Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft:
Influences on Mass Communication Research
Ferdinand Tonnies, a German sociologist, distinguished two
basic social groups: gemeinschaft and gesellschaft. Literally
translated gemeinschaft means community,' and gesellschaft
means society'. These sociological concepts can be applied
to mass communication research as well. Cultures transform from
pre-industrial, traditional communities into modern, urbanized
societies. At the same time, mass media develop and transmit the
critical ideas of the emerging mass society. The gemeinschaft
and gesellschaft concepts can be used to explain the differences
and similarities between communication in traditional and modern
cultures.
Gemeinschaft is the traditional community. Families and neighborhoods
are the boundaries of the gemeinschaft world. The members of the
community find strength in their similarities, and operate under
a collective conscience. Religion and morality are upheld by the
masses. Communication consists of face-to-face interaction, and
ideas are transmitted through an oral culture.
On the other hand, gesellschaft is modern society. Cities and
states are the building blocks of gesellschaft. Divisions of labor
and goal-oriented behavior are distinctive to the gesellschaft
world. Individualism is encouraged, and members practice contractual
morality. Laws and public opinion overpower religion. Communication
is no longer one on one, but few to many. The mass media create
and broadcast the ideas which collectively become the binding
consciousness of gesellschaft.
In theory, gemeinschaft and gesellschaft are unique from one another.
However, in reality they work together to form levels of developing
societies. No modern society is completely without some aspects
of traditional community, such as family ties and oral traditions.
One study which exemplifies the gemeinschaft and gesellschaft
concepts was The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind
in a Presidential Election by Lazarsfeld, et.al. (1948). The actual
aim of the study was to analyze how and why people vote as they
do, and the influence of mass media political campaigns. As the
study progressed, the researchers noted the significant role of
interpersonal communication in the decision-making process. The
"two-step flow" communication hypothesis emerged. It
contends that information from the mass media first flows to opinion
leaders (individuals in tune with the media who advise their peers),
and then on to the general public. This research showed that these
social relationships had a stronger influence on the voters' decisions
than the mass media had. Up to this point in mass communication
research, one on one interactions had not been considered a significant
step of the information process. The importance of the oral culture
of gemeinschaft persists even in modern society (gesellschaft.)
Another study which relied on the gemeinschaft and gesellschaft
concepts was The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities
by Ryan and Gross (1943). The study aimed to determine which channels
of information were most influential in the farmers' decision
to adopt the innovative seed. Innovation is a stage of modernization
which marks the changes in a culture from gemeinschaft to gesellschaft.
The mass media were found to influence some of those farmers who
adopted the hybrid seed. This is understandable because the initial
information concerning this new product was distributed via radio
advertisements. The researchers also studied the interpersonal
communication processes between farmers and their neighbors and
relatives. Neighbors were found to be the most influential sources
of information in the decision to adopt; close second was the
influence from salesmen, another face-to-face gemeinschaft interaction.
A more recent example of gemeinschaft and gesellschaft in mass
communication research is the revived notion of a "global
village," first introduced by Marshall Mc Luhan in the 1960s,
and currently used to describe the communication possibilities
in the today's electronic culture. There is a possibility of a
shift back to a gemeinschaft-like world as a result of new media
practices. Modern societies could be linked electronically, enabling
communities that are on opposite sides of the globe to interact
as if they were geographically closer. A shared consciousness
could develop in such a universal mass society. Mass media producers
are all for this idea of a "global village" and the
communication utopia it would create. Media critics, however,
are not as optimistic. Richard Worringham argues that although
the technology is becoming available for such a connectedness
to occur, there are still obstacles to overcome.
He concludes:
"Since the seventies, the telecommunications industries have
taken advantage of the development of satellite communication,
providing the potential for world community...Since that time,
economical, technological and informational gaps' between
developed and developing countries, have been growing at an alarming
rate, creating the potential for world anomy...Mc Luhan's notion
of the global village is yet but a vision" (1990).
Raymond Gozzi notes the oxymoronic quality of Mc Luhan's "global village" metaphor. He writes, "Global' implies a planet-wide network, encompassing thousands of miles and billions or people. Village' implies small, face-to-face communities" (1996). Perhaps, in this way, the global village can only be a unique blend of the gemeinschaft and gesellschaft concepts.
Reference List
Lowery, S., and M. De Fleur. 1995. Milestones in Mass Communication Research: Media Effects. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
Mc Luhan, M. 1964. Understanding the Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mowlana, H. 1995. The Communication Paradox. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 51:40-46.
Willis, J. 1995. The Age of Multimedia and Turbonews. Futurist 29:18-23.
Worringham, R.E. 1990. Satellite Communication: Potential for Global Communication or Global Anomy. International Journal of Instructional Media 17:191-203.
Rebecca L. Ash
JRL 304
3/8/99