THE DAILY TRAVESTY | Compersion Part 1, Penis Studies
THE DAILY TRAVESTY for February 9, 2000
    Volume 1, Issue 27
 
The Travesty Online: www.angelfire.com/zine/dailytravesty
 
 
        We say we love flowers, yet we pluck them.
        We say we love trees, yet we cut them down.
        And people still wonder why some are afraid when told they are loved.
                            --Unknown
 

AN ALTERNATIVE: A Crazy Little Thing Called...
 
Part 1 of 3 by Eric Francis
 
Note: To most Travesty readers, the following article may seem a little "out there."  My personal opinion is, I think these are extremely valid ideas-- obviously important to Eric. (Eric strives incessantly to practice what he preaches and he does a damn good job.)  I think if every one became receptive to these concepts, it would do a lot to ease the burdens of guilt and fear so many of us carry around.  However, I respect each person's individuality.  Like I said at the beginning, I am not hear to preach nor do I want to, directly or indirectly.  On that note, this publication and this editor do not necessarily "endorse" this perspective; rather, what we endorse is the entire spectrum of choice and belief and your own spot on it, so long as it is fulfilling for you and true to your self.  Our job is to present different points on that spectrum, some of them contradictory, in the hope of widening your perspective and increasing your personal options. 
 
 
For Valentine's Day, I have a word for you: "Compersion."  It's probably not a word you've ever heard. 
   
Compersion begins the first time we are turned on by someone else's pleasure, or the idea of someone else's love for anyone besides us.  You may think this is totally out-to-lunch.  But for some people it's totally natural.  There are those who are not the "jealous type," and then there are those who just love love, no matter who's it is.  We all know it's possible.  We may have an idea of how good it would feel to dissolve into the safety, freedom and unconditional acceptance of our lovers and all that they are, including the other people that they may love, and how great it would feel to let them experience all that we are, including the other people we may love.
 
This way of being is called compersion.
 
We've all found ourselves in a corresponding reality at one time or another: trapped by love.  Loving someone, feeling open and real with them and sensing it could last forever, and then, mysteriously, another soul enters the scene of our lives, conversations develop, minds meet, sexual interests may grow... we know that there's not really a conflict, or that there should not be one... but there is, or seems to be... and we are left with a huge question of what to do, because our present partner will probably just freak out if we tell them about our experience. And the contradiction is that the experience of this new person is so good.  It is so real.  And yet it threatens to destabilize what we call love.
 
When informed that love is growing with someone outside of a primary relationship, most people are, at first, unlikely to respond with compersion.  They may not quite be washed over with joy and tell you that your love for this other person is thoroughly beautiful.  Usually, at first, people respond with fear -- usually, the fear of loss of control.  And it's that control we are called upon to give up when we embrace compersion.
 
If what I hear is true, then a lot of people reading this are already getting nervous. The idea of allowing our partner to be free may seem like a wild concept, the last thing we would ever do.  Visions of this person, our very lover, in another person's arms, can burn through us like hot coals.  But more to the point, the whole idea of really feeling our feelings without denial or resistance is a daring thing in itself.  For so much of what we call love is really about resistance, and hiding who we are, and possessing the other and hence ignoring their reality, and judging ourselves for being imperfect because we are so controlling.  Hardly what you could call the divine light of freedom.  But many people feel that freedom is dangerous.
 
Now, relationships are complicated enough without adding other people to the equation.  Yet these other people seem to somehow add themselves.  We notice them in this insanely isolated, fragmented world we live in, especially so because the way we create our relationships is extremely isolating, in a time in history in which we so desperately need community.  So when people we really like show up in our jobs and in our email boxes and move into apartments next door, when we pick up on their scent and want to include them in our lives, it's not something we typically want to resist or hide from the world.  It's something to celebrate.
 
Having noticed reality, we may feel a need to keep going, to keep exploring.  We need to allow ourselves to be free.  And this will take work.  We need to teach people to love us for who we are.  We need to learn compersion for others -- to feel and express the love that loves them for who they are.  This is not as hard as it sounds.  And taking the journey is all the more appealing if we realize that all the fear and insecurity that emerged when a second love interest entered the picture were already there all along, a kind of festering toxin we were living with in a secret shadow world that always seemed to haunt the relationship.  When the light is brought in, and the toxins are purged, and we are seen for who we are, we can really begin living.
 
So one thing you can count on, if you are in a situation where you need to teach another person compersion, is that they may relate to the fact that it's better to be alive than dead.  And the only way they can love you is when they are alive.  That means really free.  Really understanding and aware and loving you, not an image they have of you.  And you need to learn to love them, not an image you have of them.  It is tricky.  It is challenging.  But it is possible.
 

PENIS STUDIES 

Here's one for research scientists
and applied epistemologists.

In 1991, Duke University funded a study
to see why the head of a man's penis was
larger than the shaft. After one year
and $180,000, they concluded that the
reason the head was larger than the shaft
was to give the man more pleasure during
sex.

After Duke published the study, Stanford
decided to do their own study. After $250,000
and 3 years of research,they concluded that
the reason was to give the woman more pleasure
during sex.

The University of Wisconsin, unsatisfied
with these findings, spent $13.27 (for a
Playboy, a Penthouse, and a case of Old
Milwaukee) and concluded that it was to
keep a man's hand from flying off and hitting
him in the forehead.


Be young.  Have fun.  Read The Daily Travesty.