Part One: Zack Kopplin, can you match my poker hand?
Part Two: Seven Nobel Laureates in science who either supported Intelligent Design or attacked Darwinian evolution
Part Three: Why you can't be a Darwinist and a "human exceptionalist"
Part Four: Twenty-one more famous Nobel Prize winners who rejected Darwinism as an account of consciousness
Part Five: Is methodological naturalism a defining feature of science?
Part Six: The myth of methodological naturalism: thirty great scientists who made scientific arguments for the supernatural
Part Seven: Seven questions for Zack Kopplin's 75 Nobel Prize winners
Part Eight: The key point at issue between Intelligent Design theory and neo-Darwinian evolution
Part Nine: "Quantify, quantify, quantify!" Why Intelligent Design is a proper scientific theory, and why neo-Darwinism is not
Part Ten: The case for Intelligent Design, in laypeople's language
Part Eleven: Answers to Common arguments against Intelligent Design
Part Twelve: Science and the STOMPS principle
Part Thirteen: Is this religion, Zack? - What I think Louisiana students deserve to hear about origins.
Part Fourteen: Teach the controversy: bad for Louisiana? You decide!