Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
« November 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Beware of British Airways
Bharat Ratna
M.F.Husain
Racism of Australians
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
You are not logged in. Log in
My thoughts
Wednesday, 18 October 2006
Remodeling Dharavi,Mumbai the American way
Transforming An Indian Shantytown Into A Middle Class Neighborhood

San Francisco Chronicle, Oct 12, 2006

India must eradicate its ubiquitous shantytowns if it is to become an economic success story. Just such an effort is underway in the Dharavi neighborhood outside Mumbai by Mukesh Mehta, an Indian architect and developer.
"Mehta has created a seven-year, $2.1 billion plan to turn Bombay's Dharavi neighborhood -- Asia's largest slum of 600,000 people -- into a middle-class area that some experts say could become a model for slum redevelopment in other Indian cities."
Mehta hopes to raze Dharavi’s existing ramshackle homes and shops and replace them with a new town complete with modern apartment buildings, parks, schools, markets, clinics, industrial parks, and even a cricket museum and an arts center.
" 'What is unique about this plan is its attempt to provide new, on-site housing for such a large number of families,' said Vinit Mukhija, assistant professor of urban planning at UCLA."
"Iqbal Chahal, the state official overseeing the massive project, said Dharavi's 535-acre marshland will be transformed mainly by private developers. In exchange for land, they will be required to build 225-square-foot apartments for families. Profits will come later by selling additional apartments at market rates. Until the new homes are complete, slum dwellers will live in free temporary housing."
"But critics call the plan simplistic and suspect its real aim is to appropriate land that has become extremely valuable given the slum's proximity to Bombay's domestic and international airports and a new, emerging business district. Social activists also cite the lack of involvement of slum dwellers in the project."


Remodeling Dharavi the American way!

Dharavi is not “outside” Mumbai. It is in the heart of it, just across the Bandra- Kurla Complex (BKC-a fast developing commercial center that has left behind Nariman Point, the current down town of Mumbai) close to the Mumbai domestic and International airports.

Dharavi is not a “shantytown”, it is a unique vibrant, thriving cottage industry complex, the only one of its kind in the world where all the raw materials produced and processes (lining cloth, sewing needles & thread,colours & dyes, pigments, skining, tanning, cutting & tailoring) of the final product (leather bags,fancy lady's purses) are carried out at the same location and the value added is very high! Families have been engaged in this industry for generations. The very nature of the process of making fine leather goods requires large tracts of open land for the activity. This is infact the kind of self sufficient,self sustaining 'village' community that the Father of the Nation -Mahatma Gandhi- dreamt of and wrote about in his books on the path India should take for its development. Those claiming to be the heirs to his philosophy should seriously reconsider the Proposal by Mukesh Mehta.

Mukesh Mehta is NOT an Indian Architect and Developer. He is an American businessman cashing in on the false and adverse publicity given to Dharavi as a 'slum' by western media; by proposing to raze the existing home-cum workplaces of the poor artisans and cramming them in 225 sq. ft cubbyhole high rise 20 storey buildings to get the land so vacated for commercial exploitation by painting colourful computer generated pictures of beautiful building towers set amidst greenary and playfields!

Let us look at the numbers. The entire land of 535 acres will be available free to the developer. Normally, in the suburbs of Mumbai, Floor Space Index (FSI) permissible is 1.00. However, this being treated as a Slum Redevelopment Scheme, the FSI permissible would be 4.5 (Development Control Regulations-DCR- for Mumbai,1991). It means that, in this land of 535 acres, after deducting statutory open space of 15%, total floor area that could be built will be 4.5 times the balance land (aprox.455 acres) ie. 2047.50 acres ! For rehousing 100,000 families in 225 sq.ft. Carpet area (aprox. 330 sq.ft.built up area) apartments, total floor area required would be around 757.50 acres. This would leave a balance of 1290 acres for 'free sale' by the Developer!

Construction of 100,000 apartments for the existing residents at a carpet area of 225 sq.ft. each will not cost more than Rs.250,000 per apartment (based on cost of resettlement in the World Bank aided MUTP II project recently completed).The total cost of rehousing will therefore be Rs. 2500 million or US $ 56.8 million (current exchange rate of IRs.44=1US $).

Total land (inclusive of roads, open spaces & amenities) required for such 100,000 apartments in 20 storey buildings at the standards permitted by the Slum Redevelopment Authority (SRA) will be about 126.50 acres leaving the balance of 408.50 acres to be used by the Developer for construction of “Free Sale” apartments. At the current price (based on recent sale of land by Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority-MMRDA) of around Rs.28000 per sq. mt. of FSI (Floor Space Index) the FSI available for sale on the balance land (1290 acres) would fetch approx.Rs.14448 million, or US $ 328.36 m. Deducting the cost of 100,000 flats (US $ 56.80m.) there would be a clear profit of Rs. 11948 million or US $ 271.56 m., a return of 478% on the investment!!

What is 'unique' about this plan is its machiavellien attempt to deprive over 100,000 families of their traditional livelyhood and home-cum work places so that the land so conveniently located across the BKC can 'host' commercial urban development that can ride piggy back on the infrastructure already created in BKC at the cost of the public exchequer and benefit the developers.

When, in the name of redevelopment, a businessman is getting ready to “Raze” Dharavi where the residents have lived for over 50 years; where are the American “Brains” of the Bill Clinton promoted Foundation who recently held a conference in USA to vociferously propagate tenure rights to the slum dwellers of the third world for the land they occupy so that they can register their ownership documents, get access to institutional finance, redevelop their area to increase the wealth of the city?

Would it not be simpler and just, to give land tenure to the existing residents of Dharavi so that they themselves can redevelop the area and upgrade its physical environment through self help efforts by registering ownership to their piece of land and availing institutional finance? YES, but then how can the developers reap a rich harvest of millions of dollars for their personal benefit?

The so called redevelopment of Dharavi therefore, is the biggest and cruelest perfidy perpetrated on the poor of Mumbai in the name of improving the urban infrastructure and converting Mumbai into Shanghai or whichever city is fancied as a “Model” at the time of such fraud!

Prakash M Apte




Posted by indie/pmapte at 7:38 PM
Updated: Thursday, 19 October 2006 7:55 AM
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Friday, 6 October 2006
Free Land Tenure/Tenements to the Encroachers?
In a recent seminar conducted by an agency promoted by a past president of the USA,
speakers and participants lamented the absence of legal right to land for almost 85% of the people in urban areas of the developing countries!

The report, in my personal opinion is a classic example of the so called 'learned professional seminarians' deliberately ignoring the stark naked and brutal truth to appear to be Mesiahs for the people of the developing countries!

In Mumbai,India only about 35% of the estimated 13m. population resides in formal housing. The rest 65% stay in slums on encroached lands or just on sidewalks or public open spaces! Obviously the occupiers of such land canot have legal rights to the land they forcibly and unauthorizedly occupy! The ultimate folly is to try to prove by simple arithmatic how much of wealth is locked up by way of unregistered mortgages! It is like lamenting the waste of water of a huge lake from a mirrage!

The raging controversy in Mumbai and other places in India arises from a bitter resentment of the law abiding middle class strugling to own a one room tenement at prevailing astronomical prices against the slum dweller encroachers who by a state law get a tenement or legal tenure to the land they forcibly occupy absolutely free!

Those who deliberate on such matters in a high flaunting language with a lot of verbiage and with a gift of the gab are far removed from the realities of the situation. Neither do they want to understand the problem, their only interest being a 2/3 day workshop/think tank/seminar or gobal discussion at the best hotel in a city of a rich country!

Prakash M Apte

Posted by indie/pmapte at 5:12 AM
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Monday, 2 October 2006
Temple Errotica
Errotica in Hindu Temple Sculptures:

Mr. Dileep D'Souza is the nth person to have made the kind of comments that he has about the errotica in temple sculptures.

In making any value judgements one has to critically examine any issue in its proper perspective and context and most important, the "times". There are many like him who indulge in such
writings without understanding these issues. I have always given the following example and will do so again.

In many Bengali traditional marriages, at the time when the bride and bridegroom garland each other as the final ceremonial act, the bride sits on a wooden flat seat and is lifted up by her maternal uncles so she is at "level" with the groom to be able to garland him. It is a custom that started probably in the 19th century, because at that time there used to be a considerable difference in the ages of the two, the bride being much younger and therefore much shorter in height than the groom. A greater disparity in the sex ratio -around 880 men to 1000 women- also contributed to the age difference between the groom and the bride. It was below the dignity of the groom to bend down infront of his wife to receive the garland.!

Though times and circumstances have changed, even today we find the custom being followed. Hence these days one may laugh heartily at the spectacle of a heafty 25 year old bride being lifted sitting on the plank!. Therefore one has to study the sociological aspects and history to undersatnd the genesis of the custom though blindly followed now.

But it is futile to expect such understanding from those whose thinking is permanently tainted by a anti Hindu bias!

Posted on 20-APR-03

Posted by indie/pmapte at 9:43 AM
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Tuesday, 26 September 2006
Rural Development Strategy
A recent news mentioned the regulations framed bythe governmentof Brazil to encourage production of Bio-Diesel as a rural development strategy

Producing desirable additives for Disel has presumably twofold objectives. First is to reduce pollution from vehicular emmission and second to encourage rural development. Encouraging farming of plants/trees from which the additive can be extracted may not necessarily lead to rural development. If such plantations are taken up on a large scale by corporate sector with maximum automation and mechanization, the small grower will either sieze to exist or will be exploited by the corporates. For genuine rural development to take place, the small plantation owners will have to be encouraged with easy access to instutional finance, assured prices for the produce, made a stake holder in the marketing and above all manufacture of the final product. Only then can the benefits filter down to the small grower, adding to his wealth and income and leading to greater purchasing power and consiquent rural development. Otherwise he will continue to be at the mercy of the village moneylender, the “Agent” buyer of his produceand exposed to the vagaries of the global market for the final product over which he has little or no control. The sad plight of the small cane grower in some of the states of India, totally ruined and driven to suicide due to fluctuating domestic and international prices of sugar and export-import policies of national government is a testimony to this scenario.

It is not only the small grower or farmer but also the small artizan who needs to be protected and encouraged to achieve all round rural development. Produce for which “local” market can be created, need to be identified. In a country like India which has an excellent transportation network of roads and railways connecting almost every village in the country ( rural population in India still forms over 70% of the total) products that can cater to the 'transient' population (containers for beverages like milk,tea,cofee, fast food items) if manufactured locally by home based artisans will add substantially to the local income and the village economy. It can, to a large extent dilute the “Push” factor responsible for the migration of rural worker to the urban centres. A welcome beginning was made in India by the Railways to ban the use of styrofoam containers for hot beverages and use the locally made small earthern pots which are also environment friendly being bio-degradable. Unfortunately the initiative did not retain its initial steam.

Any rural development strategy must centre on local produce and skills and encourage self sufficiency in villages. Despite much maligning and ridicule the philosophy of the great Mahatma Gandhi of treating village as the focal point for any national development strategy is the only way for true development in the third world countries.

Prakash M Apte

Posted by indie/pmapte at 8:23 AM
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post

Cities of Stone

A recent exhibition in Venice,Italy by Prof.Cladius D'Amato made a plea for revival of stone in Architecture in the cities of Europe and build cities of stone!

Almost all over the world, naturally occuring materials like stone, clay,timber, hay,bamboo were used for building activity. These were then easily and locally available, cheap and plentiful, environment friendly and climatically appropriate. But their use was labour intensive and had limitations due to the inherent quality of the materials. Rapid urbanization, need for low cost mass housing and greater awareness for human environment degradation due to indiscriminate use of natural resources led to a search for new manmade building materials.

In India, arid states like Rajasthan used stone extensively for walls, roofs, floors, beams, door and window frames. The internationally wellknown city of Jaisalmer is a good example. Clay was used for walls, roof insulation in other states in aluvial delta regions. By and large, depletion of the natural resource like stone and the possible environmental degradation likely to occur due to its extensive quarrying led to a search and use of alternative manmade materials like cement concrete.

Reinventing use of stone is just a gimmic. Romanticism in Architecture is for the Academics and those who can afford it, financially, physically, and glamorize it as a fashion like in dress design! For the poor; low cost, quick results and cheap availability will remain a deciding factor in the selection of building materials. In a rapidly globalizing economy, labour and transportation costs, speed and ease of construction, flexibilitity in provision of utilities and spiralling urban land costs- requiring greater carpet area per unit of built area- will be the determinants of building material use. Cities of stone can be only for the rich. The middle class may have to do with “immitation” manmade stone for their cities!

Prakash M Apte

Posted by indie/pmapte at 8:13 AM
Updated: Tuesday, 26 September 2006 8:21 AM
Post Comment | Permalink | Share This Post
Sunday, 10 September 2006

World Trade Center




The diabolic destruction of the Twin Towers in New York was an act as despicable as brazen. It was meant to be as much an affront as abuse. It sought to humiliate a great people and a great democracy into permanent shame.
Retaining the footprints of the towers as a ?memorial? and building a new Tower as a replacement would be more of a tacit and ?permanent? admission of the victory of the ?evil? over the ?good? than displaying a spirit of rejuvenation.
Architectural merits apart, the only definitive and forceful statement that a nation can make is to rebuild the Twin Towers exactly as they were and ensure that the cityscape and skyline of the great city is regenerated as if there was no aberration. A great people and a great democracy must demonstrate its undying character in ?immortality? of the symbols of its national ethos and not appear to be morally weaker than the forces of terrorism by grasping the opportunity for a new commercial exploitation of land and an Architectural commission.


Prakash M Apte

Posted by indie/pmapte at 11:01 PM
Updated: Tuesday, 26 September 2006 8:20 AM
Post Comment | View Comments (1) | Permalink | Share This Post

Newer | Latest | Older