Sermon, 2/9/3 am
Jim Huskey, Walking Through Acts # 29
We're coming to a place in our walk through the book of Acts where Paul
is journeying, moving rather rapidly at time from one place to another.
We begin this morning at the beginning of Acts 21 where Paul is on the
move again, having met with the elders from the church at Ephesus at
Miletus, then continued his journey. He made his way to two or three
different places, stayed for a few days, meets with the disciples, then
went on his way. We pick up in verse 8 of Acts 21.
"And the next day we that were of Paul's company departed, and came
unto Caesarea; and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist,
which was one of the seven; and abode with him. And the same man had
four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy." Acts 21:8,9. Let's stop
here for a moment. We remember this was one of the seven, as we're
reminded in the text here itself. But we also remember that Philip had
gone to Samaria after being selected as one of the seven, and had
worked there for a time. He went to the city of Samaria and he
preached Christ to them. Then we find that he was instructed to leave
that area and go down to an area where he would come into contact with
an individual whom we know as the Ethiopian eunuch, converted him, and
having recorded this conversion, Acts 8:39,40 concludes that chapter
with the following: "And when they were come up out of the water, the
Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him on
more; and he went on his way rejoicing. But Philip was found at Azotus;
and passing through he preached in all the cities, till he came to
Caesarea." That's the last time we have read of Philip until here in
Acts 21. Now he has four daughters, virgins, who prophesy; he is still
in Caesarea and when Paul and company come there, they stay with him.
But there's something that occurs while they are there. "And as we
tarried there many days, there came down from Judaea a certain
prophet, named Agabus. And when he was come unto us, he took Paul's
girdle, and bound his own hands and feet, and said, Thus saith the
Holy Ghost, So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man that owneth
this girdle, and shall deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles."
Acts 21:10,11. Once again, this man's name has popped up once before.
In Acts 11, we find some had travelled as far as Phenice and Cyprus
and those areas, preaching to the Jews only. But they come to Antioch
and the preach to the Gentiles as well. A great number believed and
turned to the Lord. Barnabas is sent down there. Notice verse 27 of
Acts 11. "And in these days came prophets from Jerusalem unto Antioch.
And there stood up one of them named Agabus, and signified by the
spirit that there should be great dearth throughout all the world;
which came to pass in the days of Claudius Caesar. Then the disciples,
every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the
brethren which dwelt in Judaea; which also they did, and sent it to the
elders by the hands of Barnabas and Saul." Acts 11:27-30. We've read
of this Agabus before; the first time he prophesied of a famine that
would come to pass, which it did; now he has come on the scene again.
This time his presence has to do with Paul. He took Paul's girdle,
bound himself up and said this was what would happen by the hands of
the Jews, to the man who owned this girdle.
Let's just stop here. Remember Paul has been told that he's going to
bear the name of Jesus before kings. He's going to be reminded shortly
thereafter that he would even go to Rome. Now I'm fairly certain Paul
did not have in mind making his journey to Rome as he would make it.
That's just not the way one would normally plan an evangelist trip,
to make it as a prisoner, but that's the way it would work out for Paul.
The events here in Acts 21 are setting that into motion. Here was the
prophecy regarding him being bound. His being bound would eventually
lead to his appealing to the judgment seat of Caesar and his appealing
to the judgment seat of Caesar would set in motion the voyage that would
take him to Rome to be tried.
"And when we heard these things, both we, and they of that place,
besought him not to go up to Jerusalem. (Just don't go, Paul. Don't
go to Jerusalem and these things won't happen.) Then Paul answered,
When mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? For I am ready not to
be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord
Jesus. And when he would not be persuaded, we ceased, saying, The
will of the Lord be done. And after those days we took up our
carriages, and went up to Jerusalem." Acts 21:12-15. The die was cast!!
Paul would be bound and the result of that would eventually take him
to Rome.
"There went with us also certain of the disciples of Caesarea, and
brought with them one Mnason of Cyprus, an old disciple, with whom we
should lodge. And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren
received us gladly. And the day following Paul went in with us unto
James; and all the elders were present. And when he had saluted them,
he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles
by his ministry. And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and
said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there
are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law; And they are
informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the
Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise
their children, neither to walk after the customs. What is it
therefore? The multitude must needs come together; for they will hear
that thou art come. Do therefore this that we say to thee; we have
four men which have a vow on them; them take, and purify thyself with
them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads;
and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed
concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest
orderly, and keepest the law. As touching the Gentiles which believe,
we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save
only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from
blood, and from strangled, and from fornication." Acts 21:16-25. Now
you remember there's already been one conference at Jerusalem over
this matter. Here the Jews had been bringing the report that Paul
had told the Jews which were among the Gentiles to completley forsake
their customs they had been observing over the years, including
circumcision. Now, just stop and think for a moment. Some would
suggest that these brethren were wrong in their approach to Paul in
the first place. Is circumcision anything with respect to christianity??
NO!!!! Is it all right if one is circumcised??? YES!!! Is it all
right if one is not circumcised??? YES!!! So neither way is there
any harm done or is there any advantage gained!!!!! But, was this
charge that was being made concerning Paul true? NO!!!! Paul would
not try to bind on the Gentiles those customs that had been handed
down from the law; but neither did he try to keep the Jews who became
christians from holding on to some of those practices. The truth of
the matter was, they didn't make any difference now. So in the first
place, the charges many brought against Paul were not correct.
So Paul agreed with their request. Why? because he was trying to open
doors rather than close doors. So Paul entered with the others into
the temple to be purified, to observe certain days until sacrifices
could be offered in their behalf, as was the custom of the law. Now,
remember, it's this same Paul who wrote "For in Christ Jesus, neither
circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature."
Gal. 6:15. He understood that; he understood that these were just
customs that had been handed down and that as far as real value was
concerned to his spiritual well-being, they had nothing to do with it.
But in order to keep down trouble he agreed to do this and there was
nothing wrong with it. But I want you to notice what happened.
"And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of
Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and
laid hands on him, crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man,
that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and
this place; and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath
polluted this holy place. (None of this was true. What had happened??
They had put one and one together and got SIX!!!! Luke explains!!!)
(For they had seen before with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian,
whom they SUPPOSED that Paul had brought into the temple.)" Acts 21:27-29.
Had they seen Paul in the temple with Trophimus??? NO!!!! Where did
they see Paul with Trophimus??? IN THE CITY!!!! So I guess if
Trophimus had been with Paul in the city HE HAD TO BE WITH PAUL IN
THE TEMPLE AS WELL....... Wasn't true!!! Wasn't true!!!! It's so
much easier sometimes to act on half truth and what one SUPPOSES, than
it is to get all the evidence before one jumps to a conclusion. All
this troule would be stirred up, in part, because people didn't get the
facts of the matter. That is true in so many, many incidents. But
Paul would be bound and eventually wind up having to appeal to Nero
Caesar's judgment seat because of the lies the Jews laid at his feet!!
Now it's awfully important that we get all the facts before we start
jumping to conclusions. I heard something the other morning as I was
having my morning social with some of my friends at McDonalds. A
fellow walked in the a fellow sitting next to me said, "I read his
obituary in a veterans' paper that's published here in Georgia just
last week." I said, "He doesn't look too dead to me." Sure enough.
He went and got the paper, gave it to the fellow. Well, somebody had
gotten a little bit of information here and there that wasn't true and
they acted on it, published about the man's death, and here he was
sitting in McDonalds reading about it.
All the events that follow from this point on until Paul winds up in
Rome were the results, at least in part, of the Jews' lies. Now the
Jews didn't mind lying a little bit, especially if they could get
Paul. They'll prove that a little later. But this incident was all
from them believing something that wasn't true. They didn't have all
the facts straight. Paul said it didn't matter to him. He was willing
to not only be bound, but was willing to die for the Lord in
Jerusalem if necessary.
"And all the city was moved, and the people ran together; and they
took Paul, and drew him out of the temple; and forthwith the doors
were shut. And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the
chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar. Who
immediately took soldiers and centurions, and ran down unto them; and
when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of
Paul. Then the chief captain came near, and took him, and commanded him
to be bound with two chains; and demanded who he was, and what he had
done. And some cried one thing, some another, among the multitude; and
when he could not know the certainty for the tumult, he commaned him to
be carried into the castle. And when he came upon the stairs, so it
was, that he was borne of the soldiers for the violence of the people.
For the multitude of the people followed after, crying, Away with him.
And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief
captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?
Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar,
and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were
murdered? (talk about mis-information!!!) But Paul said, I am a man
which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city;
and I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people. And when he had
given him licence, Paul stood on the stairs, and beckoned with the
hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, he
spake unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying," Acts 21:30-40. So he
would begin to make his defense - his first one. There would be many
more after this. This one is to the Jews.
The bottom line is this - all the charges brought against Paul were
false. They could not be sustained. You'll remember that already on
several occasions Paul had determined to be at Jerusalem for a
particular feast. Does that sound like he would be teaching the Jews
that it was wrong for them to go to those feasts, when he himself would
be there for them. He saw that as an opportunity, as an open door,
where he could reach some of those Jews, so he took advantage of it.
But the charges laid at his feet were false, and part of them came
about as a result of, and from the springboard of the statement that
he had taken a Gentile into the temple. Remember, that's how the
Romans would really rub it in the face of the Jews when they would
not only go into the temple, but would take a pig in there and offer
it on the altar. So this is the springboard that led to near violence
before the captain arrived to take Paul.
We'll stop here and Lord willing, this evening we'll look at Paul's
defense and some of the things he has to say and some of the things
that occur as a result of his defense. In his defense he recounts his
conversion to the Jews, as well, trying to open their eyes, help them
understand that he was once where they were right then and that they
had common ground as opposed to uncommon ground.