R 7/11/03 Lies or Lack of Good Intelligence Every time you turn on the television or pick up a newspaper, we are told that 'weapons of mass destruction' will soon be found. Haven't we planted some good evidence yet? What are we waiting for? The 2004 presidential campaign? The Democrats are rubbing their hands over forged Nigerian documents the Administration used to make its case for war more convincing. Once again we find that a 'smoking gun' was really smoke and mirrors. When asked, the President and Ari Fleischer say that it doesn't really matter if it is true that Iraq tried to buy uranium 'cakes' from the African nation or not because Saddam was such a bad guy. Whatever. He was no threat to world peace or the U.S. and they knew it. So, the question is, why would the President lie and risk impeachment, by needlessly putting American soldiers in harm's way? Why did he want to go to war? To show he was tougher than his dad? That was just a by-product. Who really wanted the war? I guess we need to ask Office of Special Plans director Abram Shulsky and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's string pullers Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. Maybe they'll repeat the 'liberation of Iraq' crap that now, after the rising American death toll and the pictures of our soldiers facing down angry Iraqi mobs, rings as hollow as the claim that the war was about weapons of mass destruction. Lack of good intelligence = stupid. Stupid or lies? I say lies. Sally Soccermom and Joe Sixpack don't trust me though. How would I know, after all? I guess we'll never know if we trust the Wolfowitzes, Perles, and Shulskys. R 6/30/03 Someone Forgot To Tell Them The latest figures for American dead in Iraq at now over 200. With the discovery of two dead soldiers who had been missing and a plethora of sniper and grenade attacks, one thing should to be all too clear. President Bush forgot to tell the Iraqis that the war was over, and that we won. Having run out of things to loot, they have begun to occupy their time thinking of ways to kill the soldiers who stood by and did nothing while they made off with their spoils. Perhaps the thought of having convicted embezzler Ahmed Chalabi as their President does not suit them and cause them to dance with joy as the Iraqi National Congress did at the much hyped statue razing. Our Ministry of Truth was able to convince Americans that those were regular Iraqi people cheering, but the Iraqis know it was just a gathering of Chalabi's men that we brought along for the ride, or for whenever the locals threw shoes instead of roses, and we needed to show brown-skinned people on TV waving at us. Kind of a traveling visitor's team cheering squad. Don't expect more dead Americans and British to matter to our policy makers, however. The show of concern and outrage is just for our consumption. Kind of like Bush psuedo-scolding Ariel Sharon for heavy-handedness against the Palestinians, all the while supplying them with missles and bullets to use on those same people. Of course this brings us to the reason for the War in the first place. The reason for Arab hostility toward America in the first place. The reason for 9/11. This also brings us to the reason for the continuing American deaths in Iraq. It's not just our occupation of that country, but our support of the country and people who stole Palestine from the Palestinians. It is our support of the terrorists of Dier Yassen ethnically cleansing an area so Jews could take the homes of Muslims. It is our support of the Butcher of Beirut, Ariel Sharon, who ordered the slaughter of thousands of women and children in refugee camps while their men were lured away to U.N. peace talks. Our soldiers will continue to be picked off, whenever an Iraqi thinks he can get away with it. Don't worry though, in the end we'll kill thousands more of them than they kill of us. Maybe that will bring comfort to 200 families over here. R 6/20/03 Where Have All The Weapons Gone? The ever growing list of false reports has been found to be full of hot air yet again.The much heralded trailers that were supposed to be Mobile Germ Warfare labs have turned out to be old artillery sighting balloon equipment sold to Iraq by the British. The thousands of tons of chemicals we were told Saddam had are non-existant and so are the Nukes. Too bad most Americans don't care that almost 200 Americans have died because the President lied to them about Iraq's WMDs. R 4/2/03 However long it takes The President bristled. "However long it takes," he said. "That's the answer to your question, and that's what you got to know." Like a Soviet Premier he thumped the podium: "And the Iraqi people have got to know that, see. They got to know that they will be liberated and Saddam Hussein will be removed, no matter how long it takes."
I guess we'll keep killing them until they are liberated.
First reports said seven, then nine, maybe 15. So far no definite number of moms and kids killed by Americans. They found out how long it takes, being now liberated, by operation Iraqi Freedom. Two women were wounded in
the attack. David Bloom, embedded journalist for MSNBC with the 3rd Infantry, reported that 15 members of a
family and extended family were killed in the attack. People across the United States can breathe a little easier with this part of the Iraqi threat to Hoboken and Sopokane eliminated.
R 4/2/2003 Of Militias and Methodists We have been driving around the town of Najaf, Iraq and like a scene out of "The Blues Brothers", have been asking the Iraqis to be traitors and give the Americans information on the whereabouts of their own soldiers and even to 'turn them in' as though being a soldier in an army that America is fighting is a crime. How would you feel if a foreign army had, after killing hundreds of your soldiers in battle, was driving through town doing thesame thing? Would you turn over your own American soldiers or point them out to the enemy? You might. You listen to ours. Would you listen to the news/propaganda telling you that your leaders were evil? Would you just be scared not to? The Shias remember being encouraged to revolt against Saddam Hussein in 1991 and then being left high and dry for the government to take revenge on them for their treason. It was treason. If you took up arms against the United States Army you would be viewed by everyone as a traitor. I myself would expect you to be tried for treason, found guilty and executed for the cowardly backstabbing traitor you would be, for getting your own people killed. Where I come from you were taught that was dishonorable and disgraceful, even if the soldiers are Methodists instead of Baptists. I find it repulsive that we play on doctrinal differences, to try with our Special Ops guys help, to convince one denomination to take up arms against or otherwise rat out members of their own army. It's like supplying the Michigan Militia or the 'Republic of Texas' with RPGs and machine guns to kill our sons in the service. Fox News is talking about our PsyOps guys spreading anti-Saddam and pro-American propaganda on the ground as spies, fellow residents like Wormtounge whispering in the ear of their neighbors to turn in the sons of each other. I say sons but of course we all know that our daughters are now also at risk. One key difference between neoconservatives and actual conservatives, is the neocon aquiesence to feminism. We conservatives knew that it was wrong to have women anywhere near combat. It's one of those primal instincts, you know the cave man protects his woman from the bear and the midieval knight's chivalry and common sense understanding that you don't put the child-bearers of your people in front of you in war. Having a 19 year old girl captured is the kind of thing we warned about, but people act as though this is a normal thing. It's wrong and every knows it, but most people and all politicians now play this game where we say the politically correct thing as though it's our own view. The Shia people have not greeted us in any significant numbers, although the press has shown us every picture of kids accepting candy from strangers and every group of the Baath political party opponents that they can come up with, cheering like Republicans would have if Bob Doles would have won over Bill Clinton. Perhaps the tales of tyranny are overblown in an effort to rouse the populace to come out with their torches. When I see images of Baghdad, I see people driving cars back and forth to work, and stores, and when I see pictures of small towns I see people much like I do in small towns anywhere. Maybe it's not as bad as they say. Maybe blood, honor, and religion (they are Muslims you know), means something. No matter what, a population can only do so much to stop invaders, not having the ability and not really having the inclination to risk life and property, wanting enough stability in the area to be able to go to work and make a living. I think if our country were invaded and if we had the media telling us that our leaders were war criminals and told us they were toturing people that there would be a steadily increasing belief, especially if the invaders success were almost certain and knowing that being on the right side of the winning team is a good thing, that the 'liberators' were right. Americans in an effort to protect their standard of living would turn over their own people. Helping to convince them would be the house to house storm trooping. No one would want to get caught by the explosive and gun sniffing dogs, and face prison and interrogation. Taking advantage of these dilemnas are the United States Military and Media. Someone who out of spite against the other political party, or who was scared not to give information are hailed as 'finally now that the heel has been removed' from their head are able to do what they wanted to do all along and turn in their own people, who deserve it because they otherwise would be killed or used as human shields.
Seven, then nine, so far no definite number of moms and kids killed by Americans, being in fact liberated by operation Iraqi Freedom. Two women were wounded in the attack . According to David Bloom, embedded journalist for MSNBC with the 3rd Infantry, reported that 15 members of a family and extended family were killed in the attack. People across the United States can breathe a little easier with this part of the Iraqi threat to Hoboken and Walla Walla eliminated. We need to see that what we persist in calling "liberation" is a grindingly brutal imposition of alien will upon a people who are coming together in their desire to kill us.
R 4/1/03 Those rascally Iraqis They sure are bad guys. We are told some pretty big ones, but there’s no limit to the size of the lie that a lemming will buy. My ex-wife always said if you’re going to lie, you might as well tell the wildest story you can think of. She said people believed them even more than the truth. So the Iraqi’s reported that the American’s had bombed two busses with about 40 people injured, including some Americans, and the reporters and ‘experts’ immediately start the spin even though they have heard nothing to confirm that it actually happened, based of course on their own extensive search, that it was most likely the Iraqis themselves who may be blowing up their own busses just so they could blame it on us. Golly! Them no-good Iraqis! If we go into a town and the people there don’t like us, it’s because the folks are forced to act like they don’t like us. Oh yeah, they machine gun their own people so they can blame it on Americans and of course because the oppressed masses want to join us in the takeover of their own country. A missile lands in a market killing civilians and we say; well, uh, it looks like it might be a, yeah that’s it, a crater prolly made by an Iraqi rocket. There they go again, shooting rockets at their own guys and blaming Americans for it umm, umm, umm. “We have not located any chemical or biological weapons as of yet.” Says General Stanley McCrystall, but we think that we will find them. They say that every day. We find a ‘chemical weapons plant’ every few days. Huh, that’s in the news for a couple, three days and then they don’t talk about it any more, because it turns out to be nothing. How about those cheaters, showing our guys that they captured on TV, never mind that we would never give them the credit for scoring a capture against us if they could not prove it to the world by showing it on TV. I guess it’s a war crime when they do it, but when we show their guys on TV, parading them by the camera in a line, or with them in the new POW position, you know kneeling with hands and feet cuffed, head bowed in submission. We say that they better treat the prisoner's the way we treat our prisoners. You mean like in Guantanamo Bay? We fired on a SUV killing seven women and children, and we say they were hoping to get their family’s killed in order to be able to accuse us of shooting civilians. Boy, are they crafty. I saw an SUV full of moms and kids just yesterday. A man is killed and his passenger wounded in a car and even though they no weapons or bombs, they give the same spin. Oh!! Can you believe this one? Those dogs were going to stoop to blow up bridges! Come on. Please. That’s what armies do in war. Have you ever seen a war movie where they could resist blowing up a bridge? How is this a crime? Listen; when they tell you about something like that as though it is some kind of shocking thing, what you’re hearing is a lie. They know it’s normal war stuff. If it were truly a just war, the Wolfowitz’s, and Wolf Blitzer’s, would not have to use this series of whoppers. We would not have to show dancing and grateful 'liberated townsfolk'. When our propaganda campaign where we jam their TV and radio shows and replace them with our own, we bomb their TV stations and then when we find that they still are watching all the satellite channels, we bomb their dish antennas. Wait a minute. They said the Iraqi tyrant, Saddam Hussein, forces them to watch only Iraqi government, lies and propaganda. Now we find out that they get 500 channels, including a few that our media owner's won't show here. Yep, if you’re going to lie, you might as well tell the wildest story you can think of. And tell them often. Every time the generals talk to the press or the press talks to the people, Repeat over and over the killing their own people/human shield mantra. They believe resistance to the propaganda is futile, but it’s not. Resist. Think.
R 2-28-2003 Hussein Challenges Bush to a Debate During an interview with Saddam Hussein, on Monday Feb. 24, with CBS News Anchor Dan Rather, the Iraqi president challenged president Bush to a debate on television. He envisioned a campaign style debate via satellite. The offer was rejected immediately by the Bush administration. Whitehouse spokesman Ari Fleisher stated: "There is no way in hell we are going to allow George to enter into a live debate with anyone. We're not all that keen on having him read scripted speeches with a delay; you think we'd risk an actual two-way with a real person? Please. What would the purpose be in holding a debate? Stopping this invasion? I don't think so." According to the latest polls, most Americans agree , nearly 12 out of every 5 people questioned responded:
"This is not the time for debate. We must destroy the weapons of mass destruction. They hate our freedom and democracy. We must preserve our freedom and democracy, even if we have to give up our Constitutional rights to do it."
R 4-14-2003 A Simple Word Have you noticed how a word that is not a normal part of our lexicon, suddenly is everywhere? Not long ago I was reading the newspaper and saw the word ubiquitous. Ubiquitous. Nobody says that. Like many of us, I consider myself to be quite literate, and no journalist knows more than I do. So, like you may have, I read it as though I understood it. As though it was a word that I used as a part of normal everyday conversation. Oobekeeshus. Yeah that's it. No need to look it up. I can glean the meaning of most words from the context. Pronunciation too. Come on, I was the sixth grade spelling champ of my school. Except that time I was the only one left on my team and the three smartest girls in the sixth grade were left on the other. Whew! That's three words for me for every one for them! But enough about me. A couple days later I noticed ‘ubiquitous’ in another article. Then again a few days after that. Now suddenly the use of the word ubiquitous has indeed become ubiquitous. One reporter notes that American's use of cell phones has gone from a few ghetto drug dealers showing off with their 'brick' phones, to the ubiquitous phenomenon that it is today. Another informs us of how the PC has moved from the realm of nerds in the basement to their present ubiquity. If that weren't enough there is always the ubiquitous Internet, which just over a decade ago was unknown to most. Don't forget ubiquitous bread machines, nail salons, and malls. How about the ever-ubiquitous punks with their pants down around their thighs, or maybe the ubiquitous stealing of music on the Internet, even with Napster shut down. Then there are the ubiquitous corporate fraud cases, more ubiquitous lying to cover it up, and the once ubiquitous dot coms. Ubiquitous proliferation of women's studies courses in the nation's colleges and universities, and it's cousin; multicultural studies of one ethnic brand or another, has helped us maintain our just below Sri Lanka standing in international academic ratings. What about the ubiquitous crossing of our border by illegal aliens. They have moved out of the southwest, until the ubiquitousness of their presence has Republicans trying to 'out Democrat' the Democrats, in an effort to give them ubiquitous citizenship and handouts in a disgusting attempt at buying their wide spread and lasting loyalty as a voting block. The granddaddy of them all is the one that the journalists and even average guy now makes on a daily basis, without realizing the sheer ubiquitous magnitude of the ubiquitous programming that we are being subjected to. A few years ago no one would have referred to these as such. I speak of the often and ubiquitous use of the term: Weapons Of Mass Destruction. Ten years ago if you had been talking about them, you would have used the old fashioned, 'nuclear weapons,' or 'atom bomb,' or maybe just 'the bomb.' But then we worried only about countries that actually had the capability to reach us with their missiles. Here's a parting thought on the ubiquity of the use of "Weapons Of Mass Destruction." Before our president George W. Bush started using it in every sound bite, he would use one of the 'old' terms, like nukyaler. Every now and then he still uses it, much to the cringing dismay, no doubt, of his speechwriters. They were afraid his ubiquitous use of 'nukyaler' would get him more of the 'oh, what an idiot, he doesn't even know the difference between Slovakia and Slovenia' press. So they did what thought they had to do and gave him some words he could say. Like, "Fevr therwus uh tahm tuh strahk, nowuz thuh tahm. Sah-Damn issah tierunt, eevul doower. Gotta bee stopped fore he uzez weppinz uf mazz d'shtruxshun, Thay hate are freeduhm."
But they do not need to worry. The media likes this war. Remember the anti-American anti-war protests of the Vietnam War. Every day on the news you saw the anti-war movement promoted. This one, though, is different. If we weren't talking about fighting a war that Dave Broder and Paul Greenberg et al agreed with, i.e., a war against an enemy of Israel, they would still be going on and on about Bush calling Greeks: Grecians.
R 4-14-2003 Your Little Criminals The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals must not have enough to do. Starting Friday it will be a crime for schoolchildren to say the Pledge of Allegiance with the words ‘under God’ in it. This nonsense started when Michael Newdow claimed that hearing a reference to God in school injured his daughter. Injured? What a moron. Oh yeah, Newdow is a Jew, but apparently doesn’t believe in God. I thought it was a religion. I guess not.
Forced, his daughter was. The whole thing just defies common sense. Get a life, Mike.
Well Paid Flashers: Can’t He Be Sexy In Another Movie? I took my 11-year-old to see Daredevil the other day. It was a pretty good movie, I thought. The ‘Bull’s-eye’ bad guy character was fiendish and the blind lawyer / superhero Daredevil played by Ben Affleck was heroic. But I had small problem with the movie. Well, no, I had a big problem with it. Why can’t these Hollywood people make a movie for kids anymore without putting in a sex scene? Daredevil meets babe. Daredevil screws babe. Oh, but come on you say, they didn’t show anything. Didn’t they? Two single people who’ve barely met, going off to DD’s lair and getting naked. Well, they only showed them naked from the waist up and they really didn’t show any boobs, you say. They showed them kissing each other’s nekkid bodies, for crying out loud! I guess it won’t bother my kids to see things like that with their kids when they grow up, they’ll be so used to it. But that’s what bugs me. Think about this; would you let two people come into your living room and strip down and kiss each other’s naked bodies? No, of course not. You would call the police. You would probably beat them with anything you could get your hands on too. But we allow it at the movies. Why? Better yet why do the people who make movies have this compulsion to tell and show kids about sex? They’ll find out soon enough. Why can’t a guy like Affleck tell the producer Avi Arad, “No. This show’s for kids.” Why would a guy like Avi Arad want to show my kid two people abviously naked in bed and kissing each other's bodies?
It was PG 13 you say. I say I don’t want my 13-year-old watching sex scenes either. It’s a comic book character people! They made it for all kids and you know it. The 13 should have been for violence, not sex. They missed out on what could have been another cool scene out of the DareDevil comic book. They did it on purpose, didn’t they? I’ll let you try to figure out why.
R 4/1/2003 Iraq. A threat? Please. The country that is the subject of all the attention lately can’t even take off a plane without our clearance. They are afraid to fly in more than two-thirds of their own country. We will shoot them out of the sky if we catch them and we have done so. If our boys detect them even turning on the radar of a ground to air missile site it dissolves in an instant cloud of smoke and ashes. I’ve read ad-nauseam, the comparisons to Hitler. Ever notice how every time the media or government want you to hate someone, they compare him to Hitler? It results in the instant brainwashing of most people. I read a letter to the editor in a newspaper today. It said, “Saddam must be stopped before he lets loose his weapons of mass destruction – which he swears he doesn’t have.” You could hear the – HAH! – in his voice. Funny how so many feel the need to wax eloquent with such terms as – lets loose his weapons of mass destruction. Lets loose!? You mean like ‘lets loose the dogs of war’? What a moron! If Saddam let loose everything he had he couldn’t take over Iran or Syria, let alone the only Superpower in the world. Do we have a problem understanding our own strength? We could decimate any country on earth, and not even break a collective sweat. Think about it. Our missiles can reach any target on earth with pinpoint accuracy. We have thousands of them also. Iraq’s missiles have a limit of 93 miles. They can’t even reach Israel, who is the only country they would ever really want to hit. You say, no sir, you’re wrong. I saw on the news that they have them there al-hamoose missiles. Proves you can’t trust ‘em. They’re in violation. Look closer my friend; those Al Samoud 2 missiles only exceed the UN mandate by 20 miles at most. That’s only 113 miles. They’ll hardly make it across the pond. Besides, they are destroying them even as I type. Of course, now that the dog has sat up and laid down and rolled over, Bush says, “Beg!!” Now it seems that exile’s the only way. With bulldozers crushing the missiles, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said, “This is the deception the president predicted.” Oh. They must have hired Siegfried and Roy to drive the bulldozers. Another ‘senior administration official said, “It’s still a definite possible but by no means definite.” He requested to remain anonymous, presumably to hide his own stupidity. Go ahead. Your supposed to say, “What about 9/11? They crashed them planes into our buildings!” Can you say Al Queda? They are a group of guys. Large? Maybe. International? Sure. A country? No. Dangerous? Yes. But they are not a government. They are not even Afghanistan, and certainly not Iraq. If Saddam has roving hit teams out there, they’re looking for rogue Iraqi’s that might do something to cause death and destruction to rain down on them from America. Oh, did I say roving hit teams. Oh yeah, it’s Israel that has announced that they are going to send teams of assassins around the world, yes Jane, even to America to be judge, jury, and executioner to the so-called enemies of Israel.
I don’t really know if we’re ever going to attack Iraq. Some days it seems certain. Some days it doesn’t. One thing is for sure though. This war is not about weapons of mass destruction. This war is not about oil. This war is about sovereignty. The world of the future has no room for countries that won’t play along. You don’t want to pay homage to the UN? You will even while we pretend not to really care about them if they want to be wussies and not fight. Hasn’t Israel ignored dozens of UN resolutions? You don’t want MTV polluting the minds of your kids? Look out. You want a moral country? No way buddy. Your teen pregnancy rate is going to go up. You will become another market for whatever we want to sell you. You will become materialistic. Because that’s what the new definition of democracy is.
Randy Waits 2-28-2003 One Night Stands:
Bonny Lee Bakley may have thought getting knocked up by a Hollywood actor would lead to mansions, money, or at the least, good child support payments, and it did for a while, but according to former homicide detective William Welch, Robert Blake had her pegged for a gold -digger in 1999. "He said," Welch testified, " 'We're going to hire a doctor to abort her and if that doesn't work we're going to whack her'." Hah, rip me off? I don't think so.
Careful girls.
No Second Chance For His Victims Thomas Miller-El shot and killed a 25-year-old hotel clerk in 1985. The clerk’s name was Douglas Walker. I had to go searching on the web to find out the victim’s name, because Anne Gearan of the Associated Press didn’t seem to think it mattered enough to mention. The other name she didn’t think mattered is Donald Ray Hall (29). Hall was shot also, but survived. He’s paralyzed from the chest down. On November 15th, 1985, the Holiday Inn in Irving, Texas was robbed by the above-mentioned Miller-El. The U.S. Supreme Court, last Tuesday, ruled 8-1 to let this scumbag have another hearing to try to prove his racial bias claim. Oh yeah, did I say that Miller-El was black? You know, it is so typical for blacks to scream racism after they commit crimes, and I’m really sick of it. This guy has his own website for crying out loud. In fact, do a search and you’ll find no shortage of sites devoted to this killer. This thief. I did a search for website’s devoted to the lives he destroyed and found none, zero. It’s funny; they don’t really deny that he shot them, just that the police and prosecutors were biased.
Miller-El’s website says; So! What if the guy he killed had called him a name as he died. Would Miller-El's murder of him be then justified? They then go on whining about poor Miller-El’s injuries. Not one word of concern for the victims, but then they believe that Miller-El is the victim. They go into excruciating detail about the continual mistreatment of poor Miller-El during his trial. The poor thing. His back hurt. I guess Donald Hall’s back doesn’t hurt though, SINCE HE’S FRIGGIN’ PARALYZED! What do you want to bet that Douglas Walker’s back doesn’t hurt either, SINCE HE’S FRIGGEN’ DEAD! Only one black person served on the jury during Miller-El’s trial. So! The implication here, of course, is that only blacks can judge blacks fairly. That whites will send innocent blacks to be lynched because of course, to be white is to be inherently racist. You know, white’s okay, as long as it’s accessorized by not white. Miller-El’s lawyers claim that the Dallas County prosecutors were racist because they excluded 9 of 10 blacks that were eligible to sit on his 1986 jury. You know, each side is allowed to exclude a certain number of jurors without explaining cause. In this case it was 14. I wonder how many whites Miller-El’s lawyers excluded. I’m not a lawyer, however, and I will give an opinion concerning cause. It is a smart thing to exclude blacks from a jury, because they have proven themselves to be inclined to give another black a get out of jail free card without giving the evidence any consideration. Can you say O.J.? Never mind whether or not he slashed up Nicole (white bitch, anyway), just whether or not one of the policemen could be proven to have said the ‘N’ word at some point in their lives. Oh yeah, before I forget. Did I mention who the one dissenting justice was? It was none other than Clarence Thomas; the only black jurist on the bench. He said that Miller-El did not prove that jurors were excluded because of their race. Apparently that was not a concern for the white justices. Their only concern was proving that they are not racists. A lot of white people check common sense at the door in an effort to prove that they are not racists. Clarence Thomas has definitely shown time and again to be the only justice on the High court who has any honor and the only one who stands by his principles. Being black, he is not imbued with the feeling of white guilt that affects so many today.I heard Walter Williams, professor of economics at George Mason University, say that he, as a descendant of slaves, “Hereby releases all white people from the need to feel guilty about the plight of black people because of any perceived notion of their own culpability in slavery,” or something along those lines. Maybe he should be on the Supreme Court too. In fact maybe more blacks would have been on Miller-El’s jury if there had been a few in the jury pool like Walter Williams and Clarence Thomas.
Maybe Miller-El should have been more like Walter Williams and Clarence Thomas; then we would not be having to read Douglas Walker’s name off of his tombstone.
|
Buried Angel
Palestinian girl from Jenin.Killed by an American made D-9 Operated by Israeli Defense Forces. 
I feel safer already, don't you?  The Israelis did that to this little girl. Is that what this flag was sewn for? Too bad this one isn't our standard. Our funding of that little girl's murder would not be tolerated. 
|
