Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!

Cannons Essays,Reports, Termpapers

Home   Essays   Link    Contact Us

CannonEssays
Papers

Management Theory: Current Status and Future Direction

     This chapter has examines the so-called systems school or management. attention was first focused on general systems theory because of the importance assigned to it by systems school advocates. Then the applied concepts of the systems approach, likewise presented from its advocates' point of view, were reviewed. Finally, the question of whether the systems approach is a new school or a subsystem of a current one was examined. Although it is difficult to deny the existence of a systems body of knowledge, it appears that the systems school is actually part of the quantitative school.

     Attention was then focused on the general value of understanding the systems concept, beginning with the organization as an open, adaptive system. Since business organizations are contrived systems, they can survive the onset of entropy and, unlike their biological counterparts, exist indefinitely, depending, of course, on how well they are managed. On the one hand, they must be responsive to change (adaptive mechanisms); on the other hand, they must not change so quickly that they are seriously thrown out of equilibrium (maintenance mechanisms). Finding the right balance is one of the keys to indefinite survival.

     The systems concept was next used to examine managerial systems. Three levels exist in the managerial system of a complex organization: technical, organizational, and institutional. The technical level is concerned with producing the goods or services. The organizational level coordinates and integrates the technical and institutional levels. The institutional level relates the activities of the organization to the environmental system. Within this system are three types of managers, one for each of the levels. Within this system are three types of managers, one for each of the levels. The technical manager is a nuts-and-bolts individual; the organization manager is more like a political mediator; and the institutional manager is a conceptual-philosophical decision maker. Yet, although there are different levels and interests within the structure, all three must combine their talents and energies in the attainment of overall organizational objectives.

     In order to achieve this blending of talent and energy, managers must plan, organize, and control. They must also make decisions and employ the latest quantitative methods where applicable; and they must understand and utilize the abilities of their subordinates through effective communication, motivation, and leadership. In short, the management process, quantitative, and behavioral schools are all still important to modern managers. In fact, managers today draw on the concepts of all three in carrying out their duties. The systems approach encourages this.

     The last section of the chapter examined management theory in the  future, noting that some synthesis among the schools of management thought appears to be going on. Ten specific reasons were cited. However, it was also noted that this synthesis is unlikely to result in a major change in the three schools of thought explored in this textbook. The management process school, the quantitative school, and the behavioral school of management thought will continue to endure into the indefinite future.