3202 - I'm back! You now have good cause to worry. And Zorro & Ester, more importantly is back too!
As you can see, Zorro is getting into a bit of trouble with me, the author, but nothing we can't fix, right? Right.
And on top of things, I got some more rpgs to play, and Sonic Adventure! Which is a really fun game!
I had a good spring break. Not relaxing enough, but I got to play through Vagrant Story for the 11th time straight in a row, from 12-4 in the morning. Man was it great!
Also I worked on my other site that will be coming shortly.
What "other site" you ask?
Well, that is simple. As I am one of the best qualified people to review these marvelous contraptions we call "video games," as I proved at EB the other day yet again, I decided it was only right to gather other great pupils in the world of gaming that I know, and make a great great great video game reviewing site. So that is taking up all my other free time besides this.
But amazingly I also had time to finish 2 pictures, one which I did for someone I don't know, which is up now, and another coming friday perhaps?
In other news, the Cloak and Dagger site never really hit it off, and now as I review games too, I don't really have time for it as well, so email me if you still want to see it around some.
Most everyone's midterms should be over, so get back to work on those long delayed fan art pictures! Send em over!
Also don't forget to keep telling people of this site, and let people know a great video game reviewing site is on the way!
I've got another weird quote thingy to let yousy guys enjoy as well as a special treat.
Here is the question I was given: What are the moral implications of executing a blind dwarf for chopping down a tree that squashed a quadriplegic squirrel stealing food from the dwarf's pantry during the acorn-famine of '63?
And I answer: Well, first you must take into account the "BDTA" or the Blind Dwarf-Tree Act that congress passed back in 1959. It states that blind dwarfs are given full rights to harrassing woodland creatures by throwing trees at them. Now, this dwarf, who we will call "Paul Newman," for future refrence, was actually chopping the tree, which might not rule in his favor in the Supreme Court (they are picky about these things.) Another important thing to take into account is what type of tree was it? If it was a cherry tree, then of course said "Paul Newman" should be tar and feathered for his crime. But if it is a fig tree, then a simple tickling would suffice.
This author is so creative it makes his mother hurt.
And his mother's mother. And her mother. And her mother. But not that mother's mother. That would be overdoing it.
