Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
LINKS
ARCHIVE
« November 2003 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Tuesday, 18 November 2003

back to the crucial issues of life


Mood:  surprised
I apologise for trivialising your day, but I've been temporarily stunned that there are people out there who Do Not See It My Way. Paralysed by a sense of horror that there could be others out there this misguided, I have to turn to you, the indolent public of cyberspace for authority.

Which of these slices of toast has been toasted to the correct degree?

Postscript: Pop Quiz is over.

You all failed. I lost all my faith in humanity, now.
Click here for the TRUE answer, and pray to scourge your tawdry cynical souls.
You're not worthy of the holy bread products.

This page graced by sarsparilla at 2:21 PM GMT
Updated: Wednesday, 19 November 2003 12:21 AM GMT
Post Comment | View Comments (25) | Permalink | Share This Post

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 2:33 PM GMT

Name: Pan
Home Page: http://panachetta.blogspot.com

No 3 is *way* too burnt so that's out. As for number 1, well it's a bit on the pale side, but no2 is a also a bit on the overdone side . . . something inbetween maybe . . .

If I HAD to make a choise I'd go for No1.

BTW is it the same piece of bread increasingly toasted or 3 seperate pieces?

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 2:36 PM GMT

Name: paul
Home Page: http://noxturne.blogspot.com

Obviously b, it's definitely dark enough to actually have been toasted, yet it still retains the lightness of bread. C. is BURNT beyond toast recognition, and A., you might as well just have untoasted bread there.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 2:39 PM GMT

Name: Vanessa

I believe the sequence of gorging myself is evident from the extraneous details. In photo 2, you can see the remains of hot buttered photo 1 casually dropped directly onto the table. Toast frenzy has led me to abandon the concept of plates, as photo 3 also demonstrates. Photo 3 simultaneously reveals that my normal habit of cutting stupid shapes into my toast is just taking up too much damn time in the toast-mouth sequence, and that I sneaked in an extra crumpet to keep me going.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 3:27 PM GMT

Name: Pan
Home Page: http://panachetta.blogspot.com

How do you cut shapes into toast?? I assumed you had some sort of toast stencil that you had placed over it . . .

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 3:39 PM GMT

Name: yidaho
Home Page: http://www.yidaho.com/mt

It can only be toast slice number one, hot and buttered.

Have you been watching 'Mermaids', by any chance?

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 3:51 PM GMT

Name: jatb
Home Page: https://www.angelfire.com/blog/tabitha/jatb

I agree with Pan; somewhere between the first and second slices seems about right. I'd go for the second if I had to choose between them. Definitely hot and buttered.

And a side order of crumpet is always a welcome addition.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 4:16 PM GMT

Name: Kat
Home Page: http://mostlyfluff@hotmail.com

The one in the middle looks the best to me.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 5:05 PM GMT

Name: sarah

toast number three, obviously, but only if you leave it to go cold and soggy over a period of a few days.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 5:15 PM GMT

Name: ThePimpress
Home Page: http://pimpress.com

Number 1 looks very much like bread and hardly toasted properly. Number 2 looks about right but the funky shape, all i have to ask about that is "why". number 3 looks burned, but i have a thing for charred food so i'd take numbers 2 or 3.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 5:40 PM GMT

Name: Niki
Home Page: http://www.upsaid.com/missuhgolightly/

I gotta say in-between 1 & 2. I would put a shamrock on it, though, but that's just me.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 5:51 PM GMT

Name: Niki
Home Page: http://www.upsaid.com/missuhgolightly/

Great. Now I'm wicked hungry for toast.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 6:11 PM GMT

Name: Vic
Home Page: http://www.thehighrise.org/weblog

That's tough - I'd go for 2, but it also depends on the topping you're wanting to add. 1 would be great for Marmite, whereas 2 would be better with jam. 3 is just plain wrong, though I suspect it would put hairs on your chest.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 7:14 PM GMT

Name: Joe

Just wanted to drop in and say hello. Have a wonderful day! :)

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 7:25 PM GMT

Name: Belle
Home Page: http://asortakindafairytale.blogspot.com/

The correct answer is why is your knife labeled "knife"? In case you fell and hit your head while preparing the six degrees of toast and got amnesia, but really still wanted to make some more toast when you came to?

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 8:04 PM GMT

Name: Vanessa

*Gets huffy and pretends it might really be a fork....*

Thinking about it, many many things in my apartment seem to be labelled with their names. Fridge, window, pot plant . . .

Now you come to mention it, that is a little defective.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 9:15 PM GMT

Name: Johan
Home Page: http://boomdijk.xs4all.nl/mt

I would think the middle one! mostly because of the fact that there has allready been eaten from the other toast in the pic. AND this toast has it's own utensils! Comes in handy, one would say!
The toast in the pic to the right... has it on with a crumpet. I don't like that....
The toast on the left is a loner!! Has to be something wrong....

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 9:44 PM GMT

Name: dave

the first one.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 10:38 PM GMT

Name: Martin Sewell
Home Page: http://www.martinsewell.com

Trick question, before being toasted they were slices of bread.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 10:43 PM GMT

Name: NC

Whichever star sign forecasts the correct cosmic reading before breakfast!

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 11:00 PM GMT

Name: tess
Home Page: http://www.tessb.blogspot.com

The first isn't toast, it's only bread.
The second is toast, beyond a shadow of a doubt, and it looks delish.
The third is some form of burnt carbohydrate.

The second wins, yay!

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 11:01 PM GMT

Name: Martin Sewell
Home Page: http://www.martinsewell.com

Rebranding at salient points of the bread-burnt continuum is a non-trivial matter, I share your horror.

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 11:51 PM GMT

Name: Angel
Home Page: http://angeltim.servimedia.de/weblog

the middle one! Although i wouldn't eat it with butter nor margarine... but with Nutella!

Tuesday, 18 November 2003 - 11:59 PM GMT

Name: muscle68
Home Page: http://muscle68.blogspot.com

I need to know how to do this.

Wednesday, 19 November 2003 - 12:00 AM GMT

Name: jatb
Home Page: http://http:/www.angelfire.com/blog/tabitha/jatb/

Nutella!?
What kind of pervert are you?
Thats clearly Marmite toast.

Wednesday, 19 November 2003 - 6:33 PM GMT

Name: Sie


The Crumpet.

View Latest Entries