Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

That's it, the astronauts have landed on the moon (photo is AS11-40-5922).
Notice, that their LEM is very badly oriented, they are obliged to get out in the shadow of the LEM.
Thankfully, the very convenient lunar "reflectivity" is here to help them.
This same reflectivity (which is perfectly imaginary) is also very practical to explain plenty of incoherences.

On a series of six photos beginning with this photo (AS11-40-5862)

and ending with this photo (AS11-40-5869)

We can see Buzz going down the ladder.
There is a first thing which looks strange: The articulation of the ladder looks unnatural.

If we compare with the normal articulation of the ladder...

...we notice that there is an alien object which has been superposed to the articulation, and this alien object is...a bottle!

If we compare the two first photos of the sequence (AS11-40-5862 and AS11-40-5863), we notice something abnormal:

In the second photo, the photographer has obviously moved on the right, and has also moved a little farther away from the LEM; we would then logically expect to see more of the plate "UNITED STATES" on the right, but it's the converse, we even see less of it!

The second anomaly is that there is an object which is brightly luminous on the first photo, whereas there is triangle shaped window which is dull, and on the second photo, it's the converse: the bright object suddenly becomes dull, and the triangle becomes luminous, and even looks like a porthole we would see the sea through!
I can see no logical explanation for this, it certainly can't be explained by the moon reflectivity!

If we make an animation with these two photos, it can make a funny effect:

Between these two photos (AS11-40-5866 and AS11-40-5867), the whole scene has rotated clockwise (we can see that a foot of the LEM has passed on the other side of another foot); this is because the photographer has moved on the right.

It is even possible to measure the angle of the rotation of the scene, by drawing a line between two same artifacts and measuring the difference of the angles of the directions of these lines on the two photos.
I have measured an angle of rotation of 40-17=23°.
But we can also see there is a little problem: the stick which is at the foot of the LEM and is completely bent on the ground has not rotated at all; it makes the same angle on the two photos.

It's even worse than that: We can see that the piston which is under the LEM has turned in the other direction (anti-clockwise).

There is even an evidence of that by the way a white reflection has moved on the piston: The white reflection has moved from the large section of the piston to its small section, which is the indication of an anti-clockwise rotation.

Some little other problems:

If we compare the buckle of the shoes between the photos AS11-40-5863 and AS11-40-5867, we can see it's different.

And if we compare the metallic piece at the end of his harness on photos AS11-40-5867 and AS11-40-5868, it obviously looks different.

On the last photo of the sequence (AS11-40-6869), the shoes of the astronaut suddenly become dark blue (whereas they were light blue before).
You are going to say that it's because they now are in the shadow; but then, why is there a shaft of light on them?

On this photo, there is something which is rather shocking: The astronaut has his two feet in the air: his left foot is floating whereas his right foot isn't still on the first rung of the ladder; it doesn't seem a normal way of going down a ladder, rather an acrobatic one!

Logically, when he arrives on the eighth rung, he should put his left foot on this rung if he has alternated his two feet.
But it's still his right foot he puts on this rung.

So, we tell ourselves that he may have missed a rung, but at least it's his left foot he will put on the last rung...not at all, it's still his right foot.
So, we wonder he has not gone down the whole ladder with his right foot,

and if instead of an astronaut going down the ladder...

...We would not rather have a charlot!

On these two photos (AS11-40-5874 and AS11-40-5875), we can see Buzz saluting the american flag.

A first remark is about the strange shape of the shadow of Buzz.

This shadow is strangely symmetrical; a very particular structure of the relief could eventually explain it, but it really would have to be very particular!

On the photo AS11-40-5875, we can see a strange face inside the visor, which looks small.

On these photos, the flag is obviously identical.

An Apollo fan has made a Gif on Wikipedia to show it was not moving:

The problem is that on this photo (AS11-40-5886), the flag which is seen on the other side doesn't look the way it should:
The flag we see on this photo is not the exact other side of the flag that Buzz saluted.

In fact, if we look at the flags closer:

we can see that the blue part with the stars is shaded on both sides:
If it is shaded on one side, it logically shouldn't be on the other side.

On this photo (AS11-40-5905), the shadow of the pole of the flag brutally stops, and is nowhere to be found till the foot of the flag.

And this close-up of the photo on which Buzz is saluting the flag shows no evidence of shadow for the pole of the flag either.

And on this photo (AS11-37-5468), the flag still appears differently

On these three photos (AS11-40-5897, AS11-40-5898, and AS11-40-5899); Armstrong takes three photos of a metallic plate fixed on the ladder.
The two first photos, have a bad luminosity, and the plate is hardly visible, but on the third photo miraculously, he found the good settings (with no way of knowing which one was the good), and the plate suddenly becomes clear and legible.

There is just a little problem; on the two first photos of the plate, we can see an object we can't see on the third photo with the good luminosity.
You don't see what it is?

Let me help you.
It's a vertical object on the left and behind the plate.
As the attention of people is focused on the plate which has miraculously become clear, they don't notice the disappearance of this object.

On photo AS11-40-5870, what is it the shadow of?
It looks very strange!

On photo AS11-40-5871, what is this strange object?
An UFO?

In this close-up of the visor in the photo AS11-40-5873, we see strange shadows on the visor of the astronaut, the shadows of several people; are there inhabitants on the moon?

On these photos (AS11-40-5878 and AS11-40-5879), we can see a footprint with a small rock ahead, and on the next photo the boot of an astronaut with a rock which looks bigger than the previous rock in comparison with the previous photo.
So we logically think that the rock on the second photo is not the same as the one on the first photo.

But when we take a close-up at the rock of the first photo and we compare with much attention the artifacts which surround the rocks on the two photos, we can see that these artifacts are the same, and therefore it's very surprisingly the same rock on the two photos!

So, I have reproduced the boot on the first photo at the same size it had relatively to the rock on the second photo, and we then can see that there is a little problem, for this boot is much smaller than the footprint it is supposed to have made.
We are entitled to deduce that there must be lunar giants on the moon!

On this couple of photos we can see the photo of the astronaut taken frontally (AS11-40-5903), and a close-up on his visor.
Two anomalies can be seen on what we can see on his visor relatively to what we can see on the photo.

1) On the photo the astronaut folds his left arm, but the visor tells us it is stretched instead; so what's right, the photo or the reflection?

2) The direction of the golden stick which is planted at the foot of the LEM cuts the legs of the astronaut at mid-height on the photo, but at the top of his legs on the reflection.

On the photo AS11-40-5920, we can see through the articulation of the piston to the leg of the LEM; they are connected through the operation of the holy spirit!

What is this brilliant object on photo AS11-40-5921; it is glowing in the shadow; normally it should be dark; if it isn't, it means it is emanating light from itself!

This is a close-up of the foot of the LEM on photo AS11-40-5926; is it really what supports the weight of the LEM?
It must be a joke!

On these two photos (AS11-40-5927 and AS11-40-5928), the photographer is taking two photographs with his camera looking in the same direction.
Since we see his shadow on the second photo, and the direction of the camera is the same on the two photos, we should also see his shadow on the first photo, since the position of the shadow of the photographer on the photo depends only on the direction he is aiming at (and also the direction of the sun, but it's very unlikely it has changed between the two photos).

I have added on the second photo the shadow which is missing and should logically be here.

On these photos (AS11-40-5931 and AS11-40-5932), we can see a triangle of stones in the foreground which has obviously rotated, whereas the direction of the objects in the background has remained the same.

On this photo (AS11-40-5935.jpg), we can see a double source light indicated by the arrows.
Would there be two suns on the moon?

On this couple of photos (AS11-40-5936 and AS11-40-5937), the first photo shows a brilliant light source coming from the left.
On the second photo, we find on the left the same artifacts we found on the right on the first photo, and with the same direction (i.e. the camera has only made a translation without rotation).
In these conditions there is no reason why we should not also see this brilliant light source on the left of the second photo!
Who turned out the light?

Moreover, the transversal direction of the artifacts changes a little between the two photos, but not the horizon line!

On these two photos (AS11-40-5942 and AS11-40-5943), the astronaut is carrying electronic devices.
The problem is that the devices he is carrying on the first photo are not the same as the ones he is carrying on the second photo.
Who made the substitution?

Here we have two views of a crater (photos AS11-40-5957 and AS11-40-5958) the astronaut is walking along.

On these photos, I have circled the zones our attention must be focused on.

On these close-ups, we can see that there is a rock which is present on the second photo, but not on the first photo.
And if you think that it might be possible that it's because it was small and the camera missed it on the first photo, I'll tell you that the camera didn't miss the little rock (circled in blue) which is just before and which is twice smaller!

on the three photos AS11-40-5960, AS11-40-5959, and AS11-40-5961, of which we see here an animation, the astronaut is moving along the LEM.

On this stereoscopic view, we see the first two photos; I have colored with corresponding colors perfectly recognizable artifacts (stones)
We can see that because the stones are farther from the photographer than the leg of the LEM, they have moved away from this leg by the fact that the photographer has moved on the right.

On this double view, the astronaut has still more moved on the right; so we would have expected the stones to have moved still farther away from the leg of the LEM...but it's the converse, they have come closer to the leg, and are even closer to it than they were on the first photo!

On these two photos (AS11-40-5962 and AS11-40-5961), the photographer takes a first photo of the LEM, then moves back and takes a second photo.
As he is farther from the LEM, this one seems to have moved back relatively to the first photo.
But the shadow of the photographer has also moved back!
This is of course stupid, and irrealistic; the shadow of the photographer always follows him.

I have corrected the shadow on the second photo to make it look like it should.

On these two photos (AS11-40-5963 and AS11-40-5964), we can see the astronaut getting busy (or pretending to) with the solar wind collector.

But we can see something which is abnormal, and I have circled it.

On this close-ups, we can see that there are metallic pieces of his harness which have disappeared on the second photo.

On the photo AS11-40-5969, if we look well, we can guess a green face lurking in the shadow of the LEM.
I have added more luminosity to this green face to make it more visible.

We are going to see a series of photos taken by the camera at the top of the LEM...and a nice series of incoherences as well!

On these two first photos (Ap11fr01 and Ap11fr02), we can see first Buzz bent; so he is smaller than when he is standing upright, and so should be his shadow; on the next photo, Buzz is standing upright, so is certainly taller than he was on the previous photo; we could expect his shadow on the second photo to be taller than on the first photo, the perspective and relief being the same.
But it's the converse, the shadow is taller on the first photo.

On the first of these two photos (Ap11fr02 and Ap11fr04), we first see Buzz just before the shadow of the leg of the LEM he is facing perpendicularly.
The shadow of the leg is cutting his both feet.
On the next photo, the astronaut has completely crossed the shadow of the leg, and this one is now entirely behind him.
But very surprisingly (and abnormally), the shadow of the leg starts from his back, then contours him by his front, and goes back to his back.
This is absurb, the shadow of the leg could only cut him this way if it was oblique to him, but here it is not the case; it is entirely behind him.

This is the way the shadow of the leg should cut the astronaut.

On these two photos (Ap11fr06 and Ap11fr07), the face of the astronaut becomes completely black (and even a part of his suit) just because he shielded his face with his hand; have you ever seen the face of somebody become completeky black just because he had shielded his face with this hand?
No, of course, it is completely absurb!

With the animation, it gives a comical effect.

Here we have both the aerial view (Ap11Fr11), and the photo taken by Armstrong (AS11-40-5874) which corresponds.
We can see that:
1) The shadow of the LEM is different on the two photos.
2) The flag is different on the two photos.
3) Armstrong should be more on the left on the aerial photo (on it he is facing a big hole which is at the extreme left on the photo he took).

Here we have the aerial view (Ap11fr12) and the only photo taken by Armstrong which can correspond (AS11-40-5902).
Indeed, Armstrong has moved on the right along the LEM down and has passed the lower edge of the photo, out of the field of the aerial camera.

This can be seen by the footprints he left on this animation:

Before disappearing from the field of the camera of the top of the LEM, he has stopped to face buzz and took a frontal photo of him.
Logically, on the photo AS11-40-5902, which corresponds to the aerial photo Ap11fr12, we should see the shadow of the LEM on the left of Buzz, and the flag on his right.

To finish this mission, there is a series of photo of the earth rising over the moon (from AS11-44-6547 to AS11-44-6559).

I have made an animation with these photos:

But on these photos we can see the same artifacts; I have circled with various corresponding colors; these artifacts are present on all the photos of the sequence.
They are the indication that the CMS didn't cover a great distance during this sequence, and also that there was not much time between the photos; in these conditions the earth is rising much too fast!