Ques. Can someone clear up the difference between locked breech and blowback? Ans. Treatise alert! Relinquish all hope: There are so many questions in this thread that I would like to try to answer by narrowing the types of guns being considered to two, what one might call the "classical" locked breech pistol and the "classical" blowback pistol. In the "classical" locked breech pistol, the barrel is initially locked to the slide, but the slide is not locked to the gripframe (receiver). Variations abound; some have tilting barrels with locking lugs on top of the barrel such as the 1911, High Power and Neuhausen, others have a separate locking block to connect barrel and slide such as the P-38, Lahti and Beretta, while still others such as the Luger (toggle action) use less common mechanisms. All of these meet the requirements of the first sentence of this paragraph. When the locked breech pistol is fired, the barrel and slide recoil backward, locked together, for a short distance. After this short distance has been traveled, the barrel/slide unit's position relative to the gripframe is by some means detected, the barrel unlocks from the slide, and then the barrel stops moving relative to the gripframe while the slide continues backward, extracting the spent cartridge's case and finally stopping against an abutment in the gripframe. (Whew!) It is to be hoped that by the time the breech is unlocking, the pressure in the barrel has fallen to a very low level. Most usually, the bullet has left the barrel by the time the slide and barrel unlock from each other. From a safety standpoint, the most important thing is that the pressure is low enough that the case wall won't rupture as the thin forward part of the case is pulled free of the chamber and hence becomes unsupported. It is also important that the pressure is low during the time the gun is unlocking because as the gun unlocks, the amount of the locking surface which is actually engaged decreases to zero and so the force per unit area of that remaining surface increases dramatically. This is for most locked breech guns. A toggle lock doesn't have this particular problem. The recoil of the barrel/slide unit relative to the gripframe is essentially unimpeded except for the resisting force of the recoil spring. The resisting force of the recoil spring on the barrel/slide unit is insignificant compared to the rearward thrust of the cartridge case on the barrel/slide unit. A heavy recoil spring does decrease the cycle time of the action. It also helps a given gun design handle a hotter cartridge through a secondary effect: When the barrel/slide moves rearward, it accelerates the frame of the gun and the hand of the shooter rearward by communicating through the recoil spring. If the recoil spring is very stiff, the grip frame will move rearward a significant amount during the time the bullet is in the barrel. The motion also compresses the web of the shooter's hand. The effect is to make the barrel/slide unit have to travel farther (relative to the original inertial reference frame) before it reaches the point relative to the grip frame where the barrel and slide unlock from each other. Note that the gun does not rotate appreciably before the bullet has left the barrel, witness the fact that the tops of the front and rear sights are very nearly the same distance from the centerline of the bore (unlike in the case of a revolver or a singleshot pistol). Another way to allow a given design of locked breech pistol to handle a hotter cartridge is by increasing the mass of the barrel/slide unit. This is because the bullet and the barrel/slide unit have a momentum/impulse/momentum relationship with each other. As a result, to the first order, the barrel/slide unit moves backward as far as the bullet moves forward times the ratio of the barrel/slide's mass to the bullet's mass. By increasing the mass of the barrel/slide unit sufficiently, you can ensure that the bullet has left the barrel before the cartridge case wall becomes unsupported. These are ways to increase how hot a cartridge can be tolerated by a given design; but be advised that one doesn't do these things and ignore other aspects: the barrel must be able to handle increased pressure and the locking lugs must be able to handle the increased force, for examples. It's not necessary to ensure that the bullet has left the barrel by the time the thin case wall becomes unsupported. The pressure falls rapidly as the bullet progresses down the barrel. In just a couple of inches of bullet travel, the pressure can fall to a few thousand psi if the cartridge is of small capacity and is loaded moderately. The thin case wall can support on the order of two to ten thousand psi according to its diameter, wall thickness, and material strength. This brings us to the "classical" blowback pistol. The blowback has the barrel fixed to the gripframe (receiver) and the slide is free to move. The first thing the blowback depends on is that same momentum/impulse/momentum relationship which the locked breech pistol depends on. The difference is that in this case the slide (rather than the slide _and_ barrel) is moving backward in response to the bullet's forward travel. The consequence is that the cartridge case is coming out of the chamber while the bullet is proceeding down the barrel. The blowback pistol also has the recoil spring's effect on the gripframe working for it. And lastly, the blowback action has the friction of the cartridge case on the chamber walls to slow the rearward motion of the case by decreasing the thrust on the slide. Surprisingly, this last can very significant. If the case is long, there is a lot of case surface area and hence a lot of normal force pushing the case walls against the chamber's interior. If the case is strong enough that its head won't tear off, a case can be fired in a gun which has _no_ breechblock*. (Provided the primer is well enough supported that it doesn't pop out.) I think the most common example of this is the 30-30 Winchester. I sure wouldn't recommend the practice of shooting a 30-30 without a breechblock, but under perfect conditions it can be done. Pistol cases don't have this much surface area so this example is meant by way of illustrating the tendency. When the pressure in the case falls low enough, the case shrinks in from the chamber walls and no longer drags on them. *(Breechblock = the part which closes off the back end of the barrel, making sure the case doesn't get pushed out of the chamber.) Since the slide moves in accordance with the ratio of its mass to the bullet's mass, as the slide of a blowback pistol is made lighter, the cartridge case has to be made stronger to handle the higher pressure it will see in the unsupported condition. In the extreme case, the slide would have no significant amount of mass. Then the case would completely exit the chamber while still at high pressure making quite a pop. This configuration is called a zip gun. The next thing to consider is the recoil which the shooter perceives. First we ought to consider the difference between a single shot pistol and an auto. In a singleshot, the momentum of the gun is equal to the momentum of the bullet. This is because of the law of conservation of momentum. The total system starts out with zero momentum and must preserve it. When we insert energy into the system, the momentum the bullet acquires must be equal to and opposite the momentum the gun acquires. With this knowledge, you can calculate the rearward velocity of the gun and the kinetic energy it carries. OK, time for just one very simple but important derivation: Let: M = mass of gun V = velocity of gun E = kinetic energy of gun m = mass of bullet v = velocity of bullet e = kinetic energy of bullet V = (m/M)*v (1) E = (1/2)*M*V^2 (2) Substituting (1) into (2): E = (1/2)*M*[(m/M)*v]^2 Cancelling like terms and substituting in the definition of e (not shown) we get: E = (m/M)*e (Note: This sort of momentum problem is different from a colliding masses momentum problem so please don't try to use this equation in that application.) We see the recoil energy of the gun goes up with bullet mass, down with gun mass and up with bullet energy. The significant thing is the lighter the gun, the more the recoil energy. Digressing for a moment, there is no worldwide agreement on the measure of recoil. In the US, recoil generally means recoil energy. In other places, it is often recoil momentum. I'll stick with recoil energy for the purposes of this discussion. Digressing further, most of the time what we calculate is technically the "free" recoil. This is the recoil the gun would have if it were suspended from strings rather than being coupled to the mass of your hand in a hard- to-characterize manner. So what does this equation imply? What it means is that an autopistol will have more recoil than a singleshot pistol. (When I say autopistol, I mean autoloading rather than fully automatic; fully automatic has _lots_ of recoil.) The reason that the autopistol has more recoil is that it's the lighter mass of the slide or slide plus barrel which has momentum equal to that of the bullet, and not the heavier mass of an entire gun. If the slide has half the weight of the total gun, then the recoil energy is doubled per the above equation, E = (m/M)*e. If the slide weighs the same as the frame (half the total gun weight) and collides elastically with the abutment in the frame, then the slide transfers exactly its momentum (and recoil energy) to the frame when it hits the abutment. In other words, the slide stops dead and the frame continues at the slide's velocity much as billiard balls interact under certain conditions. So the frame ends up getting a momentum equal to the momentum of the bullet. Since the frame is light, that momentum makes for a lot of energy. That's the difference between a singleshot (or revolver) and an autopistol when it comes to recoil. Another difference is that in the autopistol, the recoil which you feel is separated into components, that is spread out over time. The singleshot or revolver has a lesser but sharper recoil since its recoil comes all at once. If you're attuned to it, you can really feel the difference between the two types of guns. OK, I've ignored the fine points in this discussion, but let's keep this to treatise size; you haven't got time for a tome. (Thought experiments: How should the feel of the recoil of an autopistol change as the recoil spring is made progressively softer? What effect will the revolver's higher boreline have?) With the above in mind, what is the difference between a locked breech and a blowback? Not a heck of lot in any major sense. Most of it is in the fine points. In tiny blowbacks, everything is too light and the recoil is vicious. (And don't forget that noise is a lot of perceived recoil. Hot popguns can be surprisingly noisy since pressures are high at bullet exit.) In the big blowbacks like the Astra, I think what happens is that the strong recoil spring compresses or takes all the give out of your hand before the slide hits the stop. When the stop is hit, the gripframe bangs into your bones. Another thing which precompresses your hand is the drag of the case in the chamber. That drag travels through the gripframe to your hand.