to Main Page

Daniel W Kauffman Jr's Profile
Daniel W Kauffman Jr's Facebook profile
Create Your Badge



to Main Page
Opposing Views Heinlein Centennial web site This site is Gunny Approved
Heard the
Word of Blog?

Political tags - such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth - are never basic criteria. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.

Open Trackback Alliance

Check out our Frappr!

Patterico's Pledge

If the FEC makes rules that limit my First Amendment right to express my opinion on core political issues,

I will not obey those rules.

« December 2005 »
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

View blog reactions

Who Links Here

Free counter and web stats

eXTReMe Tracker

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by

Listed on BlogShares

Friday, 16 December 2005
Democrats will have an "issue agenda"

The Democrats Punt

Nancy Pelosi says that the Democrats will have an "issue agenda" for next year's Congressional elections, but it will not include a position on Iraq.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said yesterday that Democrats should not seek a unified position on an exit strategy in Iraq, calling the war a matter of individual conscience and saying differing positions within the caucus are a source of strength for the party.
Pelosi said Democrats will produce an issue agenda for the 2006 elections but it will not include a position on Iraq. There is consensus within the party that President Bush has mismanaged the war and that a new course is needed, but House Democrats should be free to take individual positions, she sa(i)d."

Let me see,

they were FOR it,

BEFORE they were AGAINST it,

but now they are NOT SAYING,

what their position is On what for most Americans is THE defining issue of the present era.

Oh and they want us to elect more of them to the Senate and House of Representatives to--

Uhh, "they are not saying?"

Just vote for us, we are not Bush, nor are we Repugs and when we figure out what we stand for, you will be the first to know, MAYBE.

Is that a firm unequivocal maybe, or a conditional,let's consult with a focus group before making any semipermanent decisions, maybe?

I wonder if they will take this firm a stand on the REST of the issues that may come up?

If having NO position as a Party on the Iraq War is a source of strength, will having no position on any other issue but them in a position of unassailable strength?

Vote for us, we stand for Nothing?

Linked to

third world county at OTA Free-for-All Post
Stray Dog at T.G.I.O.T.A.F.
Bloggin' Outloud at Friday Funny Stuff & Open Posts
NIF at It's a beautiful day at So, did you think about Open Trackback spam, buddy?
Right Wing Nation at Friday Open Trackbacks
Colbert Report at Quote of the day
The Conservative Cat at Continue the Conversation and Evolve to a Higher Level


Posted by ky/kentuckydan at 9:44 PM CST
| Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post
Updated: Sunday, 9 July 2006 9:09 PM CDT

Sunday, 18 December 2005 - 12:56 AM CST

Name: The Troll
Home Page:

Yeah I saw this story and rolled on the floor laughing. I did a nice little post on it myself. Your perspective takes a nicely different slant than mine. Oh and I love the DoDo bird pic

The Troll

View Latest Entries