I do not wish to go into much detail as to the architecture of the processors
or how they work in this guide as this comparison is intended to be a buyer's
tool and not solely a technical reference document. However, in order
to make specification comparison easier, the below table sums up the basic
differences between the processors compared here:
|
|
|
|
| Maker | Intel | Intel | Intel | Intel | AMD | AMD | AMD | IBM~Macintosh |
| Name | Celeron | Pentium II | Pentium III/e | Pentium IV | K6-2 | K6-III | Athlon | G4 |
| Transistors | 19 million | 7.5 million | 9.5 to 27 million | 48 million | 8.8 million | 21.3 million | 22 million | 10.5 million |
| Core Voltage | 2.0v | 2.8v/2.0v | 2.0v/1.6v | 1.6 v | 2.2v/2.4v | 2.4v | 1.6v | 1.8v |
| M/B Interface | Slot-1/Socket-370 | Slot-1 | Slot-1/ FC-PGA | FC-PGA | Socket-7 | Socket-7 | Slot-A | Socket |
| L1 Cache | 16KB Data 16KB Instruction Set |
16KB Data 16KB Instruction Set |
16KB Data 16KB Instruction Set |
16KB Data 16KB Instruction Set |
32KB Data 32KB Instruction Set |
32KB Data 32KB Instruction Set |
64KB Data 64KB Instruction Set |
32KB Data 32KB Instruction Set |
| L2 Cache | 128KB | 512KB | 256KB~512KB | 256KB | 512KB ~ 2048KB | 256KB ~ 2048KB | 512KB ~ 2048KB | 1024KB ~ 2048KB |
| L2 Cache Speed | CPU Clock Speed | 1/2 CPU Clock Speed | 1/2 CPU Clock Speed to FULL Clock Speed | Full Clock Speed | FSB | CPU Clock Speed | 1/2 CPU Clock Speed | CPU Clock Speed |
| Available Clock Speeds | 300MHz - 533MHz | 233MHz - 500MHz | 450MHz - 1130MHz | 1400MHz - 1500MHz | 300MHz - 500MHz | 400MHz - 500MHz | 500MHz - 800MHz | 400MHz- 500MHz |
I have heard so many bad things about Win-intel machines, that I must say something here.
There are many makers for a so called win-intel machine. For example, A win-intel PC's CPU may not be an "Intel" product, but be using an AMD's or a Cyrix's CPU, which normally have less than stellar performances compared to a true Intel. Also, The other CPUs also prove to be less stable. But the CPU is not the only factor. Motherboards, RAM, and video card brands also make or break a PC. I have been building PCs since 1992 and I have found the brands, which I feel make a PC that NEVER freezes or locks up, or gives any other problems.
Well, there you have it. Build a PC with these brands and you will be surprised by just how clean, mean, and fast your system will run.
Video Cards :-)
(Tested on 11/22/2000)
I tested four AGP video cards that were all priced below $70 (US). The cards
were:
|
S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs ($25)
|
|
Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP (v6.45.5423f.98) w/ 4 Megs
($25)
|
|
Creative Labs nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs ($25)
|
|
Creative Labs nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs ($65)
|
The software drivers used were downloaded from the vendors' sites on 11/22/2000 and were the most up-to-date drivers found.
These cards were tested using one PC system, which is listed here:
|
Pentium II 450
|
|
Windows Version 98 4.10.2222 A
|
|
384 Megs of PC100 SDRAM
|
|
ASUS B2P Motherboard
|
|
IBM ATA 100 - 20 Gig Hard Disk Drive
|
Benchmark software used:
|
WinTune 98
|
|
GT Interactive's DRIVER
|
These cards were tested for Video(2D), Direct3D, and OpenGL scores.
Video(2D)
800x600@16bits/pixel
Raw 2D scores @
800x600@16bits/pixel
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Scores | 36.13 MPixels/s | 41.86 MPixels/s | 86.61 MPixels/s | 86.17 MPixels/s |
Video(2D)
1024x768@32bits/pixel
Raw 2D scores @
1024x768@32bits/pixel
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Scores | Failed | 21.13 MPixels/s | 65.74 MPixels/s | 70.76 MPixels/s |
Direct3D
800x600@16bits/pixel
Raw D3D scores @
800x600@16bits/pixel
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Scores | 16.85 MPixels/s | 44.20 MPixels/s | 133.036 MPixels/s | 192.61 MPixels/s |
Direct3D
1024x768@32bits/pixel
Raw D3D scores @
1024x768@32bits/pixel
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Scores | Failed | 6.27 MPixels/s | 61.07 MPixels/s | 92.53 MPixels/s |
OpenGL
800x600@16bits/pixel
Raw OpenGL scores @
800x600@16bits/pixel
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Scores | 12.21 MPixels/s | 9.50 MPixels/s | 17.47 MPixels/s | 24.62 MPixels/s |
OpenGL
1024x768@32bits/pixel
Raw OpenGL scores @
1024x768@32bits/pixel
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Scores | Failed | 5.76 MPixels/s | 17.34 MPixels/s | 24.61 MPixels/s |
GT Interactive's DRIVER
| Video Card | S3 Trio 3D/2X (362/368) w/ 4 Megs | Trident 3D Image 9750 AGP | CL nVidia RIVA TNT w/ 16 Megs | CL nVidia RIVA TNT2 Pro w/ 32 Megs |
| Remarks | Failed, major artifacts | Failed, would not run | Good image, no artifacts, but slightly sluggish. | Good image, no artifacts, with fast response. |
Conclusion
As of today, I like the AGP CL TNT2 card with 32 Megs.
Click here to return to the My Computer Pages
Click here to return to the main page
.
Hits since the October 22, 1999