Sermon, 2/16/03 am
Jim Huskey, Walking Through Acts # 31
The last time we left Paul, he had been taken out of the hands of the
Jews, having made his defense standing on the staircase, and when he
reached the point of mentioning the fact that God had sent him to the
Gentile world, an uproar ensued. The chief captain promptly came at
that point and took him by force, was intending to have him beaten,
only to be warned that Paul was a Roman and he best take caution of
what he was about to do. Finding that out, the chief captain has Paul
loosed from his bands and commands the Jewish council to come and make
a case against him, allowing him to defend himself. We pick up in
Acts 23 today.
They came, high priest included, and Paul was allowed to speak.
"And Paul, earnestly beholding the council, said, Men and brethren, I
lived in all good conscience before God until this day. And the high
priest Ananias commanded them that stood by him to smite him on the
mouth. Then said Paul unto him, God shall smite thee, thou whited wall;
for sittest thou to judge me after the law, and commandest me to be
smitten contrary to the law? And they that stood by said, Revilest
thou God's high priest? Then said Paul, I wist (knew) not, brethren,
that he was the high priest; for it is written, Thou shalt not speak
evil of the ruler of thy people." Acts 23:1-5.
There's an interesting statement Paul made as he began this defense.
"...I have lived in all good conscience before God until this day."
vs. 1. Now that's a mouthful!!! There are not many people who could
have made that statement. Paul, I believe, made it in all good
conscience. I believe, as much as anyone who ever lived, Paul sought to
do what was God's will. Now he didn't always know what God's will was,
because he's pointed out already, and will do so again, that there were
many things he wound up doing that were contrary to what God wanted
done, but at the time he was doing them, thought those were the things
to do, until he learned better. That principle is very broad and it
should tell us there is that old statement 'let your conscience be your
guide.' That is a safe thing to do ONLY as far as the conscience is
PROPERLY INSTRUCTED. You see, that was the problem into which Paul had
run. He was fighting against Christ all the while, thinking he was
doing the will of God, when in fact, he was doing things contrary to
the will of God. Yes, we should follow conscience, but the first thing
we must do is make certain conscience is properly instructed. If
conscience is NOT properly instructed, we can say the same thing Paul
said and still wind up in hell.
It's interesting also, that the high priest, after Paul had made that
statement, commanded those who stood by Paul to hit him; hit him in
the mouth. Well, Paul responded to that. Paul said, "God shall smite
thee, thou whited wall..." verse 3. Now remember, Paul did not
realize that Ananias was the high priest. Also remember, Paul had been
away from Jerusalem for a time and sometimes the high priest changed
as often as the governors of Judaea did - at a whim. So Ananias was
now the high priest. The last time Paul had contact with anyone named
Ananias, he was the Jewish convert who had been chosen to give Paul
instructions as to what to do to be saved and do God's will. But this
Ananias was high priest. Paul therefore apologized for his state-
ment. When Paul was asked 'are you going to revile God's high priest?'
Paul responded, 'I didn't know he was high priest.' Paul would NOT
have reacted that way had he known. Paul made a point. It did not
seem to bother the Jews, the high priest, the council, the Sanhedrin,
to violate the very law they supposedly upheld, because to smite Paul
like that was contrary to the VERY LAW the high priest was supposed to
be enforcing and upholding. It was sort of like some of our leaders
in recent years. The very law they were supposed to be upholding, they
didn't mind violating, themselves.
So Paul saw the die pretty much cast. So he plays his "trump care".
Pardon that expression, but that's exactly what he did. He looked his
audience over and he saw that they were already divided. They are
Pharisees and the are Sadducees. Now the Sadducees said there were
no angels, no spirits, no resurrection from the dead. The Pharisees
believed in all those things. "But when Paul perceived that the one
part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the
council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee;
of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. And
when he had so said, there arose a dissension between the Pharisees
and the Sadducees; and the multitude was divided. For the Sadducees
say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit; but the
Pharisees confess both. And there arose a great cry; and the scribes
that were of the Pharisees' part arose, and strove, saying, We find no
evil in this man; but if a spirit or an angel hath spoken to him, let
us not fight against God. And when there arose a great dissension,
the chief captain, fearing lest Paul should have been pulled in pieces
of them, commanded the soldiers to go down, and to take him by force
from among them, and to bring him into the castle." Acts 23:6-10.
That's the second time he had to do that. That's going to prove
interesting, too, before it's all over.
"And the night following the Lord stood by him, and said, Be of good
cheer, Paul; for as thou hast testified of me in Jerusalem, so must
thou bear witness also at Rome." verse 11. Jews had decided the best
way to handle Paul was to kill him. They couldn't silence him, they
couldn't answer him. A group of over forty men take a vow that they
would not eat or drink until Paul was dead. They went to the chief
priest and elders and said, 'We've bound ourselves under a curse; now
here's what we want you to do. You go to the chief captain and tell
him you want Paul to be brought down to testify and to be tried. When
they bring him down, we'll kill him. We'll lie in wait and we'll
kill him.' vs. 13-15. Now isn't that interesting???? The chief
priest, the high priest, the elders of the people, were willing to do
that. Now these were the religious leaders, my friend!!!! In the
meantime, Paul nephew heard about this plan, went to the jail and told
Paul. Paul called for the centurion and told him to take the boy to
the captain, he knew something the captain needed to hear. Paul's
nephew was carried to the captain. The boy told the captain the leaders
of the Jews were trying to use him, because they were going to send
to him to bring Paul down to testify and when he brought him down,
there was a group of over forty men who had taken a vow that they
would not eat or drink until they had killed Paul, so the captain
would be playing into their hands. In reality, the chief captain was
about to get "fed up" with this mess. "And he called unto him two
centurions saying, Make ready two hundred soldiers to go to Caesarea,
and horsemen threescore and ten, and spearmen two hundred, at the third
hour of the night." verse 23. He was sending down a pretty good party
to get Paul down there - 470 men. There were 70 horsemen, 200
soldiers, 200 spearmen. He intended for Paul to get down their
safely.
Then the captain wrote a letter. Now I mentioned that this rescue
deal would come into play again. "And he wrote a letter after this
manner; Claudius Lysias unto the most excellent governor Felix sendeth
greeting. This man was taken of the Jews, and should have been killed
of them; then came I with an army, and rescued him, having understood
that he was a Roman." verses 25-27. [Oh, Shucks!!!!! When did you
find out he was a Roman, captain??? Oh, after you'd bound him and was
about to have him beaten; that's when you found out he was a Roman!!!
You didn't rescue him because you thought he was a Roman; you rescued
him because of the uproar that was caused. Then when you nearly did
the WRONG THING that would put YOUR neck on the chopping block, you
found out he was a Roman, and THEN you delivered him from the Jews,
the second time.] So the captain didn't quite tell all the truth.
He sort of got the "cart before the horse" in a few places, in other
words. "And when I would have known the cause wherefore they accused
him, I brought him forth into their council; whom I perceived to be
accused of questions of their law, but to have nothing laid to his
charge worthy of death or of bonds. And when it was told me how that
the Jews laid wait for the man, I sent straightway to thee, and gave
commandment to his accusers also to say before thee what they had
against him. Farewell." vs. 28-30.
Well, the soldiers got Paul to Caesarea. "And when the governor
had read the letter, he asked of what province he was. And when he
understood that he was of Cilicia; I will hear thee, said he, when
thine accusers are also come. And he commanded him to be kept in
Herod's judgment hall." vs. 34,35.
About five days here came Ananias. An orator has been brought to
present the Jews' case. Now remember, what had been commanded was
that his accusers stand before him face to face, but wasn't going
to be done just yet. They brought an orator to present their case.
We can tell it, because the very first thing the orator tried to do
was "butter" up Felix, the governor. "And when he was called forth,
Tertullus began to accuse him, saying, Seeing that by thee we enjoy
great quietness, and that very worthy deeds are done unto this nation
by thy providence, we accept it always, and in all places, most noble
Felix, with all thankfulness." Acts 24:2,3. Now he didn't have to lie
about it, but he did. The Jews hated his guts, because he was a
symbol of their bondage. They were under Roman domination. They
didn't think a Roman was fit to live in the first place, because he
wasn't a Jew. "Notwithstanding, that I be not further tedious unto
thee, I pray thee that thou wouldest hear us of thy clemency a few
words. For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of
sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of
the sect of the Nazarenes; who also hath gone about to profane the
temple; whom we took, and would have judged according to our law. But
the chief captain Lysias came upon us, and with great violence took
him away out of our hands, commanding his accusers to come unto thee;
by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things,
whereof we accuse him. And the Jews also assented, saying that these
things were so." vs. 4-9.
Now you notice no proof was given. How was he going to profane the
temple? How did he profane the temple? Oh, remember, that was brought
about because they S-U-P-P-O-S-E-D that Trophimus, a Greek, had been
with him in the temple. Had Trophimus been in the temple? NO!!! Was
Paul causing a stir when he was there? NO!!! In fact, when some came
who saw Paul in the temple and T-H-O-U-G-H-T that since they saw
Trophimus with him earlier in the city, he was there, and they started
stirring up the people. But none of the charges were true. So Paul
had presented his case before the mob, he presented his case before
the Jewish council, and now he was having to do it again. And in so
doing, he was speaking now to governors of Rome.
"Then Paul, after that the governor had beckoned unto him to speak,
answered, Forasmuch as I know that thou hast been of many years a
judge unto this nation, I do the more cheerfully answer for myself;
because that thou mayest understand, that there are yet but twelve
days since I went up to Jerusalem for to worship. And they neither
found me in the temple disputing with any man, neither raising up the
people, neither in the synagogues, nor in the city; neither can they
prove the things whereof they now accuse me. But this I confess unto
thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God
of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and
in the prophets; and have hope toward God, which they themselves also
allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just
and unjust. And herein do I exercise myself, to have always a
conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men. Now after many
years I came to bring alms to my nation, and offerings. Whereupon
certain Jews from Asia found me purified in the temple, neither with
multitude, nor with tumult. Who ought to have been here before thee,
and object, if they had ought against me. (You see, they never DID
show up.) Or else let these same here say, if they have found any
evil doing in me, while I stood before the council, except it be for
this one voice, that I cried standing among them, Touching the
resurrection of the dead I am called in question by you this day.
And when Felix heard these things, having more perfect knowledge of
THAT way, he deferred them, and said, When Lysias the chief captain
shall come down, I will know the uttermost of your matter."
Acts 24:10-22. So he has Paul kept, but he didn't have him in bonds
or braces or chains or anything like that, letting him have liberty.
He commanded a centurion to stay with him, he was not to forbid any
of Paul's acquaintances to minister or come to him.
"And after certain days, when Felix came with his wife Drusilla, which
was a Jewess, he sent for Paul and heard him concerning the faith in
Christ." vs. 24. He's already heard him as he stood before him
with the council was there. "And as he reasoned of righteousness,
temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled, and answered, Go thy
way for this time; when I have a convenient season, I will call for
thee. He hoped also that money should have been given him of Paul,
that he might loose him; wherefore he sent for him the oftener, and
communed with him." vs. 25,26.
Now Paul was right - Felix was knowledgeable about some of the things
among the Jews. One of the reasons for his knowledge was because his
wife was a Jewess. So in a lot of respects, he was one who understood
how to keep the Jews reasonably happy and at the same time keep Rome
happy. He had been able to do that, and the nation had been quiet for
some time in that area. When Paul reasoned with him of righteousness,
temperance and judgment to come, Felix trembled. You must remember
that this fellow had "been down the road and back". He was not your
most upright of characters, but Paul got to him. The record says he
trembled. But he said 'go your was, when I have a more convenient
season, I'll call for you.'
Now there are two factors that are going to enter in here. Paul had
gotten under Felix' skin for one thing. But also, Felix heard Paul
talking about bringing all those alms for his nation. He would be
wondering if Paul still had all that money with him. So he had hopes
of getting a little of that. Then there was a third factor. He was
a politician, and since he had to answer for the way the Jews acted
under his governorship, he wanted to keep them happy. So the record
says he sent for him the oftener and communed with him. But as far
as we know, that "convenient season" never came. It's evident it
didn't.
"But afer two years Porcius Festus came into Felix' room; and Felix,
willing to show the Jews a pleasure, left Paul bound." vs. 27.
Now remember, Paul had some freedom to move about; he had a centurion
with him, his friends could come to him, they could minister to him,
but he's still a prisoner - and it's because of politics. It will
ultimately be because of politics that he will have to appeal to
Caesar. Now, we need to understand who the Emperor was at the time
this was going on. We know him better as Nero. He's the one, you'll
remember, who lighted his garden with torches, using for fuel, the
bodies of christians. He's the one, supposedly, who fiddled while
Rome burned. He's the one who set up games to pit christians against
beasts in the colosseums, yet Paul averred that he had a better chance
standing before him, than he had standing before the Jewish leaders.
Festus would hear him and in Acts 25:8 beginning, we read, "While he
answered for himself, Neither against the law of the Jews, neither
against the temple, nor yet against Caesar, have I offended any thing
at all. But Festus, willing to do the Jews a plessure, answered Paul,
and said, Wilt thou go up to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these
things before me? Then said Paul, I stand at Caesar's judgment seat,
where I ought to be judged; to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou
very well knowest. For if I be an offender, or have committed any
thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die; but if there be none of
these things whereof these accuse me, no man may deliver me unto them,
I appeal unto Caesar." Acts 25:8-11. We might learn a lesson there.
There's a time when we need to appeal to the law that is. That's why
it's there. Paul said, 'no, I won't go down, I won't stand before
them in Jerusalem again, I'll go before Caesar's judgment seat.' And
we will later learn that when Agrippa comes, a king, Paul could have
been set at liberty, had it not been for politics. He felt his only
way out was to appeal to Caeaser. Agrippa said if he hadn't done that,
he should have been loosed. But you see Felix didn't want to turn him
loose because he might get some money from him, he wanted to appease
the Jews. Festus didn't want to turn him loose because he wanted
to appease the Jews. Paul was left with no recourse and we'll look
at that as he stands before Agrippa. When Agrippa and Bernice come,
Festus will tell them about Paul and Agrippa will say 'I want to hear.'
Of course, Festus wanted him to hear, because he hated to send him to
Rome and not have a charge to lay againt him. The bottom line is,
he didn't have a legal charge whereby he could charge Paul; so he hoped
Agrippa could come up with something, because he didn't have anything.
We'll close here, and the next time we'll see Paul making his defense
then before King Agrippa. Remember what the Lord told him? He would
stand before kings - first step in that process right here. He's
already been sent to the Gentiles, now he's going to stand before
the king and the Lord had already stood by him and told him 'you're
going to Rome, too.' Eventually, we'll read of saints in Caesar's
household, because of that trip.