[^^HOME]  [Back to aesthetics INDEX]

On this page:

              {D. Salmon's g/l for art classes}




D. Salmon's g/l's

[
Mirrored from here] Quote from the good professor's home page: "Because in our society, to be obsessed with a vision about how to make a better automobile makes you a genius, but to be obsessed with a vision about the nature of reality makes you a nut." -- Rodger Kamenetz.

Guidelines for Writing an Art Critique

One of your two required critiques must concern one of the films being shown on campus this semester. The other must be about an art show (either on campus [in the Ruddell Gallery] or off [at an area museum or gallery space]–an "exhibition" on the Internet is even fair game). The optional third critique (for extra credit) can be either a film or art critique. An art critique is a little different from a film critique, although some of the language and concerns will be the same. The length is 3- 4 pages (no fewer than 3 full pages). Assume you are the art critic for a major periodical (any of the ones listed in your syllabus would be fine). The pay is lousy, but you do get to see some really good art. Write a critique for your publication using the guidelines below as starting points. If your critique is particularly good (in the sense of well-written), we might even suggest trying to publish it. One of the best ways to learn the techniques and style for writing a critique such as this is to read other critiques. Art critiques and reviews are regularly published in the journals and periodicals mentioned in your course syllabus. Additionally, The New Yorker prints lengthy reviews on occasion. If you do not have access to such reviews (for whatever reason), many of the same periodicals have web sites that often reprint significant reviews and critiques. This is one set of guidelines. Another is printed on the reverse. Use or the other. Combine both. Doesn’t matter. 1) Begin your critique by summarizing what you know about the artist’s background and biography. Discuss when and where the artist lived, what influenced him or her and any important events that occurred. 2) Next choose one or more of the artist’s works to critique. Identify the title, the medium/ art material used, and what year the work was created in. 3) In your critique you must at some point describe the work, analyze the elements and principles within the work, interpret the work, describe its purpose, and evaluate the work using aesthetic principles. 4) If a particular aesthetic theory or writer applies, use it. The following outline is adapted from Edmund Feldman’s Varieties of Visual Experience (Prentice Hall, 1972). I. Give an introduction about the facts of the exhibit. Who? What? When? Where? II. Critique one or more of the works included in the exhibition using a four-step process. A. Description Make objective* or value-neutral* statements about the work in question. Exclude interpretations and evaluations, and instead take an objective inventory of the work. Point out single features such as objects, trees, and people. Then point out abstract elements such as shapes and colors. Finally point out textures, which can lead to a description of the "characteristics of execution." *A test of objectivity would be that most people would agree with your statement. B. Formal analysis Make statements about the relations among the things you named in the descriptions (part A). You should note similarities in formal elements–such things as color, shape, or direction. Then note dissimilarities (contrasts) in those same elements. Take note of continuities (such as the color red repeated throughout the work) and of connections (for example, the shape of a window repeated in the shape of a table) between these formal elements and the subject matter. Finally, note the overall qualities of the work. C. Interpretation Make statements about the meaning(s) of the work. This is the most creative part of your critique. Using a hypothesis, support it with arguments, based on evidence given in the description and formal analysis (parts A and B) D. Judgment This is the most complex part of the critique and requires an opinion regarding the worth of an object, based on what was learned in the previous stages of the critique. Are you moved by this work? What do you think of it? What is your aesthetic judgment? And on what is based? III. Draw conclusions–compare and contrast the works.

Notes

(this section only) [1] {Back to the TEXT} [2] {Back to the TEXT} [3] {Back to the TEXT} [4] {Back to the TEXT} [5] {Back to the TEXT} [6] {Back to the TEXT} [7] {Back to the TEXT} [8] {Back to the TEXT} [9] {Back to the TEXT} [10] { [11] {Back to the TEXT} [12] {Back to the TEXT} [13] {Back to the TEXT} [14] {Back to the TEXT} [15] {Back to the TEXT} [16] {Back to the TEXT} [17] {Back to the TEXT} [18] {Back to the TEXT} [19] {Back to the TEXT} [20] { [21] {Back to the TEXT} [22] {Back to the TEXT} [23] {Back to the TEXT} [24] {Back to the TEXT} [25] {Back to the TEXT} [26] {Back to the TEXT} [27] {Back to the TEXT} [28] {Back to the TEXT} [29] {Back to the TEXT} [30] { [31] {Back to the TEXT} [32] {Back to the TEXT} [33] {Back to the TEXT} [34] {Back to the TEXT} [35] {Back to the TEXT} [36] {Back to the TEXT} [37] {Back to the TEXT} [38] {Back to the TEXT} [39] {Back to the TEXT} [40] { [41] {Back to the TEXT} [42] {Back to the TEXT} [43] {Back to the TEXT} [44] {Back to the TEXT} [45] {Back to the TEXT} [46] {Back to the TEXT} [47] {Back to the TEXT} [48] {Back to the TEXT} [49] {Back to the TEXT} [50] { [51] {Back to the TEXT} [52] {Back to the TEXT} [53] {Back to the TEXT} [54] {Back to the TEXT} [55] {Back to the TEXT} [56] {Back to the TEXT} [57] {Back to the TEXT} [58] {Back to the TEXT} [59] {Back to the TEXT}

www Links

[
phrase generator!] 12342 yielded: With regard to the issue of content, the disjunctive perturbation of the spatial relationships brings within the realm of discourse the eloquence of these pieces.