|
If Kevin Smith is
Hollywood’s resident smart aleck, and Darren Aronofsky, its dark
visionary, then Wes Anderson (along with writing partner Owen)
is it’s cerebral humorist.
With the Royal Tenenbaums, Anderson has created a sometimes
tedious, but slanted and brutally humorous look at dysfunctional
families and the repercussions of the sins of the father. He has
cemented himself as the leader in the genre of humor that either
makes you cringe because you can relate, or think about, because
you understand. This
is the kind of movie that you don’t know what to expect going
in, and are not sure what to think when you come out, but once you
think about it, you’ll realize that you’ve seen a very smart,
well written, tilted, but slightly overdone piece of societal
observation.
The beginning of
the story, and subsequent delivery is cleverly done through the
usage of a book, going chapter by chapter.
The beginning introduces us, in depth and reminiscent of
Amelie, to the cast of characters and their history.
Royal Tenenbaum (Gene Hackman) is the obliviously uncaring
father of three child prodigies, Richie (Luke Wilson), the
tennis pro, Chas (Ben Stiller), the financial wizard who
bred and created Dalmatian mice (in one of the films many quirky
touches) and Margot (Gwyneth Paltrow), the adopted daughter
and successful writer/playwright.
Each achieved fame at a very young age, but as the story
continues, each fell on their own type of hardships.
Flashing forward 22 years, to Royal, who is either
critically ill, or just critically in need of some soul cleansing,
trying to reconcile with his wife Etheline, and the kids. The
remainder of the story progresses, in rather trying manner at
times, through the differing types of issues, ranging from dealing
with the failures, to Etheline’s courtship by her business
partner, to the closeness of Margot and Richie’s
“relationship”, to Margot’s mysterious past disappearances,
to the relationship with a neighbor child Eli (Owen Wilson),
whose presence, along with Bill Murray and Danny Glover's, I
struggled with, save just populating Anderson’s odd little world
with more weird and quirky people. The story is setup well enough, but in order to have any kind
of power must be quicker hitting, because the lethargy and
repetition tends to wear down the effect I believe.
What makes the movie work is the way that Anderson and
Wilson combine all of the little oddities, without making it seem
unreal. This,
combined with the continued creativity of delivery, the sharp,
sometimes painful truth of the script, and the acerbically
unknowing humor of Hackman’s characterization, are what make the
film bearable, and later on, ring as memorable.
He is unexpectedly sharp and consistent, with his off the
cuff, naturally sarcastic nature and delivery.
He makes Royal seem insulting without knowing it, and comes
very easily to Hackman, who has a comic touch that he can pull out
and use with great ease, as he does here. As for the rest, Paltrow maintains the same deadpan look
throughout, but with her sunken-eyed appearance and bland
delivery, she suits the character perfectly, as we feel her pain.
Unfortunately, for all of the good, including Huston’s haggard
turn as the mother, who seems to have lost her best years, we are
subjected to pointless appearances from Glover and Murray, who
sleepwalk through their roles, and whose characters seem to have
no discernible purpose, save romantic ties, or just to show that
not everything has to make sense, or have a purpose, I guess, that
is very unclear and distracting.
Most distracting of all, is the presence of the Wilson
brothers in front of the camera.
They are obviously brilliant minds when it comes to
creation and translation of natural humanity in an abnormal
presentation, but in front of the camera, it’s another story;
something I like to call the Tarantino syndrome.
It is where the creative genius and talent should remain
behind the camera, rather than in front of it.
Had that rule been applied here, and one of the characters
been removed, and another recast, this may have been a more
pleasant and rewarding, albeit still slightly over stated,
experience.
Ultimately,
The Royal Tenenbaums is a twisted, offbeat, slightly belabored
look at the dark side of the imperfect family, done by one of the
few directors who could pull this off without shocking us (ala
Todd Solondz) or depressing us. (ala Atom Egoyan)
Anderson and company have always looked at the same world
we have, except that his perspective is tilted about 45 degrees
from the rest of ours. We
see bits and pieces of our selves in their movies, especially this
one, and therein lay the success, or failure of their films.
The message here gets slightly diluted over the time it
takes to tell it, by giving us repeated versions of the same
issue, such as Margot and Eli’s relationship, Chas’s anger, or
Richie obsessions. But
beneath all of this diluted emotion and intensity, is a well
written familial commentary that hits more often than it misses,
and establishes the creators as the social observers and town
criers of that which we sometimes feel no one can understand, or
no one would want to. It is an offbeat social dissection that
takes longer than need be to makes its point about the bonds of
family love and friendship, which can be easily severed, but not
as easily repaired, and the pressures that expectation can put on
these bonds. All done through the slanted realism, viewed through the eyes
of Wes Anderson and The Wilson’s.
The point is diluted slightly by the length of the
delivery, and the presence and distraction of certain actors and
characters which distract away from the purpose of the film; that
nobody’s perfect, despite appearances, but there may be good
inside all of us, fighting to get out, and the methods of
extraction and delivery may be unconventional, but all come from
the same place. At
least this time around, unlike Rushmore,
I could at least grasp the concept and idea, and laugh at a little
bit of what I got, while in theater, and a lot more, upon
reflection. The future is bright for Anderson and Wilson
collaborations, as long as they tone things down, and don't let
their witticisms and cuteness go to their heads ($$$
out of $$$$$)
Agree?
Disagree, Questions? Comments?
Tell Me Here
|