the TOWER OF BABEL in
Babylon where language was confused (Genesis 11:1-9); The palace at JERICHO where
Eglon, king of Moab, was assassinated by Ehud (Judges 3:12-30); The EAST GATE of
SHECHEM where Gaal and Zebul watched the forces of Abimelech approach the city
(Judges 9:34-38); The TEMPLE OF BAAL/EL-BERITH in Shechem, where funds were
obtained to finance Abimelech's kingship and where the citizens of Shechem took refuge
when Abimelech attacked the city (Judges 9:4, 46-49); The POOL OF GIBEON where the
forces of David and Ishbosheth fought during the struggle for the kingship of Israel (2
Samuel 2:12-32); The POOL OF HESHBON, likened to the eyes of the Shulammite woman
(Song of Songs 7:4); The ROYAL PALACE at SAMARIA where the kings of Israel lived (1
Kings 20:43; 21:1, 2; 22:39; 2 Kings 1:2; 15:25); The POOL OF SAMARIA where King
Ahab's chariot was washed after his death (1 Kings 22:29-38); The WATER TUNNEL
beneath JERUSALEM dug by King Hezekiah to provide water during the Assyrian siege (2
Kings 20:20; 2 Chronicles 32:30); The ROYAL PALACE in BABYLON where King
Belshazzar held the feast and Daniel interpreted the HANDWRITING ON THE WALL
(Daniel 5);

"The ROYAL PALACE in SUSA where Esther was queen of the Persian king
Xerxes (Esther 1:2; 2:3, 5, 9, 16); The ROYAL GATE at Susa where Mordecai, Esther's
cousin, sat (Esther 2:19, 21; 3:2, 3; 4:2; 5:9, 13; 6:10, 12); The SQUARE in front of the royal
gate at Susa where Mordecai met with Halthach, Xerxes' eunuch (Esther 4:6); The
FOUNDATION of the SYNAGOGUE AT CAPERNAUM where JESUS cured a man with an
unclean spirit (Mark 1:21-28) and delivered the sermon on the bread of life (John 6:25-59);
The HOUSE OF PETER AT CAPERNAUM where JESUS healed Peter's mother-in-law and
others (Matthew 8:14-16); JACOB'S WELL where JESUS spoke to the Samaritan woman
(John 4); The POOL OF BETHESDA in Jerusalem, where JESUS healed a crippled man
(John 5:1-14); The POOL OF SILOAM in Jerusalem, where JESUS healed a blind man
(John 9:1-4); The TRIBUNAL AT CORINTH where Paul was tried (Acts 18:12-17); The
THEATER AT EPHESUS where the riot of silversmiths occurred (Acts 19:29); HEROD'S
PALACE AT CAESAREA where Paul was kept under guard (Acts 23:33-35), [17] along with
burial places of countless people mentioned in the Bible, and on and on and on. Should
we ignore all this evidence, because the Media tells us to? And if we do, what price will
we pay? Dear God: What if they are WRONG???

How many of these discoveries have you read about in your local or even national
newspapers or magazines? Why NOT? How many of them have been reported on CNN or
on your local newscasts? In heaven's name, WHY NOT? These are not only legitimate
news-worthy discoveries, they are EARTH-SHAKING events! Why are they hiding it from
you? Don't you DESERVE to know these things - so you can make up your OWN mind?
They certainly aren't bashful about pushing evolutionary "evidence!" I have a problem
with that, though: they announce these "findings" as though they are fact and when you
break it down it comes up another "theory." By the way, you never hear them mention
that when CHARLES DARWIN was dying, he admitted evolution was just a theory, and he
was never able to find ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE that it was true! With that in mind, let's
see what Darwin REALLY taught:

"The racism of evolution theory has been documented well and widely publicized.
It is known less widely that many evolutionists, including CHARLES DARWIN, also taught
that WOMEN ARE BIOLOGICALLY INFERIOR TO MEN. Darwin's ideas, including his view
of women, have had a major impact on society. In a telling indication of his attitude about
women (just before he married his cousin, Emma Wedgewood), Darwin listed the
advantages of marrying, which included:

" '...constant companion, (friend in old age) who will feel interested in one, object
to be beloved and PLAYED with' [#151] 'better than a DOG anyhow' [#151] 'Home, and
SOMEONE TO TAKE CARE OF HOUSE...' [18]

"Darwin reasoned that ASA MARRIED MAN he would be a 'poor slave...WORSE
THAN A NEGRO,' but then reminisces that, 'one cannot live the solitary life, with groggy
old age, friendless...and childless staring in one's face...' Darwin concludes his
discussion on the philosophical note, 'there is many a happy slave' and shortly
thereafter, married (1958).

"Darwin concluded that adult females of most species resembled the young of
both sexes and from this and the other evidence, 'reasoned that MALES ARE MORE
EVOLUTIONARILY ADVANCED THAN FEMALES.' [19] Many anthropologists
contemporary to Darwin concluded that 'WOMEN'S BRAINS WERE ANALOGOUS TO
THOSE OF ANIMALS,' which had 'OVERDEVELOPED' sense organs 'to the DETRIMENT
OF THE BRAIN.' [20] CARL VOGT, a University of Geneva natural history professor who
accepted many of 'the conclusions of England's great modern naturalist, Charles Darwin,'
argued that 'the CHILD, the FEMALE, and the SENILE WHITE' all had the intellect and
nature of the 'GROWN UP NEGRO' (1863). Many of Darwin's followers accepted this
reasoning, including GEORGE ROMANES, who concluded that EVOLUTION caused
females to become, as KEIVES postulated:

" '...increasingly less cerebral and more emotional. Romanes...shared Darwin's
view that females were less highly evolved than males [#151] ideas which he articulated
in several books and many articles that influenced a generation of biologists. Romanes
apparently saw himself as the guardian of evolution, vested with a responsibility to keep
it on the right path...University of Pennsylvania...paleontologist EDWARD DRINKER COPE
wrote that male animals play a 'more active part in the struggle for existence,' and that all
females, as mothers, have had to SACRIFICE GROWTH FOR EMOTIONAL STRENGTH...
[21]

"One reason nineteenth century biologists argued for women's inferiority was
because Darwin believed that 'UNCHECKED FEMALE MILITANCY threatened to produce a
perturbance of the races' and to 'divert the orderly process of evolution.' [22] [My word!
The man finally said something I can agree with! Although, I have to admit that applies to
males, as well.]

"Darwin taught that human sex differences were due partly to sexual selection,
specifically because men must prove themselves physically and intellectually superior to
other men in the competition for women, whereas WOMEN MUST BE SUPERIOR
PRIMARILY IN SEXUAL ATTRACTION. Darwin used examples of cultures that require the
men to fight competitors to retain their wives to support this conclusion. Because 'the
strongest party always carries off the prize,' the result is that 'a weak man, unless he be a
good hunter...is seldom permitted to keep a wife that a stronger man thinks worth his
notice.' [23] [Obviously, women get no say in the matter!]

"Other examples Darwin uses to illustrate his conclusion that evolutionary forces
caused men to be superior to women included ANIMAL COMPARISONS. Since humans
evolved from animals, and 'no one disputes that the bull differs in disposition from the
cow, the wild-boar from the sow, the stallion from the mare, and, as is well known
through the keepers of menageries, the males of the larger apes from the females,' the
same must be true with human females. [24] Further, some of the TRAITS OF WOMEN 'are
characteristic of the lower races, and therefore of a past and LOWER STATE OF
CIVILIZATION.' [25] [How did this character ever manage to find a woman willing to marry
him??]

"In summary, Darwin concludes men attain...a higher eminence, in whatever he
takes up, than can women; [#151] whether requiring deep thought, reason, or
imagination, or merely the use of the senses and hands. If two lists were made of the
most eminent men and women in poetry, painting, sculpture, music (inclusive of both
composition and performance), history, science, and philosophy, with half-a-dozen
names under each subject, the two lists would not bear comparison. We may also infer,
from the law of the deviation from averages, so well illustrated by MR. GALTON, in his
work on 'HEREDITARY GENIUS' that...the average of mental power in man must be above
that of women. [26] Obviously, Darwin totally ignored the influence of culture, the
environment social roles, and the relatively few opportunities that existed in his day, as
well as historically, for both men and women.

"The conclusion that women are evolutionarily inferior to men is at the core of
Darwin's major contribution R. EVOLUTIONARY THEORY: NATURAL ANTI-SEXUAL
SELECTION. Since selection, in the long term prunes out the weak, all factors which
facilitate saving the weak work against evolution. Males are subjected to more selection
pressures than women, including the supposed tact that, in earlier times, the stronger,
quicker, and more intelligent males were more apt to survive a hunt and bring back food.
Consequently, NATURAL SELECTION WOULD EVOLVE MALES TO A GREATER DEGREE
THAN FEMALES [Take a good look at the young males today. THIS is what they are
BRAGGING about? Give me the earlier versions, any day!]. Since women historically have
focused primarily on domestic, often menial, repetitive tasks and not on hunting, they
were less affected by selection pressures. Further, the long tradition of males has been to
protect women: only men went to battle, and the common war norms forbade deliberately
killing women. War pruned the weaker men, and only the best survived to return home
and reproduce. The eminent evolutionist, TOPINARD, concluded that men were superior
because they fought to protect both themselves and their wives and their families.
Further, Topinard taught that males have all of the responsibility and the cares of
tomorrow [and are]...constantly active in combating the environment and human rivals,
[and thus need]...more brains than the woman whom he must protect and nourish...the
sedentary women, lacking any interior occupations, whose role is to raise children, love,
and BE PASSIVE. [27]

"Women's inferiority, [#151] a fact taken for granted by most scientists in the
1800s [#151] was a major proof of evolution by natural selection. GOULD claims that there
were actually 'few egalitarian scientists' at this time. Almost all believed that 'Negroes and
women' were intellectually inferior. These scientists were not repeating prejudices
without extensive work and thought; they were attempting to verify this major plank in
evolution theory by TRYING TO PROVE, SCIENTIFICALLY, THAT WOMEN WERE
INFERIOR.

"One approach which was seized upon to substantiate that females were
generally inferior to males was to prove that THEIR BRAIN CAPACITY WAS SMALLER.
Researchers first endeavored to demonstrate empirically that female cranial capacity was
smaller, and then that brain capacity was related to INTELLIGENCE, a more difficult task
[28]

"Among the numerous researchers that used craniology to 'prove' the intellectual
inferiority of women, one of the most eminent was PAUL BROCA (1824-1880). One of
Europe's 'most prestigious anthropologists' and a leader in the development of physical
anthropology as a science, Broca, in 1859, founded the prestigious ANTHROPOLOGICAL
SOCIETY. [29] A major preoccupation of the society then was measuring various human
traits, including skulls to 'delineate human groups and assess their relative worth.' [30]
Broca's conclusion was human brains are...larger in mature adults than in the elderly, in
men than in women, in eminent men than in men of mediocre talent, in superior races
than in inferior races...other things equal, there is a remarkable relationship between the
development of intelligence and the volume of the brain. [31]

"And, as Gould notes, Broca's research was not superficial: 'One cannot read
Broca without gaining enormous respect for his care in generating [facts].' (1981)

"Broca was especially concerned about proving women's inferiority to men: 'Of all
his comparisons between groups, Broca collected most information on the brains of
women vs. men...' [32] He concluded that 'the relatively small size of the female brain
depends in part upon her physical inferiority and in part upon her INTELLECTUAL
inferiority.' [33] Broca also concluded that the disparity between men's and women's
brains was still becoming even greater, which he explained was the 'result of differing
evolutionary pressures upon dominant men and passive women.' [34]

"These views were expounded by many of the most prominent evolutionists of
Darwin's day. The thunder of the field of social psychology and a pioneer in the collective
behavior field was GUSTAVE LE BON (1841-1931). This scientist, whose classic study of
crowd behavior ('THE CROWD' 1895) is familiar to every social science student, wrote that
'even in...the most intelligent races...are a large number of women whose brains are
CLOSER IN SIZE TO THOSE OF GORILLAS than to the most developed male brains. This
inferiority is so obvious that no one can contest it for a moment; only its degree is worth
discussion....WOMEN...REPRESENT THE MOST INFERIOR FORMS OF HUMAN
EVOLUTION and...are CLOSER TO CHILDREN AND SAVAGES [well I certainly am, after
reading THIS!] than to an adult, civilized man. They excel in FICKLENESS,
INCONSISTENCY, ABSENCE OF THOUGHT AND LOGIC, and INCAPACITY TO REASON [I
can think of a few MEN this describes. Let's start with CLINTON!]. Without a doubt there
exists some distinguished women, very superior to the average man but they are as
EXCEPTIONAL AS THE BIRTH OF ANY MONSTROSITY, as, for example, of a GORILLA
WITH TWO HEADS; consequently, WE MAY NEGLECT THEM ENTIRELY.' [35] [Don't these
guys just make you feel all warm and fuzzy? Hard to believe that today's Feminazis
embrace the teachings of these jerks!]

"Re-evaluation of the conclusion that females were less intelligent found both
major flaws in the evidence that 'proved' women's inferiority and in major aspects of
evolution theory. FISHER even argues that the whole theory of natural selection is
questionable, quoting CHOMSKY's words that:

" '...the processes by which the human mind achieved its present state of
complexity...are a total mystery...It is perfectly safe to attribute this development to
'NATURAL SELECTION,' so long as we realize that there is NO SUBSTANCE to this
assertion, that it amounts to NOTHING MORE THAN A BELIEF THAT THERE IS COME
NATURALISTIC EXPLANATION for these phenomena.' (1972)

"Another method used to attack the female-inferiority conclusion of evolution was
to attack the evidence of EVOLUTION THEORY itself. FISHER, for example, makes the
following observation:

" 'The difficulties of postulating theories about human origins on the actual brain
organization of our PRESUMED fossil ancestors, with only a few limestone impregnated
skulls [#151], most of them bashed, shattered, and otherwise altered by the passage of
millions of years [#151] as evidence, would seem to be ASTRONOMICAL.' (1979)

"Actually, many of the attempts to disprove the evolutionary view that women are
intellectually inferior to men attacked the core of evolutionary theory because it is
inexorbitantly bound with human-group inferiority, which MUST exist, FROM WHICH
NATURAL SELECTION MAY SELECT. The inferiority-of-women conclusion was so
ingrained in biology, MORGAN concludes, that thinkers in this area tended to 'sheer away
from the sole subject of biology and origins,' HOPING THEY COULD IGNORE IT and
'concentrate on ensuring that in the future things will be different.' [36] He stresses that
we cannot ignore evolutionary biology, though, because while believing the 'JUNGLE
HERITAGE and the evolution of man as a hunting carnivore has taken root in man's mind
as firmly as GENESIS ever did,' she concludes that evolution must be reevaluated, and
that scientists have 'sometimes gone astray' because of PREJUDICE and
PHILOSOPHICAL PRESCRIPTIONS. She argues that the prominent evolutionary view that
women are biologically inferior to men must be challenged, and in this and scores of
other works that preceded her, dozens of writers have adroitly overturned the conclusion
that women are biologically inferior to men, and, by so doing, have UNDERMINED A
MAJOR PLANK IN EVOLUTIONISM." [37] Don't just blow all this off, thinking this is just
ancient history, so it has no effect on us today. Not only do they still discuss evolution
on TV news and talk-shows WITHOUT QUESTION, they teach it in our schools as FACT.

"The century now drawing to a close has witnessed man's greatest achievements
in science, engineering, and technological progress...So sweeping and breathtakingly
rapid have these advances come that peoples everywhere have been seduced by the
'GOSPEL OF PROGRESS,' the beguiling doctrine of salvation through the all-powerful
cognitive powers of man. 'SCIENCE' and 'REASON,' this secular faith contends, will
ultimately triumph over religious 'SUPERSTITION' and then usher in a NEW AGE of
ENLIGHTENMENT, PEACE, PROSPERITY, and continuous PROGRESS.

"The adherents of this new 'faith' come in many stripes. Their 'spiritual' lineage
may be traced to ROUSSEAU, BACON, HUME, DESCARTES, KANT, WEISHAUPT, MARX,
LENIN, ASIMOV, or a myriad of other masters. Darwin is certainly one of the leading
points of light in this glittering firmament. CHARLES DARWIN WAS NOT THE
ORIGINATOR of the ideas that have led to the abandonment of belief in the existence of
objective, transcendent truth. [38]

'But DARWIN'S ROLE was to DIGNIFY these ideas with 'SCIENTIFIC' backing and
to make them accessible to the average man in terms he could understand,' observed
JANE H. INGRAHAM. 'His shattering 'explanation' of the evolution of man from the lower
animals through means EXCLUDING THE SUPERNATURAL delivered the coup de grace
to man's idea of himself as a created being in a world of fixed truth. Confronted with the
'scientific proof' of his own animal origin and nature, Western man, SET FREE AT LAST
FROM GOD, began the long trek through SCIENTIFIC RATIONALISM, ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINISM, CULTURAL CONDITIONING, PERFECTABILITY OF HUMAN NATURE,
BEHAVIORISM, and SECULAR HUMANISM to today's INVERTED MORALITY and
TOTALITARIAN man.' " [39]

"The fruits of this 'faith' have been horrific as TOTALITARIANISM (FASCISM,
NAZISM, COMMUNISM, SOCIALISM, etc.) and its various wars and revolutions have
wrought death, suffering, and destruction on a scale undreamt of before. There are few
who will argue the point that war is hell...BUT IS WAR THE ULTIMATE EVIL? MUST WE
BE WILLING TO ACCEPT ANYTHING - EVEN TYRANNY AND SLAVERY - IN ORDER TO
AVOID WAR?

"...PROFESSOR R. J. RUMMEL's...exhaustive investigation...LETHAL POLITICS:
SOVIET GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER SINCE 1917...found that

'...INDEPENDENT OF WAR and other kinds of conflict - GOVERNMENTS
PROBABLY HAVE MURDERED 119,400,000 PEOPLE - MARXIST governments about
95,200,000 of them. By comparison, the battle-killed in ALL FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC
WARS in this century total 35,700,000 [!]

'These monstrous statistics sharply reoriented my research. For more than thirty
years as a political scientist and peace researcher, I had focused my research on the
causes and conditions of war, conflict, and peace. I had believed that war was the
greatest killer and that nuclear war would be a global holocaust. Now I have found that
the total killed by government in cold blood was almost four times that of war. IT WAS AS
THOUGH A NUCLEAR WAR HAD ALREADY OCCURED.' [40]

"The 'COLD WAR' body count alone is at least 22.5 MILLION. That's the number of
human beings MURDERED by the SOVIET COMMUNISTS from the end of WORLD WAR II
until 1987. To describe this phenomenon of mass homicide, Dr. Rummel...coined the
word 'DEMOCIDE,' which he defined as 'a government's CONCENTRATED, SYSTEMATIC,
and SERIAL MURDER of a large part of its population'...the professor reported that 'from
1918 to 1953 [the Lenin-Stalin years], the Soviet government EXECUTED, SLAUGHTERED,
STARVED, BEAT or TORTURED TO DEATH, or otherwise killed some 39.5 MILLION OF
ITS OWN PEOPLE...In CHINA, under MAO TSE-TUNG, the communist government
eliminated...45 MILLION PEOPLE. The number killed in just these two nations is about
84.5 MILLION, or a LETHALITY OF 252% MORE THAN BOTH WORLD WARS TOGETHER'
[!] 'Yet,' asks Rummel, 'have the world community and intellectuals generally shown
anything like the same horror or outrage over these Soviet and Chinese megakillings as
has been directed at the much less deadly world wars?' [41]

These figures, according to Rummel, 'may underestimate the true total by 10
percent of more...they do not even include the 1921-22 Soviet famine and the 1958-61
Chinese famine, which caused about FOUR MILLION and 27 MILLION DEATHS,
respectively'...The figures also do not include SUICIDES, which by many accounts
occurred in very significant numbers due to widespread fear, terror, shock, and
despair...[they] do not measure the MISERY among those loved ones left alive...No
accounting is made of those who died of HEARTBREAK, who gave up on life and
succumbed to disease or privation, or whose remaining years were full of anguish and
bitterness. All of this horrendous record of annihilation and desolation can be attributed,
says Rummel, to 'UTOPIA EMPOWERED,' the 'melding of an IDEA and POWER.' It is the
natural and inevitable result of the implementation of LENIN's brutal dictum:

'The scientific concept of dictatorship means nothing else but this: POWER
WITHOUT LIMIT, RESTING DIRECTLY UPON FORCE, RESTRAINED BY NO LAWS,
ABSOLUTELY UNRESTRICTED BY RULES.' " [42] [And this is Bill and Hillary's HERO!]

I would respectfully disagree with Mr. Rummel on one point: the mass killing by
"governments" IS war. This war was declared way back in the GARDEN OF EDEN when
SATAN DECLARED WAR ON GOD AND GOD'S CREATION: MANKIND. All this blood
comes from HUMANISM - the worship of MAN, instead of GOD. Next week we will examine
HUMANISM, the coming NEW AGE ONE-WORLD RELIGION, the players and their FINAL
GOAL for us. See y'all then!

Fact or Fiction...YOU Decide.

"But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord"

SOURCES

1] THE BOOKS AND THE PARCHMENTS by F. F. Bruce - Rev. Ed. Fleming H. Revell Co.
1963

2] HOW WE GOT OUR BIBLE by Ralph Earle - Baker Book House 1971

3] A GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE BIBLE by Norman L. Geisler and William E. Nix -
Moody Press 1968

4] EVIDENCE THAT DEMANDS A VERDICT by Josh McDowell - Here's Life Publishers

5] Id

6] CONSPIRATORS' HIERARCHY: THE STORY OF THE COMMITTEE OF 300 by Dr. John
Coleman - America West Publishers 1992 and founder of the International Research and
Educational Society]

7] ANCIENT SECRETS OF THE BIBLE by Charles E. Sellier & Brian Russell - Dell
Publishing 1994

8] EVIDENCE Id

9] THE FLOOD IN THE LIGHT OF THE BIBLE, GEOLOGY, AND ARCHAEOLOGY by Alfred
M. Rehwinkel - Concordia Publishing 1951

10] "FLOOD STORIES OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST" by J. Randall O'Brien - "Biblical
Illustrator" Fall 1986

11] ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE BIBLE by George A. Barton - American Sunday School
Union 1916

12] THE BIBLE AS HISTORY Id

13] THE GENESIS FLOOD by John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris - Presbyterian and
Reformed 1961

14] THE GILGAMESH EPIC AND OLD TESTAMENT PARALLELS by Alexander Heidel -
University of Chicago Press 1949

15] FLOOD STORIES OF THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Id; THE FLOOD OF NOAH AND THE
FLOOD OF GILGAMESH by Frank Lorey, M.A.* - Institute for Creation Research, PO Box
2667, El Cajon, CA 92021; Vital Articles on Science/Creation March 1997 Mr. Lorey is a
Registered Historical Archaeologist.

16] HAS ANYONE REALLY SEEN NOAH'S ARK? by Paul S. Taylor and Mark Van Bebber of
Eden Communications - Christian Answers Network 1044 N. Gilbert Rd. Gilbert, AZ 85234
[www.ChristianAnswers.Net] REFERENCES: "NOAH'S ARK: IT'S FINAL BIRTH" by Bill
Crouse - "Bible and Spade" 5:3 1993; "THE DATE OF NOAH'S FLOOD: LITERARY AND
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE" by William Shea - "Bible and Spade" 6/1: 13-17 1988;
"NOAH'S ARK?" by Gary Byers of Associates for Biblical Research - "Bible and Spade"
1/1: 6-14

17] MAN-MADE BIBLICAL STRUCTURES DISCOVERED by Bryant Wood of Associates for
Biblical Research - Christian Answers Network 1044 N. Gilbert Rd. Gilbert, AZ 85234 USA
[www.ChristianAnswers.Net]

18] THE DESCENT OF MAN AND SELECTION IN RELATION TO SEX by Charles Darwin -
D. Appleton and Company 1896

19] FEMALES OF THE SPECIES: SEX AND SURVIVAL IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM by
Beltyann Kevies - Harvard University Press 1986

20] "NINETEENTH-CENTURY CRANIOLOGY: THE STUDY OF THE FEMALE SKULL" by
Elizabeth Fee - "Bulletin of the History of Medicine" 1979

21] Kevles Id

22] Fee Id

23] Darwin Id

24] Id

25] Id

26] Id

27] THE MISMEASURE OF MAN by Stephen Jay Gould - W. W. Norton & Company 1981

28] "BRAIN SIZE AND INTELLIGENCE IN MAN" by Leigh Van Valen - "American Journal of
Physical Anthropology" 1974

29] Fee Id

30] Gould Id

31] Id

32] Id

33] Id

34] Id

35] Id

36] THE DESCENT OF WOMAN by Elaine Morgan - Stein and Day 1972

37] DARWIN'S TEACHING OF WOMEN'S INFERIORITY, IMPACT No. 249 - "Vital Articles on
Science/Creation" March 1994 by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D. - Institute for Creation Research,
PO Box 2667, El Cajon, CA 92021 [Free monthly newsletter "ACTS & FACTS," or quarterly
devotional Bible-study booklet "DAYS OF PRAISE" available]. Call (619) 448-0900 for
information. References: LANGUAGE AND MIND by Noam Chomsky - Harcourt, Brace,
and World 1972; THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF CHARLES DARWIN 1809-1882, Nora Barlow
Ed. - W. W. Noron & Co., Inc. 1958; WAR by Gwynne Dyer - Crown Publishers, Inc. 1985;
WOMAN'S CREATION: SEXUAL EVOLUTION AND THE SHAPING OF SOCIETY by
Elizabeth Fisher - Anchor Press/Doubleday 1979

38] GLOBAL TYRANNY...STEP BY STEP: THE UNITED NATIONS AND THE EMERGING
NEW WORLD ORDER by William F. Jasper - Western Islands 1992

39] "THE CONSEQUENCE OF ERROR" by Jane H. Ingraham - "The New American"
11/24/86; GLOBAL TYRANNY Id

40] LETHAL POLITICS: SOVIET GENOCIDE AND MASS MURDER SINCE 1917 by R.J.
Rummel - Transaction Publishers 1990

41] "WAR ISN'T THIS CENTURY'S BIGGEST KILLER" by R.J. Rummel - "Wall Street
Journal" 7/7/86

42] LETHAL Id; GLOBAL TYRANNY Id

All emphasis throughout this article is mine, unless otherwise indicated.
 

*Remember: THE DEADLINE IS STILL 2000 A.D. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!

GODSPEED!
The OUTLAWLADY