Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Refutations

Refutations are the heart of the debate. Even the best case ever written cannot win a round. It has been mentioned quite a bit that you must defend your case and attack your opponent's. Well, that's what refutations are: argumentation against your opponent's case and argumentation that reaffirms your case. There isn't much to say about refutations, but here are a few tips that might help:


-ROADMAP AND SIGNPOST. I cannot stress how important this is. I don't like using fancy cute little names like that but this is a very important thing and it's really easy. In the beginning of each speech, tell your judge where you are going. For instance, if I was affirmative, I might say something like, "First I will refute my opponent's case, then I will return to reenforce my own." Signposting is very similar. When refuting anything, tell the judge where you are. If you are saying something against his contention 2 subpoint a, say it! For instance, on affirmative I might say something like, "My opponent's contention 2 subpoint a says that Bill Clinton is a liar, my response is that he was just a little horny, and that would be an inappropriate thing to say on national telvision." When refuting something a little further into the debate and several arguments have been made, it might be a good idea to say what part of whose case you're on, and in a couple words say your opponent's last argument. For instance, "Against my contention 1 subpoint a, my opponent says that it is never ok to lie, my response is that Bill was perfectly correct in not telling the complete truth because millions of TV watchers would have puked on the spot."

-Use direct clashing argumentation. There is a saying, "two boats sailing in the night", or something like that. Basically, if the arguments that you and your opponent present have nothing to do with each other, or they avoid the real issue, there is no way the judge can decide which arguments make more sense and you will have a really boring and crappy round and the judge will start to draw pictures during your speech.

-Examples are good, but get real arguments and analysis in your refutations. Examples can help you reenforce your arguments if you have time for them, but you may run into some trouble if you replace analysis with examples. First of all, if your arguments depend soley on examples, you may be having a hasty generalization. For instance, just because criminal Joe Bob raped 20 women after being let out of jail, it doesn't mean that all criminals will rape 20 women after being released from jail. Second, examples may not cover the entire resolution. For instance, just talking about how great Martin Luther King, Jr. was does not make civil disobedience good. He lived quite a while ago in different social conditions. Make sure you cover the real issues of the resolution in your arguments.

-Practice word economy. Don't use more words than you have to. This is always important, but especially for the affirmative. If you haven't noticed, a 7 minute neg speech is followed by a 4 minute aff speech, and a 6 minute neg speech is followed by a 3 minute aff speech. Basically, the affirmative has a lot of ground to cover in not much time. So you don't want to use 10 words when you can use 5.

back to LD stuff

back to speech page

Email: kerwinguy@yahoo.com