Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
Wednesday, June 2, 1999

                  Story last updated at 7:06 p.m. on Sunday, May 30, 1999

                  'Twofer' tower solution was reached by luck

                  By Dan Scanlan
                  Staff writer

                  The Jacksonville Planning Commission has approved a rezoning request that
                  will allow two area digital telephone companies to co-locate on a JEA
                  power pole at 12241 St. Augustine Road.

                  The unanimous vote Thursday does more than allow the construction of a
                  140-foot telephone tower in a heavily wooded area of Mandarin.

                  The new tower gives Powertel a more palatable site than one proposed a
                  few blocks away that was facing city and neighborhood opposition. The
                  tower will also have room for up to two more antennas, allowing Sprint PCS
                  to move a controversial antenna from a site off Marbon Road.

                  ''We are all in agreement that this is a good location for this tower. The
                  whole intent here is to take down the old [Sprint] tower and erect a new one
                  at this site,'' said city attorney Karl Sanders. ''There is also the possibility we
                  will get yet another carrier to co-locate on this same tower, which is
                  unprecedented in Jacksonville, to actually have three people co-locating on a
                  tower at once.''

                  The decision also pleases Autumn Glen resident Jeffrey Smith, whose home
                  is 35 feet from that 97-foot Sprint PCS antenna off Marbon Road.

                  Smith and City Council members vehemently opposed Sprint PCS in early
                  June of 1998 when it replaced an 80-foot Jacksonville Electric Authority
                  power pole with the 97-foot concrete pole behind Smith's home and topped
                  it with an antenna.

                  City zoning officials allowed the taller pole on the power line right of way,
                  claiming it was a modification of an existing pole. But Smith contended the
                  city misinterpreted its 1996 tower ordinance, saying it should have allowed
                  an antenna atop an existing pole.

                  Smith said he knew the city was searching for a new antenna site, but didn't
                  know a final selection had been made.

                  ''That is what we have been hoping to have happen, so that is good news,''
                  Smith said. ''We were cautiously optimistic that it might happen, but you
                  never know.''

                  The ''twofer'' solution was reached by luck.

                  Powertel was facing opposition from the city's Planning and Development
                  Department over its original plans to build a 130-foot telephone tower at the
                  Day Star Christian Church, 12700 St. Augustine Road.

                  City planners said the tower would have been too close to an old property
                  line inside church property and violated the city statute that said all telephone
                  towers must be 250 feet from residential property. Powertel attorney John
                  Welch appealed that recommendation and also filed for a zoning variance
                  just in case.

                  ''We didn't expect to file for a variance because we thought we had been
                  careful to locate more than 250 feet from the nearest residential lot,'' Welch
                  said. ''We applied for the variance in the event the appeal was turned down.''

                  Then the city informed Welch that Sprint PCS had found an alternate site for
                  its controversial antenna off Marbon Road, and asked if he would be
                  interested in co-locating on that tower. That started a series of meetings that
                  ended the day before the planning commission hearing, said Coleen Carroll,
                  Sprint's senior property manager.

                  ''We worked with the general counsel's office and JEA and located another
                  site that would solve the problem and keep everyone happy. It's a very rural
                  site on a JEA easement and we all feel it's met the criteria,'' she said. ''It took
                  us a while [to find it]. We had different people we had to make happy.''

                  ''We think it is a win for everyone,'' Welch added.

                  Despite the fact that city officials and both companies agreed to the site, it
                  still needed a zoning change, and one person was opposed to it during
                  Thursday's commission hearing.

                  Realtor Jimi Jones, who represents a nearby 48-acre site's owner, said she
                  doesn't know if a developer will want a telephone antenna looming over his
                  homes.

                  ''I am afraid that the developers who have this under contract will not be
                  interested in purchasing it,'' she said. ''That being the case, you would
                  suspect that you would have an unhappy landowner.''