Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
« March 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Wudrich's Ramblings and Reviews
Monday, March 20, 2006
No wonder it didn't win any awards
So I decided on the weekend to see King Kong. And well I was looking to waste some time but I was hoping that it wasn't going to be such a waste. Did anyone else think this movie sucked? Or am I the only one?

If you haven't seen it I won't spoil it for you if you still intend on watching this crap. However I did enjoy it up until they got to the island and ran into the locals... after that it went downhill faster than Antoine Deneriaz on a ski hill (look it up).

The CG was pretty cool. I am sure Peter Jackson would have it no other way, but it doesn't make up for the scenes that dragged on or had nothing AT ALL to do with the story.

It kind of reminded me of Chronicles of Narnia. Which, looking back I forgot to post on... anyway. Both Chronicles and Kong had at least 4-5 scenes they could have cut to make the movies much shorter and more to the point.

So unless you are a die hard Peter Jackson or King Kong fan I wouldn't do much more than rent it when it is released on Tuesday. Make sure you have 3 hours to spare to get through it as well.

Chronicles of Narnia will be released to DVD April 4, 2006. Again unless you are a die hard fan, I wouldn't bother with this one either.

This week in TV I am attempting to watch all of the original episodes of the Transformers. I can't wait for the live action movie next summer. Check out the site www.transformerslive.com

Posted by kyle at 9:33 AM MST
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post

Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - 10:37 AM MST

Name: Cuppojoe
Home Page: http://cuppojoe.blogspot.com

Sorry man... Gotta disagree with you on this one. While the movie may have been long and, as you say, some of the scenes expedible, I don't think the length OR the extra scenes took away from the movie at all. For me, it wasn't about comparing it to this or that movie from the past (I know how you hate remakes), it was about letting the story entertain me... which it did. Did I go to the movie to see an accurate documentary of giant apes on remote islands? Of course not! I went there to purposely put aside reality for 3 hours. To me, it was a perfect tip-of-the-hat to the old 1940's B-movie monster flicks. Good job, Jackson!

As for Narnia... Well, I was a big fan of the books as a kid, and I just don't think the magic was captured properly on the big screen. Sure, lots of cool CG and whatnot, but I could see that our kids weren't nearly as mesmerized by it as I was when I read the books. It's a shame, but I think some stories are better in the fertile little imaginations of children.

View Latest Entries