Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
LINKS
ARCHIVE
« January 2004 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Tuesday, 20 January 2004
lunch with max, part one.
the journey

enter the eaton centre. down, down to the depth of the beast. past talbot's, gap, and of course potterybarn. and the south food court. continue underground... south. into the bay. marching through towels and cookware on my way to lunch. turn right, toward the dreaded bay street. this is where the world changes. i don't belong here. (neither does max). suddenly i'm passing by watch stores, high class tailors, and such things. food courts catering to people in and out of roy thompson hall.
you don't need a jacket to get from eaton centre to union station, or almost all the way to the CN tower. what is this a sign of?
continuing past food courts (3 more), a scotiabank that looks like the entrance to a theatre, and of course, luxury cars. finally i arrive at the first canadian place, main lobby. k. find timothys. nope wrong building, you want 1 first canadian place. that way, main lobby. one building 2 addresses, 2 main lobbies.
*sigh*

_____________________________________________

would you rather be the top of the bottom or the bottom of the top?

Posted by jazz/hippy0 at 1:35 PM EST
Updated: Tuesday, 20 January 2004 2:25 PM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (14) | Permalink | Share This Post

Tuesday, 20 January 2004 - 2:45 PM EST

Name: Mex

I'm on the edge of my seat!! THE SUSPENSE IS KILLING ME!

Tuesday, 20 January 2004 - 10:43 PM EST

Name: chloe

neither. top. top of the top....or...ON top...~chuckles~ so inapropriate...

Wednesday, 21 January 2004 - 8:52 PM EST

Name: Erika

Yeah giant underground things jam packed with stores are kind of creepy. Although going from the Eaton Centre to Union Station just requires the subway, and that's okay.

Bottom or top....depends on what you're talking about, and whether or not I know that there's a whole other layer that I can't get to when I'm at the top of the bottom.

Thursday, 22 January 2004 - 2:23 PM EST

Name: Max

I'm STILL on the edge of my seat!

Thursday, 22 January 2004 - 2:55 PM EST

Name: Laura

Logically, if I were the top of the bottom, then I'd still be on top.
There. Decision made. Suck it, yo.

Thursday, 22 January 2004 - 4:04 PM EST

Name: Max

Logically eh? But wouldn't you also still be on the bottom?

Thursday, 22 January 2004 - 4:51 PM EST

Name: Dave

the best of both worlds?

Thursday, 22 January 2004 - 7:14 PM EST

Name: chloe

hahahahahahaha

Friday, 23 January 2004 - 10:47 AM EST

Name: chloe

WHEN COME BACK BRING DAVE....wanker.

Friday, 23 January 2004 - 11:31 AM EST

Name: ali

laura, your language skills cause you to resemble nigel.

Friday, 23 January 2004 - 11:54 PM EST

Name: Erika

What?

Saturday, 24 January 2004 - 1:48 AM EST

Name: Laura

I don't see why.

------- <-top
_______ <-bottom

The top is still higher than the bottom, no matter where the bottom be. Since we were given no specified units of measurement, I'll just go ahead and assume that it's two-dimensional and whatever on top stays on the top.
Otherwise both parts would be stuck somewhere in the middle, and that's kind of a lame answer.

Saturday, 24 January 2004 - 1:52 AM EST

Name: Laura

My language skillz so do not cause me to resemble Nigel. Whasssssap? Word. Fuck. Silly people. Stephen's a dumbass. So, anyway. Fuck.

Saturday, 24 January 2004 - 8:23 PM EST

Name: chloe

like me.

View Latest Entries