Idolatry and the role of
esoteric groups over the centuries

Jesus, Moses, greek philosophers, Galileo, Giordano Bruno, Van Gogh, and their relation to the esoteric secrets involving "The Matrix", "The Truman Show" and Plato's "Allegory of the Cave".

Site hosted by Angelfire.com: Build your free website today!
(dissahc) -

by Frank Pann

--------------------

Over the last 25 centuries, esoteric groups and secret societies organized themselves into small circles of people seeking for spiritual growth.

Some of them have actually discovered - and experienced - what are considered to be the "esoteric secrets", among which are the artificial manipulation of elements around someone, through thought reading, the use of ordinary language as a key to a second, hidden vocabulary , and the deliberate introduction of symbolic archetypes into the perception field of the manipulated person - usually their disciple.

The manipulated persons are what Plato - the philosopher - has called "prisoners" in his famous text "Allegory of the Cave", or the equivalent to the character of Truman Burbank in the movie "The Truman Show", or yet to Neo and his friends in the movie "The Matrix".

If you stop to analyse certain figures and/or groups of people that constitute part of the known history of the human civilization on Earth, you'll find out fascinating and curious situations in which they have involved themselves, as well as the environment of idolatry and mythology that "common people" have cultivated over them.

Jesus and his folks, for instance, have never idolized themselves, or one another. They have never founded any church and they have never built any temples in which people should worship them. They were idolized by people who didn't know what was really going on. And many decades and centuries later the stories and written documents left by this esoteric group were used by those eager for power and imbibed by greed to found their churches and build their temples.

If you look well, you'll realize that the "Bible" (and similar texts) constitutes a collection of tales containing archetypes that have been used over the times by those "in the know" to purposefully produce a second meaning for the ordinary language (in any language), in order to compel these so-called "linguistic prisoners" to analyse the relation between these archetypes and their very lives, inviting them to deconstruct dichotomies that are present in the "visible world" and to free themselves from this "strange prison".

These people "in the know" are what Plato has called "the guardians of the visible world".

"They are the gatekeepers. They're guarding all the doors, they're holding all the keys."

--- Morpheus, in "The Matrix" ---

So if you read about Jesus curing the blindness of a man, for example, or putting a cripple to walk, then it's not difficult to realize that this is the generic archetype of the keyword "disabled person".

Or if you read about him performing the "miracle" of the "multiplication of the fishes", it's just the archetype of keyword "MEAT" : "a lot of flesh" for a "prisoner" to have sex with his "brothers" or "sisters".

Or yet, if you look to the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross and his resurrection three days later, then it's only the archetype of "auric suicide" (a variation of keyword "DEATH") and the alleged subsequent "activation of his crystal" ("resurrection").

The same way, if you see the story of a boy who was not created by his real father, but by another one, and who after his "training" (God knows where) entitled himself "the son of God", then you can see the archetype of any other Pan (keyword "PAN"), especially the virgin ones.

And if you read the story of a man who has "walked over the waters", you're just seeing the archetype of a "linguistic prisoner" freeing himself from his prison (keyword "WATER", or "RAIN").

The examples are countless. By analysing the known history of humankind, you can notice that every time you had an esoteric group "in the know" of these so-called "secrets", you had a small group of characters performing these types of actions as if they were in a stage, just to produce a specific effect over the minds of these "prisoners".

The difference is that, at that epoch, the members of these esoteric groups "in the know" of these esoteric secrets had the possibility of using paranormal faculties inside the "visible world" - "the Matrix", using them only to produce archetypes for these "linguistic prisoners", while today this wouldn't be possible because of the present technology and structure of power within the "visible world" ("national security" doctrines, military groups, NSA, FBI, CIA, MI-5, MJ-12 and others). Any character performing such actions in public nowadays would be chased, persecuted and forced to disappear...

The same you could say of Moses and his folks : according to the story, he "opened the waters" of the "Red Sea" in order to conduct his people to the "Promised Land". You can say that it was only a group of folks producing archetypes for another group of "linguistic prisoners". This time, they're handling the keywords "WATER" (= "RAIN") and "RED" (= "FIRE"), meaning "a prisoner who is freeing himself from this linguistic prison, separating love from illusion during the arousal of his kundalini".

Another esoteric group can be found by looking 2400 years ago to the philosophers of Ancient Greece : Plato, Socrates, Aristotle and others.

Plato, for obvious reasons : he wrote the "Allegory of the Cave", which presents a variety of keywords like WALL, SHADOWS, FIRE, SUN, etc., as well as the use of significant terminology, as in "the guardians of the visible world", the "Upper World", the "instrument of knowledge", "strange prisoners" and so on.

Socrates, by his turn, was Plato's master. Did you know that, according to the official history, he committed suicide by drinking poison (hemlock) ? Can you conceive a man who wrote "the Allegory of the Cave" - in other words, someone with a deep knowledge of how this system of using doubletalk and thought reading works - really committing suicide ? What about his master !

Here you can see Socrates performing an apparent physical suicide within the "visible world" to produce the archetype of "auric suicide" (the same produced by Jesus on the cross). Obviously none of these characters that commit an apparent suicide in order to produce this archetype for the minds of these "prisoners" really "dies", as their bodies are replaced by clones and they go to the outside world, leaving the "stage" woundless.

This archetype of "auric suicide" is even the name of a Beatles' song : "Live and Let Die". That's a variation of keyword "DEATH".

And Aristotle, who was Plato's disciple, elaborated an astronomical theory that has established the bases of the known Aristotelian geocentrism, placing the Earth as the center of the Universe... Any similarity with "The Truman Show", or with Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" isn't merely a coincidence. You can also say that he was deliberately creating for the minds of "linguistic prisoners" of his time the archetype of "self-importance", inducing the manipulated person to identify himself with "the Earth" being rounded by "the planets" (that is, the persons artificially creating the archetypes around him) and by "the Sun" (keyword "SUN", meaning a "more spiritualized" individual, who comes from the "outside world" and who operates as a character inside the "visible world").

Finally, you can analyse isolated figures who have also produced curious archetypes, in most cases persons who were strangely ahead of their times, probably because of their contacts with what existed outside the "visible world"...

Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer, produced in Rome in 1633 the archetype of someone denying his own ideas in order to avoid being burnt in the flames of the Inquisition, meaning a "linguistic prisoner who changes his belief system or his behaviors in order to avoid auric death".

And before him, Giordano Bruno, Italian philosopher, who used to talk about life on other planets, and who advocated there was no reason to wonder at the "miracles" of Jesus because he, Bruno, could perform even "greater" ones, preferred to purposefully create the opposite archetype : his character was officially burnt alive by the catholic Inquisition in 1600, also in Rome, due to "heresy" because he refused to recant his ideas. In other words, it's the archetype of "a linguistic prisoner who prefers to make his auric payment than to change his beliefs".

Vincent Van Gogh, Dutch painter, very significantly produced the archetype of someone cutting off one's ear. His apparently insane act was news on December 24, 1888, in the Paris newspapers. That's the archetype of the "linguistic prisoner" that is so frightened and so terrified about his prison that he prefers to live without hearing anything than to live hearing these keywords with a second meaning. There was no walkman at that time...

The list is enormous. You only have to analyse the history of the last centuries to pick intriguing examples of this art of producing archetypes to generate an effect over the minds of "linguistic prisoners".

None of these groups or persons should be idolized or worshipped by "linguistic prisoners" of the present time. They were all just and only some more characters performing specific actions to a group of "prisoners" of their times, just like an endless number of characters do today over the "prisoners" of our time. The idolatry is always on the mind of the idolater. It's a illusion.

This is my contribution to the page "Free Your Brain" posted by someone under the alias "Zero Left" and/or "piece_of_nothing". I hope you won't idolize me !, and nor these folks. Thanks.

-------------------