Saturday, 19 June 2004 - 1:16 PM EDT

This is from your links:
This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al Qaeda.
?President Bush, in an exchange with reporters, June 17, 2004

"[A]cting pursuant to the Constitution and [the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002] is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations,

including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001"

Do you not see how the last quote is actually 2 statements.
The top part says going after terrorists & their organizations which would certainly include IRAQ. No one
could deny that Iraq had a relationship with al Qaeda.
They used northern Iraq as a training site.

The bottom part merely includes those nations directly involved. You could substitute the word "and" or "also" for the word including and it means the same thing.
Bush may be accused of poor sentence structure, but your facts don't support lying.

It would appear that your sources are more culpable then not in so far as they did not publish the rest of the paragraph from the 911 commission. It states emphatically that there was a link between al Qaeda & Iraq.
It is not new though that those sources are more interested in creating news than reporting it.

msotamike

Saturday, 19 June 2004 - 3:05 PM EDT

Ha. Well that's just great. Who can we trust? Oh, wait, nobody ever trusted him.

Sunday, 20 June 2004 - 7:44 PM EDT

Ha. Who are you talking about, Bill Clinton? No one ever trusted him after he had his way with Monica, and raped a few on the way. Is that who you mean? Or Gore, the man that invented the internet? Ha.

If you have more than a grade school education, you should be able to articulate.
Ha.

Fact of the matter is we can't trust any of them in Congress, mostly Kennedy, Daschel, Gephart, Feinstein, Clinton, and all the rest that will not deal with the facts as presented.
Most are so preoccupied wiht getting "ahead" reelected or in Bills case just "head"

Monday, 21 June 2004 - 7:08 PM EDT

Are you alleging that President Clinton raped a "few" people along the way? I'm assuming you mean it metaphorically.

The sad truth is that we have an appointee with an agenda, powered by the neoconservatives , and this administration had embroiled america in a needless war costing thousands of lives and god knows how much money while at the same time offering tax cuts that overwhelmingly assist the upper 1 percent of american earners, while at the same time leaving millions of the economically struggling who don't make enough to pay income tax but are forced to pay into Medicare and other expenses. No president has ever cut taxes during wartime; it's just bad policy.