Volume I, No 1 Syndouloi October 1999
The Periodical of the Pre-Sem Club
Fellowservants of Christ
Our First Issue!
At the end of the 1996-1997 school year,
ten pre-seminary students signed the proposed constitution of the newly formed
Pre-Sem Club. This organization, which
was student formed and led from the very beginning, is dedicated to promoting
“the fellowship, education, spirituality, maturity, and faith of those who seek
to be pastors in the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod.” The Pre-Sem Club has aimed to fulfill these goals through times
of fellowship, picnics, trips, and weekly meetings. However, until this year the Pre-Sem Club had no official
newsletter that would keep its members informed and reach out to new
members.
What you are reading is the very first
issue of Syndouloi, the Pre-Sem
Club’s official periodical. The name comes from Colossians 4:7 and means
fellowservants. As St. Paul called his
friend Tychicus his fellowservant, so we remember that all of us are
fellowservants of Christ. This monthly
publication will include devotions, book reviews, interviews, editorials,
notices of upcoming meetings, and anything else you want it to include.
This is your publication, so if you have any ideas, opinions, devotions,
or anything else you want to share with the pre-seminary community here at
Concordia, just sent it via campus mail to the editor, Heath Curtis. I hope you enjoy the issue, and I’ll see you
Wednesday night at 9 in the Dorcas chapel.
Stay in the Word Read Jn 15:1-8;
LC Pref. 3-8 (Tappert 358)
College is one of busiest times in our
lives. There are papers to write, books
to read, meetings to attend, friends to see, and more. Often, things can get so busy that we can
allow them to push God out of our lives.
At first we just skip the longer reading in our devotions, then we drop
the reading altogether, then our prayer time dwindles to nothing, and
eventually we are careening through life without the support we need so much.
Jesus reminds us that we do, in fact, need
this support. In John 15, Jesus says
quite plainly that if we separate ourselves from him, his word, and his love,
we can do nothing. We will be nothing.
Luther also chastises those who think they
do not need a regular time of study and prayer. Luther notes in his Large Catechism than even he, a doctor of
theology, studied the most basic Christian doctrines everyday.
With warnings like these, do we dare allow
our projects to crowd out God?
Certainly not, especially when we recall that God comes to us only
through his Word and Sacraments. He
will not visit you while you sit on the couch watching the game. We can only find him in the ways he has
given us to find him.
Besides this stern warning from God, we
also have his promises to always be with us if we remain with him. Jesus says it best, in John 15:7 “If you
remain in me, and my words remain in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be
given you.” He is waiting: take his
gifts, and lift up your requests before the throne.
Prayer:
Lord, forgive me for ignoring you, help me to stay in your Word and Will. Amen.
Editorial: Is The Liturgy
Adiaphora?
Across Christendom and in our own LCMS,
people are arguing about worship. While the arguments differ from place to
place, they all hang on one important question: is liturgy adiaphora? The answer to that question, in my opinion,
depends more on how someone defines terms that to his or her orthodoxy or
intelligence.
First, let's start with the more accepted
of the terms: adiaphora. This terms
means "indifferent thing," something that could be changed or even
ignored and forgotten about with no adverse affects to the faith which we
profess. Everyone accepts this definition from the stubbornest (they prefer the
term "orthodox") "traditional" to the most free-wheeling
(they prefer the term "Spirit-led") "contemporary." The question still remains, is the liturgy
adiaphora, is it something that can be changed, altered, or ignored and left
out at the will of Christians?
How you answer this question will, of
course, depend on what you mean by liturgy. In fact, two people might have an
entire conversation (or fight) about worship and altogether miss the mutual
points they have to offer because they define liturgy differently. I believe that this is both the reason we
have so much animosity and misunderstanding in the LCMS about worship and the
beginning to the solution of the problem.
You see the "contemporary"
worshipers define liturgy as chant, chancel prancing, vestments, candles,
16th-century chorales, processions, and organ music. If any of these things
were changed, altered, or passed over the Christian faith would not be harmed.
Of course liturgy is adiaphora!
On the other hand, "traditional"
worshipers define liturgy as Trinitarian invocation, baptism, confession and
absolution, the Lord's Prayer, the Lord's Supper, and an orthodox statement of
faith (the Creed). None of these things can be altered or changed without
changing (i.e. damaging) the Christian faith: they are the Christian faith. Of
course liturgy is not adiaphora!
That is quite a problem: two groups of
dedicated, sincere Christians fighting tooth and nail and each not even knowing
what the other is saying. I am not
saying that there is some easy fix to the "worship wars" but let us at least get our terms straight. Perhaps it would be better to drop
"liturgy" from our vocabulary when we discuss how Christians should
worship; it seems to do more harm than good.
Instead, we should begin by talking about what is essential to Christian
worship and what is not. When we have a list of the essentials, then we can
talk about music, instruments, vestments and their places and forms. Until we
do that I am afraid the "worship war" will be a hopeless quagmire
with no victor, but three losers: us, them and God.
Notes and News
· September 20-22: Over twenty pre-seminary students from
Concordia-Seward traveled to St. Louis for the Seminary’s Symposium. The Symposium focused on eschatology and the
Church’s hope for the next millennium.
Professor Block will be purchasing six audio cassette tapes from the
Symposium and will have them available in the Pre-Sem Room (Becker 107,
combination SPI). The consensus from
all who attended is summed up well by Scott Adle, “It rocked.”
· The Pre-Sem Club has three officers, an editor of this
publication, and a sponsor, all of whom are there to serve you. Here is their information if you need to
contact them: President, Bert Mueller, 8665; Vice President, Dan Wing, 8530;
Secretary/Treasurer Chris Ahlman, 8631; Editor, Heath Curtis, 8505; Sponsor,
Prof. Block, 7442
· October’s meetings are all scheduled at the regular time
and place: 9pm Wednesday nights in the Dorcas Chapel. These one-hour meetings usually consist of free pop and cookies, a speaker or Bible study, and prayer. If you, or someone you know, would like to
lead one of our weekly meetings please contact Bert or Dan.
Something to Ponder
In 1675, Dr. Philip Jacob Spener wrote the
following to his brothers in the ministry.
It is still a good piece of advice today. (Pia Desideria, page 36. Translated by Tappert in the Fortress Press
1974 edition.)
“Let us remember that in the last judgment we shall
not be asked how learned we were and whether we displayed our learning before
the world; to what extent we enjoyed the favor of men and knew how to keep it;
with what honors we were exalted and how great a reputation in the world we
left behind us; or how many treasures of earthly goods we amassed for our
children and thereby drew a curse upon ourselves.
Instead
we shall be asked how faithfully and with how childlike a heart we sought to
further the kingdom of God; with how pure and godly a teaching and how worthy
an example we tried to edify our hearers amid the scorn of the world, denial of
self, taking up of the cross, and imitation of the Savior; with what zeal we
opposed not only error but also wickedness of life; or with what constancy and
cheerfulness we endured the persecution or adversity thrust upon us by the
manifestly godless world or by false brethren, and amid such suffering praised
our God.”