CK15 BACK TO INDEX
THE PRINCE OF WALSCHLAND
IS THERE A PRINCE OF ITALY?
A PRINCE OF THE ROMANS?
THE PRINCE OF WALSCHLAND
In the book of Daniel in the old testament,
we are told that "the people" of "a prince" (to come) shall destroy
the city of jerusalem and its temple, (this would be the second
temple as the first was destroyed under the babylonian riegn.
So we know that a people of a future prince would destroy the city
and sanctuary, and we know this happened in ad 70 -to ad 133 as
indeed jerusalem and the temple therein was destroyed, the people
who did this were romans.
these roman legions were stationed in brittania (britan and wales )
they marched down to jerusalem and sacked it totally in 133 ad
destroying both it and the Temple, just as the prophecy describes.
So jerusalem was left without a Temple just as Jesus Christ, the Son
of God had described,
"not one stone will be left upon another " he had said, referring to
the temple that stood while he walked the earth before his death
( the cutting off but not for himself ) as described in daniel.
After his ressurection and ascension into heaven, (about 90 years
later) the romans came and destroyed it completley as it was written in daniels
prophetic writings.
The roman legions who came down from brittania had adopted a symbol
from that region, it was a RED DRAGON which was symbolic of the
celtic god dewi, which inturn originated in ancient babylon.
(some scholars say the celts adopted it from Rome but i believe the Romans adopted it from the celts)
That same red dragon was the red dragon from which charles prince of wales recieved his power throne and authority,
And that red dragon was the same that symbolicly destroyed JERUSALEM AND
THE SECOND TEMPLE BACK IN AD 133.As the Roman legions that sacked Jerusalem carried it as a battle banner.
First Vespasion led the assualt then Titus took over the campaign to crush the Jewish uprising, that had started in approx 70 ad and finished in 133 ad with the total destruction of the temple and the city .
In the book of revelation THE RED DRAGON IS SYMBOLIC OF SATAN, also the RED DRAGON WAS THE SECOND SYMBOL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE ( they had adopted it from the celtic tribes as i previously described.)
THE TITLE PRINCE OF WALES
It is interesting to note also that although the title Prince of Wales
was around long before the present Prince of Wales, the Red Dragon
was never before the symbol of Wales as it was in Charles case, for
only a few years before Prince Charles' investiture, Queen Elizabeth II
officialy made the Red Dragon the symbol of
wales, and so the Royal standard of the British Monarchy ( and its
authority) ceased to fly over Wales in the way it previously had.
Indeed the british flag of the Union the Union Jack, has Scotland,
England and Ireland clearly depicted within its colours , yet Wales
is not and never was included.
So in a real literal sense when prince charles was
investitured as Prince of Wales in 1969, for the first time in that titles
history, a Prince of Wales recieved his throne, power and authority
direct from the power over wales, namely the red dragon.
for wales is not under the standard of the english throne in the same manner as the rest of the united kingdom ,
Wales or Walschland as it was orignally named ,
is a
power unto itself, and a principality ruled by the eldest son of the British Monarch
( HIS MOTTO READS )
"I THE BLACK PRINCE SERVE THE RED DRAGON"
And the Queen herself made sure we knew
what that power is by making the red dragon officially fly as THE
REAL POWER AND SYMBOL of WALES.
I repeat, the red dragon never before gave power in Wales in this official capacity, and never
before was The Red Dragon said to give the power of title, throne, authority and power to a Prince of Wales in this officially sanctioned way ,
nor to the eldest son of a British Monarch, in this way, for legally the red dragon flag had not been the legal flag of Wales officially before the investiture of the present Prince of Wales.
It was unpresidented and new, to have the red dragon as the official symbol and power giver ,of Wales.
Prince Charles is descended from Roman Emperors on his fathers side, Prince Philip, who is of greek ancestary, and Roman .
On the day of his investiture Queen
Elizabeth II, (Prince Charles' mother) made it clear that she herself was
not giving charles the title of the prince of wales, for she herself
only read out the oath of titlelship, she had not the power to say ,
she herself bestowed her son the title prince of wales legally ,
that is why she said.
"this dragon gives you your power, throne and authority."
(see the book of revelation for a similar phrase)
he replied,
"I am your liege man and worthy of earthly worship."
(Liege is an Old English word meaning Lord.)
so legally wales has as its symbol of power, the red dragon which
symbolises a pagan god Dewi , The Great Red Serpent of The Sea.
and the throne of england has no power over wales in a
constitutional royal sense ,only through the title prince of wales being given to the heir of the throne of england, as the royal standard of the kingdoms
the monarch rules is pictured in the countries flag, and the uk flag
does not include the principality of wales, the red dragon is the
symbol of power over wales.
in the case of the commonwealth this is also true,however wales isnt known as part of the commonwealth, it is MEANT TO BE part of the UNITED KINGDOM itself!!
yet the one holding the title prince of wales rules over the country of
wales as a principality in a royal sense,
however no other prince of wales actually had the red dragon give him
his power throne and authority in the same way charles did ,
for before in past times , the princes of wales who owned that title,
did not have authority and a title over A WALES with the red dragon as HER official symbol.
PRINCE CHARLES HOWEVER, DOES.
the queen herself has made it plain that, the red dragon gave her son
his power throne and authority, she herself certainly did not.
The name wales itself has its own strange meanings and origins and
can be literally translated "italy" or land of romans even.
heres the article on the origin of the name wales.
Wales
Wales is that western portion of Great Britain which lies between the
Irish Sea and the River Dee on the north, the counties (or portions
of counties) of Chester, Salop, Hereford, and Gloucester on the east,
the estuary of the Severn on the southeast, the Bristol Channel on
the south, and St. George's Channel on the west.
NAME
The name Wales has been given to this country not by its inhabitants
but by the Teutonic occupiers of England, and means "the territory of
the alien race"Or foreigners . "Welsh" (German Wälsch) implies a people of either
Latin or Celtic origin living in a land near or adjoining that of the
Teutons; thus Wälschland is an obsolescent, poetical German term for
"Italy."
After an invasion lasting 330 years, the Anglican, Saxon, and
Jutish "comelings" having driven the earlier "homelings" into the
hill-country of the west by steady encroachments and spasmodic
conquests, the names Wales and Welsh were applied to the ancient
people and the land they retained. Wales is in French, Pays de
Galles, from Latin Gallus, Low Latin Wallia. In the Middle Ages the
Welsh coined in their own tongue a name of similar origin for their
country, when, in poetry only, they termed it Gwalia. The Welsh
language, however, has no cognate word for the people themselves;
they have, ever since the days of the Saxon Heptarchy, styled
themselves by no other title than Cymry. The etymology of this word
has been a much debated question, but in the opinion of Sir John Rhys
(a prime authority) it is compounded of the British con bro and
means "compatriots"--the federated tribes of ancient Britain who
together contested the soil of their native land with the Germanic
invader. In Welsh Cymru means Wales, Cymro a Welshman, Cymracs a
Welshwoman, and Cymry Welshmen.
the above was taken from '
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15532a.htm
summary
So according to the above the name WALES actuallly means ITALY
so charles prince of wales , simply means charles prince of italy or
in other words The prince of "The romans", WHEN trying to describe
the future leader of rome (or the revived rome /the final beast kingdom(ROME BEING THE MAJOR TOOL OF SATAN AGAINST GOD'S PEOPLE AND ANNOINTED, Past present and future, ) and The advent and time frame and worldy position of this figurehead of the roman
people who would destroy jerusalem in 133 ad
an angel called him"the prince to come"
he could have quite easily called this person the prince of italy or
the prince of the people called romans.
Or even the PRINCE OF WALSCHLAND.
so the prince to come of daniel nine can be linked to the Prince of
Wales via these facts.
Also the beast mentioned in the last book of the new testament who
recieves his power throne and authority from the red dragon ( the second
symbol of rome the symbol of wales also can be linked to both wales
and rome in the same sense , to Prince Charles ,
and so the prince to come of daniel nine, can easily
be seen to be the final beast king/ kingdom of daniels writings and the 8th beast king of the book of revelation who rules the beast kingdom,
and the
beast out of the sea, with both rome the red dragon and wales linking
them all to Prince charles ,
(not to mention the beast imagery of a lion/ leopard with
feet of a bear, who recieves His POWER , THRONE AND AUTHORITY FROM THE RED DRAGON.
Just like prince charles did.
in both the book of daniel the prophet and the book of revelation we
read of royal figures, a prince and kings peoples and kingdoms, symbols and imagery that all lead to
the same Final BEAST kingdom and the same person, the kingdom and the person
being indivisable ,
ITALY being interpretated "WALES "FROM THE ORIGINAL GERMAN WALSCHALND meaning ITALY which was the
land of the roman people , romans being the people of the prince to
come,who like the beast in the book of revelation is linked to the RED DRAGON and so the people of the prince to come can in actual real sense
be linked to CHARLES PRINCE OF WALES or CHARLES PRINCE OF ITALY
WHO HAS BOTHA MAJOR LINK TO THE SAME RED DRAGON AS THE PRINCE TO COME AND THE BEAST OF REVEALTION,
PLUS HE EVEN HAS THE BEAST OF REVELATIONS IMAGERY AS HIS UNIQUE PERSONAL COAT OF ARMS.
depending on your language ( in a symantic sense.)
FOR the people of the PRINCE TO COME WERE ROMAN.
and italy was the roman homeland.
AND
WALES
MEANT
ITALY
IN
THE
BEGINNING.
(Also see) He Will Be Linked To Rome/ Prince OF Italy/king Of The EEC
Is this really true, is it all made up?
to find out go to the third link in the index.
