Sermon 1/25/04 am
Jim Huskey, Sundry Lessons From Romans 15
We coming near the end of our series of lessons from the book of
Romans. Today we're looking at the fifteenth chapter. As we noted
as we began our study and as we got to chapter 12, the first eleven
chapters have to do primarily with doctrinal matters. Chapter 12 on
through the end of the book has a lot to do with everyday christian
living. We noticed that in particularly chapters 12, 13, 14.
Paul began chapter 15 this way, "We then that are strong ought to bear
the infirmities of the weak, and not to please ourselves. Let every
one of us please his neighbour for his good to edification. For even
Christ pleased not himself; but, as it is written, The reproaches of
them that reproached thee fell on me." Rom. 15:1-3.
There are a lot of folks in the world, and quite a few of them in the
Church, that take a philosoophy that says 'it ain't nobody's business
what I do.' Well, there is a major flaw in that reasoning. No man
lives to himself and no man dies to himself. We don't live in a
vacuum, we're not isolated from the world. We into contact daily with
multitudes of people, whether we realize it or not. Therefore, Paul
said we have a responsibility to those folks. Of course, I realize in
verse 1 of chapter 15 he is looking primarily at relationships within
the Church. Those that are strong, he said, ought to bear the
infirmities of the weak. We talked a little in chapter 14 about that
same principle, that we must take into consideration the other fellow.
Some folks' vocabulary as far as their actions and attitudes are
concerned are very limited to "I", "ME", "MY". Paul said, however,
that we've got to bear the infirmities of the weak, that is, the STRONG
have to do that. I guess the weak won't do that. But the strong do
that. James, remember, wrote in James 3:1 "My brethren, be not many
teachers, knowing that we have shall receive the greater condemnation."
The King James version says "masters", the American Standard version
says "teachers". There is a responsibility that goes with opportunity
and knowledge and maturity. That responsibility involves other people.
In particuar, here, he made reference to the fact that it involves
those who are weak.
Then Paul pointed out that our main goal in life is NOT to please
ourselves. A lot of folks haven't learned that, either. It's 'what
"I" want, what "I" like, what "I" don't want and what "I" don't like.'
The mature individual, however, particular the mature christian, gets
outside himself/herself and takes into consideration the needs of other
people.
There's a broad theme in Romans 15, so if I gave a title to this
lesson today I guess it would be Sundry Lessons From Romans 15. But
this is where Paul began and he came back to it that in verse 7 we are
to receive one another as Christ also received us. "Wherefore receive
one another, as Christ also received us to the glory of God." There
should not be the barriers in the Church that may be found in the world.
We've mentioned several times that the ground is level at the foot of
the cross. We're all on equal footing there.
There's another interesting lesson. I'll probably spend a little more
time on this because there is so much misunderstanding about it. In
verse 4 Paul said, "For whatsoever things were written aforetime were
written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the
scriptures might have hope." The things that were written aforetime
were the Old Testament scriptures. Because of the fact that we do not
believe we live under the Old Testament today, there are a lot of folks
who say 'Well, you just don't believe the Old Testament.' Well, no,
much to the contrary. We believe it to the very fullest and what's more
important, I believe, we understand something of the purpose for which
it was given and that it was never given to be a permanent law. There
are so many passages that point that out. In particular, Jeremiah 31
is one of the interesting ones, and one of the reasons I chose that one
is because the Bible is its own best interpreter. The apostle Paul,
in the Hebrew letter, quoted directly from Jeremiah 31 when he talked
about the fact that the old law, the old covenant, with all its
trappings was taken out of the way, was done away, was nailed to the
cross. What Jeremiah said was this, "Behold, the days come, saith the
Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and
with the house of Judah; not according to the covenant that I made with
their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out
of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an
husband unto them, saith the Lord; but this shall be the covenant that
I will make with the house of Israel; after those days, saith the Lord,
I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts;
and will be their God, and they shall be my people." Jer. 31:31-33.
In Hebrews chaptes 7, 8, 9, the author there went into great depth to
show that there was a new priesthood, and a new priesthood made
necessary a new covenant, then he pointed out that, "In that he saith,
A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and
waxeth old is ready to vanish away." Heb. 8:13. The passage from which
he quoted as he began that discussion is Jeremiah 31 beginning about
verse 31, which is the one I was just quoting. The Old Testament was
given for a temporary law, particularly the law of Moses. Now the
apostle Paul, in the book of Galatians, gave us just a little bit of
insight of that in chapter 3. Verse 23 reads, "But before faith came,
we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should
afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring
us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that
faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster." What did you
say? The law was our schoolmaster to get us to Christ, but once faith,
that system that was revealed, was come, we are no longer under the
schoolmaster. I don't suppose our understanding of that principle is
helped by the usage of the term "schoolmaster". We would think of a
schoolmaster as a principle or superintendent, because that's the was
we use that concept. That was not the case in the Old Testament.
Remember, a lot of the kids in that day and time, when they went to
school, they literally WENT TO SCHOOL. They didn't come home every
afternoon. They stayed until the end of the quarter, etc., or whatever
system they used then, until that course was finished, then they were
brought home. The schoolmaster was the person who took them from home
and delivered them to the teacher. That's a little different concept
than we think of when we talk about a schoolmaster in our language,
but that's what the original term meant. We would compare him to the
bus driver I guess, who picks the child up in front of the house and
carries him to the school. He's responsible for getting him from the
point where he is to the point where he needs to be. Well, now that's
what Paul said the law was. It was responsible for getting man from
the point where he was to the point where he needed to be. Where did
he need to be? Christ !!!! Well, the law was designed to bring man
to that point. Remember Jesus himself, while he was here upon the
earth, would say, 'All that's written in the law, the paslms and the
prophets conerning me must be fulfilled.' It was, before his death.
Remember his prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane? 'I have finished
the work Thou gavest me to do.' So it was done. But again, if one
believes the Old Testament and the things that are stated therein,
then he has to understand that it as never designed to be permanent.
Remember what Moses, the giver of the law, said? "I will raise them
up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put
my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall
command him. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not
hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require
it of him." Deut. 18:18,29. So Moses realized there would come someone
after him and the responsibility of the people would be to hear him
and no longer Moses. I don't know anywhere that's better illustrated
than in the transfiguration. Do you remember when Jesus took Peter,
James and John up into a mountain apart from the others and was
transfigured before? In Matthew 17, verse 1 beginning, we read,
"And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James and John his brother,
and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart, and was transfigured
before hem; and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was
white as the light. And behold, there appeared unto them Moses and
Elias talking with him. Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus,
Lord, it is good for us to be here; if thou wilt, let us make here
three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias.
(Now he put Jesus first in that group.) While he yet spake, behold a
bright cloud overshadowed them; and behold a voice out of the cloud,
which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear
ye him." Matt. 17:1-5. Well now wasn't the work of Moses and Elias
important? Yes, it was, absolutely!!!! Wasn't what they said true?
Absolutely!!!!! Well why would Peter be out of order then in saying
'Let's honor all three, let's built a tabernacle to each one of them'?
Because God said "..This is my beloved son,....hear ye him." In
other words, there was a time when they were to hear Moses, there was
a time when they were to hear Elias, but that time "ain't no more."
Now they were to him God's Son. "....hear ye him."
So Paul said, "For whatsoever things were written aforetime were
written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of the
scriptures might have hope." What do you mean by that, Paul? Well,
did you ever hear of those three boys in the Old Testament by the name
of Hananiah, Azariah and Mishael? Now we don't know them so well as
Hananiah, Azariah and Mishael. We know them better as Shadrach,
Meshach and Abednego. Where is that story recorded? In the Old
Testament. It was written aforetime (book of Daniel). Well, how
can we draw comfort from that? Well, let's look at the story. What
happened? The king declared, through the encouragement of some of
his underlings who were jealous, that everyone would have to bow down
and worship him and his image that had been made of him, so in other
words they were worshipping the king, but they were to bow down to
his idol. Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego understood that God said
don't make any graven images, don't have any other gods and don't
serve them and don't bow down to them. So Shadrach, Meshach and
Abednego said 'We don't do it.' But the law said they were going into
the fiery furnace if they didn't. 'Well, we'll go to the fiery
furnace.' You're going to burn up. 'No, we aren't. We believe God
will take of us, but even if he doesn't, he still said don't worship
the idol, so we aren't going to worship it.' And they didn't. These
kids can tell you what happened. Shadrach, Meschach and Abednego were
thrown into the fiery furnace, but did you notice they weren't the
ones who got singed. Remember what happened to those who threw them
in? Do you know what else happened? They didn't get burned at all.
Know what else happened? When the king looked in the furnace he said
'I thought I put three men in there; I see a fourth one and he looks
like the Son of God.' Well, what do you learn from that? Well, we
learn for one thing the awesome power of God, that he can do the
things he's promised to do. We learn for another thing that there are
blessings that come from doing what God has said do. Well, that's
what Paul said, wasn't it, that we through patience and comfort of the
scriptures might have hope. That's why he said they were there.
Oh, you remember the promise God made to Abraham concerning his seed
and the land he would give him? Abraham was wandering as a stranger
in that land when the promise was made. It would be 430 or more
years before they would actually come into the land of promise, the
offspring, his seed, and inherit the land. Not the hordes of Egypt,
nor the Ammonites, the Canaanites, the Hivites, etc. who dwelt in the
land - nothing could prevent God's bringing them into the land and
fulfilling the promise he had made to Abraham. Well, isn't that what
Paul said in Romans 15:4, "...that we through patience and comfort of
the scriptures might have hope." That's the reason they are there.
That's the reason they are valuable. They served their purpose to
get man up to the point of Christ, but they're still important, they're
still valuable. Why? Because they give us hope. When we read the
lessons that are there, when we see those principles illustrated, Paul
said we have hope.
Then there is a third interesting note in this 15th chapter. Paul,
himself, was the minister of Christ, verse 16 beginning, to the Gentiles.
"That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles,
ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles
might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Ghost. I have therefore
whereof I may glory through Jesus Christ in those things which pertain to
God. For I will not dare to speak of any of those things which Christ
hath not wrought by me to make the Gentiles obedient, by word and deed,
through mighty signs and wonders, by the power of the Spirit of God
so that from Jerusalem, and rond about unto Illyricum, I have fully
preached the gospel of Christ. Yea, so have I strived to preach the
gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another
man's foundation. But as it is written, To whom he was not spoken of,
they shall see; and they that have not heard shall understand."
Rom. 15:16-21. I don't know if you realize the impact of that statement
where Paul said he had preached the gospel from Jerusalem to Illyricum,
but some day get you a map of the Old Testament world that shows the
journeys of Paul and start way down here in Judaea at Jerusalem, on
up through Syria, Cilicia, Cappadocia, Pontus, Galatia, over into Asia,
on up into Thracia, over into Macedonia, into Achaia, up to Illyricum,
just across the sea from Italy. At the time Paul wrote this, he still
had not been to Rome, all way up through all this area, all way
around, all way up here on the map. He did it when means of travel
were crude, you either walked, rode a camel or donkey, or pulled in
a chariot of some sort or in a boat powered by sails. So much of the
time would be spent in travelling, yet Paul said he had preached the
gospel from Jerusalem to Illyricum. It's well said that Paul probably
did more for the cause of Christ than any other being save Jesus,
himself, as he strove to spread the message. Why? because he was
convinced that man was lost without it. So, as he would later write,
he became all things to all men that he might by all means save some.
Those are some sundry lessons from the fifteenth chapter of the book
of Romans. Tonight we'll try to tie up our study as we look at some
things said at the end of the sixteenth chapter and mention a few
folks named in the early part of the chapter, and see how Paul brought
it all neatly together himself, going all way back to the very first
chapter, about the third verse and coming right back to it as he
concludes, saying 'this is why I did this.'