This swastika is here to show a curious occurance in Canada today.
Certain forces are trying to eliminate all use of the swastika,
on the grounds that it
is an evil symbol of hatred and death.
Anyone in Canada that dares display it runs the
risk of being branded a Nazi.
With expanded Human Rights Legislation, it might be possible that
the mere display of of it could get one
charged with a Human rights violation, if anyone viewing it feels
harrassed or threatened. Can a mere symbol be considered
to promote hatred? Can a symbol do harm to anyone, merely by viewing it.
Well, the answer is YES, in Canada anyway.
The swastika in the form represented is a symbol of the National Socialist
(Nazi) Party of Adolf Hitler. Its presence evokes
universal scorn and rage.
Is your reaction to this symbol the same?
If not, why not?
What i find interesting is that there is another symbol in
wide spread use in Canada today that represents an ideology and
system that has been responsible for the deaths of at least 10 times
as many people as Nazism has. My question... Why is this other symbol
not equally reviled and disgraced? Our local newspaper the St Catharines
Standard recently carried a picture of a local youth wearing this other
evil symbol of death, yet there was no hue and cry... no
special interest groups were clamoring for an explanation as to why
this picture was allowed in our local paper. Is there an underlying
politcal bias in this country responsible for this
curious discrepancy...I don't know... but one can suspcect
THE SWASTIKA: GOOD OR EVIL?
The swastika is actually an ancient and honourable symbol,
still used today by many cultures
around the world, including
Buddhists and
Jains. The Jains
also have the swastika on their flag.
I can't be responsible for the fact that certain organizations
adopted it as their political symbol. I also can't be responsible
for the reaction of people to perceived sighting of this symbol.
I can however post it on my website in solidarity with innocent groups
and organizations that are being persecuted by special interest groups
pursuing their own motives and agendas.
Where Will They Stop?
There is a town in California that has the misfortune of having a
swastika in the cast-iron scroll-work of their lamp standards.
Certain organizations in that town are in the process of demanding
the town replace the lamp-standards. The town of Glendale is being
pressured by the Jewish Defence League to remove the "offending"
symbols. The town is fighting it. To visit the site,
CLICK HERE.
When the JDL has finished with Glendale, they can fly out
to Hawaii and visit The First Chinese Church of Christ campus and
CHECK OUT THE DECOR
When they get back to the mainland, they can drive to a
certain dam on the Colorado river with some bags of cement and cover up
some swastikas INLAID IN CONCRETE
After that, they should go on to Denver, and visit
Saul Rosenthal, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League
office in Denver, and ask him why he has not started a complaint about
a prestigious subdivion in Denver named
SWASTIKA ACRES
And what is the JDL going to do about museums that display
ANCIENT ARTIFACTS with swastika motifs? Are the museums anti-Semitic? Should the
artifacts be destroyed, or merely hidden from public view?
How do Hindu's feel about this relentless attack on one of
their oldest and most sacred symbols. To visit a site that answers
that question
CLICK HERE.
You'd think that all Jews would be sensative to the religious symbols
of another faith, considering all they've been through.
Personally, I think the JDL is making themselves look stupid
fighting over such trivial issues. As another example Microsoft was
forced to remove one of its backgrounds from its Windows 95 program
because it "looked like" a swastika. There are even groups and
individuals in Canada trying to force the town of Swastika, Ontario to change its name.
Nothing is too trivial for some people
in their obsession to promote "tolerence and acceptance".
If you banned the swastika tomorrow, it wouldn't make the
world a better place. It would just make it's allure that much stronger.
If you want to destroy the effect of the neo-Nazi's strongest symbol,
don't suppress it. Promote it, restore it to it's true meaning and
status as a nature and good luck symbol. The name itself means to be
of good fortune. They're all around anyway, if you look for them.
Symbols only have as much power as you give them. By obsessing
about the "evilness" of the swastika, you only give more power
to the people who use it.