Aether-Wave

Home

Aether-Wave Computer Modelling! ... Dr. Jay! thanks for getting back to me! Am looking forward to your simulation!! [I don't suppose you write software for the MacIntosh??] Sorry if you thought I was being simplistic in my description of the mathematics of nature.! I was being complete -- to show nature in a thousand times more detail than covert physics. A thousand times, and more, detail than 'Quantum Physics'! That is -- there are no 'photons'! [There are NO photon particles! And no POINT particles or charges! No points in nature!] [There are, of course, quantized energy transfers in nature. But no photon particles, and points in motion, or in existence!!] the electron is eight times larger in radius than the proton! It is a volume, a vortex, of aenertia, motion, wave action. But not 'waves' in the sense of points plotting a curve -- instead, a continuum field of experience. A continuum gradient of electric and magnetic experiences! Read the "Undiscovered Phyics" if you like! It is easy to read -- for anyone who reads English, and has a little bit of physics background. for that matter, most of it is comprehensible to people who only have rundimentary English capabilities, and much of it -- to the people of the world with no English-language ability. That is why it is published as illustrations! If you look at the proof of metric relativity -- you will find out what 'charge' is, and energy and mass -- and that they are NOT fundamental concepts ... The math is trivial -- as is ALL math in nature. I didn't spend thirty years studying this for nothing. [Ten years doing nothing else!] The equation is a sine function. Easy. And you know what a helicoid is, a spiral, which propagates ... as a screw ... We are describing electromagnetic waves, from nature, not from institutional physics. Not from institutional math. That math does not apply in nature! As there are no points, no straight lines, etc. in nature. Again, if you need an equation to PLOT the printing of the helicoidal aether waves and lightwaves (and the EM volumes which are electrons and proton), or to throw a beam of electrons against the screen of your computer, it is a sine function, as described in my previous letter to you. i.e., just write out equations for the x, y and z as sinusoidal functions of time ... that is, write out the equation for plotting a circle, in the XY plane, with the point or plotter moving around the circumference of the circle as a function of time. x = sin(t); y = cos(t); [t = time] if plotted this way, then it appears as a circle, a one-loop lissajous figure, on the surface of the computer screen. change it to x = sin(t), y = 0, z = cos(t) and you see it as a two dimensional circle sideways, as a line! change it to y = a sin(t), z = b cos(t), and x = c t -- and you have the helicoid, propagating away off the side of your computer screen !! (or top, if you let y = c t.) [a, b and c are constants which you can select to vary the ellipsoidal properties in both the lateral (electric vector) direction, and the longitudinal (magnetic vector) direction.] By switching x and y, you get the helicoid propagating upward, rather than sideways. [Later we can add a constant function of t to x,y or z in order to veer the helicoid off at different angles with respect to the viewer. [as in y = t/d + {a sin(t)}; z = t/e + {b cos(t)}; and x = t/f +{c t} ... with d, e and f being additional constants.] Thanks again for making me review this!! [I am sure you will see if I made any mistakes here ...] It is six years or so since I was looking at how to plot nature (SIMPLE NATURE) on the computer screen with algebra! [Addition, multiplication, subtraction and addition are the ONLY functions which take place in nature!!] Best regards! And looking forward to your participation in building our X49 scramjet engines, and predecessor bench-top rocket engine, if that interests you. For Mother Sun, Moon, and Milky Way! Millennium Twain ... now in our 22nd day of global fasting for world peace ... riseup/www/info/ worldfast ... satyagraha -- fasting protest ... Gandhi named this concept of action: "satyagraha" (combining the Hindu words for "truth" and "holding firmly.") ************ ********* ********* * ************ ********* ********* ****** Computer Algorithms to Plot Aether-Wave Topology of Creation !!! Wednesday April 30, 2003 11:38 am ... dr Jay et al! still trying to track down some software on the web -- to do what you offered to do from scratch -- re: create a pc/mac algorithm for plotting the electromagnetic aether foundation of experience! displaying the waveforms of the 'unseen' helix waves, which create the 'seen' quantized waves, and the standing waves we know as matter (electrons, protons, neutrons, atoms, molecules). creating images of Lissajous matter patterns with more or less humps, wavelengths, N mumbers. N=1 is a loop, N=2 is infinity figure, etc. these Lissajous figures are the variable standing- wave topologies of the electron! in my first 'guestimate' as to how the sinefunction would be structured to plot the propagating, open-ended, aether waves and lightwave, I suggested: [as in y = T/d + {a sin(T)}; z = T/e + {b cos(T)}; and x = T/f +{c T} ... with d, e and f being additional constants.] now it occurs to me that the constants a, b, and c modify only the amplitude. you will want to also insert constants or variables in front of each T in the sine functions .. i.e., [y = t/d + {a sin(jT)}; z = t/e + {b cos(kT)}; and x = t/f +{c T}] that way, for the nonquantized aether waves, and the quantized lightwaves, propagating in open-ended coils ... you can demonstate that when j=k (or perhaps j=nk) ... integer multiples of the two transverse frequencies ... you have a coupling condition which preserves the amplitude and wavelength of the lightwave ... when this harmonic coupling does NOT exist ... then you have the MORE plentiful aether waves ... which unravel (redshift) as they screw their way along .. ____________ _________ _________ ______ ____________ _________ _________ ______ as to the Electron wave structure ... we just have to plot the Lissajous curves ... which are, I believe, [y = {a sin(jT)}; z = {b cos(kT)}; and x = {c sin(jT)] that is, not only are we generating a trigonometric circle -- but the circle has a sine hump generated in it -- [see attached 3hump ELECTRON jpg] ____________ _________ _________ ______ ____________ _________ _________ ______ in the case of a proton, we have to go two steps further! [The proton is a superposition, nonlinear, of three waveforms, not two (as is the electron). we have to generate a ring-slinky. a slinky which is coiled around -- mouth to tail -- and reconnected into a torus with a large (spin) radius, and a small ('twist') radius. definitely NOT as simple as an electron with 137 little humps, going around one big hump! as the the 137 humps in the proton have to not only move up and down, in the +/- X axis for example -- they also have to move IN-AND-OUT -- in the Z axis. so I assume we will need: [y = {a sin(jT)}; x = {c sin(jT); and z = {b cos(kT) + b' cos(137kT)}] !!! in other words, as the large z component [b cos(kT)] varies once around the spin axis, the minor z component b' cos(137kT) varies 137 times! Not exactly 137! But you will know where to get the number! [Inverse of Fine Structure Constant!] ____________ _________ _________ ______ Looks like we are closing in on it!! Anyone out there have a lead on downloading some good Lissajous-within- a-Lissajous plotting software for the Apple? !! WE ARE ARRIVING!!! Millennium Twain now in our 25th day of global fasting for world peace ... riseup/www/info/ worldfast ... satyagraha -- fasting protest ... Gandhi named this concept of action: "satyagraha" (combining the Hindu words for "truth" and "holding firmly.") You can read my discussion of the work of my colleague Philip Kanarev on pages 39-41 of New Study In Scarlet. We worked together for years. His is the best discussion of above-ground hydrogen spectra ... but does not have a model of the electron and proton detailed enough to go into the sub-ground states of the hydrogen/neutron -- which I call a hydron and Randy Mills calls a hydrino. Kanarev doesn't explore the aether wave and experiential fundamentals from which mass and energy and charge, and time and distance, all metrics, are derived. You can see a better model of the neutron from Thomas G. Barnes on pages 43-47. See Paramahamsa Tewari's neutron model on pp. 47-48, and his proton model on page 68. Tewari's model has little merit to it, also ignoring the fundamentals. You will also want to read Milo Wolff, Olof Sunden, Walter Cassani, Chris Illert, Donald Reed and Horst Preussker referenced there. And review Preussker's "Whirlring" proton model. And of course, review Randy Mills book. He doesn't have a model of the hydrogen/ neutron, nor look at the fundamentals, but he does have a good discussion of sub-ground spectral frequency expectations. As you will see from the current dialog in the NuclearStructure discussion group I am now taking the structural analysis of hydrogen and the neutron a few steps forward and focusing on the specific harmononic frequencies within the component electron and proton, and their shared spectrum as well. I am hoping you will forward summaries of your electrolysis and Brown's gas work to the NuclearStructure group. We are setting up a shop, and will focus on hydrogen and electrolysis there, here in Ojai California. The lab, a new mini-exploratorium, has been named ElectroVersity. For our whole world of culture, for all our sacred relations, Millennium Twain --- in free_energy, Rein Reinkort wrote: ------------ ----- To: Messias Twain Very interesting information about hydrogen atom construction, but what do you mean about Dr. P. Kanarev quantum mechanics theory and his hydrogen atom construction? I do with research on the field of water dissociation and results of huge tests with Brown gas showed me that this effect is more near to Kanarev explanation. Sincerely Rein Reinkort --- Saatja: Messiah Twain Kuupäev: 04.12.2007 18:47:26 --- Re: [antigrav] Electromagnetic Aether, Electrodynamic Plasma here is the graphic, depicting the range of states of the neutron = hydrogen atom, from A New Study In Scarlet, showing the relative size change of the electron lissajoid EM wave as it (she!) shrinks down around the proton. (Mother Proton!) from Page 37 of New Study In Scarlet. Millennium Twain http://groupkos. com/mtwain/ NuScarlet- pt1.pdf http://groupkos. com/mtwain/ NuScarlet- pt2.pdf ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ re: neutron is hydrogen in sub-ground state: http://tech. groups.yahoo. com/group/ NuclearStructure /message/ 292 in GreenGlow, 'Warm' wrote: Conventionally, chemical reactions involve just the electrons and generally just the valence electrons of an atom. Of coarse in the case of hydrogen there is only one. The states of an excitory states of an electron are not nuclear in nature, however, a neutron, when it decays into a proton and electron also gives off an electron-antineutri no, because that decay involves the weak nuclear force, and thus is quite different than a change in an electrons orbital energy. .. blessings Ash! and Eleni!! I worked with D2Fusion in the 1990s, and have been promoting and designing Dense Plasma Focus systems for about two decades. Good to see all the progress, and publicity. I will share it with others. And now that I have a lab again, will start similar experiments. For all our sacred relations, Millennium Twain http://www.D2fusion .com and http://jlnlabs. online.fr/ cfr --- In energy2000, "ashtweth_nihilisti c" <> wrote: Thanks you for that information and remaining on topic. I have updated and added it don't forget focus fusion as well. http://www.panacea- bocaf.org/ plasmaelectrolys is.htm http://www.panacea- bocaf.org/ focusfusion1. htm Regards Ashtweth --- In energy2000, Messiah Twain wrote: You can read my discussion of the work of my colleague Philip Kanarev on pages 39-41 of New Study In Scarlet. We worked together for years. His is the best discussion of above-ground hydrogen spectra ... but does not have a model of the electron and proton detailed enough to go into the sub-ground states of the hydrogen/neutron -- which I call a hydron and Randy Mills calls a hydrino. Kanarev doesn't explore the aether wave and experiential fundamentals from which mass and energy and charge, and time and distance, all metrics, are derived. You can see a better model of the neutron from Thomas G. Barnes on pages 43-47. See Paramahamsa Tewari's neutron model on pp. 47-48, and his proton model on page 68. Tewari's model has little merit to it, also ignoring the fundamentals. You will also want to read Milo Wolff, Olof Sunden, Walter Cassani, Chris Illert, Donald Reed and Horst Preussker referenced there. And review Preussker's "Whirlring" proton model. And of course, review Randy Mills book. He doesn't have a model of the hydrogen/ neutron, nor look at the fundamentals, but he does have a good discussion of sub-ground spectral frequency expectations. As you will see from the current dialog in the NuclearStructure discussion group I am now taking the structural analysis of hydrogen and the neutron a few steps forward and focusing on the specific harmononic frequencies within the component electron and proton, and their shared spectrum as well. I am hoping you will forward summaries of your electrolysis and Brown's gas work to the NuclearStructure group. We are setting up a shop, and will focus on hydrogen and electrolysis there, here in Ojai California. The lab, a new mini-exploratorium, has been named ElectroVersity. For our whole world of culture, for all our sacred relations, Millennium Twain --- in free_energy, Rein Reinkort wrote: ------------ ----- To: Messias Twain Very interesting information about hydrogen atom construction, but what do you mean about Dr. P. Kanarev quantum mechanics theory and his hydrogen atom construction? I do with research on the field of water dissociation and results of huge tests with Brown gas showed me that this effect is more near to Kanarev explanation. Sincerely Rein Reinkort --- Saatja: Messiah Twain Kuupäev: 04.12.2007 18:47:26 --- Re: [antigrav] Electromagnetic Aether, Electrodynamic Plasma here is the graphic, depicting the range of states of the neutron = hydrogen atom, from A New Study In Scarlet, showing the relative size change of the electron lissajoid EM wave as it (she!) shrinks down around the proton. (Mother Proton!) from Page 37 of New Study In Scarlet. Millennium Twain http://groupkos. com/mtwain/ NuScarlet- pt1.pdf http://groupkos. com/mtwain/ NuScarlet- pt2.pdf ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ re: neutron is hydrogen in sub-ground state: http://tech. groups.yahoo. com/group/ NuclearStructure /message/ 292 in GreenGlow, 'Warm' wrote: Conventionally, chemical reactions involve just the electrons and generally just the valence electrons of an atom. Of coarse in the case of hydrogen there is only one. The states of an excitory states of an electron are not nuclear in nature, however, a neutron, when it decays into a proton and electron also gives off an electron-antineutri no, because that decay involves the weak nuclear force, and thus is quite different than a change in an electrons orbital energy.

Alien Technology
Exopolitics

The mastery of etheric energy will lead to far more wide-ranging advances than electricity ever did. Within etheric energy, lie the keys to powerful healing modalities, pollution-free energy, and many other valuable innovations.

Email: bobcolee@yahoo.com