Abortion foe may join FDA panelBy Michael Collins
Post Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — A Lexington gynecologist who is active in the anti-abortion movement and is pressuring the federal government to rescind its approval of the "abortion pill" is in line for a position on a key advisory committee on women's health issues. Abortion-rights groups are furious that the Bush administration is considering W. David Hager for an appointment to the Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee.
The panel advises the Food and Drug Administration and made the recommendation that eventually led to government approval of RU-486, the so-called abortion pill. Hager's critics describe him as a right-wing ideologue who has no credibility in the medical or scientific community.
As evidence, they point to a book that Hager authored with his wife, Linda, that stresses "the restorative power of Jesus Christ in one's life" and puts a strong spiritual emphasis on easing women's suffering from health problems.
"He's more interested in ideology than in science or medicine," said Gloria Feldt, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
Hager did not respond to requests for an interview.
But his defenders say he is a well-respected physician and researcher who is hardly an extremist. He is a part-time professor at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine and supervises the residency program at Lexington's Central Baptist Hospital.
"He is an outstanding and highly qualified candidate," said Bill Pierce, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
One published report said that Hager would serve as chairman of the panel, but Pierce insisted that no decision has been made on Hager's appointment.
Kenton County Commissioner Barb Black said Hager would be a good addition to the committee. Black said she sought Hager's advice earlier this year when the Northern Kentucky health board was debating whether to reject federal family planning money because of concerns that birth-control pills can cause medical problems and, in some cases, even abortions.
Hager felt, as did Black, that there was inconclusive medical evidence to link birth-control pills to abortion — a position that put him at odds with some in the anti-abortion movement, Black said.
Hager's position on that issues shows that he is someone who "looks at all of the medical facts and considers all of the data before he makes a judgment call," she said.
Hager has been active in the anti-abortion movement for years and is probably one of the best-known obstetrician-gynecologists in Lexington, said Frank Schwendeman, president of the Kentucky Right to Life Association.
He also has worked to reduce pregnancy among teen-agers and has promoted the abstinence-only approach to sex education. In addition, he was one of the doctors who participated in a federal study last year that questioned the effectiveness of condoms in protecting against sexually-transmitted diseases.
Emory Wilson, dean of the UK College of Medicine, said Hager's contributions "to the literature and to our knowledge of infectious diseases in women have been significant and respected by others in the field."
In August, Hager was one of several physicians in the Christian Medical Association who petitioned the FDA to shelve the RU-486 "abortion pill" pending a review of the approval process and complications attributed to the drug.
Abortion-rights supporters contend it would be a conflict for Hager to serve as chairman of the FDA's advisory committee at the same time he is pushing the agency to shelve RU-486.
The appointment doesn't require confirmation by Congress.
"For someone who doesn't trust or support women's rights to reproductive health care — and I'm talking about contraceptives as well as abortion — to be in a position to make critical decisions about the future of health care is quite frightening," said Beth Wilson, director of the Reproductive Freedom Project for the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky.
Feldt and others say Hager's appointment is part of a pattern by the Bush administration to fill key advisory positions with people for whom ideology is more important than medicine or science.
Other appointees they cited as examples include Mildred Jefferson, a founder and former president of the National Right to Life Committee who has been asked to serve on a new panel on clinical research trial safety; and Tom Coburn, a former Republican congressman from Oklahoma who was named in January co-chairman of the Presidential Advisory Council on HIV and AIDS. Coburn has questioned the effectiveness of condoms in preventing sexually transmitted diseases.