19th century Feminism in America

Feminism has put a lot of importance upon the past as a propaganda tool. Here I hope to correct some of the myths and inaccuracies that are put about, and give the other side of the story on a number of points. As is often the case with this sort of re-balancing the evidence provided is not intended to be a balanced picture all by itself. It is assumed that the reader has already heard an inbalanced account of the history of feminism from feminist sources. To the issues then:

"Feminist" from here on, refers to feminists of 19th century America.

Women were not oppressed by men
Neither men nor women of the 19th century generally agreed with the feminist view of women as slaves of oppressive men. On the contrary the view taken was that women were especially cared for. A modern view would be that women and men were both restricted by their gender roles, and both sexes helped to enforce those roles. Some few early feminists were able to see this but most could not see the male role was also 'oppresive'. As for the female role, they mostly blamed men, but their frustration at women who did not want to lose their chains often bubbled to the surface.

Women were not oppressed by male laws
A frequent false claim is that women of the 19th century were treated as property. Feminists of the time often exagerated the restrictions on women, and rarely mentioned the benefits women received or the special duties that men had under law. They incorrectly tended to assume that the small number of powerful men in charge of making laws would favour their own sex. If anything the reverse was true.

Women were restricted by female laws.
Feminists would have had a far better case if they had claimed to be oppressed by what I will term 'female law' -- the strict Victorian laws of social etiquette that especially paralysed women into a passive 'ladylike' lifestyle. Victorian morality was much more severe than previous puritanical restrictions in history -- only the sucess of the Industrial Revolution allowed so many people (women) to be so under-employed.

Both men and women fought for women's rights
Another aspect of feminists' revision of history is the idea that women acting alone and against male opposition managed to win their rights. I will be highlighting some of the forgotten or censored male contributions to the movement. In the same way both men and women fought against change. I shall be highlighting some of the women who wanted things to stay the way they were.

The importance of the vote
Today "winning" the vote for women from men is seen as the most important achievement of the women's movement. Certainly from a modern perspective the vote is a symbol of acceptance and citizenship -- even if it is not used! But in the 19th century the vote was not valued for itself, so much as a means to an end. The lack of the right to vote was not seen as self-evident inequality.

Feminists were not generally egalitarian
Although they used the language of equality to demand the same rights (but not the same obligations) as men, most feminists were pro-woman not egalitarian. They did not champion any male causes, or usually even admit there could be any. Often the attitude of the female feminists, including the most notable leaders of the movement, was sexist and actually anti-male. As today some women were genuinely egalitarian, some were female supremacists, and most were just comfortably biased. It was after all a women's movement, not a man's, and not neutral or egalitarian.

Index of specific women feminists (sources, and quotations in a larger context)
Abigail Adams
Lucretia Mott
Sarah Grimke
Sojourner Truth
Elizabeth Cady Stanton
Susan B Anthony
Lucy Stone
Victoria Woodhull
Frances Wright
Mary Kelley