COURT OF APPEALS RULING My attorney did not present his briefing on my divorce case to the Court of Appeals until September, 1996. I received notification of the Court of Appeals ruling by mail in mid-January, 1997. At that time, my divorce became final and I was officially divorced. Overall, the appeal was denied with minor exceptions. The Court ruled: - the Judge "abused her discretion" in imposing sanctions - sanctions were impermissible but did not require my personal funds that had been in a savings account that had been seized by the Court and inaccessible by me be released to me - the amount of attorney fees I was to pay to my ex-spouse's attorney reverted to $3,500.00 - all other aspects of the judgment were to remain in effect. With the USFSPA this meant my ex-spouse was awarded 28% of gross/disposable military retired pay minus SBP costs. Reading the Court of Appeals opinion it was not surprising the appeal was largely denied. My attorney's briefing to the Court of Appeals mentioned nothing about the Judge at the lower Court refusing to allow a trial, the Judge's behavior, and about the circumstances involving awarding retired military payments to my ex-spouse. With the USFSPA the Court of Appeals could have: 1. allowed no ex-spouse military retirement payments, 2. allowed reduced ex-spouse military retirement payments from what my ex-spouse claimed, 3. ruled ex-spouse payments were due for a limited number of years, 4. ruled reduced ex-spouse payments were due for a limited number of years, 5. ruled ex-spouse payments were to stop upon remarriage by my ex-spouse Instead, the Court of Appeals took the most extreme and most beneficial position possible for my ex-spouse. The Court ruled my ex-spouse should be awarded payments for a time covering from the time of marriage to include when the divorce process started to the time of retirement and that such payments should continue even after remarriage for the duration of my ex-spouse's or my life.