Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« February 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Art and Aesthetics
General Theology
Life in Particular
Rants
Reflections
Theology and Johnny Cash
Home
IndieFaith
You are not logged in. Log in
IndieFaith Blog
Tuesday, 7 February 2006
Commies
While I was much impressed with the still relevant critique which I found in the chapter 1 of the Communist Manifesto I was disappointed by the second chapter which outlines the positive contribution of Communist thought. Isn't this always the case. We are great a criticizing but when it comes to a positive contribution . . .
I admit that I am certainly behind the times when it comes to current Marxist development. However, I am unclear as how it much is has progressed. It seems like the only thriving communist expression is China (are they still technically considered communist?) which has adopted active capitalist strategies to bolster the economy. I would love to learn more about their situation as it seems quite unique on the world's stage (any thoughts out there?)

alright, as promised here are a few captions from chapter 2 "Proletarians and Communists"

"The immediate aim of the Communists is the . . . formation of the proletariat as a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, and conquest of political power by the proletariat."

"The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. . . . You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population."

"The average price of wage labour is the minimum wage, i.e., that quantum of the means of subsistence which is absolutely requisite to keep the labourer in bare existence as a labourer. What therefore, the wage-labourer appropriates by means of his labour, merely suffices to prolong and reproduce a bare existence."

"All we want to do away with is the miserable character of [bourgeois] appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital."

Perhaps I will leave this for a few installments. Posts are supposed to be short and snappy right?

I have been very interested in the nineteenth century critique of religion. Forthcoming posts will hopefully include Nietzsche's's "Anti-Christ" and Freud's "The Future of an Illusion". I find Nietzsche's's critique so fascinating because I think he is so right and so wrong often on the same point.

Posted by indie/faith at 9:48 AM EST
Updated: Tuesday, 7 February 2006 4:28 PM EST
Post Comment | View Comments (3) | Permalink | Share This Post

Wednesday, 8 February 2006 - 10:01 PM EST

Name: dave beldman
Home Page: http://beldmandave.blogspot.com/

I know you voted NDP and all, but has it ever crossed your mind that it is possible that capitalism is simply a part of God's (good) creational order. ;)
You'll come around.

Friday, 10 February 2006 - 6:10 PM EST

Name: Joel

I am hitting up a little Nietzsche right now as well. Hard to rely on him as an authority, but provocative, certainly.

I think Cuba is still considered communist, and are doing a good job of it, economically. Still totalitarian and all that, but if those can be divided, it seems to be the best working economic model around.

Also the "civilized countries" depend as much on "barbarian countries" for cheap labour and resources as the other way around if not more.

Friday, 10 February 2006 - 7:50 PM EST

Name: daved

yes i hope to have something on nietzsche up soon. not entirely sure what to make of him.

View Latest Entries