George's Information and Comments

www.giac2002.org

Further quotes summarizing the National Review article: "The White House, the CIA and the Wilsons"

"Simple. Clean. And very misleading. The real story is considerably more complicated [referring to a July 27, 2005 Washington Post summary]. . . ."

___________

"It should be clear by now that the only one telling flat-out lies was Joseph Wilson. Again, Wilson's trip to Niger took place in February 2002, some eight months before the U.S. government received the phony Iraq-Niger documents in October 2002. So it is not possible, as he told the Washington Post, that he advised the CIA that 'the dates were wrong and the names were wrong.' And it is not possible, as Wilson claimed to the New York Times, that he debunked the documents as forgeries.

That was hardly Wilson's only fabrication. He would also tell reporters that his wife had nothing to do with his trip to Niger and, as noted in the New Republic article, that Vice President Cheney's office had seen the report of his findings. Both claims were false.

It seems that very few people paid attention to the CIA's report on Wilson's trip to Niger. And those who did found that his account--particularly his revelation of the meeting between Mayaki and the Iraqis in 1999--supported the original reporting that Iraq had sought uranium from Niger [emphasis added]. . . ."

__________

"As I say, seemingly exhaustive [referring to a 7/22/05 New York Times front page story/timeline]. But there is one curious omission: July 7, 2004. On that date, the bipartisan Senate Select Intelligence Committee released a 511-page report on the intelligence that served as the foundation for the Bush administration's case for war in Iraq. The Senate report includes a 48-page section on Wilson that demonstrates, in painstaking detail, that virtually everything Joseph Wilson said publicly about his trip, from its origins to his conclusions, was false. . . .

___________

"This is not a minor detail. The Senate report, which served as the source for much of the chronology in this article, is the definitive study of the events leading up to the compromising of Valerie Plame. The committee staff, both Democrats and Republicans, read all of the intelligence. They saw all of the documents. They interviewed all of the characters. And every member of the committee from both parties signed the report."

Click here to return to George's Page.

If you want to be put on the GIAC e-mail list, click contact the GIAC web master.  Please use GIAC as the first word in your subject line, to help ensure your message is not inadvertently rejected as spam.