Notes – Polygraph

Polygraph Examination – P

(Cover Page)

 

Content:

1) Letter of Monday 04.03.85 from Seán Kelly to Mr. M. Seligson.

2) Letter of Tuesday 14.05.85 from Seán Kelly to Mr. M. Seligson.

3) A two page polygraph examination test result, taken on Tuesday 21.05.85.


Note (On item three above): See "Pre-examination Comments" on page one of polygraph result. Specifically: "Mr. Kelly stated that he was being kept under surveillance...." They are the words of the polygraphist. The woman was clearly told I was fighting for justice because of an attempt to murder me by intelligence agencies of the United States of America and Britain. I made no issue on surveillance.

Seán Kelly.

 

30 Queen's Road,
Kenilworth CV8 IJS,
Warwickshire.
Monday 04.03.85

Dear Mr. Seligson,

Thank you for your letter dated 28th ultimo, which arrived today. You will find below questions laid out to elicit a "yes" or "no" response. These are abstracted from a more comprehensive document.

Questions:

1) Are you, or have you ever been, a member of the IRA, INLA, or a kindred organisation?

2) Have you ever given aid or succour to the IRA, INLA, or a kindred organisation?

3) Have you ever shown sympathy or given support to the IRA, INLA, or a kindred organisation?

4) Have you ever been involved or associated individually or in party to any terrorist activity?

5) Have you ever been involved or associated individually or in party to causing malicious injury to person or property?

6) Have you ever been involved in or associated with intelligence gathering?

7) Have you ever been involved in or associated with crime, criminals or criminal activity?

8) Do you have any Left Wing sympathies or inclinations?

9) Do you hold or have sympathy with a unilateral belief in nuclear disarmament?

10) Do you have a technical or other in-depth understanding of electrics or electronics?

11) Do you have a working ability with electrics or electronics?

12) In all your communications, verbal and written, to Mr. John Butcher MP, excluding the letter of March 16th 1984, did you make any misrepresentations or seek to represent another interest or party?

13) Specifically referring to your Friday 19 October 1984 meeting with Mr. John Butcher MP, was your verbal communication in accord with the truth and actual happenings?

14) Specifically referring to your 19 October 1984 meeting with Mr. John Butcher MP, did your verbal presentation seek to represent or benefit another interest or party?

15) Can you sing any songs, rebel or otherwise?

Obviously the above has a greater context and represents a greater understanding of happenings; it, for the immediate intention, will serve its purpose. Further confidential and contextual detail is witheld. I look forward to receiving your date and agreement.

Yours sincerely,
Seán Kelly


Mr. M. Seligson.
Polygraph Security Services Ltd.,
London W10 5NT.

 

30 Queen's Road,
Kenilworth CV8 IJS,
Warwickshire.
Tuesday 14.05.85.

Dear Mr. Seligson,

I will be calling in person to deliver this letter and deposit £80 for a polygraph test and to arrange a mutually acceptable date and time for the examination. I regret the necessity to renew the quest after cancelling the previous application.

The previous application was cancelled in the belief that it would be no longer necesary. Clearly that was a misunderstanding.

Attached to this letter will be a copy of the list earlier submitted and containing fifteen questions requiring a "yes" or "no" response which can form the basis for the test. The polygraphist and I can restructure the questions to, as you say, maintain the "integrity" of the polygraph examination and achieve "the objective with a valid and reliable test..."

Additional to the list of fifteen questions submitted, which, I add, though dated as the original, is a retyped copy containing some minor corrections to further preclude the potential for ambiguity, will be another paragraph, detailed below, and against which a test is sought. This paragraph is easily the most important put before you for examination. It is imperative that any restructuring maintain fidelity with the original and provide a valid and critical test.

The paragraph is extracted from a wide ranging document and is quoted in full.

"FOUR: Believe Monday 28 February, 1977, on my return journey from Dublin to Coventry, while waiting in Westland Row railway station, Dublin, a girl sat down beside me and opened up conversation. She remained in my company through the ferry crossing (to Holyhead) and by train to Crewe, where she alighted. This girl was from Northern Ireland. She had no baggage which was unusual. I did not know the purpose of her journey. I never knew or had knowledge of the girl before our meeting at Westland Row railway station. I have had no knowledge of or contact with the person since."

The document from which the above was abstracted was compiled last year. The major part of the content, including paragraph four, was incorporated during the early months of 1984. It is very important that this perspective be registered.

When the test is being carried out you may invite scholars of the polygraph or other interested parties to witness the examination. There will be no objection from this quarter.

I thank you for your consideration.

Yours sincerely,
Seán Kelly.

Mr. M. Seligson.

Director,

Polygraph Security Services Ltd.,

London W10 5NT.

Fig P

Note: Reference to test number 16. Her name is Evelyn. She was from Belfast and had an age and physical compatibility with Miss Evelyn Glenholmes – whom I am confident she is.

 

END