A:  "...and what if they start digging into what really happened?"

 B:  "And they say what? Who would believe them? They'd just be-"

 A:  "Yes I know, I know, - 'conspiracy nutters'."
 
 
 
 
Report findings from the official Investigation into the World Trade Centre destruction.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
The smoke and dust behind building 7 was from the two towers that collapsed hours earlier.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                
 
   See: https://jayinreallife.wordpress.com/category/911/
Some believe that chemical explosives made with a material called thermite were poisitoned
in the building to weaken the structure and cause in effect what's referred to as a 'controlled demolition'!
 
Professional opinion consensus by Engineers from across America: https://youtu.be/z8W-t57xnZg
 
   
     
Eye witness:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urNEAakzOYk
 
When thermite is used, the chemical reaction can continue long after the explosion causing pools of molten metal.
 
         
           
 
https://digwithin.net/2013/12/08/thermite/            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g
 
  
 
 
 
       

A red bandana in pristine condition was said to have survived the flight 93 crash, as well as Ziad Jarrah’s passport.

(Apparently a passenger on the flight called on her cell phone and mentioned that one of the hijackers was wearing a red bandana.)
 
   
 
 
 

Reputedly a film from the garage across the road.
 
       
https://youtu.be/ZzbVn3o8JNE
 
       
 

Reputedly all film was confiscated.
 
                 

Motive?
In the summer of 2000, the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neo-conservative think tank that included many soon to be Bush administration officials and advisors, issued a document calling for the radical restructuring of U.S. government and military policies.

It advocated the massive expansion of defence spending, the re-invasion of Iraq, the military and economic securing of Afghanistan and Central Asia, increased centralized power and funds for the CIA, FBI, and NSA, among a slew of other policies that would, in the near future, be enacted upon their ascension to power.

In the same document, they cite a potential problem with their plan. Referring to the goals of transforming the U.S. and global power structure, the paper states that because of the American Public's slant toward ideas of democracy and freedom, "this process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." (ibid.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

..and Building 7?

Building 7's tenants included the Secret Service, the Internal Revenue Service, and several financial institutions, including the Securities and Exchange Commission. The SEC lost numerous case files in the collapse -- files relating to investigations of corporations such as World Com.

Tower 7 also contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud corporate, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions.
...money ?

The World Trade Centre had been showing signs of age...The previous lease holders had been given notice that the asbestos throughout the buildings had to be removed and there had been less than full tenancy rates, possibly due to the buildings outdated communication system...

Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center lease was purchased by one group for $3.2 billion....the buildings were already insured for everything including terrorism...

…. this group later filed two insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the view that the two towers were two separate attacks. The total potential payout was $7.1 billion…
 
 

Humans go to war with each other. It is what they have always done and always will do. M.A.D. has skewed that somewhat, changing the pattern more to localised proxy wars..

When the people in power either create or enable a period of peace for their country, the population can enjoy and entertain such ideals as freedom, almost genuine civil rights and democracy. However, if you look at the long view of human history, this is not the default state.

Just who are the people with the power? They are people with astronomical wealth who grow discontent after buying, owning and doing all the things the very wealthy can do, and then turn their ambitions towards accumulating tremendous influence and power.

But unfortunately, at some point in time the people in power can decide that their future position does not look as secure as it was once. They look at the big picture of the developments and changes across the globe and believe that their country is losing its geopolitical position of strength in the world.

They then take the view that to redress this, their country needs to inject a massive commitment into its industrial military production and engage in some impressive and aggressive military posturing.

This they think will not only elevate their nation to a greater position of strength, but boost their own future economic prospects through the interest they earn from lending more money to the government for arms manufacturing and contracts, with companies that these people often own themselves. Plus this new commitment in spending will they believe reinvigorate the economy of their country in general.

This can all sound very good until you look at the loss of life and destruction of property and infrastructure in the countries that are attacked, and the suffering, injuries and loss of life of the soldiers fighting on both sides.

Regardless, the people in power look at the big picture and think it is essential that they press on.

The only hurdle is galvanising public opinion so that the people across the country are fired up and angry and  and willing to get on board with committing their nation to a new war footing. Plus be willing to accept seeing their sons and daughters engaging in aggressive foreign wars and military campaigns.

But what event would generate the national outrage, anger and commitment to support their country engaging in another overseas war?

So what if the attacks on 9/11 were not caused by foreign terrorists, but were organised and planned by powerful and influential  internal groups to ready the nation for war. Perhaps even enlisting some help from clandestine elements outside the country, from people who might have thought that their own interests would also be served by an America ready for war.

If this is the case, it is pointless calling for justice because the perpetrators are all well hidden and imbedded in the political fabric of the nation over which they exert tremendous influence. They are also protected on many different levels by the country’s security forces. 

If the attacks on 9/11 really were organised by powerful individuals to ready their own nation for war then those who died on that day were not victims of terrorists, but were the unwilling, unknowing 'heroes' who were the first to die in their nation’s latest war.

 
      
A seven thousand year old skull, one of many skulls unearthed in the same location most bearing similar signs of violence.  
   

Otzi the man found still frozen in ice in the Swiss Alps was 5300 years old. It seems he did not die from the sub-freezing conditions. He was found to have a flint arrow head imbedded in his back and the DNA remains reveal the blood of four people on his artefacts - one on his flint knife, two on his arrow heads and one on his grass coat.