"Plaintiff relies heavily on Brafman v. United States, 384 F.2d 863 (5th Cir. 1967), where an assessment was invalidated due to the lack of a signature"


This defect, however, was a significant violation of the regulation…

A signature requirement protects the taxpayer by ensuring that a responsible officer has approved the assessment… " - Curley v. U.S. 791 F. Supp 52 (E.D.N.Y. 1992) Cite as 764 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT Page 315


TO DATE, I CAN'T DETERMINE IF THIS GUY IS EVEN REAL! HE WON'T ANSWER ME PERSONALLY, HE HASN'T EVEN ATTEMPTED TO 'RESPOND' IN ANY WAY WHATSOEVER, TO ANY STATEMENTS, NOTICES, OR DEMANDS FROM ME. ME THINKETH HE ACQUIESCES A TAD TOO MUCH.

Will the REAL Gerald Bair please sign up!? Obviously these are not the SAME signatures. HOWEVER, THE FIRST ONE HAS BEEN FRAUDULENTLY USED ON DOCUMENTS OF "ASSESSMENTS". I WONDER WHO IS FORGING THE DIRECTORS SIGNATURE? Hmmmmmmmmm.....


© Paul Revere
Last Updated: